Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
So what?LOL…can’t get one by you
47.6% of the people I know are in the trades
You know they were replaced and you lie 99% of the time anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what?LOL…can’t get one by you
47.6% of the people I know are in the trades
Cell phones?
Why don’t you tell us about the Microwave ovens and Flat Screened TVs
The poor have it so good
Their cell phones and large screen TVs are either free or at a discount; they do not get air conditioners.If I couldn’t eat, I wouldn’t be too concerned with a cell phone and having to pay for my plan or minutes. But hey, that’s just me.
Out with the mocking again when you can’t refute the point. A homeless person living on other people’s money has no business with an expensive cell phone. She can buy the same cheapo one I have - I can make and receive calls, texts, and emails. If it’s good enough for a middle class person, it should be good enough for a poor person.Cell phones?
Why don’t you tell us about the Microwave ovens and Flat Screened TVs
The poor have it so good
That’s the problem with the poor; they’re not miserable enough.Cell phones?
Why don’t you tell us about the Microwave ovens and Flat Screened TVs
The poor have it so good
Even Republican Nassau County gives poor people cell phones and service.Out with the mocking again when you can’t refute the point. A homeless person living on other people’s money has no business with an expensive cell phone. She can buy the same cheapo one I have - I can make and receive calls, texts, and emails. If it’s good enough for a middle class person, it should be good enough for a poor person.
So in addition to paying for their food and lodgings, we have to subsidize their expensive toys also?Their cell phones and large screen TVs are either free or at a discount; they do not get air conditioners.
A cell phone and TV are now considered necessities.So in addition to paying for their food and lodgings, we have to subsidize their expensive toys also?
That’s the problem with the brainwashed liberals. They think having to do with a generic smartphone or a mid-size TV is misery.That’s the problem with the poor; they’re not miserable enough.
Not to mention a 2010 BMW.That’s the problem with the brainwashed liberals. They think having to do with a generic smartphone or a mid-size TV is misery.
Out with the mocking again when you can’t refute the point. A homeless person living on other people’s money has no business with an expensive cell phone. She can buy the same cheapo one I have - I can make and receive calls, texts, and emails. If it’s good enough for a middle class person, it should be good enough for a poor person.
Republicans support everything you mentioned. At variance is how Democrats choose to measure that.Our President supports minimum wage increases, healthcare,worker collective bargaining, workplace safety
All opposed by Republicans
50 years of welfare and they still allow the drug pushers to run the neighborhood.You tell em Lisa
Those poor folks should be eating out of Dumpsters, there is some good food in there. We can put cots in abandoned Warehouses so they have a roof over their heads.
Just as long as we don’t ask the Rich to pay more
Not an expensive one, nor a large flat-screen. I am quite happy with my $99 phone, which includes a year of service, and my 43” TV. I say if it’s good enough for a responsible middle-classer who had to pay for it herself, it’s good enough for a poor person for who other people have to buy it.A cell phone and TV are now considered necessities.
I'm not the one you have to whom you have sell this idea.Not an expensive one, nor a large flat-screen. I am quite happy with my $99 phone, which includes a year of service, and my 43” TV. I say if it’s good enough for a responsible middle-classer who had to pay for it herself, it’s good enough for a poor person for who other people have to buy it.
That’s the problem with the poor; they’re not miserable enough.
I know some who did...literally.If you don’t make people suffer, they will not pick themselves up by their bootstraps and become Rocket Scientists
50 years of welfare and they still allow the drug pushers to run the neighborhood.
Thete's a point where society has to say, "Screw you!".
Only in Liberalville is the very reasonable comment that poor people living off of OPM don’t need the latest Smartphones equivalent to telling them to eat out of a dumpster.You tell em Lisa
Those poor folks should be eating out of Dumpsters, there is some good food in there. Road Kill also makes a good meal. We can put cots in abandoned Warehouses so they have a roof over their heads.
Just as long as we don’t ask the Rich to pay more
Yes, they had a choice.Do they have a choice?
All the “good jobs “ skipped town