"Besieged"?

[DGS49]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

 

[OldLady]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

If Trump hadn't conveniently canned Sessions and installed Barr just in time for the Mueller Report's release, it makes me wonder... what would Sessions' "summary of findings" of the Report been like?

 

[Oldstyle]

Democrats are lashing out at anyone they can at this point. The Mueller Report didn't provide what they said it would...which means they've been misleading the American public for the past two years. Now Barr is threatening to investigate THEM for what took place before and after the election of Donald Trump...specifically who was behind the phony "dossiers"...who used them to get multiple FISA court warrants to spy on the Trump campaign...and who was it that repeatedly leaked classified materials!

Remember Hillary saying that if Trump was elected that they'd all "hang"? She said that because she knows only too well all the games that were being played on her side of the aisle and that without a Democrat sitting in the Oval Office to control the Justice Department...investigations into their behavior would result in people going to prison.

 

[Oldstyle]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

If Trump hadn't conveniently canned Sessions and installed Barr just in time for the Mueller Report's release, it makes me wonder... what would Sessions' "summary of findings" of the Report been like?

Sessions recused himself from the entire Mueller investigation...what makes you think he would have had any comment on it at all?

 

[Votto]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

Well before Trump government organizations like the DOJ and FBI were all unbiased seekers of justice and truth.

LMAO!

Just kidding. Now I'm not saying that Trump is guilty here but I'm thinking that those on the Left, for perhaps the first time in their lives, are gaining a level of appreciation for the level of corruption within the US federal government and lack of adequate checks and balances.

Then again, I think once Trump leaves they will return to worshipping the beast. All will be well once he is gone I'm afraid.

 

[Oldstyle]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

Well before Trump government organizations like the DOJ and FBI were all unbiased seekers of justice and truth.

LMAO!

Just kidding. Now I'm not saying that Trump is guilty here but I'm thinking that those on the Left, for perhaps the first time in their lives, are gaining a level of appreciation for the level of corruption within the US federal government and lack of adequate checks and balances.

Then again, I think once Trump leaves they will return to worshipping the beast. All will be well once he is gone I'm afraid.

It's rather amusing to watch those who had no problem at all with Attorney Generals like Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch doing blatantly political things to benefit liberals...but are OUTRAGED because they feel Attorney General Barr might be conservatively biased! If someone wants to talk about "obstruction of justice" then let's start with that secret meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac just days before the Justice Department decided not to bring charges against Hillary for something that she quite plainly DID do!

 

[Votto]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

Well before Trump government organizations like the DOJ and FBI were all unbiased seekers of justice and truth.

LMAO!

Just kidding. Now I'm not saying that Trump is guilty here but I'm thinking that those on the Left, for perhaps the first time in their lives, are gaining a level of appreciation for the level of corruption within the US federal government and lack of adequate checks and balances.

Then again, I think once Trump leaves they will return to worshipping the beast. All will be well once he is gone I'm afraid.

It's rather amusing to watch those who had no problem at all with Attorney Generals like Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch doing blatantly political things to benefit liberals...but are OUTRAGED because they feel Attorney General Barr might be conservatively biased! If someone wants to talk about "obstruction of justice" then let's start with that secret meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac just days before the Justice Department decided not to bring charges against Hillary for something that she quite plainly DID do!

The only reason Mueller was even appointed was because Mr. McGoo recused himself, because he was part of the deep state, something Eric Holder would never have done.

In fact, Eric Holder is the only AG who was ever held in contempt of Congress for his illegal Fast and Furious program.

 

[Oldstyle]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

Well before Trump government organizations like the DOJ and FBI were all unbiased seekers of justice and truth.

LMAO!

Just kidding. Now I'm not saying that Trump is guilty here but I'm thinking that those on the Left, for perhaps the first time in their lives, are gaining a level of appreciation for the level of corruption within the US federal government and lack of adequate checks and balances.

Then again, I think once Trump leaves they will return to worshipping the beast. All will be well once he is gone I'm afraid.

It's rather amusing to watch those who had no problem at all with Attorney Generals like Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch doing blatantly political things to benefit liberals...but are OUTRAGED because they feel Attorney General Barr might be conservatively biased! If someone wants to talk about "obstruction of justice" then let's start with that secret meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac just days before the Justice Department decided not to bring charges against Hillary for something that she quite plainly DID do!

The only reason Mueller was even appointed was because Mr. McGoo recused himself, because he was part of the deep state, something Eric Holder would never have done.

In fact, Eric Holder is the only AG who was ever held in contempt of Congress for his illegal Fast and Furious program.

Holder was the guy who brokered the Marc Rich pardon in the waning hours of the Clinton presidency...he never should have been considered for a position requiring integrity because he made it quite clear by what he did with that pardon that he has no integrity!

 

[TNHarley]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

If Trump hadn't conveniently canned Sessions and installed Barr just in time for the Mueller Report's release, it makes me wonder... what would Sessions' "summary of findings" of the Report been like?

Sessions wouldnt have gave a report on it. He recused himself.

 

[Crepitus]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

 

[OldLady]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

If Trump hadn't conveniently canned Sessions and installed Barr just in time for the Mueller Report's release, it makes me wonder... what would Sessions' "summary of findings" of the Report been like?

Sessions recused himself from the entire Mueller investigation...what makes you think he would have had any comment on it at all?

Good point. I had forgotten.

 

[OldLady]

Barr besieged by allegations he's being Trump's protector

Let's see...a "siege" is a military campaign wherein an attacking army tries to seclude a target city, castle, or encampment, preventing food and other necessities from coming in, whilst bombarding the target city, castle, or encampment, all in the hope of forcing surrender.

At the present moment, the U.S. Attorney General is attempting to go about his business, meet his constitutional obligations, and put to rest the long campaign to reverse the results of the 2016 presidential election. The ill-presented "Mueller Report" has been made public to the extent that it is legal to be made public, its conclusions are open to any literate person to interpret, and Mueller has made himself available to both Congresspeople and Senators who wish to question him about his release of the Mueller Report (which was, by law, a "confidential" document), and his decision not to pursue criminal prosecution of the President or any of his minions, based on the findings of the Mueller Report.

The said Report conspicuously did not recommend prosecuting any of the questionable activities, nor does it exonerate any of the misdeed-era...but of course exoneration was not the purpose of the Mueller team, so that is not surprising.

In the face of the A.G. trying to go about his business, he has been publicly and viciously slandered (to which he has not bothered to respond), his impeachment has been impotently suggested, he is threatened with being pointlessly and impotently charged with "Contempt of Congress," and AOC doesn't "like" him.

Question: Is he "besieged" if (a) none of his accusers is being truthful, (b) none of the threats can effectively be carried out, (c) he is not visibly harmed, nor is there any chance that he will be harmed by any of this, and (d) he manifestly doesn't care?

It is a puzzlement.

Well before Trump government organizations like the DOJ and FBI were all unbiased seekers of justice and truth.

LMAO!

Just kidding. Now I'm not saying that Trump is guilty here but I'm thinking that those on the Left, for perhaps the first time in their lives, are gaining a level of appreciation for the level of corruption within the US federal government and lack of adequate checks and balances.

Then again, I think once Trump leaves they will return to worshipping the beast. All will be well once he is gone I'm afraid.

It's rather amusing to watch those who had no problem at all with Attorney Generals like Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch doing blatantly political things to benefit liberals...but are OUTRAGED because they feel Attorney General Barr might be conservatively biased! If someone wants to talk about "obstruction of justice" then let's start with that secret meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac just days before the Justice Department decided not to bring charges against Hillary for something that she quite plainly DID do!

Yes, they really screwed the pooch with that one.

 

[Claudette]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

LMAO You don't need to protect someone who doesn't need protecting.

You really should get your head out of your ass.

 

[Crepitus]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

LMAO You don't need to protect someone who doesn't need protecting.

You really should get your head out of your ass.

So, if trump doesn't need protecting why is Billy-boy spending all his time lying and spinning?

 

[Claudette]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

LMAO You don't need to protect someone who doesn't need protecting.

You really should get your head out of your ass.

So, if trump doesn't need protecting why is Billy-boy spending all his time lying and spinning?

No one but a lefty loon like you thinks he's lying and spinning. In fact if his report said what you hoped and prayed it would say he'd be your new hero.

Trump doesn't need protecting and no one is doing anything to protect him.

Buckle up buttercup. Trump will win in 2020 and you will have four more years to moan, groan and complain. I'll be LMAO of at your whiny ass.

 

[Crepitus]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

LMAO You don't need to protect someone who doesn't need protecting.

You really should get your head out of your ass.

So, if trump doesn't need protecting why is Billy-boy spending all his time lying and spinning?

No one but a lefty loon like you thinks he's lying and spinning. In fact if his report said what you hoped and prayed it would say he'd be your new hero.

Trump doesn't need protecting and no one is doing anything to protect him.

Buckle up buttercup. Trump will win in 2020 and you will have four more years to moan, groan and complain. I'll be LMAO of at your whiny ass.

But he is lying and spinning. He was chosen specifically for the purpose.

 

[Silent Warrior]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

There are none so blind as those that refuse to see.

 

[miketx]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

Your a liar.

 

[Crepitus]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

There are none so blind as those that refuse to see.

What are the constitutional obligations he is fulfilling in your opinion?

 

[Crepitus]

meet his constitutional obligations,

I see no signs of this. He is just protecting tRump.

Your a liar.

Get back in the closet Mikey, nobody wants to hear from you.