Biden Administration & US Liberal Fake News Media Gives Putin Opportunity to Ask If Ashli Babbitt Was 'Assassinated'

If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
And you agree, right, you have no right to shoot an unarmed home invader...yes?
Circumstances would dictate that of course. Glad you agree that BLM and Antifa rioters should be shot.

Greg
Depends on what they were doing. If they are violently breaking into private or public property or threatening lives, and they get shot ... too bad. If a policeman points a gun and they ignore it and keep coming it is on them. Wouldn’t you agree?
A policeman says "Stop or I'll shoot" That did not happen. You condone murder. Admit it you are certainly not alone.
So you are ok with violent mobs breaking into places and threatening people but police can’t stop them? You DO support those who violently rioted during the Floyd protests right?
You are deflecting. The cops never said they were going to shoot. Murder.
 
Putin Hammered Fake News Biden Administration and Biden Administration of 'Politically Partisan' 6 Jan narrative / actions / reporting and cover-up of details of Ashli Babbit murder....

-- Biden, talking briefly about Putin's comments, INTENTIONALLY LIED about protestors / rioters killing a Police Officer. This has been debunked, The coroner reported the officer did not die from any blunt force trauma, was not killed by rioters.


WOW! Putin Rips ABC Hack and Biden Admin Over Illegal Detention of Jan. 6 Protesters – Ashli Babbitt Murder – Black Lives Matter Destruction (Video)



Democrats, the Biden administration, and the Fake news media only have themselves to blame for giving Putin this issue and a platform on which to attack the US on this.

Fake news false narrative reporting on things like that rioters killed the policeman and blacking out all the details and facts.....

The Biden administration engaged in the cover-up (hiding the fact that the FBI had been recruiting former Military / SpecOps members to infiltrate the Patriot groups, and refusing to release full video inside the Capitol)...

Biden continuing to repeat the lie that the officer who died was killed by the protestors.....

The fact that immediately after the Riot Nancy Pelosi did NOT call them 'domestic terrorists' but accused them of attempting the certification of the election, which was being done as per the Constitution and process...she did not begin calling them 'terrorists' until later....

The fact that Democrats are blatantly making this a publicly obvious case of partisan politics, as those conservatives involved in the 6 Jan Capitol event have been tracked down, arrested - some are being held without charges still (Illegally unless being held as a 'terrorist') in small cells in horrible conditions while violent BLM rioters video taped and arrested for illegally being in the Capitol have already been released.
- The difference, as Putin points out, is political view / ideology / agendas. Putin actually has a point that the Democrats, fake news media, and Biden have allowed the perception (if not fact) that conservative participants are being singled out for rejecting Democrat ideology / agenda and for opposing the idea Biden is a legitimate President.

He's right - it sure does lok like this, and the Democrats, Biden administration and Fake news liberal media only have themselves to blame for this.






^^^ conservatives, the new Commies.
 
Ashli Babbit "assassinated???" Well, that is just asinine.

The OP is just regurgitating Russian propaganda. To remind the OP, Russian propaganda is filth meant to divide Americans. Russians know that Trumpers are easy marks for their trash. Please OP, stop being a tool for the Reds.

What word do you prefer for the cops shooting an unarmed woman dead?
Hero.
 
So you are ok with violent mobs breaking into places and threatening people but police can’t stop them? You DO support those who violently rioted during the Floyd protests right?
Currently much of your defense of murder of the innocent is moot because we don't even know
about the makeup of much of the mob and how many were FBI informants and provocateurs and not.
The behavior of the rabble at the capitol is absolutely nothing like that of the crowds that came to Trump
rallies night after night.

And of course a government that would keep political prisoners locked up for an indefinite period for minor offenses and whitewash murder and keep the killer's identity a secret can't really be dealt with in any fair and rational way. They must be compelled to deal honestly with the public.

Joe Biden has shown zero interest in getting to the bottom of things so comparisons to Vlad Putin are
impossible to avoid..
 
Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately
No.
There was a target, a targeted individual.
The D.C. policeman drew the firearm out of the holster, ready, aim, fire,hit the target.
That was deliberate and planned, premeditated.
Stupid Democrat logic like that is what prevents law abiding citizens from owning firearms and puts them in the hands of criminals.
LOL

You cons are such flaming imbeciles. :cuckoo:

Your notion that shooting her was deliberate, planned and premeditated is ridiculous enough to dispel by pointing out had she not tried climbing through that window to breach the police barricade, she wouldn't have been shot.
 
I see another rightwing Putin supporter...

No one here is a 'Putin supporter'.


Putin said the US Govt / Capitol Police shot and killed an unarmed, petite, conservative, female military veteran American citizen.

What specifically did he get wrong?

Did the capitol Policeman shoot an unarmed, petite, conservative female, military vet American citizen?

YES!


Is that an excessive use of force?

YES!


The Policeman shot blindly / indiscriminately through a doorway, according to him and witnesses, did not fully see his target, did not see the other officers behind her, took the shot, and killed Babbit.

- Some snowflakes claim the opposite, that he saw his target perfectly - then they are saying the shooter intentionally chose to shoot an UNARMED, petite, conservative, female military veteran American citizen...which makes his decision a very BAD decision and the definite, excessive use of force.

Perhaps you just hate the idea of our own government and fake news media's mishandling, lack of transparency, fake news reporting, and even Biden's continued pushing of the debunked false narrative that rioters killed a policeman was / had to be called out by a Communist, Russian Dictator and enemy of the united States.

Putin can still be a vile, murderous, brutal communist dictator and soulless former KGB operative and still make a good point.
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
:itsok:
 
I see another rightwing Putin supporter...

No one here is a 'Putin supporter'.


Putin said the US Govt / Capitol Police shot and killed an unarmed, petite, conservative, female military veteran American citizen.

What specifically did he get wrong?

Did the capitol Policeman shoot an unarmed, petite, conservative female, military vet American citizen?

YES!


Is that an excessive use of force?

YES!


The Policeman shot blindly / indiscriminately through a doorway, according to him and witnesses, did not fully see his target, did not see the other officers behind her, took the shot, and killed Babbit.

- Some snowflakes claim the opposite, that he saw his target perfectly - then they are saying the shooter intentionally chose to shoot an UNARMED, petite, conservative, female military veteran American citizen...which makes his decision a very BAD decision and the definite, excessive use of force.

Perhaps you just hate the idea of our own government and fake news media's mishandling, lack of transparency, fake news reporting, and even Biden's continued pushing of the debunked false narrative that rioters killed a policeman was / had to be called out by a Communist, Russian Dictator and enemy of the united States.

Putin can still be a vile, murderous, brutal communist dictator and soulless former KGB operative and still make a good point.
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
:itsok:
Your post is retarded.
 
He’s not wrong.

“Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin asked. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. Four hundred and fifty people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that prosecution for political opinions?”

He is totally wrong you Communist stooge. Putin is playing you rubes like a violin. Why don't you move to your mother Russia.

She did not walk into Congress She was attempting to use force to impose her will on the government. Political demands? Their candidate lost and there is no such thing as political demands. Putin arrests people for making political spee4ch such as a all-girl band who were jailed for singing "Putin go home".
Ah so an unarmed middle age woman can stage a coup of the USA!
Who said Leftards were insane!
With a violent mob behind her and lawmakers in front of her? Absofuckinglutely.
 
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:
LOL

Poor baby, cry to Trump's Department of Justice. They were the first to say it was a justifiable shoot.
 
Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately
No.
There was a target, a targeted individual.
The D.C. policeman drew the firearm out of the holster, ready, aim, fire,hit the target.
That was deliberate and planned, premeditated.
Stupid Democrat logic like that is what prevents law abiding citizens from owning firearms and puts them in the hands of criminals.
LOL

You cons are such flaming imbeciles. :cuckoo:

Your notion that shooting her was deliberate, planned and premeditated is ridiculous enough to dispel by pointing out had she not tried climbing through that window to breach the police barricade, she wouldn't have been shot.

But that is the whole point.
Hundreds had already cross similar police barricades half a dozen times.
There was no reasonable expectation this one would have been any different, and more important, there was no warning.
Sure this shooting did end it, and at some point they likely did have to end it.
But it could have been ended just as easily with a warning shot.
No one had to be killed.
There was no reason to do that.
 
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:
There was nothing indiscriminate about it. She was the one jumping through the smashed window just outside the room that Congress was sheltering in. If you don’t recall, the Capitol Police have a duty to protect Congress just as Secret Service protect the president.
What danger did an unarmed woman present?
Leading a violent mob into the House chamber where members of Congress were holed up.
 
He’s not wrong.

“Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin asked. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. Four hundred and fifty people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that prosecution for political opinions?”

He is totally wrong you Communist stooge. Putin is playing you rubes like a violin. Why don't you move to your mother Russia.

She did not walk into Congress She was attempting to use force to impose her will on the government. Political demands? Their candidate lost and there is no such thing as political demands. Putin arrests people for making political spee4ch such as a all-girl band who were jailed for singing "Putin go home".
Ah so an unarmed middle age woman can stage a coup of the USA!
Who said Leftards were insane!
With a violent mob behind her and lawmakers in front of her? Absofuckinglutely.

There was no violent mob and there were no longer any lawmakers in the building.
 
He’s not wrong.

“Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin asked. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. Four hundred and fifty people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that prosecution for political opinions?”
LOOL...I respect him so much I wish he was prez.......LOLOL

The Clintons murdered way more, one recently, so why not?
Are you still hung up on that old conspiracy theory? There are much more modern and up to date ones for you these days.
LOLOL...You DGod damned bastard. I hope your
 
You just can'tstop lying.

No, the window Ashli was trying to get through did not lead to anywhere sensitive.
The door into the House chamber where members of Congress were hiding was just a few feet away.

So there was no reason to prevent her traversal of the window.
Yes, there was. To protect the member of Congress who were hiding from that violent mob.

After Ashli was shot, the video then showed there were over 20 fully armed cops hiding out on and below the stairs, so there was no risk to anyone.
There was a risk because when she was shot, there was only one cop up there.
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
^^^ more lies.
 
I see another rightwing Putin supporter...

No one here is a 'Putin supporter'.


Putin said the US Govt / Capitol Police shot and killed an unarmed, petite, conservative, female military veteran American citizen.

What specifically did he get wrong?

Did the capitol Policeman shoot an unarmed, petite, conservative female, military vet American citizen?

YES!


Is that an excessive use of force?

YES!


The Policeman shot blindly / indiscriminately through a doorway, according to him and witnesses, did not fully see his target, did not see the other officers behind her, took the shot, and killed Babbit.

- Some snowflakes claim the opposite, that he saw his target perfectly - then they are saying the shooter intentionally chose to shoot an UNARMED, petite, conservative, female military veteran American citizen...which makes his decision a very BAD decision and the definite, excessive use of force.

Perhaps you just hate the idea of our own government and fake news media's mishandling, lack of transparency, fake news reporting, and even Biden's continued pushing of the debunked false narrative that rioters killed a policeman was / had to be called out by a Communist, Russian Dictator and enemy of the united States.

Putin can still be a vile, murderous, brutal communist dictator and soulless former KGB operative and still make a good point.
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
:itsok:
Your post is retarded.
:boohoo:
 
Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately
No.
There was a target, a targeted individual.
The D.C. policeman drew the firearm out of the holster, ready, aim, fire,hit the target.
That was deliberate and planned, premeditated.
Stupid Democrat logic like that is what prevents law abiding citizens from owning firearms and puts them in the hands of criminals.
LOL

You cons are such flaming imbeciles. :cuckoo:

Your notion that shooting her was deliberate, planned and premeditated is ridiculous enough to dispel by pointing out had she not tried climbing through that window to breach the police barricade, she wouldn't have been shot.

But that is the whole point.
Hundreds had already cross similar police barricades half a dozen times.
There was no reasonable expectation this one would have been any different, and more important, there was no warning.
Sure this shooting did end it, and at some point they likely did have to end it.
But it could have been ended just as easily with a warning shot.
No one had to be killed.
There was no reason to do that.
No one else threatened to get as close to lawmakers as Ashli Targetpractice got.
 
Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately
No.
There was a target, a targeted individual.
The D.C. policeman drew the firearm out of the holster, ready, aim, fire,hit the target.
That was deliberate and planned, premeditated.
Stupid Democrat logic like that is what prevents law abiding citizens from owning firearms and puts them in the hands of criminals.
LOL

You cons are such flaming imbeciles. :cuckoo:

Your notion that shooting her was deliberate, planned and premeditated is ridiculous enough to dispel by pointing out had she not tried climbing through that window to breach the police barricade, she wouldn't have been shot.
She was not warned. Murder. There was NO REASON to shoot her. Did they plan to kill someone? Yes. That is how you intimidate others.
 

Forum List

Back
Top