Boycott Israel

Figures. The European Zionists behaved badly starting in 1920. Hard to imagine considering how they were treated in Europe and Russia.
Not the place to discuss this. But you do never come and visit the appropriate thread for it.

Do not read because you do not want to have your education from childhood look like the piece of crap it is.

And it is not only for you, but it is for all the people who wish to believe those lies, because their minds work that way.

Some have managed to go against that non historical education.
 
The Arabs and Muslims invade, conquer, colonize, and occupy in an act of aggression but it is actually called an act of being indigenous of the places they invaded and conquered.

Precious.
Nope. The Arabs have been in Palestine since Abraham.
 
Not the place to discuss this. But you do never come and visit the appropriate thread for it.

Do not read because you do not want to have your education from childhood look like the piece of crap it is.

And it is not only for you, but it is for all the people who wish to believe those lies, because their minds work that way.

Some have managed to go against that non historical education.
There's more to history than Jewish history.
 
Are you talking about the Akkadians and Amorites?
You were attempting to prove that the Arabs were in Canaan 10,000 years ago.

Remember the thread I started for it?

The one where you could not find proof of it if your life depended on it?


Isn't it a sin to lie during Easter?

It should be.
 
Indeed, it is hard to argue facts on the ground.

Remember, conquest, colonization, and occupation are acts of aggression. You can't do that and claim the right to defend yourself.
Indeed. Remember, conquest, colonization, and occupation are acts that define islamist history.

You never studied your islam'ology so wouldn't know that.
 
Indeed. Remember, conquest, colonization, and occupation are acts that define islamist history.

You never studied your islam'ology so wouldn't know that.

Early Muslim conquests.

71FD6BAC-BB68-4A46-8B15-70E21A8F872A.png


Expansion from 622–750, with modern borders overlaid.
 
RE: Boycot Israel
SUBTOPIC: Another Misinterpretation of the Law
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Indeed, it is hard to argue facts on the ground.

Remember, conquest, colonization, and occupation are acts of aggression. You can't do that and claim the right to defend yourself.
(COMMENT)

This little bit of logic is simply untrue.

The Arab Palestine BREAK THE LAW each time they commit an offense solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (the Israelis).​
The Arab Palestine BREAK THE LAW each time they commit an offense solely intended to seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them.​

The elements of self-defense are very specific. The Right of Self-Defense has a very short time of validity.

The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) cannot attack the Israelis in self-defense for something the Arab Palestinians claim happened last month, or last year, or in 1967 or 1948. Self-Defense is the right to protect the people from immediate threats of harm.

1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Boycot Israel
SUBTOPIC: Another Misinterpretation of the Law
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(COMMENT)

This little bit of logic is simply untrue.

The Arab Palestine BREAK THE LAW each time they commit an offense solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (the Israelis).​
The Arab Palestine BREAK THE LAW each time they commit an offense solely intended to seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them.​

The elements of self-defense are very specific. The Right of Self-Defense has a very short time of validity.

The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) cannot attack the Israelis in self-defense for something the Arab Palestinians claim happened last month, or last year, or in 1967 or 1948. Self-Defense is the right to protect the people from immediate threats of harm.

1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Self-Defense is the right to protect the people from immediate threats of harm.
Indeed, from the ongoing Nakba.

 
At a time when more and more journalists have decided to eschew objectivity and truth in favor of partisan advocacy, the Guardian’s naked promotion of the Palestinian cause is an example of how low media organisations can go absent the ethical guardrails that have long governed the profession.

The outlet doesn’t merely uncritically amplify the Palestinian narrative at every opportunity, but often – by blurring cause and effect and omitting elements of the story that would paint Palestinians in a negative light whilst highlighting information, usually divorced of context, imputing Israeli malevolence – routinely publishes articles libeling Jewish state.

 

Forum List

Back
Top