Bathrooms

[jknowgood]

Shitforbrains thinks there is a law against acting strange.
If that were the case, he'd be spending his life in prison.

If you're doing something like, oh, looking up women's skirts (what you ironically want to legalize) then you could and absolutely should be reported.

Public restrooms in parks, bus and train stations have no doors on the stalls. That's why I hang out in those ladies bathrooms.

View attachment 73326

You have a sick, perverted imagination. Seek help.

How come no one on the left can explain why they pass laws so sexual predators can now legally hangout in women's bathrooms?

Maybe because that's not what the laws are about.
legality has no bearing on perverts behavior.
If it did we wouldn't need the existing laws .
Another case of penis paranoia.

What are you gonna support next? Incest?

 

[daws101]

also false! I won this debate long ago, all you got left is paranoia'

Lol, the dude doesn't even know what arbitrary is!

What would you expect from such a lightweight?

But he is a good little pet troll for Pop!

really pop?
everything you post is arbitrary .
it's all personal , none of it based on fact or reason .
that's the definition of arbitrary .
btw pop who are you talking to?

I am not a public policy nor a law.

Nice attempt at deflection, but you proved yet again, all Pop has to do is shake the Troll food box, and my pet troll Daws comes a runnin!

LMFAO

another arbitrary post..

And yet another deflection by my scrawny bet Troll, Daws.

Quite everyone Daws is tending to its butthurt.

wake up pop you're talking shit agin.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Exactly. If there's a weirdo behaving oddly in the bathroom, report them. That's how it has always been and still is. If the other people in the bathroom are minding their own business, then so should you.

Do you have a problem with a law that bans perverts from peeping in a public restroom?

Why, or why not?

Not all peepers are violent rapists, but damn near all violent rapists are peepers.

There have been laws against that for years. Next!

 

[daws101]

If you're doing something like, oh, looking up women's skirts (what you ironically want to legalize) then you could and absolutely should be reported.

Public restrooms in parks, bus and train stations have no doors on the stalls. That's why I hang out in those ladies bathrooms.

View attachment 73326

You have a sick, perverted imagination. Seek help.

How come no one on the left can explain why they pass laws so sexual predators can now legally hangout in women's bathrooms?

Maybe because that's not what the laws are about.
legality has no bearing on perverts behavior.
If it did we wouldn't need the existing laws .
Another case of penis paranoia.

What are you gonna support next? Incest?

you already do...next question ...

 

[daws101]

the rationalizations and false accusations are pandemic on the right,

 

[Pop23]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

 

[Rustic]

When I go to a public bathroom, I want the other people I see in there to be women. I don't care if they were born women or became women. If they are men, born men or changed to men, let them use the men's bathroom. What's the big deal? Anytime anyone tries to peek over or under a stall, they're going to be called out. If men are exceptionally curious about the guy at the next urinal, they're going to be called out, too. We have greater things to worry about in this country.

Yeah it's a great thing for little girls to be creeped out or not even wanting to go to the public restroom... Lol

 

[Muhammed]

Exactly. If there's a weirdo behaving oddly in the bathroom, report them. That's how it has always been and still is. If the other people in the bathroom are minding their own business, then so should you.

Do you have a problem with a law that bans perverts from peeping in a public restroom?

Why, or why not?

Not all peepers are violent rapists, but damn near all violent rapists are peepers.

there are already laws (hundreds of them) that ban peeping.
have they ever stopped any one ?....... no.
your statement is ignorant and irrelevant.

Says the resident forum pervert...

 

[daws101]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

 

[daws101]

Exactly. If there's a weirdo behaving oddly in the bathroom, report them. That's how it has always been and still is. If the other people in the bathroom are minding their own business, then so should you.

Do you have a problem with a law that bans perverts from peeping in a public restroom?

Why, or why not?

Not all peepers are violent rapists, but damn near all violent rapists are peepers.

there are already laws (hundreds of them) that ban peeping.
have they ever stopped any one ?....... no.
your statement is ignorant and irrelevant.

Says the resident forum pervert...

so fact is a perversion ?
good to know .

California "Peeping Tom" Laws – Penal Code 647(i) and 647(j) PC

 

[jknowgood]

Public restrooms in parks, bus and train stations have no doors on the stalls. That's why I hang out in those ladies bathrooms.

View attachment 73326

You have a sick, perverted imagination. Seek help.

How come no one on the left can explain why they pass laws so sexual predators can now legally hangout in women's bathrooms?

Maybe because that's not what the laws are about.
legality has no bearing on perverts behavior.
If it did we wouldn't need the existing laws .
Another case of penis paranoia.

What are you gonna support next? Incest?

you already do...next question ...

Liberal answers a question with an insult, so I take that as a yes.

 

[Pop23]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

You do realize that a trans male and a non trans male are similarly situated, right?

 

[daws101]

You have a sick, perverted imagination. Seek help.

How come no one on the left can explain why they pass laws so sexual predators can now legally hangout in women's bathrooms?

Maybe because that's not what the laws are about.
legality has no bearing on perverts behavior.
If it did we wouldn't need the existing laws .
Another case of penis paranoia.

What are you gonna support next? Incest?

you already do...next question ...

Liberal answers a question with an insult, so I take that as a yes.

a factual insult .
and no I don't support it.
any one with more than one live brain has figured that out already .
ignorant fucks like you need to be spoon fed.

 

[daws101]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

 

[Pop23]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

A POV has no bearing in the law.

You've proven you know nothing.

I'm arguing with a nitwit.

 

[daws101]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

A POV has no bearing in the law.

You've proven you know nothing.

I'm arguing with a nitwit.

bullshit pop the law is entirely POINT OF VIEW.
you've given two fine examples of the lack of objectivity
and one straight up lie.
you are discrimination based on anger not reason. Need I go on?

 

[Pop23]

Denying accesses to one male while allowing access to another male, is arbitrary application of law.

So denying a wedding cake to gays based on arbitrary reasons, while supplying wedding cake to a hetro couple is OK according to the left

You can't make this shit up!

RLMFAO

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

A POV has no bearing in the law.

You've proven you know nothing.

I'm arguing with a nitwit.

bullshit pop the law is entirely POINT OF VIEW.
you've given two fine examples of the lack of objectivity
and one straight up lie.
you are discrimination based on anger not reason. Need I go on?

Please!

So in your POV a tranny male (pre op) is more simalar to a Woman, than to a Male......

Proceed

 

[daws101]

false premise , based on appearance .
there is nothing arbitrary in these laws .
you could make the same argument about traffic signals and speed limits and still be just as wrong.
btw pop, you can make this shit up because you just did.

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

A POV has no bearing in the law.

You've proven you know nothing.

I'm arguing with a nitwit.

bullshit pop the law is entirely POINT OF VIEW.
you've given two fine examples of the lack of objectivity
and one straight up lie.
you are discrimination based on anger not reason. Need I go on?

Please!

So in your POV a tranny male (pre op) is more simalar to a Woman, than to a Male......

Proceed

where did I say or imply pre op ?
oh that's right never ,
so again you are basing you argument on another prejudice .
the answer would be yes except for appearance .
just can't stop yourself from that kind of discrimination ...

 

[Pop23]

You can discriminate based on appearance?

We will need a link to that doozy.

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

A POV has no bearing in the law.

You've proven you know nothing.

I'm arguing with a nitwit.

bullshit pop the law is entirely POINT OF VIEW.
you've given two fine examples of the lack of objectivity
and one straight up lie.
you are discrimination based on anger not reason. Need I go on?

Please!

So in your POV a tranny male (pre op) is more simalar to a Woman, than to a Male......

Proceed

where did I say or imply pre op ?
oh that's right never ,
so again you are basing you argument on another prejudice .
the answer would be yes except for appearance .
just can't stop yourself from that kind of discrimination ...

We are discussing transgenders, that come in two flavors, pre op and post op. Both allowed in the Woman's restrooms.

So proceed with your reasoning that a transgender male is more simalar to a Woman, than a Man.

Proceed

 

[daws101]

it not legal but it's done all the time ,
you are doing it right now .
no link needed , just an objective pov , an ability you lack.

A POV has no bearing in the law.

You've proven you know nothing.

I'm arguing with a nitwit.

bullshit pop the law is entirely POINT OF VIEW.
you've given two fine examples of the lack of objectivity
and one straight up lie.
you are discrimination based on anger not reason. Need I go on?

Please!

So in your POV a tranny male (pre op) is more simalar to a Woman, than to a Male......

Proceed

where did I say or imply pre op ?
oh that's right never ,
so again you are basing you argument on another prejudice .
the answer would be yes except for appearance .
just can't stop yourself from that kind of discrimination ...

We are discussing transgenders, that come in two flavors, pre op and post op. Both allowed in the Woman's restrooms.

So proceed with your reasoning that a transgender male is more simalar to a Woman, than a Man.

Proceed

ok I'll let you move the goal posts because you're desperate .
you argument is still based on appearance and it's not valid ,next question.