- Thread starter
- #101
Poor the dainty. Narcissistic to a fault. But also delusional.
Refuting you, the dainty, has not a thing to do with any derangement syndrome over you.
Learn to consider and accept criticism of your sloppy thinking.
Now, despite your ongoing effort to make yourself the thread topic, I will endeavor to return this thing to the topic.
The Bragg case is an insidious effort to criminalize things which simply aren’t criminal. And it’s done purposefully for nothing more than partisan political reasons.
I know the dainty won’t actually consider or address the point. But it is still true that nothing about the persecutor’s legal “theory of the case” makes sense.
But one of the major problems he has created is this: let’s pretend that any business record was falsified. That’s a misdemeanor. To make it a felony, the persecution has to maintain (and does) that the commission of that misdemeanor was for the purpose of committing some “other” crime (or to conceal such other crime).
However, Persecutor Bragg merely chummed the waters at that point. He offered (largely off the record) a few hypotheticals about the “other” crime or crimes. Therefore, assuming some of the jurors agree that Trump’s “intent” was to commit Federal election fraud but other jurors instead speculate that Trump’s “intent” was to commit a state election law crime and yet others conclude that he had no intent to commit a crime but, instead, only wanted to conceal his purpose.
You could (under those circumstances) wind up with a non unanimous verdict. However, a unanimous verdict is a legal requirement.
Many of the TDS vermin don’t care. Whatever happens someday down the road on an appeal is of very little to no concern for them. Their agenda is much more immediate. A conviction — even one that comes despite the facts and the actual law — is all they care about. Why? Because it’s not about seeking justice. It’s all about partisan political persecution.
Wow! What a screed. DDS on steroids.
Did Dante ever occupy your mind.