Behold The Damage Done By Liberalism

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,379
61,083
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Is this an amendment to the Constitution that we should support?

" It is the primary purpose of this national government to provide domestic tranquility by reducing risk. This risk may be physical or it may be fiscal. In order to fulfill this sacred obligation, the national government shall be deemed to have sufficient power to eliminate threats from the environment through regulation, and to eliminate threats from economic uncertainty through insurance."

Theodore Lowi, a political science eminence of Cornell University, claims that this is already in effect.





1. This is the was socialist regime's function.

Leftist governments infantilize their citizenry. They promise to take care of the electorate from cradle to grave. The Welfare State inhibits the maturation of youth into responsible adults.
In earlier times, the view of males was to earn a living and use same to support a wife and family.

Obama: "if you're a young adult, you can stay on your parent's health insurance policy until you are 26." So much for the view of being independent at the age of 21. Bet there would be applause if he had announced 'until 36!'
This is what the Liberal Welfare State encourages: dependence.
So....where are all the men? Ask the Liberals what happened to them.



Now, you’re an adult, a 20-something…and some stranger opens the door for you…OK, ‘thanks.’ But when that becomes every day, and they insist on sweeping the path to your car as well…shouldn’t you start to as ask yourself ‘What the heck does this person want from me?”

They want to make you happy…according to their definition…your whole life. That’s Liberalism.
And it starts at school breakfasts for your children…..






2. From Brad Thor's novel, "The Last Patriot."

" Up until the 1950s, American children yearned for adulthood. When their time came to be adults they stepped into the role proudly, leaving childhood behind and taking up the mantles of responsibility, honor, and dignity. They embraced and championed the ideals of those who came before them while valiantly tackling new ideas and problems that their families, communities and nations faced. Those days were long gone.

Americans now shunned adulthood, preferring to remain in a state of perpetual adolescence. By failing to move forward with grace and dignity, they left a gaping hole in American society. They treated relationships like disposable lighters, tossing marriages away when they ran out of gas. Children were left without families, and even worse, they were left without adults who could be role models of responsible behavior.

With this lack of willingness to seep forward and embrace adulthood, the nation had lost sight of its core values and ideals. In its place had morphed an 'every man and woman for himself' mentality in which materialism was placed before spirituality and submission to God."




3. This is what Leftist governments do to their populace. When political operatives advocate doing something ‘for the children” one can see the tendency to make children out of the citizenry.

a. “Vice President Al Gore said the government should act like “grandparents in the sense that grandparents perform a nurturing role.” Cult of the Presidency

b. “…Denton Walthall, who asked a question in the second presidential debate in 1992. …Referring to voters as "symbolically the children of the future president," he asked how voters could expect the candidates "to meet our needs, the needs in housing and in crime and you name it, as opposed to the wants of your political spin doctors and your political parties.” How town-hall debates can go very wrong for a candidate.





4. Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.”

As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.”

It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”





5. Prior to the 20th century, Congress was considered the apex of the American political system, but today many believe the President to be more akin to the king or religious leader described by Frazer in “The Golden Bough.” He must be the ‘great father,’ the ‘miracle worker,’ and the ‘fulfiller of all wants.’
Liberals swoon at the charisma of an Obama or a John F. Kennedy.

a. Obama supporter Peggy Joseph:
“I never thought this day would ever happen. I won’t have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won’t have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know, if I help him, he’s gonna help me.”

b. Obama: "This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow, and our planet began to heal."





The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.
 
Is this an amendment to the Constitution that we should support?

" It is the primary purpose of this national government to provide domestic tranquility by reducing risk. This risk may be physical or it may be fiscal. In order to fulfill this sacred obligation, the national government shall be deemed to have sufficient power to eliminate threats from the environment through regulation, and to eliminate threats from economic uncertainty through insurance."

Theodore Lowi, a political science eminence of Cornell University, claims that this is already in effect.

No.

Why?

Because he's dead wrong about the primary purpose of this national government. It is not to provide "domestic tranquility by reducing risk". That's made up Progressive bullshit. The primary purpose of our national government is to keep us free.
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.





I used to believe that you were a dope.

Now I have a much lower opinion of you.
 
Is this an amendment to the Constitution that we should support?

" It is the primary purpose of this national government to provide domestic tranquility by reducing risk. This risk may be physical or it may be fiscal. In order to fulfill this sacred obligation, the national government shall be deemed to have sufficient power to eliminate threats from the environment through regulation, and to eliminate threats from economic uncertainty through insurance."

Theodore Lowi, a political science eminence of Cornell University, claims that this is already in effect.

No.

Why?

Because he's dead wrong about the primary purpose of this national government. It is not to provide "domestic tranquility by reducing risk". That's made up Progressive bullshit. The primary purpose of our national government is to keep us free.




You miss his point, e....

He is showing the inadequacy of Liberalism, not the success.
Lowi is not a defender of Liberal/Progressive/Democrat designs.


Lowi goes on to say

1. The two basic questions as to what constitutes acceptable constitutional government are a) the actual scope of governmental power, and
b) the forms by which governmental power could be exercised.


2. The Roosevelt Revolution established that in our democracy there can be no limit to governmental power. Prior to this, it was the character of the United States that government was limited to a specific set of activities; under Roosevelt, this was discarded as too confining.
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.

I used to believe that you were a dope.

Now I have a much lower opinion of you.
i see. so you don't believe that president obama should have repaired completely in a few years what took decades to destroy?
 
Is this an amendment to the Constitution that we should support?

" It is the primary purpose of this national government to provide domestic tranquility by reducing risk. This risk may be physical or it may be fiscal. In order to fulfill this sacred obligation, the national government shall be deemed to have sufficient power to eliminate threats from the environment through regulation, and to eliminate threats from economic uncertainty through insurance."

Theodore Lowi, a political science eminence of Cornell University, claims that this is already in effect.

No.

Why?

Because he's dead wrong about the primary purpose of this national government. It is not to provide "domestic tranquility by reducing risk". That's made up Progressive bullshit. The primary purpose of our national government is to keep us free.




You miss his point, e....

He is showing the inadequacy of Liberalism, not the success.
Lowi is not a defender of Liberal/Progressive/Democrat designs.


Lowi goes on to say

1. The two basic questions as to what constitutes acceptable constitutional government are a) the actual scope of governmental power, and
b) the forms by which governmental power could be exercised.


2. The Roosevelt Revolution established that in our democracy there can be no limit to governmental power. Prior to this, it was the character of the United States that government was limited to a specific set of activities; under Roosevelt, this was discarded as too confining.

I guess I did.
 
The entire de Tocqueville quote:

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood: it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?


Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things;it has predisposed men to endure them and often to look on them as benefits.

WHAT SORT OF DESPOTISM DEMOCRATIC NATIONS HAVE TO FEAR

Tocqueville: Book I Chapter 1

We now have that despotic government.
After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.





I used to believe that you were a dope.

Now I have a much lower opinion of you.


Really? I didn't even know he existed until I saw that post...
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.

If you listen to them and ask them a few questions their answers to problems will usually contridict another belief they have.

For example in another thread I said that the president couldnt do anything and some RW'er replied "The Guy with the pen couldnt do anything?" then after two more posts it was suggested that Obama should fix it himself without congress because "He's been doing that anyway"

LOL

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ll-of-obama-s-endless-lies-5.html#post8757005
 
Last edited:
We don't last a nation. I'm convinced of that now


1. Sadly, I have to agree.

2. In a masterful stroke, the Leftists of the 60s moved from the streets into the venues of dissemination of information.

With the patience of the Chinese, they have taken over the schools and the media to control the education, the thinking of a populace that has accepted gifts, entitlements, and given up it's birthright, Liberty.






3. There is the passage from Genesis 25:29-34, which accurately describes the cultural shifts that have taken place.
Star Parker explains it this way, in her book, "Uncle Sam's Plantation,"....


Read this, and replace "Jacob" with "Uncle Sam," "Esau," with "the People," and "birthright," with "freedom."

29 Once when Jacob was cooking some stew, Esau came in from the open country, famished.
30 He said to Jacob, “Quick, let me have some of that red stew! I’m famished!”
31 Jacob replied, “First sell me your birthright.”
32 “Look, I am about to die,” Esau said. “What good is the birthright to me?”
33 But Jacob said, “Swear to me first.” So he swore an oath to him, selling his birthright to Jacob.
34 Then Jacob gave Esau some bread and some lentil stew. He ate and drank, and then got up and left.
So Esau despised his birthright.




4. Corrosive indolence warped a once healthy work ethic, and a new cultural ideal took hold in society. Envy. Once the needy got a taste of government handouts, the genie was out of the bottle.

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness became the expectation of government obligation to provide happiness to everyone. Dependence begat a lower echelon of faithful voter. Politicians advanced the idea that the alleviation of poverty was the sole responsibility of politicians.

Just what Tocqueville had predicted came to pass.




"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
- Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850)
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.

If you listen to them and ask them a few questions their answers to problems will usually contridict another belief they have.

For example in another thread I said that the president couldnt do anything and some RW'er replied "The Guy with the pen couldnt do anything?" then after two more posts it was suggested that Obama should fix it himself without congress because "He's been doing that anyway"

LOL

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ll-of-obama-s-endless-lies-5.html#post8757005






So....because his "Stimulus" proved to be a complete failure, and revealed the Obama signature incompetence, you'd like to pretend that it never happened?
 
The expectation of a godlike President who can or should solve all of our problems reinforces the central impulse of Liberalism, to politicize and control more and more of private life, always expanding the power of government.

an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.

It all depends on what people consider solving problems. For us adults who prefer to take care of our own families, we want the government to stop killing jobs, raising taxes and quit meddling in the private sector.

For the forever children who expect government to take care of them their whole lives, they want more given to them. Those folks are usually happy because of the many promises to improve their lives. Of course, government can't really do that and it's up to individuals, but they have come to rely solely on welfare to get by and get excited when their keepers promise to steal more from the big mean wealthy on their behalf.

There is a growing group who believes that government is the answer to everything and because of race baiting and class warfare. The liberals created a fake monster and their dependents cheer when they claim they'll kill it. The adults know that the only monster is big government.
 
Last edited:
an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.

If you listen to them and ask them a few questions their answers to problems will usually contridict another belief they have.

For example in another thread I said that the president couldnt do anything and some RW'er replied "The Guy with the pen couldnt do anything?" then after two more posts it was suggested that Obama should fix it himself without congress because "He's been doing that anyway"

LOL

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ll-of-obama-s-endless-lies-5.html#post8757005






So....because his "Stimulus" proved to be a complete failure, and revealed the Obama signature incompetence, you'd like to pretend that it never happened?





C C is a drone. It does whatever its masters tell it to.
 
When do job creators start creating jobs with their record profits?
 
an odd sentiment coming from you since you blame the president entirely for not single-handedly repairing the world economy to your satisfaction.

If you listen to them and ask them a few questions their answers to problems will usually contridict another belief they have.

For example in another thread I said that the president couldnt do anything and some RW'er replied "The Guy with the pen couldnt do anything?" then after two more posts it was suggested that Obama should fix it himself without congress because "He's been doing that anyway"

LOL

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ll-of-obama-s-endless-lies-5.html#post8757005


So....because his "Stimulus" proved to be a complete failure, and revealed the Obama signature incompetence, you'd like to pretend that it never happened?


Who even mentioned the Stimulus?
 
If you listen to them and ask them a few questions their answers to problems will usually contridict another belief they have.

For example in another thread I said that the president couldnt do anything and some RW'er replied "The Guy with the pen couldnt do anything?" then after two more posts it was suggested that Obama should fix it himself without congress because "He's been doing that anyway"

LOL

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ll-of-obama-s-endless-lies-5.html#post8757005


So....because his "Stimulus" proved to be a complete failure, and revealed the Obama signature incompetence, you'd like to pretend that it never happened?


Who even mentioned the Stimulus?



Well...that was a door that you opened: "... I said that the president couldnt do anything..."

So...let's agree: this President is an incompetent.

But, then, so are you.

True?
 
So....because his "Stimulus" proved to be a complete failure, and revealed the Obama signature incompetence, you'd like to pretend that it never happened?


Who even mentioned the Stimulus?



Well...that was a door that you opened: "... I said that the president couldnt do anything..."

So...let's agree: this President is an incompetent.

But, then, so are you.

True?

Is this what tourett's looks like?
 

Forum List

Back
Top