Big win for Civil Rights...and from left wing 9th Circuit Court of Appeals no less....

[2aguy]

Your right, thats where sad, cause killing a baby should b a right as long as one feels like it.

Yes it should, your retarded rhetoric notwithstanding.

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Because its their body for starters. Do you think you have a right to have cancer cut from your body?

The body of the baby is not their body......cancer actually is their body and cancer is not a human being...twit.

That's the losing side of the argument.

Yes....and so was the humanity of the Jews in socialist Germany......

 

[daws101]

Murder is not Constitutional.......

Early term abortion is as much a constitutional right as is owning a gun, your monkey jabber notwithstanding.

Your right, thats where sad, cause killing a baby should b a right as long as one feels like it.

could you make any less sense?

This is what happens when pregnant women use meth too frequently.

R u acting out again, poor nigga. Find ur daddy if it's possible n forgive him for never loving u. Its got to really fuck with u knowing how many men ur momma was fucking n she never had the decency to tell u Which one was daddy. Damn shame, Keep ur head up brotha.

Seems you never graduated grade school either.

 

[daws101]

Sounds like the anti-abortion end run involving excess regulation of abortion facilities.

Which amendment guaranteed to right to kill and dispose of babies again?

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. —Ninth Amendment

Murder is not a Right.

Yes it is.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Murder is not Constitutional.......

Early term abortion is as much a constitutional right as is owning a gun, your monkey jabber notwithstanding.

Your right, thats where sad, cause killing a baby should b a right as long as one feels like it.

Yes it should, your retarded rhetoric notwithstanding.

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

I have two main problems with abortion.

1. How can it be murder if I kill a woman's fetus at X months old, but if she kills the same fetus at the same age it's choice? This isn't logical because the entire pro abortion movement is based on the belief that before Y a fetus isn't a human, and as we discussed earlier murder is the illegal killing of a human being, well if in the case of abortion you can declare that a fetus under X is NOT a human then later on you can't just change your mind and say "okay in this case it IS a human , so we're charging murder" laws are supposed to be consistent.

Of course both sides just agreeing that at X a fetus becomes a baby would end that debate right there, but no one in any position of power wants to end debates, that would leave the rest of us time to investigate THEIR activities.

2. I think it's completely unfair that men are put in the position of not having ANY choice about whether they would like their fetus to grow up to be a baby, but on the other hand if they do NOT want a baby they also have no choice but to support said child should the mother decide to allow it to become a baby.

Notice that neither of my arguments stems from morality.

 

[Liberty777]

Early term abortion is as much a constitutional right as is owning a gun, your monkey jabber notwithstanding.

Your right, thats where sad, cause killing a baby should b a right as long as one feels like it.

could you make any less sense?

This is what happens when pregnant women use meth too frequently.

R u acting out again, poor nigga. Find ur daddy if it's possible n forgive him for never loving u. Its got to really fuck with u knowing how many men ur momma was fucking n she never had the decency to tell u Which one was daddy. Damn shame, Keep ur head up brotha.

Seems you never graduated grade school either.

Ninth grade education. My father was killed, my mother n I were forced to move back to the reservation. I got a job n the oilfeild, worked my way up n now make well over six digits a year. Just bought my mom a brand new house, pretty good for a month grade education eh.

 

[MikeK]

What exactly do the proponents of such a stupid restriction hope to achieve? What harm is avoided by prohibiting the presence of a gun shop within proximity of certain other entities, such as schools? What positive effect is achieved by such a plainly senseless proposition?

Guns are neither pornographic nor infectious and people who lawfully own guns are neither evil nor diseased. So the very proposal of such a restriction is stupidly offensive.

Americans who oppose gun ownership typically know nothing about guns, or are afraid of them, or are the type who are not inclined to defend themselves under any circumstances -- or all three.

At this time the entirety of Europe and Scandinavia is presently enduring the initially passive stages of foreign invasion by non-uniformed but plainly and defiantly militant young Islamic males who have demonstrated their aggressive intentions by raping and molesting young White women and brazenly announcing the ultimate objective of ethnic conquest. There is no reason to believe the U.S. will not be subjected to the same kind of initial aggression as the level of Muslim migration increases. But in spite of what clearly is an impending menace, the literal threat of internal aggression by an already present foreign enemy, the anti-gun agitators are busily discouraging Americans from possessing the means of defending themselves from a threat which could not be more visible and menacing.

Any American who is not acquainted with the tale of the Eloi vs the Morlocks, is encouraged to obtain and read a copy of H.G. Wells', The Time Machine. This classic was published in 1895 but the contemporary implications could not be more obvious.

 

[daws101]

Then you must agree with Trump that women who have abortions should be treated as murderers.

Trump never said that, why must you lie?

He said they should be punished. What else would the punishment be if abortion is murder?

They hypothetical question he was asked did not ask anything about murder.

See what just happened here was that you yourself know that at a certain point abortion should be murder, so you misspoke.

Trump was asked if a woman should be punished if abortion were illegal. And nothing more. Now of course in the heat of the moment anyone is going to say a person should be punished if they commit a crime, but the hypothetical was stupid b/c you damn well know abortion will never be illegal.

It was a slick question to ask a candidate who isn't a skilled politician and would have known to stay away from that question. Hillary , for example, would have had a 30 minute long answer that didn't answer shit.

I was responding to YOU calling it murder, fuckwit.

I didn't call it murder you illiterate fool, in fact I said EXACTLY the opposite that it and the death penalty are both NOT murder, exactly because they are the LEGAL killing of a human being. That idiot Daws is the one arguing that legal killings are still murder if they aren't moral.

Moron

False! I'm stating fact .
murder is murder legal or moral
sometimes it's necessary.
end of story.

 

[daws101]

Yes it should, your retarded rhetoric notwithstanding.

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Because its their body for starters. Do you think you have a right to have cancer cut from your body?

The body of the baby is not their body......cancer actually is their body and cancer is not a human being...twit.

That's the losing side of the argument.

Yes....and so was the humanity of the Jews in socialist Germany......

False comparison!

 

[Asclepias]

Early term abortion is as much a constitutional right as is owning a gun, your monkey jabber notwithstanding.

Your right, thats where sad, cause killing a baby should b a right as long as one feels like it.

Yes it should, your retarded rhetoric notwithstanding.

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

I have two main problems with abortion.

1. How can it be murder if I kill a woman's fetus at X months old, but if she kills the same fetus at the same age it's choice? This isn't logical because the entire pro abortion movement is based on the belief that before Y a fetus isn't a human, and as we discussed earlier murder is the illegal killing of a human being, well if in the case of abortion you can declare that a fetus under X is NOT a human then later on you can't just change your mind and say "okay in this case it IS a human , so we're charging murder" laws are supposed to be consistent.

Of course both sides just agreeing that at X a fetus becomes a baby would end that debate right there, but no one in any position of power wants to end debates, that would leave the rest of us time to investigate THEIR activities.

2. I think it's completely unfair that men are put in the position of not having ANY choice about whether they would like their fetus to grow up to be a baby, but on the other hand if they do NOT want a baby they also have no choice but to support said child should the mother decide to allow it to become a baby.

Notice that neither of my arguments stems from morality.

1. You stopped the life the woman wished to have.

2. It may seem unfair but until you carry the child in your womb an equal amount of time it really isnt unfair.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Trump never said that, why must you lie?

He said they should be punished. What else would the punishment be if abortion is murder?

They hypothetical question he was asked did not ask anything about murder.

See what just happened here was that you yourself know that at a certain point abortion should be murder, so you misspoke.

Trump was asked if a woman should be punished if abortion were illegal. And nothing more. Now of course in the heat of the moment anyone is going to say a person should be punished if they commit a crime, but the hypothetical was stupid b/c you damn well know abortion will never be illegal.

It was a slick question to ask a candidate who isn't a skilled politician and would have known to stay away from that question. Hillary , for example, would have had a 30 minute long answer that didn't answer shit.

I was responding to YOU calling it murder, fuckwit.

I didn't call it murder you illiterate fool, in fact I said EXACTLY the opposite that it and the death penalty are both NOT murder, exactly because they are the LEGAL killing of a human being. That idiot Daws is the one arguing that legal killings are still murder if they aren't moral.

Moron

False! I'm stating fact .
murder is murder legal or moral
sometimes it's necessary.
end of story.

You are WRONG. Murder is a legal construct PERIOD.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Your right, thats where sad, cause killing a baby should b a right as long as one feels like it.

Yes it should, your retarded rhetoric notwithstanding.

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

I have two main problems with abortion.

1. How can it be murder if I kill a woman's fetus at X months old, but if she kills the same fetus at the same age it's choice? This isn't logical because the entire pro abortion movement is based on the belief that before Y a fetus isn't a human, and as we discussed earlier murder is the illegal killing of a human being, well if in the case of abortion you can declare that a fetus under X is NOT a human then later on you can't just change your mind and say "okay in this case it IS a human , so we're charging murder" laws are supposed to be consistent.

Of course both sides just agreeing that at X a fetus becomes a baby would end that debate right there, but no one in any position of power wants to end debates, that would leave the rest of us time to investigate THEIR activities.

2. I think it's completely unfair that men are put in the position of not having ANY choice about whether they would like their fetus to grow up to be a baby, but on the other hand if they do NOT want a baby they also have no choice but to support said child should the mother decide to allow it to become a baby.

Notice that neither of my arguments stems from morality.

1. You stopped the life the woman wished to have.

2. It may seem unfair but until you carry the child in your womb an equal amount of time it really isnt unfair.

1. Oops you admit it is a life, therefor that life should have rights.

2. It certainly is unfair. No man alive who's ever had kids would believe otherwise. Oh his political persuasion might demand that he deny that, but no man think it's fair that he has no choice in whether he becomes a father or not.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes it should, your retarded rhetoric notwithstanding.

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

I have two main problems with abortion.

1. How can it be murder if I kill a woman's fetus at X months old, but if she kills the same fetus at the same age it's choice? This isn't logical because the entire pro abortion movement is based on the belief that before Y a fetus isn't a human, and as we discussed earlier murder is the illegal killing of a human being, well if in the case of abortion you can declare that a fetus under X is NOT a human then later on you can't just change your mind and say "okay in this case it IS a human , so we're charging murder" laws are supposed to be consistent.

Of course both sides just agreeing that at X a fetus becomes a baby would end that debate right there, but no one in any position of power wants to end debates, that would leave the rest of us time to investigate THEIR activities.

2. I think it's completely unfair that men are put in the position of not having ANY choice about whether they would like their fetus to grow up to be a baby, but on the other hand if they do NOT want a baby they also have no choice but to support said child should the mother decide to allow it to become a baby.

Notice that neither of my arguments stems from morality.

1. You stopped the life the woman wished to have.

2. It may seem unfair but until you carry the child in your womb an equal amount of time it really isnt unfair.

1. Oops you admit it is a life, therefor that life should have rights.

2. It certainly is unfair. No man alive who's ever had kids would believe otherwise. Oh his political persuasion might demand that he deny that, but no man think it's fair that he has no choice in whether he becomes a father or not.

1. Why do you say oops? I never said it wasnt a life. It just doesnt have any rights since its literally living off of someone elses body.

2. I have 4 kids and I am under no illusions about fairness. Since I am not carrying the child I really dont have a say until the child is born.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

I'm not as nearly as smart as all u college educated folk, that's a fact, but explain to me why abortion should remain a right.

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

I have two main problems with abortion.

1. How can it be murder if I kill a woman's fetus at X months old, but if she kills the same fetus at the same age it's choice? This isn't logical because the entire pro abortion movement is based on the belief that before Y a fetus isn't a human, and as we discussed earlier murder is the illegal killing of a human being, well if in the case of abortion you can declare that a fetus under X is NOT a human then later on you can't just change your mind and say "okay in this case it IS a human , so we're charging murder" laws are supposed to be consistent.

Of course both sides just agreeing that at X a fetus becomes a baby would end that debate right there, but no one in any position of power wants to end debates, that would leave the rest of us time to investigate THEIR activities.

2. I think it's completely unfair that men are put in the position of not having ANY choice about whether they would like their fetus to grow up to be a baby, but on the other hand if they do NOT want a baby they also have no choice but to support said child should the mother decide to allow it to become a baby.

Notice that neither of my arguments stems from morality.

1. You stopped the life the woman wished to have.

2. It may seem unfair but until you carry the child in your womb an equal amount of time it really isnt unfair.

1. Oops you admit it is a life, therefor that life should have rights.

2. It certainly is unfair. No man alive who's ever had kids would believe otherwise. Oh his political persuasion might demand that he deny that, but no man think it's fair that he has no choice in whether he becomes a father or not.

1. Why do you say oops? I never said it wasnt a life. It just doesnt have any rights since its literally living off of someone elses body.

2. I have 4 kids and I am under no illusions about fairness. Since I am not carrying the child I really dont have a say until the child is born.

1. If it's a human life it should of course have rights. Or are you suggesting that welfare recipients should have no rights since they live off of someone else?

2. The law is supposed to blind and fair. ALWAYS

 

[Liberty777]

There is a life at the moment of conception. No timeframe or law changes the fact u r murdering a baby.

 

[Asclepias]

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

I have two main problems with abortion.

1. How can it be murder if I kill a woman's fetus at X months old, but if she kills the same fetus at the same age it's choice? This isn't logical because the entire pro abortion movement is based on the belief that before Y a fetus isn't a human, and as we discussed earlier murder is the illegal killing of a human being, well if in the case of abortion you can declare that a fetus under X is NOT a human then later on you can't just change your mind and say "okay in this case it IS a human , so we're charging murder" laws are supposed to be consistent.

Of course both sides just agreeing that at X a fetus becomes a baby would end that debate right there, but no one in any position of power wants to end debates, that would leave the rest of us time to investigate THEIR activities.

2. I think it's completely unfair that men are put in the position of not having ANY choice about whether they would like their fetus to grow up to be a baby, but on the other hand if they do NOT want a baby they also have no choice but to support said child should the mother decide to allow it to become a baby.

Notice that neither of my arguments stems from morality.

1. You stopped the life the woman wished to have.

2. It may seem unfair but until you carry the child in your womb an equal amount of time it really isnt unfair.

1. Oops you admit it is a life, therefor that life should have rights.

2. It certainly is unfair. No man alive who's ever had kids would believe otherwise. Oh his political persuasion might demand that he deny that, but no man think it's fair that he has no choice in whether he becomes a father or not.

1. Why do you say oops? I never said it wasnt a life. It just doesnt have any rights since its literally living off of someone elses body.

2. I have 4 kids and I am under no illusions about fairness. Since I am not carrying the child I really dont have a say until the child is born.

1. If it's a human life it should of course have rights. Or are you suggesting that welfare recipients should have no rights since they live off of someone else?

2. The law is supposed to blind and fair. ALWAYS

1. I disagree with your "should" statement. So does the law of the land.

2. The law should never be blind. Yes it should be fair.

 

[Uncensored2008]

That's the losing side of the argument.

Really?

Because you have no rational response? (not that you ever do.)

 

[Uncensored2008]

Freedom of choice the freedom that all other freedom is based on.
That's why.

Especially the "right" to kill another, right duhs, you drooling fucking retard?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yes it is.

Derp derp derp.

Just in case any of us wondered what happened to Truthiness Matters.....

 

[daws101]

He said they should be punished. What else would the punishment be if abortion is murder?

They hypothetical question he was asked did not ask anything about murder.

See what just happened here was that you yourself know that at a certain point abortion should be murder, so you misspoke.

Trump was asked if a woman should be punished if abortion were illegal. And nothing more. Now of course in the heat of the moment anyone is going to say a person should be punished if they commit a crime, but the hypothetical was stupid b/c you damn well know abortion will never be illegal.

It was a slick question to ask a candidate who isn't a skilled politician and would have known to stay away from that question. Hillary , for example, would have had a 30 minute long answer that didn't answer shit.

I was responding to YOU calling it murder, fuckwit.

I didn't call it murder you illiterate fool, in fact I said EXACTLY the opposite that it and the death penalty are both NOT murder, exactly because they are the LEGAL killing of a human being. That idiot Daws is the one arguing that legal killings are still murder if they aren't moral.

Moron

False! I'm stating fact .
murder is murder legal or moral
sometimes it's necessary.
end of story.

You are WRONG. Murder is a legal construct PERIOD.

Moralizing.

 

[Asclepias]

There is a life at the moment of conception. No timeframe or law changes the fact u r murdering a baby.

If that were true why dont they imprison moms that have abortions like Trump wants to do?