Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stolen elections should be overturned.
You are not responding to my argument against the Supreme Court decision 20 years ago because it is a question about that decision 20 years ago.Here it is againYour argument was dismissed over 2 decades ago.
Thus, your
There is no such thing as an unarmed militia.as I and Justice Berger read the SA because all citizens have a right to keep and bear arms and hunt food and defend property as long as they are part of a well regulated community organized militia for the common defense or community defense in times of emergency,
What we have in modern times is some cobbled up right bestowed upon any cockamamie hillbilly or troubled youth who wants a gun to have essy access to them and zero association or obligation to their community “regulated” (in the SA but forgotten) in some way that firearms be strictly used and SECURED in the preservation of the common good and safety of all.
Jan6 was not in the common good that the SA is supposed to protect.
You have no factual basis for your assumption that he would not have bought a shotgun, has ne been unable to get an A
Your argument is irrelevant and requires no response, other than to note it was dismissed 2 decades ago.You are not responding to my argument against the Supreme Court decision 20 years ago...
Your claimed raising the aget to 21 would have stopped the shooting.You have no factual basis for your assumption...
In the Uvalde Texas massacre the shooter turned 18, bought two AR15s and within a week murdered 19 kids and two teachers. And you gun whackos argue that raising the age to 21 would not save these kids.
I advocate that there’s a waiting period, when a young 18-year-old wants to purchase an assault rifle, specifically those that have had no background in the use of firearms or does not have a genuine purpose or interest or need to have one. Because he wants one ain’t cutting it:
If there was just a 10 day waiting period in the Uvalde Texas massacre these kids would be out of schooom and alive and enjoying their summer just like you are probably about to do.
Okay, so how did one join a militia when none was formed until a threat came along?
I do not have to demonstrate anything. Since you cannot demonstrate that he would’ve taken a different weapon and committed the atrocity at the exact moment that it happened.Your claimed raising the aget to 21 would have stopped the shooting.
This can only be true if you can demonstrate he would not have bought another gun.
Your claimed raising the age to 21 would have stopped the shooting.You cannot prove he would have gunned down these kids right after he turned 18 with a different weapon.
Your claimed raising the age to 21 would have stopped the shooting.
This can only be true if you can demonstrate he would not have bought another gun.
You doI do not have to demonstrate anything
No. He waited 8 months after his sister refused to buy a gun for him. If the law was 21 he may have chosen another means to get a weapon but May 16 would not be the day he waited to get it. No one knows exactly when his attack begins if at all but I don’t believe it is cosmically possible that Ramos attacks the school on the same day at the same time in the exact path with the only exception was he had an illegal shotgun in his hands and the exact number of kids died by bleeding out because law enforcement stopped himYou do
And you know you can't.
Thus, your claim is nonsense.
Nothing here in any way supports your assumption that he would not have bought a different gun.No. He waited 8 months...
Can you be more specific I wrote a lot more than that in the post you are responding to. I see your arguments are limited to in generalities only which humors me to think that you have nothing.Nothing here in any way supports your
www.rawstory.com
Because the date time weapons victims situation wouid be entirely different when his May 16 birthday is not a driving factor.Your claimed raising the age to 21 would have stopped the shooting.
The government can’t make guns illegal in 1790 America with an exact reading of the SA.How would one belong to a militia if the government had the ability to make firearms illegal and you couldn't own one?
Your claimed raising the age to 21 would have stopped the shooting.Can you be more specific ...
Nothing here in any way supports your assumption that he would not have bought a different gun.Because the date time weapons victims situation wouid be entirely different when his May 16 birthday is not a driving factor.
I said he may have purchased a different gun. Who are you arguing with?Nothing here in any way supports your assumption that he would not have bought a different gun.
As such, your claim that not getting an AR would have stopped this shooting is nonsense.
Then your claim that raising the age for an AR to 21 would have stopped this shootingsis false.I said he may have purchased a different gun.
The government can’t make guns illegal in 1790 America with an exact reading of the SA.
Can you be more specific I wrote a lot more than that in the post you are responding to. I see your arguments are limited to in generalities only which humors me to think that you have nothing.
Uvalde survivor takes first legal action against gun manufacturer after deadly school shooting: report
A special education staffer at Robb Elementary in Uvalde, Texas, is taking the first step toward legal action against the gun manufacturer, Daniel Defense. According to NPR.org, the latest impending lawsuit is considered the first in the aftermath of the Uvalde school shooting which claimed the...
Great news just breaking.
On Thursday, June 2, court documents were filed in the 38th Judicial District. NPR reports that Emilia "Amy" Marin "petitioned the court to force the company to sit for a deposition, as well as to produce materials related to its website, profits, lobbying, sales, and marketing of AR-15-style rifles like the one used at the shooting."
