Biden declared Jackson non qualified

So why was she confirmed 2 times already with no opposition??


Amy Barret wasn't
Bret Kav wasn't
etc, etc, etc...

That damn black bitch got some nerve, huh?
Cause the swamp and especially the dem swamp are psychos putting in woke affirmative action morons.
 
Wouldn't it also be racism to give someone preferential treatment due to their race/skin color? It's the other side of the same coin, imho.
No. That shows a fundamental misunderstanding of racism. We give people prefential treatment all the time for all sorts is reasons, nepotism, attraction, self interest, these aren't inherently racist actions. What makes something racist is when those actions are negatively motivated by your belief in the inherent inferiority of the person or group.
 

"Following a segment on Tucker Carlson Tonight, Wednesday, Carlson, came under fire for questioning the credentials of President Biden’s Supreme Court Nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson. This came just days after he attacked her very nomination, saying it would humiliate the Supreme Court, and make the U.S. look like Rwanda.
Taking a different approach than he did for any of former President Trump’s three nominees, all of whom are white, Carlson demanded to know what Brown got on her LSAT.


Why wouldn’t he tell us that? That would settle the question conclusively as to whether she’s a once-in-a-generation legal talent. It would seem like American’s in a democracy have a right to know that and much more before giving her a lifetime appointment." DNC Chair Jaime Harrison took it upon himself to put forth Jackson’s academic accomplishments. So, despite not knowing the meaningless answer to what Jackson got on the LSAT, Carlson’s question about her academic prowess has been answered."

Tucker brings up an excellent point, why don't we know this woman's LSAT scores? Just look at her name for example -- it sounds so foreign and inferior; putting her on the court will make our Supreme Court look like Rwanda...why is Biden hiding her LSATs?? Everyone knows that every Supreme Court nominee going back for the last 30 yrs have all been asked to provide their LSAT score -- why does this whore think she is so special to where she can hide her scores??

Look at her name, it sounds foreign and muslim, are we sure she was even born in America?? Why hasn't she released her birth certificate? Why hasn't she released her LSATs...What do we know about her 9th grade Algebra scores?? What is Biden hiding. Yea, I know she graduated from Harvard with honors, yea, I know she was editor of the Harvard Law review -- but still, how do we know she actually earned any of it?

We all know that most blacks who get degrees from schools like Princeton and Harvard never earned them and only got them because their black. Do you think Thomas Sowell really deserved his Harvard degree? The guy was a high school dropout. It reminds me of how Tucker couldn't get into the CIA; I am sure people like Jackson reminds him of how he was probably passed over by some inferior black.

Moot point. Tucker is nothing but a spoiled little rich kid that never worked a day in his life. That doesn’t qualify you for anything.

anybody in any all of life or s more qualified than Tucker on anything. Including most blacks.
 
You're the one accusing him of racism you dipshit, you tell me.
Ok, get up on your two hind feet, explain and defend a policy that excludes all other white, brown, yellow female or males for that position. If you can convince me that it is not racist, I will bow down to your superior intellect.
 
Moot point. Tucker is nothing but a spoiled little rich kid that never worked a day in his life. That doesn’t qualify you for anything.

anybody in any all of life or s more qualified than Tucker on anything. Including most blacks.
Are you not aware that Biden has never held a real job either? For the past 50 years, he has sucked off the hind teat of government so Biden must not be qualified either.
 
Ok, get up on your two hind feet, explain and defend a policy that excludes all other white, brown, yellow female or males for that position. If you can convince me that it is not racist, I will bow down to your superior intellect.
😄

That's not really how debate goes. It's not up to me to prove to you this isn't racist. You're the one claiming racism and so the burden of proof is on you. What I will say is that Biden can only nominate one person and so eventually his choice would of excluded everyone except that one person. Would he have needed to find a white/black/Asian bisexual fundamentalist Christian to check every box and not be considered a bigot by you?
 
You're projecting, kid. I'm just the one who suggested that AA may be the reason the scores are not revealed. You and your posse of useful idiots immediately went into triggered attack mode. Read the thread with an open mind.
They have no argument except to scream RACISM as loud as they can
 
No. That shows a fundamental misunderstanding of racism. We give people prefential treatment all the time for all sorts is reasons, nepotism, attraction, self interest, these aren't inherently racist actions. What makes something racist is when those actions are negatively motivated by your belief in the inherent inferiority of the person or group.
Really? So you mean when white people don't get preferential treatment all the time it's not because nonwhites believe all whites are inherently inferior? Say they actually believed all whites were inferior. That would still not be racism? Not even "reverse racism"?
 
Last edited:
Is giving white people preferential treatment, because they're white, racism?
The problem with that question for me is that it is missing necessary context. We don't do things for no reason and so I would wonder why is that white person getting preferential treatment. It brings me to my larger point which is that clearly racism isn't just an act but also the motivations behind the act. For instance the act of denying a black person a job isn't inherently racist but if you deny a black person a job because you think they are inherently inferior then that is racist, so clearly motive and not the act in and of itself is the determining factor.

Now let's look at Bidens pick. Is the full context of his choice that he decided to nominate a black woman because she is black, full stop? Or because she is black and black women have been historically kept from serving on the Court? If you can't be honest about the full context of the choice then you can't make an honest assessment of whether or not said act was racist.
 
No. That shows a fundamental misunderstanding of racism. We give people prefential treatment all the time for all sorts is reasons, nepotism, attraction, self interest, these aren't inherently racist actions.


What makes something racist is when those actions are negatively motivated by your belief in the inherent inferiority of the person or group.
we dont believe blacks are genetically inferior

but they should be required to reach the same standards as everyone else
 

Forum List

Back
Top