Biden ADMITTED To Abusing His Power As VP To Force Ukraine To Fire Prosecutor, Protect His Son

i already said there is zero proof biden did this for his son.
The whole 'son' thing is actually a sleight of hand distraction. Joe Biden confessed - bragged - on video-tape that he blackmailed the leader of an allied nation.

Snowflakes respond by saying, 'The prosecutor was corrupt, & everyone wanted him fired'. SO WHAT?! The United States has no justification for injecting itself into the government of another nation, through blackmail or use of military force, but that is EXACTLY what Barry did FREQUENTLY.

- Barry applied pressure to both have Mubarak removed from office then to have elections moved up, benefitting and helping the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood take over allied Egypt.

- Barry used tax dollars to inject himself into Israel's election in an attempt to remove Netanyahu from office.

- Barry 'pimped' out the US military to Al Qaeda - who slaughtered 3,000 Americans - to help them murder Gaddafi and take over Libya.

- Joe bragged about blackmailing Ukraine's P.M.

- Barry was caught telling Medvedev to pass on to Putin he would be more 'flexible' after re-election

- Barry committed an International War Crime by invading Syria without that nation's request / approval to do so and without Congressional approval to do so, all because of his embarrassing ill-advised 'Red Line'

Democrats / snowflakes have no problem with all of that, but when the President talks t a foreign allied leader and it threatens one of the criminal Democrat's own - especially their leading Primary candidate, the double-standard hypocrisy, false narratives /accusations come out

'It' is only illegal / a threat when Republicans do it.

Load of crap.


yes, you are correct. Biden is a load of crap.

Now pay attention.

Biden Admitted that he Threatened to Withhold Loan Guarantees from Ukraine Unless Shokin was Fired
By Keith Mann

Biden freely admitted to his role in having Shokin removed in during an event sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018.

Ryan Saavedra on Twitter

So to you guys this looks like Biden pressured the Ukrainian government to remove a man who was investigating his son. Half a story does not create fact and all you Trump fellatio artists have done over these 3 years of living stupidly is taken half a f-ing story and run your mouths.

The Ukrainian Rada Wanted Shokin Removed

The Rada=The Central Council of Ukraine was the All-Ukrainian council that united the political, public, cultural and professional organizations of the Ukrainian People's Republic.


Joe Biden was not a member of the Ukrainian Rada

Viktor Shokin had much bigger issues than the corruption case against Mykola Zlochevsky. Almost immediately after he was appointed, he started to cause almost irreparable harm to Ukraine’s legal system.

For starters, he failed to prosecute any prominent members of the Yanukovych regime or anybody in the current government. He constantly blocked reform to Ukraine’s broken legal system. He was in charge of implementing the 2014 law on prosecution which the European Union had asked Ukraine to do for years.

The law aimed to reduce to role of prosecutors who “were absurdly superior to judges in the Soviet legal system that persisted in post-Soviet Ukraine” according to Atlantic Council. It also called for a reevaluation of all prosecutors in order to weed out the more corrupt and incompetent ones. Shokin manipulated the process so that the old system mostly remained the same and minimal, ineffective changes were implemented.


He was the largest obstacle to judicial reform in Ukraine. It wasn’t just Joe Biden calling for his ouster, it was the United States government and the European Union.


Joe Biden & Ukraine: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

So the assertion Trump made, the dumb ass right wing twitter idiots you follow, all of the alt right media you use is a bunch of bs fake news. So your opinions relative to this matter are incorrect. Trump looks like he's in a world of hurt on this one. And if Barr wants to go down with the ship, he can also.
The RADA was CORRUPT and wanted to play their own corrupt game with Biden and Obama... AND THEY DID...... LOL

Now its being exposed for what it is...

You fucking idiots cant see that your narrative is dead on arrival.. Flog that dead horse....

Bullshit.
 
and that mentality is getting us where again?

hey - i'm all for stopping most of our foreign funding and reviewing just why we do it and if the value is there. but none of this puts a link to bidens video and it being for his son.
it got Biden's son 50k a month salary and it appears you don't fking care about that. hmmmmm fks like you who turn their cheek accepts something hard I guess. I thought you had some fking intelligence, I guess not.
there you go again - speculating on my motives and then pretending you're correct. if you feel better to insult me, have at it but it won't get us anywhere.
pretending I'm correct about what exactly?
about why i post what i do and my own personality. but hey - free country. think of me what you will. what sleep i lose i'll gain back in laughter.
I don't wish to insult anyone, but dude, you can't just shrug your shoulders when evidence is provided to you. 50k a month right after the prosecutor is fired. yeah, pure coincidence right? I'll laugh. I don't think I'm correct about shit, I understand what is what. if you can't add 1+1 and get 2, I can't help you.

The prosecutor was not investigating Burisma.
 
50k a month salary for his son. you don't think that is coincidence? just wondering who the fk you think his son actually is?
i think there's a lot of things to wonder about.

i don't think there is a bit of proof beyond speculation at this point. if i'm wrong and there is a direct link, just lay it on me.
50k a month salary for his son. why do you think he got that money? please, you're a fairly intelligent dude, now you're silent? hmmmm

I'm at least consistent. you can ask me anything and I will answer.
it doesn't matter what i think. it matters what can be proven.

if we can prove this was done to protect his son, great. but in a courtroom speculation should never be allowed. i'm not going to do the "what if" game cause the other side does it. i'm bitching at them for their speculation also right now that it's about getting dirt on trump. no proof of that either.

both sides are manufacturing rage.
50k a month is something to look into. why hasn't anyone? and you ignore it. funny shit. I'll call a scum fk a scum fk everyday, you not so much.
fine. go look. dig deep. it is our culture these days. if we find proof that's what it was for, great. nail him to the wall. but i am not for ANYONE being "nailed to the wall" for things that cannot be proven.
Most counter intelligence stuff can't be proven. It's in other countries and why we can't. what we can do and should do is question why joe biden's son received a 50k a month salary right after the prosecutor was fired. why didn't they? Hitlery tried, but left it alone when she assurance biden wouldn't run in 2016, swamp creatures eat swamp creatures, and we're on the outside watching and can't do jack shit, and you wish to lecture me. funny shit dude. I have a logical thought, and I use my brain. it's why I don't believe in global warming, seas rising, (no one can say where the water will come from to make it rise, why?)russia russia when I know for a fact the internet streaming capabilities forbid any such hacking as what was stated. Bandwidth is bandwidth, and you can't transmit more than the size of the pipes that data flows over. facts, it is all I use.

I get handed in here propaganda after propaganda. So spare me the innocence gig.
 
Last edited:
[

and where in this video does it say he's doing it for his son? .

You are being naive. Is it the TDS making you that way?
People are incapable or putting obvious associated pieces together.

Again, for example, we are being asked / demanded to believe that a known, notoriously criminal businessman and his criminal Ukraine Energy company - known for dealing with Putin in the past and standing to gain from Putin's annexation of Crimea - sought out not just an American lawyer but sought out a mediocre American lawyer who had no knowledge of Energy /Energy companies and who had been kicked out of the US military for drug use, and NOT just to be one of their lawyers but to immediately become one of their Board members, being paid approximately $3 million...

...and we are being asked / commanded to believe that the fact that this lawyer's father was / is Joe Biden, the Vice President of the United States, who had been recently made Obama's Point Man to / for the Ukraine, and that none of this played absolutely part in the criminal Ukrainian businessman / company choosing Hunter Biden to be THAT lawyer.

:rolleyes:
 
wdd3nW0.jpg
 
there you go again - speculating on my motives and then pretending you're correct. if you feel better to insult me, have at it but it won't get us anywhere.
pretending I'm correct about what exactly?
about why i post what i do and my own personality. but hey - free country. think of me what you will. what sleep i lose i'll gain back in laughter.
I don't wish to insult anyone, but dude, you can't just shrug your shoulders when evidence is provided to you. 50k a month right after the prosecutor is fired. yeah, pure coincidence right? I'll laugh. I don't think I'm correct about shit, I understand what is what. if you can't add 1+1 and get 2, I can't help you.
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
 
[

and where in this video does it say he's doing it for his son? .

You are being naive. Is it the TDS making you that way?
People are incapable or putting obvious associated pieces together.

Again, for example, we are being asked / demanded to believe that a known, notoriously criminal businessman and his criminal Ukraine Energy company - known for dealing with Putin in the past and standing to gain from Putin's annexation of Crimea - sought out not just an American lawyer but sought out a mediocre American lawyer who had no knowledge of Energy /Energy companies and who had been kicked out of the US military for drug use, and NOT just to be one of their lawyers but to immediately become one of their Board members, being paid approximately $3 million...

...and we are being asked / commanded to believe that the fact that this lawyer's father was / is Joe Biden, the Vice President of the United States, who had been recently made Obama's Point Man to / for the Ukraine, and that none of this played absolutely part in the criminal Ukrainian businessman / company choosing Hunter Biden to be THAT lawyer.

:rolleyes:
well it should be obvious i don't suffer from TDS but hey - we go there when someone disagrees with us. some people can't help themselves and *eveything* falls into extremes.

with me | against me.

binary.

i hate it.
 
pretending I'm correct about what exactly?
about why i post what i do and my own personality. but hey - free country. think of me what you will. what sleep i lose i'll gain back in laughter.
I don't wish to insult anyone, but dude, you can't just shrug your shoulders when evidence is provided to you. 50k a month right after the prosecutor is fired. yeah, pure coincidence right? I'll laugh. I don't think I'm correct about shit, I understand what is what. if you can't add 1+1 and get 2, I can't help you.
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
how are you going to get to the fire? I'm all ears.
 
"IN HIS OWN WORDS, WITH VIDEO CAMERAS ROLLING, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko."


A huge 'THANK YOU' going out to the Deep State anti-Trump Intel Agency holdout for bringing the almost-forgotten / almost-completely-ignored/hidden back up and on to 'Center Stage' in yet another failed 'We've got him this time' Democrat moment...perfect timing...

...and a huge 'THANK You' to Uncle Joe for feeling the need to admit this on camerain an attempt to try to prove to snowflakes he IS a tough guy who can strong-arm foreign governments / leaders when he wants / has to...

This is yet another attempted attack on President Trump that has 'boomeranged'.

In blackmailing Ukraine to protect his son, especially WHEN he did it, Biden basically helped / threatened to help Putin...


"It’s particularly odd that a Vice President would make such a threat to an ally that was under siege from Russia. The loss of $1 billion in loan guarantees would have been a huge blow to Ukraine and a boon to Russia, given the state of relations between the two countries."


Report: Biden forced ouster of prosecutor investigating his son's firm

Yes, Biden wanted the prosecutor removed but nowhere was Hunter Biden under investigation.

Notice how the Russian immediately picks up the lie and goes with it.


so tell us, if not to protect his son from prosecution, why did he bribe the guy?

Because he didn't.


He is on tape saying he did. Are you insane?
 
about why i post what i do and my own personality. but hey - free country. think of me what you will. what sleep i lose i'll gain back in laughter.
I don't wish to insult anyone, but dude, you can't just shrug your shoulders when evidence is provided to you. 50k a month right after the prosecutor is fired. yeah, pure coincidence right? I'll laugh. I don't think I'm correct about shit, I understand what is what. if you can't add 1+1 and get 2, I can't help you.
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
how are you going to get to the fire? I'm all ears.
how is anyone? i'm all ears also.

i do know i'm not going to speculate my way there cause i hate it when done to trump.
 
I don't wish to insult anyone, but dude, you can't just shrug your shoulders when evidence is provided to you. 50k a month right after the prosecutor is fired. yeah, pure coincidence right? I'll laugh. I don't think I'm correct about shit, I understand what is what. if you can't add 1+1 and get 2, I can't help you.
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
how are you going to get to the fire? I'm all ears.
how is anyone? i'm all ears also.

i do know i'm not going to speculate my way there cause i hate it when done to trump.
so you ignore the facts? is that what you do?
 
I don't wish to insult anyone, but dude, you can't just shrug your shoulders when evidence is provided to you. 50k a month right after the prosecutor is fired. yeah, pure coincidence right? I'll laugh. I don't think I'm correct about shit, I understand what is what. if you can't add 1+1 and get 2, I can't help you.
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
how are you going to get to the fire? I'm all ears.
how is anyone? i'm all ears also.

i do know i'm not going to speculate my way there cause i hate it when done to trump.


the big difference here is that we have Biden on tape bragging about how he bribed the Ukrainian official. No, he does not ever say it was to protect his son from prosecution, but why else? No one has yet given a logical reason for his doing it other than to protect his son. If you have one, lets hear it.
 
These stupid uneducated low information Moon Bats afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome don't care that Creepy Joe abused the power of his office to put pressure on a foreign government to keep his corrupt son from being prosecuted.
now you have biden derangement syndrome as there is zero proof this is why biden did it. you can't very well yell at one side for speculation then turn around and do it yourself.


I understand your question, but you have yet to give us any other reason for the bribe. waiting-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOLOL

That's because it wasn't a bribe.
 
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
how are you going to get to the fire? I'm all ears.
how is anyone? i'm all ears also.

i do know i'm not going to speculate my way there cause i hate it when done to trump.
so you ignore the facts? is that what you do?
show me the *fact* biden did it for his son.
 
i've said there's a lot to look into and yes, it needs to be looked into.

was the prosecutor going after his sons salary as the ONLY point? why did the other countries also want this guy gone? yes there's a lot to wonder about but i think as a country we've done more than enough speculation of guilt in the social justice world.
I can't answer any of your questions because no one investigated it. why? that is the only question that needs to be asked. What was the prosecutor doing that upset all countries? let's have it. I'm good, you're asking the right questions, yet no one is delivering answers, why? 50k a month right afterward. and that isn't suspicious to you?
i'm not saying it isn't a good question. *IF* the prosecutor in the ukraine was investigating why they were paying bidens son, i certainly see smoke. i just want the fire before i call it burning.
how are you going to get to the fire? I'm all ears.
how is anyone? i'm all ears also.

i do know i'm not going to speculate my way there cause i hate it when done to trump.


the big difference here is that we have Biden on tape bragging about how he bribed the Ukrainian official. No, he does not ever say it was to protect his son from prosecution, but why else? No one has yet given a logical reason for his doing it other than to protect his son. If you have one, lets hear it.
but why else?

dunno - but therein lies the speculation.

TRUMP BRIBED THE UKRAINE!!! the right goes crazy and says stop the lies and speculation. then turns around and does it. just makes no sense to me.
 
These stupid uneducated low information Moon Bats afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome don't care that Creepy Joe abused the power of his office to put pressure on a foreign government to keep his corrupt son from being prosecuted.
now you have biden derangement syndrome as there is zero proof this is why biden did it. you can't very well yell at one side for speculation then turn around and do it yourself.


I understand your question, but you have yet to give us any other reason for the bribe. waiting-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cause they wanted that prosecutor out. ours and many countries. feel free to look it up while you wait.


Its none of our business who acts as prosecutor in another country. Even if true, the bribe was illegal.
Imbecile, it is our business if they want our money. Just yesterday, Trump said....

"Why would you give money to a country if you think they're corrupt?"
 
Funny. There was no quid pro quo with Biden.
WTF?

The prosecutor was fired, Biden's son was protected from indictment / prosecution, and Ukraine got money....

.
Okay, so the dumb fuck doesn’t understand Latin. Not his fault he’s an idiot.

For you other lefty idiots though just interpret quid pro quo as you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. They scratched uncle Joe’s by firing the guy and Joe scratched back by giving them the billion bucks. Easy-peasy.
And how did Joe Biden benefit from that?
 
i think there's a lot of things to wonder about.

i don't think there is a bit of proof beyond speculation at this point. if i'm wrong and there is a direct link, just lay it on me.
50k a month salary for his son. why do you think he got that money? please, you're a fairly intelligent dude, now you're silent? hmmmm

I'm at least consistent. you can ask me anything and I will answer.
it doesn't matter what i think. it matters what can be proven.

if we can prove this was done to protect his son, great. but in a courtroom speculation should never be allowed. i'm not going to do the "what if" game cause the other side does it. i'm bitching at them for their speculation also right now that it's about getting dirt on trump. no proof of that either.

both sides are manufacturing rage.
50k a month is something to look into. why hasn't anyone? and you ignore it. funny shit. I'll call a scum fk a scum fk everyday, you not so much.
fine. go look. dig deep. it is our culture these days. if we find proof that's what it was for, great. nail him to the wall. but i am not for ANYONE being "nailed to the wall" for things that cannot be proven.
Most counter intelligence stuff can't be proven. It's in other countries and why we can't. what we can do and should do is question why joe biden's son received a 50k a month salary right after the prosecutor was fired. why didn't they? Hitlery tried, but left it alone when she assurance biden wouldn't run in 2016, swamp creatures eat swamp creatures, and we're on the outside watching and can't do jack shit, and you wish to lecture me. funny shit dude. I have a logical thought, and I use my brain. it's why I don't believe in global warming, seas rising, (no one can say where the water will come from to make it rise, why?)russia russia when I know for a fact the internet streaming capabilities forbid any such hacking as what was stated. Bandwidth is bandwidth, and you can't transmit more than the size of the pipes that data flows over. facts, it is all I use.

I get handed in here propaganda after propaganda. So spare me the innocence gig.
never said he was innocent. that's your speculation on what i have said. i said there is no proof he's guilty.

sounds like the left going after trump for russia - we can't prove you did it but you're guilty. like that tactic, i see.
 
cause they wanted that prosecutor out. ours and many countries. feel free to look it up while you wait.


Its none of our business who acts as prosecutor in another country. Even if true, the bribe was illegal.
there's a lot of things "none of our business" that we historically have a problem MAKING It our business. to get selectively mad makes you just as bad as those who do it for their purposes also.


I'm not selective. I was pissed when Bush invaded Iraq, the idea that we need to control other countries is contrary to everything in our constitution. america first, let the rest of the world deal with their own problems. But if they screw with us, hit them twice as hard.
and that mentality is getting us where again?

hey - i'm all for stopping most of our foreign funding and reviewing just why we do it and if the value is there. but none of this puts a link to bidens video and it being for his son.


if not to save his son from prosecution, then why did he bribe the guy? Give us any other reason. and don't try "we didn't like the prosecutor" again. WTF harm can one ukrainian prosecuter do to the USA?
Dumbfuck, how did that save his son from prosecution when his son wasn't being prosecuted?

Critically thinking things through is above your pay grade, idn't it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top