Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 24,301
- 19,922
- 2,288
When I first saw the title of the article I was figuring the two options were either to save the planet or die. Instead, he says if we save the planet we are going to die in a world war but if we wind up avoiding the world war then we are going to die from the planet not being saved. So, what do we do? Do we save the planet and succumb to a world war or do we do our best to avert WWIII and succumb to Climate Change? Decisions, decisions. My vote is that we can learn to live with a hotter planet but I'm not so sure if we can live with a radioactive planet. It now seems like Bill Gates is saying, "Screw Climate Change, there are bigger problems than that which we need to worry about. He has literally changed his mind on Democrat's watch who were all hell bent on saving the planet.
www.yahoo.com
Bill Gates says the world is facing two options: A ‘major war’ or another pandemic in less than 30 years
Bill Gates, the cofounder of Microsoft, says he is kept up at night by the threat of a world war or another pandemic.