Black teens kidnap And torture white teen

[basquebromance]

The blacks are cowards! They gang up on one person!

 

[basquebromance]

The NAACP prez wants to occupy Sessions office in Alabama while Chicago's South Side slides into some dystopian hell, ok.

 

[dannyboys]

This is fucking wrong and evil. I hope the people that did this spend the next 20 years in prison.

I hope they get life.

I hope they are sent to a Federal prison run by the Aryan Brotherhood!

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The "peaceful", "anti-racist" common regressives...


Graphic footage captured on Facebook Live shows a mentally handicapped white man being tortured in Chicago by African-American assailants as they laugh and express their disgust for white people and President-elect Donald Trump.

‘F**k Donald Trump, F**k White People!’: 4 People In Custody After Man Kidnapped, Tortured On Facebook Live

It's an open season on the Trump supporters and the lame stream media is shutting the hell up about it.

I don't know why this White guy ended up the way he did. We don't know what he might have done to provoke his attackers. It wouldn't matter to most of you anyway. All you see is a "innocent" White victim of Black violence. Well, 4 Blacks,whether they had cause or not, do NOT represent the entire Afro-American population.

If it makes you feel better, I'll post something just as bad with the exception that this time a handicapped Black kid is the victim of White toughs:
White football player accused of raping black, disabled team-mate avoids prison


]

"An Idaho prosecutor’s declaration that an alleged rape of a black, mentally disabled football player with a coat hanger by his white team-mate was not a sex crime and was not racially motivated has sparked mounting criticism among campaigners against sexual assault.

John RK Howard was initially charged with felony forcible sexual penetration by use of a foreign object, but on Friday, the 19-year-old reached a plea bargain that allowed him to plead guilty to a felony count of injury to a child. The deal will allow Howard to avoid prison time unless he violates his probation, the Twin Falls Times-News reported.

The October 2015 assault drew national headlines after the victim told the courtthat he had been attacked by three football team-mates and sodomized with a coat hanger in the locker room.

The victim’s family filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the high school and school officials, claiming that the school had failed to protect the student from a campaign of racial harassment by other students that culminated in the sexual assault.

The victim was called racial epithets such as “watermelon”, “chicken-eater”, and “******”, and Howard taunted the victim with a “Ku Klux Klan” song, the lawsuit alleged.

But during Friday’s hearing, the prosecutor, deputy attorney general Casey Hemmer, played down both the racial and sexual aspects of the crime, according to the Twin Falls Times-News."

Let's see how the justice system handles the perps in YOUR op. I'll bet you the prosecutor,won't downplay any aspect of that crime. He will likely go for the max.

Typical liberal-ass pussy response- you suggest that treating another human being like this could somehow be justified when it is black on white, and then try to draw a false equivalency to a completely different case. Deflect and protect, duck, dive and lie. What a Nancy.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

live streaming it and shouting racist and anti trump messages

Chicago Police: 4 in custody after man tied up, tortured on Facebook Live

These people are heroes. If you support Trump then you get what's coming to you.

You're a friggin retarded scumbag.

At first I thought your screen name was American Fart

At first I thought you were smart, painfully obvious that is a stretch.

 

[dannyboys]

I am calling on this nation to rise up and speak with one voice in condemning this vile, vitriolic, hateful movement called BlackLivesMatter

You all watch.
After Trump becomes the President the new AG/ DHS/FBI/CIA will designate MLM as a terrorist organization.
Take that to the bank!

 

[NightFox]

Uh-Huh, you must have missed all the poor choice of words moments (remember the Hispanic Judge bullshit, the Goldstar Family, the attacks on Megyn Kelly just to name a few examples?) that the Donald had during the campaign which triggered all the racist/misogynist/<whatever "ist" flavor of the month> fixated morons on the left, that is why he and his campaign bear part of the responsibility for all the ugliness we're seeing from the (as you correctly pointed out) intolerant left wing lunatics and there confused followers, this was completely avoidable had he engaged his brain before putting his mouth in gear in those instances.

How would any of those examples justify any violence?

Nobody claimed it justifies ANYTHING, nice attempt at straw man construction though.

it's an explanation of CAUSE AND EFFECT.

And how does it represent hate? I didn't see the hate so the hate was between your ears, don't try to play it off on others.
.

Of course YOU didn't see "hate", you're a partisan Saint Trump supporter, what you "saw" doesn't mean a damn thing, it's what the folks that are still somewhat objective saw and what they concluded that counts and many of those people saw flagrantly offensive remarks being made by the Donald.

Personally I couldn't care less what he says or who he offends, I didn't support him because I don't agree with his philosophy and I don't trust him.

Nice attempt at deflection. The subject was the horrific violent act and political rhetoric was cited as an underlying cause, which you endorsed!

LOL, deflection do you know what that word means? I was directly addressing cause and effect, do you have a reading problem or is the selective comprehension intentional?

You used terms like partisan Saint Trump supporter then want it to appear I'm the problem? Who do you think you're kidding?

The fact that you react so strongly to any criticism of the Donald invalidates your "who me" routine so exactly whom do you think you're kidding?

The party didn't want Trump, I voted against the party so the party animal here is YOU.

Uh-huh, how exactly did you "vote against the party"? and how exactly am I the "party animal" when I have been consistently anti-partisan all along?

And again, if you saw hate the hate belongs to you, not the one you need to pin it on.

Dear "Cannot read with comprehension to save his life" , what I saw isn't material AGAIN it's what those that remain somewhat objective saw and how they reacted to it, You should really get out and talk to some people that aren't wedded to partisan interests and who normally don't give a fuck about politics, I have and what they perceived was plenty of "hate" emanating from the Trump Campaign and that was due to numerous unforced errors on the Donald's part.

People chop up posts when they know they are full of shit.

Actually people do it when they are giving you the courtesy of directly addressing the points you are attempting to make individually, of course other people just post strung together nonsense because arguments based on reason and evidence is something that is beyond their capacity and thus they feel the need to attempt to obscure that fact.

..and you're welcome.

The left hyperventilates when they encounter disagreeable thought, then they blame the right for creating the strife. Yes, the hate is all yours if that's what you saw.

Apparently I was mistaken in the belief that you could objectively analyze anything that doesn't fit into your partisan box.

Politics is to a large degree perception, when you have half the country perceiving that you are to one degree or another a racist/misogynist/<fill in your favorite "ist" here> before you even take office there's a problem with your Presidency and in the Donald's case that problem was to a degree his own creation, if you can't understand that you fit the definition of lemming.

At this point he's got some 'xplainin' to do if he wants to build sufficient political capital to carry out the majority of his stated agenda.

 

[peabody]

The "peaceful", "anti-racist" common regressives...


Graphic footage captured on Facebook Live shows a mentally handicapped white man being tortured in Chicago by African-American assailants as they laugh and express their disgust for white people and President-elect Donald Trump.

‘F**k Donald Trump, F**k White People!’: 4 People In Custody After Man Kidnapped, Tortured On Facebook Live

It's an open season on the Trump supporters and the lame stream media is shutting the hell up about it.

I'm not sure I see the problem here. The Israelis do this kind of thing all the time. And Trump supporters have threatened to do this kind of thing to blacks and Muslims. If anything, this happened because of Trump supporters. Trump supporters need to apologize here because they bring this shit on themselves. Shame

 

[easyt65]

They are fucking animals.

THESE people are - don't label everyone based on the actions of these obviously F*ed Up individuals.

 

[Iceweasel]

How would any of those examples justify any violence?

Nobody claimed it justifies ANYTHING, nice attempt at straw man construction though.

it's an explanation of CAUSE AND EFFECT.

And how does it represent hate? I didn't see the hate so the hate was between your ears, don't try to play it off on others.
.

Of course YOU didn't see "hate", you're a partisan Saint Trump supporter, what you "saw" doesn't mean a damn thing, it's what the folks that are still somewhat objective saw and what they concluded that counts and many of those people saw flagrantly offensive remarks being made by the Donald.

Personally I couldn't care less what he says or who he offends, I didn't support him because I don't agree with his philosophy and I don't trust him.

Nice attempt at deflection. The subject was the horrific violent act and political rhetoric was cited as an underlying cause, which you endorsed!

LOL, deflection do you know what that word means? I was directly addressing cause and effect, do you have a reading problem or is the selective comprehension intentional?

You used terms like partisan Saint Trump supporter then want it to appear I'm the problem? Who do you think you're kidding?

The fact that you react so strongly to any criticism of the Donald invalidates your "who me" routine so exactly whom do you think you're kidding?

The party didn't want Trump, I voted against the party so the party animal here is YOU.

Uh-huh, how exactly did you "vote against the party"? and how exactly am I the "party animal" when I have been consistently anti-partisan all along?

And again, if you saw hate the hate belongs to you, not the one you need to pin it on.

Dear "Cannot read with comprehension to save his life" , what I saw isn't material AGAIN it's what those that remain somewhat objective saw and how they reacted to it, You should really get out and talk to some people that aren't wedded to partisan interests and who normally don't give a fuck about politics, I have and what they perceived was plenty of "hate" emanating from the Trump Campaign and that was due to numerous unforced errors on the Donald's part.

People chop up posts when they know they are full of shit.

Actually people do it when they are giving you the courtesy of directly addressing the points you are attempting to make individually, of course other people just post strung together nonsense because arguments based on reason and evidence is something that is beyond their capacity and thus they feel the need to attempt to obscure that fact.

..and you're welcome.

The left hyperventilates when they encounter disagreeable thought, then they blame the right for creating the strife. Yes, the hate is all yours if that's what you saw.

Apparently I was mistaken in the belief that you could objectively analyze anything that doesn't fit into your partisan box.

Politics is to a large degree perception, when you have half the country perceiving that you are to one degree or another a racist/misogynist/<fill in your favorite "ist" here> before you even take office there's a problem with your Presidency and in the Donald's case that problem was to a degree his own creation, if you can't understand that you fit the definition of lemming.

At this point he's got some 'xplainin' to do if he wants to build sufficient political capital to carry out the majority of his stated agenda.

No, when you chop up posts it makes it very difficult to respond, don't talk down to me, you arrogant ass. Very few people do it for that reason. What I said is the truth, you see hate because the hate exists in your head. The more you type the more proof there is.

I didn't see the hate you do. Neither did a whole bunch of people so trying to use what the people saw is an stupid argument. But you are too arrogant to see it.

 

[easyt65]

what's interesting and amazing is that we have full blown histrionics from our "traditional media" about accusations about Trump supporters harassing minorities, MOST of these stories wind up being discredited or proven to be a hoax. And here we have actual footage of a racist based hate crime and the media reaction is measured at best...

Black people can't be racists - don't you know that?

 

[peabody]

live streaming it and shouting racist and anti trump messages

Chicago Police: 4 in custody after man tied up, tortured on Facebook Live

These people are heroes. If you support Trump then you get what's coming to you.

You're a friggin retarded scumbag.

At first I thought your screen name was American Fart

At first I thought you were smart, painfully obvious that is a stretch.

I'm sorry I have let you down. I was only trying to employ some Swiftian commentary

 

[NightFox]

No, when you chop up posts it makes it very difficult to respond,

LOL, yeah I understand, Internet message boards and quoting , it's too tough for some people to handle.

don't talk down to me, you arrogant ass. .

Sorry to have triggered you so far from your safe space, want me to call you a taxi?

 

[dannyboys]

How would any of those examples justify any violence?

Nobody claimed it justifies ANYTHING, nice attempt at straw man construction though.

it's an explanation of CAUSE AND EFFECT.

And how does it represent hate? I didn't see the hate so the hate was between your ears, don't try to play it off on others.
.

Of course YOU didn't see "hate", you're a partisan Saint Trump supporter, what you "saw" doesn't mean a damn thing, it's what the folks that are still somewhat objective saw and what they concluded that counts and many of those people saw flagrantly offensive remarks being made by the Donald.

Personally I couldn't care less what he says or who he offends, I didn't support him because I don't agree with his philosophy and I don't trust him.

Nice attempt at deflection. The subject was the horrific violent act and political rhetoric was cited as an underlying cause, which you endorsed!

LOL, deflection do you know what that word means? I was directly addressing cause and effect, do you have a reading problem or is the selective comprehension intentional?

You used terms like partisan Saint Trump supporter then want it to appear I'm the problem? Who do you think you're kidding?

The fact that you react so strongly to any criticism of the Donald invalidates your "who me" routine so exactly whom do you think you're kidding?

The party didn't want Trump, I voted against the party so the party animal here is YOU.

Uh-huh, how exactly did you "vote against the party"? and how exactly am I the "party animal" when I have been consistently anti-partisan all along?

And again, if you saw hate the hate belongs to you, not the one you need to pin it on.

Dear "Cannot read with comprehension to save his life" , what I saw isn't material AGAIN it's what those that remain somewhat objective saw and how they reacted to it, You should really get out and talk to some people that aren't wedded to partisan interests and who normally don't give a fuck about politics, I have and what they perceived was plenty of "hate" emanating from the Trump Campaign and that was due to numerous unforced errors on the Donald's part.

People chop up posts when they know they are full of shit.

Actually people do it when they are giving you the courtesy of directly addressing the points you are attempting to make individually, of course other people just post strung together nonsense because arguments based on reason and evidence is something that is beyond their capacity and thus they feel the need to attempt to obscure that fact.

..and you're welcome.

The left hyperventilates when they encounter disagreeable thought, then they blame the right for creating the strife. Yes, the hate is all yours if that's what you saw.

Apparently I was mistaken in the belief that you could objectively analyze anything that doesn't fit into your partisan box.

Politics is to a large degree perception, when you have half the country perceiving that you are to one degree or another a racist/misogynist/<fill in your favorite "ist" here> before you even take office there's a problem with your Presidency and in the Donald's case that problem was to a degree his own creation, if you can't understand that you fit the definition of lemming.

At this point he's got some 'xplainin' to do if he wants to build sufficient political capital to carry out the majority of his stated agenda.

President Trump OWNES THE FUCKING BANK!!!! when it comes to 'political capital'.
He is the 'bank president'. The REP senate majority and REP majority in Congress means he doesn't 'need' ANY DEMS to help him 'geterdone'.
Breaking News! The Senate is going to invoke Dirty Harry's 'Nuclear Option' and vote in the next SGJ. The Senate only needs 50 votes.
Thanks a lot Harry.
I can't WAIT to watch Schumer and Nancy howling like a stuck pigs in front of the cameras.

 

[Moonglow]

Nobody claimed it justifies ANYTHING, nice attempt at straw man construction though.

it's an explanation of CAUSE AND EFFECT.

Of course YOU didn't see "hate", you're a partisan Saint Trump supporter, what you "saw" doesn't mean a damn thing, it's what the folks that are still somewhat objective saw and what they concluded that counts and many of those people saw flagrantly offensive remarks being made by the Donald.

Personally I couldn't care less what he says or who he offends, I didn't support him because I don't agree with his philosophy and I don't trust him.

Nice attempt at deflection. The subject was the horrific violent act and political rhetoric was cited as an underlying cause, which you endorsed!

LOL, deflection do you know what that word means? I was directly addressing cause and effect, do you have a reading problem or is the selective comprehension intentional?

You used terms like partisan Saint Trump supporter then want it to appear I'm the problem? Who do you think you're kidding?

The fact that you react so strongly to any criticism of the Donald invalidates your "who me" routine so exactly whom do you think you're kidding?

The party didn't want Trump, I voted against the party so the party animal here is YOU.

Uh-huh, how exactly did you "vote against the party"? and how exactly am I the "party animal" when I have been consistently anti-partisan all along?

And again, if you saw hate the hate belongs to you, not the one you need to pin it on.

Dear "Cannot read with comprehension to save his life" , what I saw isn't material AGAIN it's what those that remain somewhat objective saw and how they reacted to it, You should really get out and talk to some people that aren't wedded to partisan interests and who normally don't give a fuck about politics, I have and what they perceived was plenty of "hate" emanating from the Trump Campaign and that was due to numerous unforced errors on the Donald's part.

People chop up posts when they know they are full of shit.

Actually people do it when they are giving you the courtesy of directly addressing the points you are attempting to make individually, of course other people just post strung together nonsense because arguments based on reason and evidence is something that is beyond their capacity and thus they feel the need to attempt to obscure that fact.

..and you're welcome.

The left hyperventilates when they encounter disagreeable thought, then they blame the right for creating the strife. Yes, the hate is all yours if that's what you saw.

Apparently I was mistaken in the belief that you could objectively analyze anything that doesn't fit into your partisan box.

Politics is to a large degree perception, when you have half the country perceiving that you are to one degree or another a racist/misogynist/<fill in your favorite "ist" here> before you even take office there's a problem with your Presidency and in the Donald's case that problem was to a degree his own creation, if you can't understand that you fit the definition of lemming.

At this point he's got some 'xplainin' to do if he wants to build sufficient political capital to carry out the majority of his stated agenda.

President Trump OWNES THE FUCKING BANK!!!! when it comes to 'political capital'.
He is the 'bank president'. The REP senate majority and REP majority in Congress means he doesn't 'need' ANY DEMS to help him 'geterdone'.
Breaking News! The Senate is going to invoke Dirty Harry's 'Nuclear Option' and vote in the next SGJ. The Senate only needs 50 votes.
Thanks a lot Harry.
I can't WAIT to watch Schumer and Nancy howling like a stuck pigs in front of the cameras.

Are you actually a graduate from an accredited school?

 

[easyt65]

I can't WAIT to watch Schumer and Nancy howling like a stuck pigs in front of the cameras.

Hillary does NOT 'howl'....she BARKS!

 

[Iceweasel]

No, when you chop up posts it makes it very difficult to respond,

LOL, yeah I understand, Internet message boards and quoting , it's too tough for some people to handle.

don't talk down to me, you arrogant ass. .

Sorry to have triggered you so far from your safe space, want me to call you a taxi?

No, asshole. I can spend my day chopping your posts up too but I don't play stupid games. And when people talk down to me I talk down to them. So go stuff your safe space up your whatever.

 

[August West]

A white gang took it one step further and murdered their mentally challenged victim. This was a few years ago but I don`t recall any of you ku kluxxers posting it on this board or any other. Geez, I can`t imagine why. They set her on fire and threw her in a garbage can. Like good Christians they wrapped her up in Christmas decorations.
Murder of Jennifer Daugherty - Wikipedia

 

[Norman]

The "peaceful", "anti-racist" common regressives...


Graphic footage captured on Facebook Live shows a mentally handicapped white man being tortured in Chicago by African-American assailants as they laugh and express their disgust for white people and President-elect Donald Trump.

‘F**k Donald Trump, F**k White People!’: 4 People In Custody After Man Kidnapped, Tortured On Facebook Live

It's an open season on the Trump supporters and the lame stream media is shutting the hell up about it.

I'm not sure I see the problem here. The Israelis do this kind of thing all the time. And Trump supporters have threatened to do this kind of thing to blacks and Muslims. If anything, this happened because of Trump supporters. Trump supporters need to apologize here because they bring this shit on themselves. Shame

You don't see a problem here?

W - T - F?

Yet, I am sure this is the type of person who goes completely berserk when he hears that the police has defended themselves against a black looter.

But thanks for letting us know that you condone violence/torture. Typical libressive.

 

[Dschrute3]

The Democrats are inciting this type of brutality. It's gonna get worse once Trump is officially sworn in. It's why i advise folks to arm themselves. Acquire a firearm and become proficient with its use. Democrat violence is going to increase. Don't leave yourself and your family unprotected.