Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What part of the whistleblower testimony has not been?The congresscritters in the room couldn't say what he said, they could however say what he didn't say, and that was Ukraine knew the aid was being held up. Without that knowledge there could have been no quid pro quo, could there? Ukraine didn't find out the aid was being held till 29 Aug. Shortly after the aid was released and the sale of the anti-tank missals was completed and Ukraine had started no new investigations. They did have an ongoing investigation into Burisma that started in Feb, that wasn't mentioned in the call.
.
By August the Ukranians knew the aid was being withheld- and according to Taylor's statement, were told that unless they made a public announcement of an investigation into, among other things, the Bidens, that the aid would not be coming, that the Ukrainians wouldn't get the sought after meeting in the White House.
And give us that link about the 'ongoing investigation into Burisma since February- since in August Trump's operatives were still trying to pressure Ukraine into starting them.
Was that from 2nd, 3rd or 4th hand information? And I provided a link already, look it up.
.
You do realize that the whistleblower's testimony was backed up when the call notes were released, right?
No it wasn't.
.
Key allegations from the Ukraine whistleblower are true, despite what Trump says
Whistleblower complaint:
“I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals.”
What we know:
This core claim has been confirmed. Based on Trump’s public comments and the White House transcript of his call with Zelensky, it’s now clear that Trump used his position to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden. If Zelensky bowed to this pressure, Ukraine would have been interfering in the 2020 election to help Trump win.
Whistleblower complaint:
“The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General Barr appears to be involved as well.”
What we know:
The whistleblower was spot-on about Giuliani, who has been transparent about his role and maintains he hasn’t done anything wrong. The whistleblower was less sure about Barr. Trump mentioned Barr on the Zelensky call, but the Justice Department said Barr didn’t learn about it for “several weeks” and that he never discussed Ukraine with Giuliani
Whistleblower complaint:
“According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelenskyy to … initiate or continue an investigation into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.”
What we know:
The White House transcript of the call revealed that this is accurate. Trump told Zelensky: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution, and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great.” In addition, after the complaint was publicly released, Trump publicly asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden family
Whistleblower complaint:
“According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelenskyy to … assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the US cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike.”
What we know:
The White House transcript of the call included Trump’s mention of CrowdStrike, which is at the center of a Trump-supported conspiracy theory about alleged Ukrainian meddling in 2016. Trump said: “I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it … I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it.”
And that is just a small sample.
Now you...
Imbecile...Who cares?
It is OFFICIAL.
Hunter Biden never attended a single board meeting. NOT ONE.
What does a BOARD MEMBER DO?
He/she ATTENDS BOARD MEETINGS
Hunter Biden was a "GHOST Board Member" who was really a CONDUIT for a KICKBACK.... No wonder the Dems don't want this INVESTIGATED....
I know that self-illusive Biden video must've been painful for you to see the umpteenth time, and I see you still aren't owning its content. Here's you a little bar of soap to clean out your filthy mouth, Faun, in memory of my dear grandmother who cleaned me of the thoughts of ugly words when I was four years old:LOLOLPresident Trump never did such a thing. It's too bad cannabis is now legal. I can understand where your toxic gas plume is coming from.LOLTruth or lies doesn't make a difference with the TDS'ers when the goal is impeaching Trump. Got itLOLFiction, fiction, fiction. You get over it.
There's nothing I need to get over. Trump's getting impeached. And even if the Senate doesn't vote him out -- he's gonna flame out.
You have nothing to counter Trump asking a foreign national to help take down a political rival.
Trump's getting impeached and he deserves to for abusing his office.
You're truly fucking brain-dead.
"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."
"You, I, and other U.S. taxpayers just shelled out $45 million dollars to get a Mueller Report."Man oh, man ThisisMe, you been had. The Democrats not only never had any evidence, they've been proven liars on 5 different expensive explorations into the possibilities they postulate.Maybe, maybe not, but in the words of mills lane (cdm version) "let's get it on!" [emoji16]I'm not a trump supporter, but I do lean to the right. I wont attack him, rather, I say, lets get this thing started. The dems.have the evidence, let's get the articles drawn up and sent to the house for a full vote so we can get this thing moving.
That's the last thing they want.
This feely-good closed door crapshoot also has no evidence. At best, it's a wannabe quid pro quo that isn't and never was a quid pro quo, and it never will be. Bring it on again? Pass the melatonin, please.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but, it doesnt matter what is true or not, what matters is what dems can get the media to report. Part of what is going on is not just trump impeachment, its public opinion. The dems have done a good job at monopolizing all avenues of media. For the last 3 years, it's been trump, russia, ukraine, collusion, corruption.
My stance, as of late, is, you cant convince anyone they are right or wrong, so why bother. That dent in the cement wall is deep enough, and eventually your head will hurt, so why keep banging.
The dems control the house, so, they basically control the narrative. Repubs can come out and show proof that they are right, and the dems can just leak another news story that will occupy the media cycle, and divert attention to what they want you to "know".
Maybe my stance will change once all this comes out in the open and we can start seeing information coming from the repubs, once they are allowed to start their defense and do some questioning of their own.
I'm just ready to get all this behind us. So my stance is, let's do it! If trump is guilty, then he needs to go, if hes innocent, then we can finally put all this to rest.
ThisisMe said, "If trump is guilty, then he needs to go, if hes innocent, then we can finally put all this to rest."You, I, and other U.S. taxpayers just shelled out $45 million dollars to get a Mueller Report. It cleared President Trump of the falsetto accusation that he colluded with Russia to get information on Clinton so he could use it to win the election. That never happened, but we found out he never, no not once, contacted the Russians or any other foreign government to get at the paranoid former First Lady of President Bill Clinton.
You may be influenced by people so punked out by Hillary's defeat they cried at her wannabe victory party, and heard their party leaders trying to fix the problem by promising they would "Get Trump" with impeachment the very next day. And they went about it full force for the duration of November, December, and days leading up to the inauguration of President Trump. Their orders to the Democrat operatives of the press have been daily, emailed, faxed, and hand-delivered to synchronize the specific words du jour being identical to all the other 200 news outlets who coordinate Democrat orders expediently.
So I'm not surprised people like you think who aren't tied down to either side, but favor certain elements in one side or the other.
Democrats are outdoing themselves to create an impression that President Trump has done something, It's fiction, every word of it. If you keep that in mind, their lies don't get under your toenails.
The Kavanaugh hoax came first, about the modus operandi under which the Democrats function. It was all a lie, all along, and leftist leadership made it happen. I am hoping you know the details but not wanting to offend you by regurgitating that which is provable and what part is fiction. The question is, why did the Democrats select rape as their cause celebre to erase Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court list forever? The answer is simple: they wanted women mad at President Trump, because he had a higher percentage of women voting for him than they anticipated. 90% of Americans will be madder than a hatter to think a public official has raped somebody else, particularly a single woman who is young and pretty and is vetted in persuasion to the nines.
If you need to know anything about the dirty tricks of the left, and you haven't noticed, stick around. America is in for the next phase about what America is going to do to prevent another Congressional majority from putting the swampy stuff on conceal. We cannot allow this to happen again in this nation. It is not only unconstitutional, it is anti-constitutional, in my humble opinion.
No more secret committee meetings excluding opponent party members of that committee, Democrats.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What part of the whistleblower testimony has not been?By August the Ukranians knew the aid was being withheld- and according to Taylor's statement, were told that unless they made a public announcement of an investigation into, among other things, the Bidens, that the aid would not be coming, that the Ukrainians wouldn't get the sought after meeting in the White House.
And give us that link about the 'ongoing investigation into Burisma since February- since in August Trump's operatives were still trying to pressure Ukraine into starting them.
Was that from 2nd, 3rd or 4th hand information? And I provided a link already, look it up.
.
You do realize that the whistleblower's testimony was backed up when the call notes were released, right?
No it wasn't.
.
Key allegations from the Ukraine whistleblower are true, despite what Trump says
Whistleblower complaint:
“I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals.”
What we know:
This core claim has been confirmed. Based on Trump’s public comments and the White House transcript of his call with Zelensky, it’s now clear that Trump used his position to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden. If Zelensky bowed to this pressure, Ukraine would have been interfering in the 2020 election to help Trump win.
Whistleblower complaint:
“The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General Barr appears to be involved as well.”
What we know:
The whistleblower was spot-on about Giuliani, who has been transparent about his role and maintains he hasn’t done anything wrong. The whistleblower was less sure about Barr. Trump mentioned Barr on the Zelensky call, but the Justice Department said Barr didn’t learn about it for “several weeks” and that he never discussed Ukraine with Giuliani
Whistleblower complaint:
“According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelenskyy to … initiate or continue an investigation into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.”
What we know:
The White House transcript of the call revealed that this is accurate. Trump told Zelensky: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution, and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great.” In addition, after the complaint was publicly released, Trump publicly asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden family
Whistleblower complaint:
“According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelenskyy to … assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the US cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike.”
What we know:
The White House transcript of the call included Trump’s mention of CrowdStrike, which is at the center of a Trump-supported conspiracy theory about alleged Ukrainian meddling in 2016. Trump said: “I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it … I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it.”
And that is just a small sample.
Now you...
The WH transcript showed that Trump asked Selensky to cooperate with the AG 4 times. The Constitution gives the president free reign to conduct foreign policy and an obligation to enforce the law. Your commie fantasies notwithstanding, there was nothing improper about the call.
.
he was hired because his father was VP
If you can show Biden did something for them
When the target of the investigation is running in the same election, yes, it's helping Trump's campaign.Soliciting a foreign national to help with one's campaign
Asking for an investigation into missing US taxpayer funds is not helping a campaign, it is helping the US figure out where YOUR PARTY wasted/stole our money....
Dumbfuck cuck ... the president cannot violate one law to enforce another.What part of the whistleblower testimony has not been?By August the Ukranians knew the aid was being withheld- and according to Taylor's statement, were told that unless they made a public announcement of an investigation into, among other things, the Bidens, that the aid would not be coming, that the Ukrainians wouldn't get the sought after meeting in the White House.
And give us that link about the 'ongoing investigation into Burisma since February- since in August Trump's operatives were still trying to pressure Ukraine into starting them.
Was that from 2nd, 3rd or 4th hand information? And I provided a link already, look it up.
.
You do realize that the whistleblower's testimony was backed up when the call notes were released, right?
No it wasn't.
.
Key allegations from the Ukraine whistleblower are true, despite what Trump says
Whistleblower complaint:
“I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals.”
What we know:
This core claim has been confirmed. Based on Trump’s public comments and the White House transcript of his call with Zelensky, it’s now clear that Trump used his position to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden. If Zelensky bowed to this pressure, Ukraine would have been interfering in the 2020 election to help Trump win.
Whistleblower complaint:
“The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General Barr appears to be involved as well.”
What we know:
The whistleblower was spot-on about Giuliani, who has been transparent about his role and maintains he hasn’t done anything wrong. The whistleblower was less sure about Barr. Trump mentioned Barr on the Zelensky call, but the Justice Department said Barr didn’t learn about it for “several weeks” and that he never discussed Ukraine with Giuliani
Whistleblower complaint:
“According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelenskyy to … initiate or continue an investigation into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.”
What we know:
The White House transcript of the call revealed that this is accurate. Trump told Zelensky: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution, and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great.” In addition, after the complaint was publicly released, Trump publicly asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden family
Whistleblower complaint:
“According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the President pressured Mr. Zelenskyy to … assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee and examined by the US cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike.”
What we know:
The White House transcript of the call included Trump’s mention of CrowdStrike, which is at the center of a Trump-supported conspiracy theory about alleged Ukrainian meddling in 2016. Trump said: “I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it … I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it.”
And that is just a small sample.
Now you...
The WH transcript showed that Trump asked Selensky to cooperate with the AG 4 times. The Constitution gives the president free reign to conduct foreign policy and an obligation to enforce the law. Your commie fantasies notwithstanding, there was nothing improper about the call.
.
No, I blame the Deep State Demonrats. They used the two years to clean up on House Seats to carry out their promise in 2016 to pull out the "Insurance Policy" the salacious Steel Report included among other false narratives created by Hillary's pals the spinroom darlings. Nancy Pelosi did her part in orchestrating the time sequences. Jerry Nadler went on a diet and used his carefully-manipulated language to attempt to destroy the President with more and more and more lies and innuendos than most people ever tell in 10 lifetimes."You, I, and other U.S. taxpayers just shelled out $45 million dollars to get a Mueller Report."Man oh, man ThisisMe, you been had. The Democrats not only never had any evidence, they've been proven liars on 5 different expensive explorations into the possibilities they postulate.Maybe, maybe not, but in the words of mills lane (cdm version) "let's get it on!" [emoji16]That's the last thing they want.
This feely-good closed door crapshoot also has no evidence. At best, it's a wannabe quid pro quo that isn't and never was a quid pro quo, and it never will be. Bring it on again? Pass the melatonin, please.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but, it doesnt matter what is true or not, what matters is what dems can get the media to report. Part of what is going on is not just trump impeachment, its public opinion. The dems have done a good job at monopolizing all avenues of media. For the last 3 years, it's been trump, russia, ukraine, collusion, corruption.
My stance, as of late, is, you cant convince anyone they are right or wrong, so why bother. That dent in the cement wall is deep enough, and eventually your head will hurt, so why keep banging.
The dems control the house, so, they basically control the narrative. Repubs can come out and show proof that they are right, and the dems can just leak another news story that will occupy the media cycle, and divert attention to what they want you to "know".
Maybe my stance will change once all this comes out in the open and we can start seeing information coming from the repubs, once they are allowed to start their defense and do some questioning of their own.
I'm just ready to get all this behind us. So my stance is, let's do it! If trump is guilty, then he needs to go, if hes innocent, then we can finally put all this to rest.
ThisisMe said, "If trump is guilty, then he needs to go, if hes innocent, then we can finally put all this to rest."You, I, and other U.S. taxpayers just shelled out $45 million dollars to get a Mueller Report. It cleared President Trump of the falsetto accusation that he colluded with Russia to get information on Clinton so he could use it to win the election. That never happened, but we found out he never, no not once, contacted the Russians or any other foreign government to get at the paranoid former First Lady of President Bill Clinton.
You may be influenced by people so punked out by Hillary's defeat they cried at her wannabe victory party, and heard their party leaders trying to fix the problem by promising they would "Get Trump" with impeachment the very next day. And they went about it full force for the duration of November, December, and days leading up to the inauguration of President Trump. Their orders to the Democrat operatives of the press have been daily, emailed, faxed, and hand-delivered to synchronize the specific words du jour being identical to all the other 200 news outlets who coordinate Democrat orders expediently.
So I'm not surprised people like you think who aren't tied down to either side, but favor certain elements in one side or the other.
Democrats are outdoing themselves to create an impression that President Trump has done something, It's fiction, every word of it. If you keep that in mind, their lies don't get under your toenails.
The Kavanaugh hoax came first, about the modus operandi under which the Democrats function. It was all a lie, all along, and leftist leadership made it happen. I am hoping you know the details but not wanting to offend you by regurgitating that which is provable and what part is fiction. The question is, why did the Democrats select rape as their cause celebre to erase Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court list forever? The answer is simple: they wanted women mad at President Trump, because he had a higher percentage of women voting for him than they anticipated. 90% of Americans will be madder than a hatter to think a public official has raped somebody else, particularly a single woman who is young and pretty and is vetted in persuasion to the nines.
If you need to know anything about the dirty tricks of the left, and you haven't noticed, stick around. America is in for the next phase about what America is going to do to prevent another Congressional majority from putting the swampy stuff on conceal. We cannot allow this to happen again in this nation. It is not only unconstitutional, it is anti-constitutional, in my humble opinion.
No more secret committee meetings excluding opponent party members of that committee, Democrats.
Blame Republicans.
When the target of the investigation is running in the same election, yes, it's helping Trump's campaign
There's nothing to own. There was nothing illegal with Biden using that money to get U.S. policy imposed.I know that self-illusive Biden video must've been painful for you to see the umpteenth time, and I see you still aren't owning its content. Here's you a little bar of soap to clean out your filthy mouth, Faun, in memory of my dear grandmother who cleaned me of the thoughts of ugly words when I was four years old:LOLOLPresident Trump never did such a thing. It's too bad cannabis is now legal. I can understand where your toxic gas plume is coming from.LOLTruth or lies doesn't make a difference with the TDS'ers when the goal is impeaching Trump. Got itLOL
There's nothing I need to get over. Trump's getting impeached. And even if the Senate doesn't vote him out -- he's gonna flame out.
You have nothing to counter Trump asking a foreign national to help take down a political rival.
Trump's getting impeached and he deserves to for abusing his office.
You're truly fucking brain-dead.
"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."
Here's your correction to lies and filthy words for your fellow USMB posters, doll:
Just say the word, and I can deliver the extra-gritty green one to here.
Oh, never mind I don't need any more of your filthy words:
Yes, by the IG, as you well know but play dumb!Has the whistlblower been cross examined? hmmmm?
Dumbfuck. Biden had zero influence over that money. He was bluffing when he threw it on the table and Poroshenko even called him out on it. In reality, it wasn't Biden's money to give -- it was given by our Congress and Obama. Nor was Biden in a position to take it back as he had no authority, only Obama did. Which is why when Poroshenko called him out on his bluff, Biden immediately said to call Obama.he was hired because his father was VP
Not just VP, but a VP with INFLUENCE over a $1 billion foreign aid package....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A perfect example of how the "human scum" on the Right lie by editing out the actual context of anyone they quote!
Pelosi was calling out REPUBLICANS for conducting wrap-up smear campaigns, not touting the phenomenon as a go-to strategy for Democrats. That is why nothing the worthless lying scum Right ever posts is true!
"No, I blame the Deep State Demonrats."No, I blame the Deep State Demonrats. They used the two years to clean up on House Seats to carry out their promise in 2016 to pull out the "Insurance Policy" the salacious Steel Report included among other false narratives created by Hillary's pals the spinroom darlings. Nancy Pelosi did her part in orchestrating the time sequences. Jerry Nadler went on a diet and used his carefully-manipulated language to attempt to destroy the President with more and more and more lies and innuendos than most people ever tell in 10 lifetimes."You, I, and other U.S. taxpayers just shelled out $45 million dollars to get a Mueller Report."Man oh, man ThisisMe, you been had. The Democrats not only never had any evidence, they've been proven liars on 5 different expensive explorations into the possibilities they postulate.Maybe, maybe not, but in the words of mills lane (cdm version) "let's get it on!" [emoji16]
This feely-good closed door crapshoot also has no evidence. At best, it's a wannabe quid pro quo that isn't and never was a quid pro quo, and it never will be. Bring it on again? Pass the melatonin, please.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but, it doesnt matter what is true or not, what matters is what dems can get the media to report. Part of what is going on is not just trump impeachment, its public opinion. The dems have done a good job at monopolizing all avenues of media. For the last 3 years, it's been trump, russia, ukraine, collusion, corruption.
My stance, as of late, is, you cant convince anyone they are right or wrong, so why bother. That dent in the cement wall is deep enough, and eventually your head will hurt, so why keep banging.
The dems control the house, so, they basically control the narrative. Repubs can come out and show proof that they are right, and the dems can just leak another news story that will occupy the media cycle, and divert attention to what they want you to "know".
Maybe my stance will change once all this comes out in the open and we can start seeing information coming from the repubs, once they are allowed to start their defense and do some questioning of their own.
I'm just ready to get all this behind us. So my stance is, let's do it! If trump is guilty, then he needs to go, if hes innocent, then we can finally put all this to rest.
ThisisMe said, "If trump is guilty, then he needs to go, if hes innocent, then we can finally put all this to rest."You, I, and other U.S. taxpayers just shelled out $45 million dollars to get a Mueller Report. It cleared President Trump of the falsetto accusation that he colluded with Russia to get information on Clinton so he could use it to win the election. That never happened, but we found out he never, no not once, contacted the Russians or any other foreign government to get at the paranoid former First Lady of President Bill Clinton.
You may be influenced by people so punked out by Hillary's defeat they cried at her wannabe victory party, and heard their party leaders trying to fix the problem by promising they would "Get Trump" with impeachment the very next day. And they went about it full force for the duration of November, December, and days leading up to the inauguration of President Trump. Their orders to the Democrat operatives of the press have been daily, emailed, faxed, and hand-delivered to synchronize the specific words du jour being identical to all the other 200 news outlets who coordinate Democrat orders expediently.
So I'm not surprised people like you think who aren't tied down to either side, but favor certain elements in one side or the other.
Democrats are outdoing themselves to create an impression that President Trump has done something, It's fiction, every word of it. If you keep that in mind, their lies don't get under your toenails.
The Kavanaugh hoax came first, about the modus operandi under which the Democrats function. It was all a lie, all along, and leftist leadership made it happen. I am hoping you know the details but not wanting to offend you by regurgitating that which is provable and what part is fiction. The question is, why did the Democrats select rape as their cause celebre to erase Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court list forever? The answer is simple: they wanted women mad at President Trump, because he had a higher percentage of women voting for him than they anticipated. 90% of Americans will be madder than a hatter to think a public official has raped somebody else, particularly a single woman who is young and pretty and is vetted in persuasion to the nines.
If you need to know anything about the dirty tricks of the left, and you haven't noticed, stick around. America is in for the next phase about what America is going to do to prevent another Congressional majority from putting the swampy stuff on conceal. We cannot allow this to happen again in this nation. It is not only unconstitutional, it is anti-constitutional, in my humble opinion.
No more secret committee meetings excluding opponent party members of that committee, Democrats.
Blame Republicans.
No he's not. But the Democrats perpetrating their little dervish plots are going to jail for treason. Sooner than you think.LOLFiction, fiction, fiction. You get over it.Your whining doesn't alter the fact that Republiscums can't call witnesses now because they made that rule in 2015.There's a difference which you well know, Mr. Faun. This fiction is not really all that original, but it's like the other 5 false narratives. It's fiction. All of it is fiction down to the final letter. And you're not owning the fiction, but even in spite of yourself it's--yep--fiction.LOLYou're comparing apples and oranges. No President was being impeached in 2015. The trouble with using a matchstick iq is that when you strike, it burns what's left of the stick. And furthermore, you're playing around with fire like a kid in a dry grass field.
So what? They changed the rules that they're now pissing about. Democrats are now using the Republicans' rules which is why the minority party, now Republicans, have no subpoena power and can't call witnesses. It matters not what the hearing is about -- it applies to all hearings in the House.
Bitch away, bitch.
Sucks for them. Get over it.
There's nothing I need to get over. Trump's getting impeached. And even if the Senate doesn't vote him out -- he's gonna flame out.
Biden had zero influence over that money
You have zero evidence of a kickback. You saying it couldn't be more meaningless.When the target of the investigation is running in the same election, yes, it's helping Trump's campaign
The crime happened before the Biden campaign started. There was a crime, a kickback, and you and yours don't want it INVESTIGATED.....
We should investigate every one of the "Hunter Biden got paid in this and that foreign country" because it was GLOBAL, not just Ukraine.
Joe Biden was selling US aid packages for KICKBACKS. So was his "boss" the closeted COCKSUCKER...
Mueller is a Republican. He was appointed by a Republican. That Republican was filling in for another Republican who recused himself. That Republican was appointed by a Republican president.
