Bobby Jindals proposed GOP alternative to Obamacare

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Aug 4, 2009
285,105
157,819
2,615
Count Jindal unpersuaded: Repeal and replace Obamacare

In his plan, Jindal calls for:

• Providing $100 billion over 10 years to provide grants to states that take innovative steps on health care, including guaranteeing access to insurance for people with preexisting conditions. The Affordable Care Act bars insurers from discriminating against those with medical problems that often have made getting coverage difficult. Why can't this be done in addition to Obama care? If you want to provide additional money to the states for innovative healthcare.....do it. Nothing in Obamacare prevents this

• Creating a standard individual deduction for health insurance for individuals whether they are covered through their employers or on their own.
Want a standard individual deduction for health insurance? Do it. Nothing in Obamacare prevents this

• Instituting a permanent ban on federal funding of health insurance plans that cover abortions.

Unconstitutional

The plan calls for increased state flexibility on Medicaid, expanded health savings accounts, additional price and quality disclosures by hospitals and other health care providers, and new limits on lawsuits.


Obamacare already provides increased state flexibility on Medicaid. Health savings accounts can be expanded under Obamacare, so can requiring more disclosure. If Republicans want tort reform...pass it


Nothing in this plan makes it necessary to repeal Obamacare
 
Last edited:
I can only hope that there will be much-much-much needed changes to the disaster called Obamacare.
Things that regardless of party affiliate, or political compass can agree on.
Things that ACA did not address whatsoever, in fact makes worse.
 
I can only hope that there will be much-much-much needed changes to the disaster called Obamacare.
Things that regardless of party affiliate, or political compass can agree on.
Things that ACA did not address whatsoever, in fact makes worse.

Undoubtedly one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) faux pas in America's history. A total joke. Of the paltry 7 million that signed up the bulk were poor folks who believed Obama's lie but lost their insurance anyway. It's questionable as to whether the rest have paid their premiums. If they HAD paid their premiums then you can rest assured that the Obama administration would be rubbing that in our collective face. But ... silence prevails.
 
Still looking for a Republican plan to replace Obamacare.

What Jindal proposed is far from a comprehensive plan
 
We don't need anything "comprehensive".

Obamacare has one good idea- no exclusions for pre-existing conditions. Keep that- and toss the rest.

Then make small changes one at at time.

Obamacare is a monument to the fact that Government doesn't do "comprehensive" well.
 
Count Jindal unpersuaded: Repeal and replace Obamacare

In his plan, Jindal calls for:

• Providing $100 billion over 10 years to provide grants to states that take innovative steps on health care, including guaranteeing access to insurance for people with preexisting conditions. The Affordable Care Act bars insurers from discriminating against those with medical problems that often have made getting coverage difficult. Why can't this be done in addition to Obama care? If you want to provide additional money to the states for innovative healthcare.....do it. Nothing in Obamacare prevents this

• Creating a standard individual deduction for health insurance for individuals whether they are covered through their employers or on their own.
Want a standard individual deduction for health insurance? Do it. Nothing in Obamacare prevents this

• Instituting a permanent ban on federal funding of health insurance plans that cover abortions.

Unconstitutional

The plan calls for increased state flexibility on Medicaid, expanded health savings accounts, additional price and quality disclosures by hospitals and other health care providers, and new limits on lawsuits.


Obamacare already provides increased state flexibility on Medicaid. Health savings accounts can be expanded under Obamacare, so can requiring more disclosure. If Republicans want tort reform...pass it


Nothing in this plan makes it necessary to repeal Obamacare

Let's see if I have this right. Jindal 2ants to replace Obamacare with...umm...



Obamacare?
 
We don't need anything "comprehensive".

Obamacare has one good idea- no exclusions for pre-existing conditions. Keep that- and toss the rest.

Then make small changes one at at time.

Obamacare is a monument to the fact that Government doesn't do "comprehensive" well.

How do you fund your no exclusions on pre-existing conditions?
What do you have against Healthcare exchanges to allow small business and individuals to get competitive rates?
 
We don't need anything "comprehensive".

Obamacare has one good idea- no exclusions for pre-existing conditions. Keep that- and toss the rest.

Then make small changes one at at time.

Obamacare is a monument to the fact that Government doesn't do "comprehensive" well.

How do you fund your no exclusions on pre-existing conditions?
What do you have against Healthcare exchanges to allow small business and individuals to get competitive rates?

Government broke the system by entwining employers and healthcare with tax breaks and incentives. Now we have to rely upon them to fix it?

God, you're dumb....
 
ACA is not the best solution by far, but until now our GOP has offered nothing of worth: nothing.

So get off your high horse, Zander, and offer something constructive.
 
Get rid of the 'Death Panels' that Sarah Palin exposed creating that created a White House panic.
 
ACA is not the best solution by far, but until now our GOP has offered nothing of worth: nothing.

So get off your high horse, Zander, and offer something constructive.

When responding to healthcare, Republicans have offered up gimmicks and tax cuts. Truth is, they want nothing to do with healthcare bills except kill it
 
Jindal's proposals could have been incorporated into the ACA at the outset had Republicans wished to participate in reform rather than obstruct.

Republicans could still get Democratic support for many of these proposals.

It is only when they start with......."Repeal Obamacare and then......"
 
Get rid of the 'Death Panels' that Sarah Palin exposed creating that created a White House panic.

All plans have quality of life discussions, private and public.

Only private health care insurance has death panels constituting bean counters as deciders.
 
Government broke the system by entwining employers and healthcare with tax breaks and incentives. Now we have to rely upon them to fix it?

Yes. That is because they only way to fix the government having created the tax breaks and incentives is to have the government remove the tax breaks and incentives.

Duh.
 

Forum List

Back
Top