Biden says he'll raise all the money needed by taxing anyone making over $400,000 a year.

[Nostra]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

 

[Oldestyle]

I would suggest reading this. It's by Thomas Sowell. He understands the topic that you so obviously don't, Daniel!

Minimum Wage Madness, by Dr. Thomas Sowell

Political crusades for raising the minimum wage are back again. Advocates of minimum wage laws often give themselves credit for being more "compassionate" towards "the poor.

www.creators.com

The left has a lawful solution for that too. It is termed and styled, equal protection of the laws regarding employment at the will of either person in our at-will employment States, for unemployment compensation. A simple solution to simple poverty. Just another "war" the right wing was clueless and Causeless about how to win.

LOL...let me guess...you're one of those people that think if you get really "wordy" that you can make yourself sound like you know what you're talking about?

"It is termed and styled, equal protection of the laws regarding employment at the will of either person in our at-will employment States, for unemployment compensation."

That sentence right there...is beyond pathetic! What does any of it mean?

 

[danielpalos]

There will be no problem since he can promise that GDP growth will be 5% a year...

What ever happened to Trumpâs boast of 4%, 5% or even 6% growth?

Whatever happened to Trump’s boast that the U.S. economy would be able to grow not just at 3% but at “4%, 5% or even 6%” a year?

www.marketwatch.com

So how does Biden pay for it...

Reverse the Trump tax cut for rich and corporates... $1.5 trillion
Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion.

Borrow infrastruction expense and pay off over increased production (Capital expendeture)... $1.3 trillion

Education pays off in increased tax revenue. It also drives an economy...

The return to investment in education - OECD

Data and research on education including skills, literacy, research, elementary schools, childhood learning, vocational training and PISA, PIACC and TALIS surveys., Growing advantages for the better educated and likely continuing high levels of unemployment as economies move out of recession...

www.oecd.org

Housing plan will also drive economic activity in the construction market... Homeless are expensive cost on a city...

Combating opioid epidemic: Borrow the money, Cutting funding to poor will just make this worse...


This is all better than ploughing the money in to hole in the dessert. $2.4 billion.

Financial cost of the Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

You wrote: Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion How do you figure that? YOU have NOTHING to prove your statement. JUST a guess... I ON the other hand have a link... follow the link!

the government estimates that raising the tax rate on this small group will raise about $600 billion in new revenues over the next decade.

Who Actually Earns $400,000 Per Year?

The Poor are a larger group. Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay enough in taxes.

Here is a simple example of what raising the minimum wage means IF YOU owned a restaurant.
Note the 2nd largest % of revenue (gross sales) is salaries and wages..@ 15.1%
So if the salaries/wages go up just 5%... there is no profit...therefore no business!
View attachment 379079

Salaries and wages do not refer only to minimum wage.

 

[Oldestyle]

You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Daniel and it's just going to get worse. Why try and argue something that you know so little about?

Says the guy with no valid arguments only fallacy, in the public domain.

I provided valid arguments...you provided gibberish! It's what people do when they don't have enough knowledge to MAKE a valid argument!

 

[danielpalos]

There will be no problem since he can promise that GDP growth will be 5% a year...

What ever happened to Trumpâs boast of 4%, 5% or even 6% growth?

Whatever happened to Trump’s boast that the U.S. economy would be able to grow not just at 3% but at “4%, 5% or even 6%” a year?

www.marketwatch.com

So how does Biden pay for it...

Reverse the Trump tax cut for rich and corporates... $1.5 trillion
Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion.

Borrow infrastruction expense and pay off over increased production (Capital expendeture)... $1.3 trillion

Education pays off in increased tax revenue. It also drives an economy...

The return to investment in education - OECD

Data and research on education including skills, literacy, research, elementary schools, childhood learning, vocational training and PISA, PIACC and TALIS surveys., Growing advantages for the better educated and likely continuing high levels of unemployment as economies move out of recession...

www.oecd.org

Housing plan will also drive economic activity in the construction market... Homeless are expensive cost on a city...

Combating opioid epidemic: Borrow the money, Cutting funding to poor will just make this worse...


This is all better than ploughing the money in to hole in the dessert. $2.4 billion.

Financial cost of the Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

You wrote: Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion How do you figure that? YOU have NOTHING to prove your statement. JUST a guess... I ON the other hand have a link... follow the link!

the government estimates that raising the tax rate on this small group will raise about $600 billion in new revenues over the next decade.

Who Actually Earns $400,000 Per Year?

The Poor are a larger group. Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay enough in taxes.

You are economically illiterate.

Enjoy your $25 Big Macs.

Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals or politics. Right wing fantasy is all you have.
Inflation would be less than five percent. And, wages should outpace inflation, regardless.

Thanks for confirming your economic illiteracy.

What illiteracy; last time I argued this point with some math guys we agreed inflation would be less than five percent. Even the dollar menu won't double.

 

[danielpalos]

There will be no problem since he can promise that GDP growth will be 5% a year...

What ever happened to Trumpâs boast of 4%, 5% or even 6% growth?

Whatever happened to Trump’s boast that the U.S. economy would be able to grow not just at 3% but at “4%, 5% or even 6%” a year?

www.marketwatch.com

So how does Biden pay for it...

Reverse the Trump tax cut for rich and corporates... $1.5 trillion
Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion.

Borrow infrastruction expense and pay off over increased production (Capital expendeture)... $1.3 trillion

Education pays off in increased tax revenue. It also drives an economy...

The return to investment in education - OECD

Data and research on education including skills, literacy, research, elementary schools, childhood learning, vocational training and PISA, PIACC and TALIS surveys., Growing advantages for the better educated and likely continuing high levels of unemployment as economies move out of recession...

www.oecd.org

Housing plan will also drive economic activity in the construction market... Homeless are expensive cost on a city...

Combating opioid epidemic: Borrow the money, Cutting funding to poor will just make this worse...


This is all better than ploughing the money in to hole in the dessert. $2.4 billion.

Financial cost of the Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

You wrote: Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion How do you figure that? YOU have NOTHING to prove your statement. JUST a guess... I ON the other hand have a link... follow the link!

the government estimates that raising the tax rate on this small group will raise about $600 billion in new revenues over the next decade.

Who Actually Earns $400,000 Per Year?

The Poor are a larger group. Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay enough in taxes.

Here is a simple example of what raising the minimum wage means IF YOU owned a restaurant.
Note the 2nd largest % of revenue (gross sales) is salaries and wages..@ 15.1%
So if the salaries/wages go up just 5%... there is no profit...therefore no business!
View attachment 379079

lol. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics. Labor costs are only 3.6 percent in your own list.

NO YOU dummy!
So if the salary and wages are doubled... then dummy Labor costs will become 30% not 15.1% from that list
MORE proof dummy which you evidently don't know how to use the internet to find out FACTS!!!

the average labor cost generated by front- and back-of-the-house positions across all restaurant categories comprises 30.5 percent of sales revenue What Is Normal for a Restaurant's Labor Cost Percentage?

Restaurateurs commonly aim to keep labor costs between 20% and 30% of gross revenue.

How to Efficiently Manage Labor Costs for Your Restaurant

Are you looking to get on top of your restaurant labor costs? Check out our latest blog with tips on how to efficiently calculate and manage the cost of labor in your restaurant.

upserve.com

Restaurants whose average ticket totals between $15 and $25 typically spend 33.2 percent of gross sales on labor expenses.

Food Service Industry: Labor Cost Standards

Food Service Industry: Labor Cost Standards. Labor can be one of the highest expenses that a food service business incurs. Restaurants and food processors must pay employees to prepare food and then to get it to customers, either by serving tables or by delivering packaged product at a wholesale...

yourbusiness.azcentral.com

View attachment 379136
View attachment 379135

You are the one claiming all wages would double not merely the minimum wage jobs.

 

[Nostra]

There will be no problem since he can promise that GDP growth will be 5% a year...

What ever happened to Trumpâs boast of 4%, 5% or even 6% growth?

Whatever happened to Trump’s boast that the U.S. economy would be able to grow not just at 3% but at “4%, 5% or even 6%” a year?

www.marketwatch.com

So how does Biden pay for it...

Reverse the Trump tax cut for rich and corporates... $1.5 trillion
Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion.

Borrow infrastruction expense and pay off over increased production (Capital expendeture)... $1.3 trillion

Education pays off in increased tax revenue. It also drives an economy...

The return to investment in education - OECD

Data and research on education including skills, literacy, research, elementary schools, childhood learning, vocational training and PISA, PIACC and TALIS surveys., Growing advantages for the better educated and likely continuing high levels of unemployment as economies move out of recession...

www.oecd.org

Housing plan will also drive economic activity in the construction market... Homeless are expensive cost on a city...

Combating opioid epidemic: Borrow the money, Cutting funding to poor will just make this worse...


This is all better than ploughing the money in to hole in the dessert. $2.4 billion.

Financial cost of the Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

You wrote: Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion How do you figure that? YOU have NOTHING to prove your statement. JUST a guess... I ON the other hand have a link... follow the link!

the government estimates that raising the tax rate on this small group will raise about $600 billion in new revenues over the next decade.

Who Actually Earns $400,000 Per Year?

The Poor are a larger group. Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay enough in taxes.

You are economically illiterate.

Enjoy your $25 Big Macs.

Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals or politics. Right wing fantasy is all you have.
Inflation would be less than five percent. And, wages should outpace inflation, regardless.

Thanks for confirming your economic illiteracy.

What illiteracy; last time I argued this point with some math guys we agreed inflation would be less than five percent. Even the dollar menu won't double.

You and a few other freshman jugheads agreed, huh?

 

[danielpalos]

Holeeee shiiiiit!

You mean to tell me the key to a successful socialist nation that gives free everything to everyone is just taxing those making 400k or more? There’s no negative economic impact, as a matter of fact it will cause a boom economy.

This whole damn time it was that easy. I bet Venezuela, Cuba etc all feel pretty dumb right now.

In right wing fantasy, any thing fantastical you can make up, is Always right.

 

[danielpalos]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

 

[danielpalos]

You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Daniel and it's just going to get worse. Why try and argue something that you know so little about?

Says the guy with no valid arguments only fallacy, in the public domain.

I provided valid arguments...you provided gibberish! It's what people do when they don't have enough knowledge to MAKE a valid argument!

lol. I provided more valid arguments than You. See how easy that is.

 

[Nostra]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

What makes you think all labor that goes into the cost of goods is minimum wage labor? And you have no clue what operating expenses are either.

You are a clueless dolt.

 

[danielpalos]

There will be no problem since he can promise that GDP growth will be 5% a year...

What ever happened to Trumpâs boast of 4%, 5% or even 6% growth?

Whatever happened to Trump’s boast that the U.S. economy would be able to grow not just at 3% but at “4%, 5% or even 6%” a year?

www.marketwatch.com

So how does Biden pay for it...

Reverse the Trump tax cut for rich and corporates... $1.5 trillion
Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion.

Borrow infrastruction expense and pay off over increased production (Capital expendeture)... $1.3 trillion

Education pays off in increased tax revenue. It also drives an economy...

The return to investment in education - OECD

Data and research on education including skills, literacy, research, elementary schools, childhood learning, vocational training and PISA, PIACC and TALIS surveys., Growing advantages for the better educated and likely continuing high levels of unemployment as economies move out of recession...

www.oecd.org

Housing plan will also drive economic activity in the construction market... Homeless are expensive cost on a city...

Combating opioid epidemic: Borrow the money, Cutting funding to poor will just make this worse...


This is all better than ploughing the money in to hole in the dessert. $2.4 billion.

Financial cost of the Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

You wrote: Increase tax on Rich (> 400k per year)... $1 Trillion How do you figure that? YOU have NOTHING to prove your statement. JUST a guess... I ON the other hand have a link... follow the link!

the government estimates that raising the tax rate on this small group will raise about $600 billion in new revenues over the next decade.

Who Actually Earns $400,000 Per Year?

The Poor are a larger group. Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay enough in taxes.

You are economically illiterate.

Enjoy your $25 Big Macs.

Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals or politics. Right wing fantasy is all you have.
Inflation would be less than five percent. And, wages should outpace inflation, regardless.

Thanks for confirming your economic illiteracy.

What illiteracy; last time I argued this point with some math guys we agreed inflation would be less than five percent. Even the dollar menu won't double.

You and a few other freshman jugheads agreed, huh?

Yes, they were not fantastical right wingers.

 

[danielpalos]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

What makes you think all labor that goes into the cost of goods is minimum wage labor? You are a clueless dolt.

We were discussing doubling the minimum wage.

 

[Oldestyle]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

I'm curious, Daniel...what do you think will happen when "entry level" pay is raised to say $15 an hour? Will the people who have job skills that command $15 an hour NOW not expect an equal raise to their pay?

 

[Nostra]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

What makes you think all labor that goes into the cost of goods is minimum wage labor? You are a clueless dolt.

We were discussing doubling the minimum wage.

So? Answer the question. What makes you think all labor that goes into the cost of goods is minimum wage labor?


Once again you expose what a clueless moron you are.

 

[Oldestyle]

You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Daniel and it's just going to get worse. Why try and argue something that you know so little about?

Says the guy with no valid arguments only fallacy, in the public domain.

I provided valid arguments...you provided gibberish! It's what people do when they don't have enough knowledge to MAKE a valid argument!

lol. I provided more valid arguments than You. See how easy that is.

I just asked about as simple a question as there is, Daniel and you don't seem to have an answer for it. Why is that?

 

[danielpalos]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

I'm curious, Daniel...what do you think will happen when "entry level" pay is raised to say $15 an hour? Will the people who have job skills that command $15 an hour NOW not expect an equal raise to their pay?

I believe Capitalists will optimize operations for the bottom line. And, Labor needs a cost of living adjustment regardless. Capitalists are welcome to automate for the bottom line. I hope all good Capitalists feel thoroughly goaded.

 

[danielpalos]

Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden!

There should be no upper limit to markets.

What? That might be the most clueless post of the day! People that make minimum wage don't pay Federal taxes, Daniel! So you think you can raise their wages to the point where they do and that will fix the deficit problem? You don't really know much about economics...do you?

Why don't you learn simple English and then respond? They would be paying taxes if you raise the wage enough. Nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics, the law, morals, or politics. Right Wing fantasy is all they seem to know and understand.

So you're going to give them more money in order to take it away? That works in your economic model? Do yourself a favor...read Thomas Sowell's book on economics...specifically the chapter on minimum wage policy.

Simple math, right wingers. Even more difficult than simple English, right wingers.

Never took a single Economic class...did you, Daniel?

You never had a valid argument for rebuttal did you, Oldstyle.

How do you want me to "argue" with someone lacking in even the basics of economic theory, Daniel? It's quite obvious that this is a subject that you're totally ignorant about. So you'll spout nonsense that you heard in your Political Science class and I'll laugh at you.

Forget economic theories, he can't even look at a table and see simple numbers.

I see Labor costs at 3.6 percent.

Exactly. That proves you are an idiot.

Show how I am wrong.

Ok kid, I'll hold your hand one time. Scan down the column of numbers until you find 15.1%. Then look to the left (ask someone which direction that is if you have to) and tell me what costs that 15.1%.

I have no confidence in your ability to follow these simple instructions.

Post your list again.

Not my list.

It clearly states Labor costs at 3.6 percent. Prove me Wrong, right winger. I love being Right, even though I am on the left.

You don't know the difference between "cost of goods sold" and "operating expenses", Moron.

And you are clearly too stupid to even scan down a column of numbers.

It clearly shows the cost of Labor. Show me where your 15.1 percent number says the same thing.

Thanks for proving my post.

You are the one using all of labor not just minimum wage labor. I never claimed all salaried personnel should have their salaries doubled.

What makes you think all labor that goes into the cost of goods is minimum wage labor? You are a clueless dolt.

We were discussing doubling the minimum wage.

So? Answer the question. What makes you think all labor that goes into the cost of goods is minimum wage labor?


Once again you expose what a clueless moron you are.

You are the one claiming an outrageous rate of inflation. Even at fifteen point one percent, that won't happen.

 

[Oldestyle]

I know you're not well versed in economic theory, Daniel but on some levels this is pretty easy stuff! Raising the minimum wage has to result in raises across the labor market. People that have skills WILL demand that they be paid for those skills! You know that's true. So if everyone gets a raise then what have you really accomplished for those making minimum wage? You've put more money in their pockets...but that money will be worth less! So what have you REALLY done for them?

 

[danielpalos]

You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Daniel and it's just going to get worse. Why try and argue something that you know so little about?

Says the guy with no valid arguments only fallacy, in the public domain.

I provided valid arguments...you provided gibberish! It's what people do when they don't have enough knowledge to MAKE a valid argument!

lol. I provided more valid arguments than You. See how easy that is.

I just asked about as simple a question as there is, Daniel and you don't seem to have an answer for it. Why is that?

LOL. Which question was that, right winger? All I see in the past few posts from You is nothing but ad hominems.