manifold
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
Oh that's just mani throwing out a convoluted summation in an attempt to throw the civil debate off track.![]()
convoluted?
Sorry sis, not the case this time. I've discussed this very topic many many times and several, if not most pro-choicers suddenly have a problem with supporting a woman's choice to abort when the reason is a birth defect. Once even asked about the ethics of aborting a fetus if it could be pre-determined that the child would be homosexual. You should've seen them all lose their shit.
Alright, I'll take your word for it.....this time.
I appreciate it.
The moral argument they typically weave on the subject goes something like this: If a woman doesn't want any child, period, then abortion is ok. But if she intends to get pregnant, and does so, then there should be a no-return policy regardless of the defects.