- Jun 12, 2010
- 103,139
- 25,581
Sicilia was quite clear he was referencing Miller vs US and the restriction of sawed off shotguns. Anti gunners have bastardized what he saidScalia is not around to tell us what he meant.
We have to look at the last three major decisions by the Supremes. Heller, McDonald and Bruen. They all strongly declare that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right. Bruen goes the farthest to say that the goddamn government better have a really really really good reason to infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms because what we have seen lately doesn't hack it. It is now required that the lower courts must apply Strict Scrutiny when determining if the fucking law is infrinigning or not. Something they haven't done in the past that allowed gun and magazines bans and dictated ridiculous licensing requirements.