Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said he was vetoed off asswipe before he even started. Try to keep up.Wrong. He wasn’t voted off the Jan. 6 sham committee. Former Speaker Pelousy refuses to permit him to serve on it because like all DNC liberals, she is purely a hack, like you.
And, it isn’t Jim who bellows lies and bullshit. That’s the Democratics.
Your faggoty whining is just more or your endless dishonesty, clap.
It was a sham investigation designed to smear Trump. Everybody saw them as it was happening. Open your eyes.You call the investigation to be a sham but then again it reported that there was no evidence of coordination.
It’s easy to dig your head into the sand. It’s hard to argue facts.
This is correct.
The GOP/QANON is the brother Mafia and traitor Family of Fox News, who knows better but, as Rupert Murdock admits, knowingly lies to the morons to keep them watching.HOLY COW! Jim Jordan "Whistleblowers" were paid by a Trump Ally, more proof they have nothing
what a fraud, and so are the people who believe his crap
If you're investigating fake crimes, you're gonna need fake whistle blowers. Cut Insurrection Jim some slack folks!
Revealed: Jim Jordan's FBI 'whistleblowers' were paid by Trump ally and spread J6 conspiracy theories
A trio of witnesses being called as "whistleblowers" by the GOP committee investigating the "weaponization" of government were paid off by a Trump ally and spread conspiracy theories, reported The New York Times on Thursday."The first three witnesses to testify privately before the new...www.alternet.org
Your lie is done. No one believes Biden is legitimate and no one trusts his fascist regime but traitors. You really think the majority of Americans are traitors?You're shstick is done. Try to live with it. Or don't. Whatever. I don't control losers that can't take a hint that most of America thinks magaturds are c*nts..
But it didn’t smear Trump, did it? If it’s intended to smear him, then it would have “exonerated” him.It was a sham investigation designed to smear Trump. Everybody saw them as it was happening. Open your eyes.
And I agree. It is hard for you to grasp facts.
Of course not. The majority of Americans are sane, rational people. Unfortunately, a shrinking minority of loudmouthed extremists (ie, YOU) are led to believe they are a majority.You really think the majority of Americans are traitors?
The only thing shrinking is your credibility. In fact, it has curled up and died. RIP.Of course not. The majority of Americans are sane, rational people. Unfortunately, a shrinking minority of loudmouthed extremists (ie, YOU) are led to believe they are a majority.
Nobody cares what things “sound like” to you. You moron.Madcow? MS-LSD?
NY SLIMES?
Sounds to me like the usual bunch of lying deep state leftards.
I wouldn't believe a single word coming out of these fucktards.
It wasn’t a “veto,” either, ya stupid assmuncher. It was simply a partisan hack power play by that nasty bitch, Pelousy.I said he was vetoed off asswipe before he even started. Try to keep up.
How many more "whistleblowers" is Gymmy going to trot out so he can show again that he's nothing but a clown putting on a show for you dopes to drool over?
But it didn’t smear Trump, did it?
If it’s intended to smear him, then it would have “exonerated” him.
You keep thinking i'm looking for credibility in this place. I'm not.The only thing shrinking is your credibility. In fact, it has curled up and died. RIP.
You’re crossing your wires. I was talking about the “Russia Russia Russia investigation” which I assumed meant the Mueller investigation. Is that not right?Of course it did. Every fucking day. Endless and breathless reports based on “leaks” from shitstains like pencil neck.
You dope. The sham committee was never in any position to exonerate him or otherwise. They did smear him. And their conclusion didn’t either exonerate him or otherwise.
That is not what I said.You keep thinking i'm looking for credibility in this place. I'm not.
Jordan has already shown himself to be a fool in these hearings featuring a couple of hacks who have already been discredited. He wasen't allowed on the J6 hearing because HE's a hack just like the toadies he called to appear.It wasn’t a “veto,” either, ya stupid assmuncher. It was simply a partisan hack power play by that nasty bitch, Pelousy.
And just because you imagine that the witnesses are dishonest whistleblowers doesn’t mean that they are. The article was bullshit.
Alternet? Really? And you bought it hook, line, and sinker….lolHOLY COW! Jim Jordan "Whistleblowers" were paid by a Trump Ally, more proof they have nothing
what a fraud, and so are the people who believe his crap
If you're investigating fake crimes, you're gonna need fake whistle blowers. Cut Insurrection Jim some slack folks!
Revealed: Jim Jordan's FBI 'whistleblowers' were paid by Trump ally and spread J6 conspiracy theories
A trio of witnesses being called as "whistleblowers" by the GOP committee investigating the "weaponization" of government were paid off by a Trump ally and spread conspiracy theories, reported The New York Times on Thursday."The first three witnesses to testify privately before the new...www.alternet.org