Boom!!!! Judge in Manafort case says Mueller only wants to hurt Trump

[Hutch Starskey]

Leave Hillary out of this, we are talking about the crooked Trump, crooked Manafort and bias judge. You seem to be short of knowledge. A bias judge hired by Reagan. Voice voted in.

Crooked Hillary is "all in" on the Hamburger Hill Mueller Witch Hunt! No offense, did you graduate high school by any chance? If so, where?

"Crooked Hillary" had not a damned thing to do with the appointment of Mueller, dope.

 

[imawhosure]

They wrote exoneration papers for her before her and other key witnesses even testified.......One business day after her testimony and they cleared her. The Clinton Foundation got over 90 million in laundered money from HSBC.....Bank........and low and behold............guess who used to be on the board there................COMEY........nice job bro..........sit back do nothing and rake in the dough..........quite there to be the top dog at the FBI.............WOOF WOOF..............

This same bank laundered over a 100 million to the drug cartels...........no one went to jail..........Talk about Corruption and LAWLESSNESS...............no justice..............They freaking funded Drug Cartels..............This country is fucked.

Stop believing RW propaganda. Get a fucking brain.

Nope, lotsa research, and what did I say that was a lie. All facts in evidence. You just aren't paying attention. I watch BOTH sides of the news believe it or not.

So, tell us.........what you got on the collusion/delusion? Tell us 1 thing tied to Trump, anything. They have multiples tied to the Hillary campaign. Now you tell everyone how that statement is a lie!

Did or did NOT the Obama officials DENY their was a FISA warrant pertaining to the Trump campaign? Was that a lie or not-) I can go on, and on, but you already know everything I am going to say........for the most part..........and I know everything you can NOT say, lolol!

You poor silly RWNJ. You still look at the situation as a competition between Trump and Hillary. Here's a news flash for you. That election was over a long time ago. This is about the criminal activity of our current orange president. Try to catch up.

Stop believing RW propaganda. Get a fucking brain.

Use google...............and confirm it your dang self...........He was on that board............They were CHARGED with MONEY LAUNDERING to the drug Cartels..................

He quit and became TOP DOG............and they gave money to the Clinton Foundation.......I've shown that evidence on other threads from multiple sources.............

Now hold your nose and blow as hard as you can and maybe you can dislodge your head from your ass.

Mueller isn't up against Amateurs.............This is a knife fight..................and your side is starting to lose.....Why...because the Truth wins the day..........Only evidence of Collusion is your side.......Lying FBI officials LEAKING everything to the press.................

KARMA...........deal with it.

Ummm, I would like to point out a VERY important point-------->

According to the policy of the DOJ and justice department under BOTH party's, a sitting President can NOT be indicted. He can be impeached, but not indicted. This law/rule, has NOT changed. It was spelled out on multiple occasions that to indict, a President must be out of office.

So you might ask, "so Whosure, you are saying that once Trump leaves office, he is in a world of hurt!"

Maybe yes, maybe no. If they go into his business dealings, I suppose anything is possible.............but I wasn't bringing that statement up thinking about Trump. The key word is "sitting!" Soooooooooo, can you think of any non-sitting Presidents who can now be indicted, possibly for civil rights violations, or money laundering into a foundation-)

Would you mind pointing out which law, or written policy says that?

Sure, and it was decided both in 1972 or 73, and by the DOJ during the Clinton impeachment hearings. The SC will uphold the law, no doubt about it!

So how did they get Clinton into court before his impeachment?

His lawyer said, "no way Jose!" But Clinton basically said, "I got this," and against his lawyers advice, got hosed.

Understand, his lawyer was 100% correct----------> the President has no moral obligation, nor credible compunction under the constitution, to discuss his sex life in public. BJ would NOT listen to his lawyers. He lied in the deposition, which was why he was impeached, basically a process crime also.

Still, he could NOT be compelled to testify, basically he volunteered. Maybe Arkansas is much closer to Tennessee then we are aware of, but New York is not, so unless Trump is as dumb as a box of rocks, he will not be a Tennessean and volunteer.

Remember, and this is key------------->Clinton did NOT get impeached for "having sex with that woman," he got impeached on a process crime of lying about "having sex with that woman," along with other small lies on how he handled "other women."

By the way Bulldoggy, are you male, female, or transgender? Why do I ask? Because if you are FEMALE, you are untrustworthy, and at the whims of your wildly swinging hormones-)

Why would I say that?

What have we found out about Kennedy from the women he was involved with? Can't keep their mouths shut, depending upon the cycle, now can they!

What about Bill Clinton? What was up with all that? He was turned in by the skirt patrol, if as you Leftists believe everything was consensual. So if those chicklets are lying and everything was all "we are horny, lets do it," then you females again threw someone under the bus because they made you feel good. Women are VIPERS, wouldn't you agree! And to think, all the women ole BJ was doing, were working for him, so they are DEMOCRATS! So, I guess Democratic women have no control over their hormonal shifts, or is BJ lying-)

And then we have Trump, and a pornstar, lol. Now, I got a DIFFERENT question than most-------------> is THUNDERSTORM a Leftist, or is she a conservative church goer, lololol? Wait, wait, you mean another Leftist/liberal/Democratic/Socialistic woman who actually signs a NDA, has her hormones rage, and all of the sudden she can't control herself or stick with contracts she has made?!?!?!?! You Leftist women are weak, no wonder you shouldn't be in the military, or in business, or most anywhere else unless a man is there to guide you doing your hormonal time! Of course, when you are over 50 or so and dry up like a prune, I suppose it is ok as your hormones calm down-)

How about good ole Harvey Weinstein-) Why Harvey, Bill, and Hilly, were all friends-) I got tons of pics of the internet with them all together. Want me to post them?!?!?!?! All those Lefty actresses, kept their mouthes shut, kinda like the bimbos did with Clinton. Then all of the sudden, BAM, all the leftist womens cycles got in sync, and they blabbed and blubbered.

Good ole Harveys chicks became the "me too" movement. BJs chicks, became bimbo eruptions. Why is that Mz Hypocrite-)

Truth is----->Lefty women can't control themselves. The hormones are to much for them. Just look at them........they put plastic vaginas on their heads, march around, and act idiotic, sleep with men, then claim it is all the mans fault depending upon their hormonal cycle, they demand they can kill little girls in the womb, they insist they want equal rights, but refuse to give up their SPECIAL rights not to have to qualify for a job as a man does.

You Leftist women are PHONY-BALONEYS!

And as far as Sarah-Huckaby-Sanders..........I got a question for you men--------> you are stranded on an island alone with your 7 year old child for 6 months to a year. Who you want to find on the beach--->

1. Sarah Sanders

2. Thunderstormy

3. Bullsh**dog

I take Mz Sanders 11 times out of 10-)

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ellis does not like that the prosecutors have the power to wheel and deal with Manafort.

Manafort was the one who broke the law, Ellis.

 

[eagle1462010]

Ellis does not like that the prosecutors have the power to wheel and deal with Manafort.

Manafort was the one who broke the law, Ellis.

Tried and convicted without a trial again...............

He's already guilty right.................

Oh..........you still forget that the GOD Rosenstein can't convict him without having to go to another branch of gov't to do it............

Silly you.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So much so that they suspend all faculty for rational thought. Watching them try to manage and explain the many contradictions on the Daniels payout has been very entertaining.

A year and half ago this began as what................seems the confusion is on your side.

The question isn't about how this began a year and a half ago, dope.

The question is whether or not the indictment of Manafort was within the scope of the special counsel's investigative authority. The Deputy AG says very clearly that it was indeed.

Motion denied.

Whatever bro.........

You still think they are gods...................if so why do we need the Judicial Branch at all.............There is a reason they have to go to the courts to decide, try and proceed with legal matters...........but it just goes over your head............

What the hell do they teach in schools these days.

You still think they are gods.......

Not at all. That is your damaged perspective.

I simply believe that Rosenstein is doing his job and this motion is a desperate attempt to get the charges dropped. IOW, reality.

The Judge said why aren't those cases in a lower court by normal proceedings...............and wanted to know why they thought they had the authority to bring it to a higher court when some accusations were a decade old..........

So he requested the guidelines..................Will they deny him that ...................or he can simply say take it to a lower court and get the hell out of my courtroom......................Yeah...........he can make that decision...........and then you can appeal............and another judge can over rule or sustain................then appeal.....wash rinse repeat

Rosenstein can set guidelines.....doesn't mean his guidelines are legal...........why the courts are the deciding factor.

They already provided the court with the requested material. That was in an exerpt of a link I provided you, fool.

Of course Rosentsein's guidelines are legal. They're set at his discretion.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ellis does not like that the prosecutors have the power to wheel and deal with Manafort.

Manafort was the one who broke the law, Ellis.

Tried and convicted without a trial again...............He's already guilty right.................Oh..........you still forget that the GOD Rosenstein can't convict him without having to go to another branch of gov't to do it............Silly you.

Manafort can go to trial, eagle; that is his choice.

Why are you upset: that Mueller's boys have the whip hand under the law?

Easy: don't break the law.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's a kick to watch conservative snowflakes act like they know the law.

LOL

The IG gave the goods on McCabe. The Judge basically said what we've been saying all along. Judicial Watch has the other goods that need to be brought into investigation. Not to mention the Full IG report is not out nor the investigation of the FISA warrants from a prosecuter with the DOJ.

Mueller isn't up against amateurs...............And your side just got smacked in the face today whether you like it or not.

McCabe has not a thing to do with this motion, fool.

You can't figure out examples of this investigation being allowed in this precious thread now can you...........

Bottom line.................Judicial Branch is not beholding to the executive branch.........maybe one day you'll understand that.

Beholden? The court has no authority to tell the Deputy AG how to conduct investigations.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And they were all charges he was CLEARED OF over a decade ago.

More Trumpkin fantasy. No, he was never cleared of the charges.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And now parts that were left out in the OP.
========================================
You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” Judge T.S. Ellis III said during a morning hearing. “You really care about getting information Mr. Manafort can give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump and lead to his prosecution or impeachment.”
Manafort was seeking to have the bank and tax fraud charges against him dismissed in federal court in Alexandria, with his lawyers arguing that the alleged crimes have nothing to do with the election or with President Trump.
Ellis agreed, but he made no immediate decision on the defense motion. He said even without such a connection the special counsel, which is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, may well still have the authority to bring the charges
“I’m not saying it’s illegitimate,” Ellis said.
Federal judge in Virginia grills special counsel on Manafort investigation
====================================

and? wasn't the link given?

The OP and the topic title are a classic lie of omission.

It's what pseuedocons like you and the topic starter are very good at.

B.S. even USA today reported it that way

 

[tinydancer]

Would you mind pointing out which law, or written policy says that?

Sure, and it was decided both in 1972 or 73, and by the DOJ during the Clinton impeachment hearings. The SC will uphold the law, no doubt about it!

And in case you don't like that one, try this one-) It would go to the supreme court, but that is ok-)

You posted a video by Lavin. That's just sad.

1. His name is Levin

2. He worked in the DOJ

3. He has given you proof, like it or not that you can research yourself

4. Prominent Liberal Dershowitz concurs, emeritus from Harvard

Typical response............attack the messenger. People like you, really do not get it, or maybe you do, and do not care. I voted for BILL CLINTON the 2nd time, yes I did! You see, a red hat, or blue hat means NOTHING! What means something is our country, and its laws. We didn't get to where we are by ignoring the laws of the land. It protects ALL of us, red hats and blue hats alike. If we don't like the laws, we collectively change them. Not you people, you IGNORE THEM! Totalitarian in essence.

Your side used to be the champions of civil liberties. Now look at you, just look! You only want to protect people who agree with you, and throw out the rules for people who don't!

This all is going to end badly for your side, if for nothing else, it is a moral issue...........equal protection under the law. One whiff of overstepping by the government in this case, is going to bring your whole political world down on your ears, and it appears that there is not only 1, there are several.

Your side has been working 16 months in the public eye, and has little to nothing. Now watch what happens starting on this side after the IG report. A tsunami is coming purposely designed for the midterms, inspired by you totalitarians, to have the biggest impact at the correct time. And you know what your biggest problem is going to be? WE HAVE PROOF, and not innuendo-)

Levin is a whiny idiot who wishes he was as credible as Alex Jones. What about some proof of that law or written policy, or did you forget about that?

A whiny idiot? He was Chief of Staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese for crying out loud and President of the Landmark Legal Foundation. He certainly has more credibility that you or Alex Jones.

 

[Eaglewings]

Leave Hillary out of this, we are talking about the crooked Trump, crooked Manafort and bias judge. You seem to be short of knowledge. A bias judge hired by Reagan. Voice voted in.

Crooked Hillary is "all in" on the Hamburger Hill Mueller Witch Hunt! No offense, did you graduate high school by any chance? If so, where?

"Crooked Hillary" had not a damned thing to do with the appointment of Mueller, dope.

How can they even compare....

 

[Wyatt earp]

Leave Hillary out of this, we are talking about the crooked Trump, crooked Manafort and bias judge. You seem to be short of knowledge. A bias judge hired by Reagan. Voice voted in.

Crooked Hillary is "all in" on the Hamburger Hill Mueller Witch Hunt! No offense, did you graduate high school by any chance? If so, where?

"Crooked Hillary" had not a damned thing to do with the appointment of Mueller, dope.

How can they even compare....

No kidding Trump is way out of Hillary's league when it comes to corruption, she is even better then Al capone .

 

[tinydancer]

Is the FBI enough? Slimeball, lyin' Comey for starters! Esmeralda, did you graduate high school? If so, where. Just curious.

Did the FBI indict her? Moron. You think she owns the FBI and every other law enforcement agency in the US? You're an idiot. Your brain is nothing but mush.

They wrote exoneration papers for her before her and other key witnesses even testified.......One business day after her testimony and they cleared her. The Clinton Foundation got over 90 million in laundered money from HSBC.....Bank........and low and behold............guess who used to be on the board there................COMEY........nice job bro..........sit back do nothing and rake in the dough..........quite there to be the top dog at the FBI.............WOOF WOOF..............

This same bank laundered over a 100 million to the drug cartels...........no one went to jail..........Talk about Corruption and LAWLESSNESS...............no justice..............They freaking funded Drug Cartels..............This country is fucked.

Stop believing RW propaganda. Get a fucking brain.

In the context of Trump, Russia, collusion, it is over, and everyone knows it, except maybe you. Now, if you want to talk about what Manefort did 10 years ago, that is fine. Let it be known though that he was under investigation BEFORE he became Trumps temporary campaign manager, so is kind of out of the scope of the special counsel. Let it also be known that the scope was set AFTER the raid of his home, which is kind of shaky legal ground.

For you Leftists on here who do not follow this whole fiasco closely, you better understand you now need to change your position. Even most media has had to, as pushing the collusion/delusion has gotten their favorite people (the Dimikrauts) into more hot water than Trump. And do you know why the media has switched gears also? Because the collusion/delusion is going to take a very, very, VERY nasty turn when the IG report drops, now that he has a Utah prosecutor on his team to indict.

I know, I know, if you haven't followed closely or weren't paying attention, you are scratching your head or possibly laughing, mumbling something like, "no way Jose," but you better start looking into it before poop smacks you in the face as you weren't aware you might have to duck soon-)

Lets all be honest with what has happened, and everyone can see it------------->

1.The media started this collusion by using leaks.

2. The leaks they reported on looked very bad for Trump.

3. The Republicans even bought into the notion.

4. Then something AMAZING happened! Someone took all the reports (leaks) from the media, put them together, and realized there was something really wrong there. (and you could do it too if you wanted to for yourself with minimal research, you don't have to take my, or their word, you could prove it to yourself)

5. When the "something is really wrong here" was 1st brought out, every Democrat in congress, the FBI, the DOJ, and the media laughed and said, "conspiracy," remember! Funny thing was----------> it was the medias OWN reporting that was used, and the leaks provided to them by the left-) And so, either the media had to RETRACT what they had written, or stand behind their sources and words. They STOOD BEHIND IT.

6. And that is how YOUR side has screwed itself, lol, because the reporting and facts did not jibe. The timeline was impossible without prior knowledge by the leakers, and everything they said has now opened a can of worms for..........in all honesty.......the LAST administration, thus the Democrat hierarchy. Why do you think people are leaving in droves?

7. And let me be the 1st to tell you this-------------> see all those Republicans resigning or not running for reelection? Know why? Cause Trump is guilty, correct, and they have no chance, right! Nope!!!! Because while there is always turnover, some of these are because they know what is coming. The swamp is NOT just made of Democrats you know, and it wasn't only Democrats who wanted Trump out to keep the status quo.

8. Did you see that Baker and Paige resigned from the FBI? Yes, I mean that PAIGE!!!!!! Gee, wonder why now-) Oh, I know what they said in a statement, but, we all know that is baloney-macaroni-and cheese, lol.

Ummmmmmmm, yeah Lefties, you really need to start paying a little more attention!

And how long did it take for the voices in your head to convince you of all that?

Nope, lotsa research, and what did I say that was a lie. All facts in evidence. You just aren't paying attention. I watch BOTH sides of the news believe it or not.

So, tell us.........what you got on the collusion/delusion? Tell us 1 thing tied to Trump, anything. They have multiples tied to the Hillary campaign. Now you tell everyone how that statement is a lie!

Did or did NOT the Obama officials DENY their was a FISA warrant pertaining to the Trump campaign? Was that a lie or not-) I can go on, and on, but you already know everything I am going to say........for the most part..........and I know everything you can NOT say, lolol!

You poor silly RWNJ. You still look at the situation as a competition between Trump and Hillary. Here's a news flash for you. That election was over a long time ago. This is about the criminal activity of our current orange president. Try to catch up.

Did the FBI indict her? Moron. You think she owns the FBI and every other law enforcement agency in the US? You're an idiot. Your brain is nothing but mush.

They wrote exoneration papers for her before her and other key witnesses even testified.......One business day after her testimony and they cleared her. The Clinton Foundation got over 90 million in laundered money from HSBC.....Bank........and low and behold............guess who used to be on the board there................COMEY........nice job bro..........sit back do nothing and rake in the dough..........quite there to be the top dog at the FBI.............WOOF WOOF..............

This same bank laundered over a 100 million to the drug cartels...........no one went to jail..........Talk about Corruption and LAWLESSNESS...............no justice..............They freaking funded Drug Cartels..............This country is fucked.

Stop believing RW propaganda. Get a fucking brain.

Use google...............and confirm it your dang self...........He was on that board............They were CHARGED with MONEY LAUNDERING to the drug Cartels..................

He quit and became TOP DOG............and they gave money to the Clinton Foundation.......I've shown that evidence on other threads from multiple sources.............

Now hold your nose and blow as hard as you can and maybe you can dislodge your head from your ass.

Mueller isn't up against Amateurs.............This is a knife fight..................and your side is starting to lose.....Why...because the Truth wins the day..........Only evidence of Collusion is your side.......Lying FBI officials LEAKING everything to the press.................

KARMA...........deal with it.

Ummm, I would like to point out a VERY important point-------->

According to the policy of the DOJ and justice department under BOTH party's, a sitting President can NOT be indicted. He can be impeached, but not indicted. This law/rule, has NOT changed. It was spelled out on multiple occasions that to indict, a President must be out of office.

So you might ask, "so Whosure, you are saying that once Trump leaves office, he is in a world of hurt!"

Maybe yes, maybe no. If they go into his business dealings, I suppose anything is possible.............but I wasn't bringing that statement up thinking about Trump. The key word is "sitting!" Soooooooooo, can you think of any non-sitting Presidents who can now be indicted, possibly for civil rights violations, or money laundering into a foundation-)

Would you mind pointing out which law, or written policy says that?

Key here is that the President has to be impeached and removed from office before he can be put on trial.

Constitutional scholar opinion: In a 1997 paper titled Presidential Privilege Against Prosecution, Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt and co-author Akhil Reed Amar referred to the presidency as “constitutionally distinct” compared with other elected offices. With such enormous responsibilities, he believes the president’s job cannot be impeded before the president is formally removed from office.

“The president cannot be prosecuted until he has left office, and the impeachment process is the only constitutional way to hasten that day,” Kalt told WikiTribune. “But once he has left office, he is fair game.”

Founding Father opinion: Alexander Hamilton is often cited for his position that a president cannot be indicted while in office. He inferred as much in the Federalist Papers in 1778, a document with no authority, but great legal value.

“The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law,” wrote Hamilton before becoming the nation’s first U.S. Treasury Secretary.'

Can a sitting president be indicted?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, td.

 

[tinydancer]

They wrote exoneration papers for her before her and other key witnesses even testified.......One business day after her testimony and they cleared her. The Clinton Foundation got over 90 million in laundered money from HSBC.....Bank........and low and behold............guess who used to be on the board there................COMEY........nice job bro..........sit back do nothing and rake in the dough..........quite there to be the top dog at the FBI.............WOOF WOOF..............

This same bank laundered over a 100 million to the drug cartels...........no one went to jail..........Talk about Corruption and LAWLESSNESS...............no justice..............They freaking funded Drug Cartels..............This country is fucked.

Stop believing RW propaganda. Get a fucking brain.

Nope, lotsa research, and what did I say that was a lie. All facts in evidence. You just aren't paying attention. I watch BOTH sides of the news believe it or not.

So, tell us.........what you got on the collusion/delusion? Tell us 1 thing tied to Trump, anything. They have multiples tied to the Hillary campaign. Now you tell everyone how that statement is a lie!

Did or did NOT the Obama officials DENY their was a FISA warrant pertaining to the Trump campaign? Was that a lie or not-) I can go on, and on, but you already know everything I am going to say........for the most part..........and I know everything you can NOT say, lolol!

You poor silly RWNJ. You still look at the situation as a competition between Trump and Hillary. Here's a news flash for you. That election was over a long time ago. This is about the criminal activity of our current orange president. Try to catch up.

Stop believing RW propaganda. Get a fucking brain.

Use google...............and confirm it your dang self...........He was on that board............They were CHARGED with MONEY LAUNDERING to the drug Cartels..................

He quit and became TOP DOG............and they gave money to the Clinton Foundation.......I've shown that evidence on other threads from multiple sources.............

Now hold your nose and blow as hard as you can and maybe you can dislodge your head from your ass.

Mueller isn't up against Amateurs.............This is a knife fight..................and your side is starting to lose.....Why...because the Truth wins the day..........Only evidence of Collusion is your side.......Lying FBI officials LEAKING everything to the press.................

KARMA...........deal with it.

Ummm, I would like to point out a VERY important point-------->

According to the policy of the DOJ and justice department under BOTH party's, a sitting President can NOT be indicted. He can be impeached, but not indicted. This law/rule, has NOT changed. It was spelled out on multiple occasions that to indict, a President must be out of office.

So you might ask, "so Whosure, you are saying that once Trump leaves office, he is in a world of hurt!"

Maybe yes, maybe no. If they go into his business dealings, I suppose anything is possible.............but I wasn't bringing that statement up thinking about Trump. The key word is "sitting!" Soooooooooo, can you think of any non-sitting Presidents who can now be indicted, possibly for civil rights violations, or money laundering into a foundation-)

Would you mind pointing out which law, or written policy says that?

Sure, and it was decided both in 1972 or 73, and by the DOJ during the Clinton impeachment hearings. The SC will uphold the law, no doubt about it!

So how did they get Clinton into court before his impeachment?

Here ya go...

Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)[1], was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation, in federal court, against him or her, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office. In particular, there is no temporary immunity, so it is not required to delay all federal cases until the President leaves office.

Clinton v. Jones - Wikipedia

 

[Billy_Bob]

It's a kick to watch conservative snowflakes act like they know the law.

LOL

The IG gave the goods on McCabe. The Judge basically said what we've been saying all along. Judicial Watch has the other goods that need to be brought into investigation. Not to mention the Full IG report is not out nor the investigation of the FISA warrants from a prosecuter with the DOJ.

Mueller isn't up against amateurs...............And your side just got smacked in the face today whether you like it or not.

McCabe has not a thing to do with this motion, fool.

You can't figure out examples of this investigation being allowed in this precious thread now can you...........

Bottom line.................Judicial Branch is not beholding to the executive branch.........maybe one day you'll understand that.

Beholden? The court has no authority to tell the Deputy AG how to conduct investigations.

Good luck in your quest...

Your about to get a lesson in "Scope of Authority"...This Judge is about to throw the whole mess out for gross prosecutorial misconduct.

This Judge figured out they had no authority in Manafort's case to do squat.. that is why he wanted to see all memos on the investigations authorities. If he throws these out as not concurring with the laws regulating the special counsel or find they violated their mandate, the judge could kill the investigations outright as being unlawful.

This could not end well.. and if they refuse to give him access to these documents he could kill them with prejudice as being unlawful.. This is one judge who wont screw around with the crap Mueller is doing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This Judge is about to throw the whole mess out for gross prosecutorial misconduct.

Haha...wow. pure, delusional, Trumpkin fantasy. If anything, this judge is going to get himself removed from this case with his comments.

 

[tinydancer]

Ellis does not like that the prosecutors have the power to wheel and deal with Manafort.

Manafort was the one who broke the law, Ellis.

Innocent until proven guilty Jake. Thank heavens Manafort has a Judge who can see thru the Stasi like tactics of Mueller.

 

[tinydancer]

This Judge is about to throw the whole mess out for gross prosecutorial misconduct.

Haha...wow. pure, delusional, Trumpkin fantasy. If anything, this judge is going to get himself removed from this case with his comments.

In your dreams.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This Judge is about to throw the whole mess out for gross prosecutorial misconduct.

Haha...wow. pure, delusional, Trumpkin fantasy. If anything, this judge is going to get himself removed from this case with his comments.

In your dreams.

That doesn't make any sense. I don't care if the judge is removed or not. Of the two of us, you are the only one letting your personal fetishes cloud your judgment.