basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,042
- 2,220
- Banned
- #381
"a nation cannot survive treason from within" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So we can't believe the polls about the election but can on Obama's approval rating?Pretty dam good legacy leaving with a 60% approvalAnd you black messiah is busy golfing trying not to think about his legacy.Your orange messiah is probably stamping his feet right now while tweeting like a 13 year-old girl.9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com
I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...
OMG, really? The most liberal, most overturned court in the country ruled for the left? Stunning, simply stunning ...
This EO does all that?. It's not just terrorism from abroad, but they will be working to stop citizens from being terrorized in Chicago or anywhere else that has been out of control in this country. Stay Tuned.Read the damn law.
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
Whenever the President finds
What did he find that the last president missed?
What precipitated this action to warrant it's implementation at this time? What is the purpose of and desired outcome that will mitigate ongoing concerns with terrorism in the next ninety days?
We have the Senate, remember?You mean the guy who called out Trump for "demoralizing" Justices?We need to get Gorsuch in the SCOTUS right away!
The democrats should give Gorsuch all the consideration the republicans gave Garland.
Mohammed Reza Taheri-aza intentionally rammed into people on the UNC Chapel Hill campus. Nine people were injured, none seriously. Taheri-aza was reportedly an Iranian-born U.S. citizen.List them
. That's who Martial is...You never answered how the president is granted authority to suspend habeas corpus unilaterally from Article 1 of the Constitution which grants powers to the Congress and not the executive.Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.
"Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation"
What you said, I just pointed this out myself before in this thread and I cited the exact part of the US Constitution where President Trump can put America under Martial Law.
Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
Also Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution states:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Martial law on the national level may be declared by Congress or the president.
Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel Invasions."
Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution it declares that "the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States."
Neither constitutional provision includes a direct reference to martial law. However, the Supreme Court has interpreted both to allow the declaration of martial law by the president or Congress.
When illegals come into the country, security has been breeched. When they kill and rape American citizens, security has been breeched. Don't you agree?When did our security get breeched? What damage was done. The list will be fluid, so why should we be focused on your tactic to use the list in the ways that you are ? The nations security has been breeched, and a continuation to fix that problem will keep going until solved once and for all.Have we been attacked here in the US by people from these countries?. All one has to do is bring up case after case of Americans being attacked here by these specific people right ?Please show where national security is irreparably harmed by removing this order.These judges have transferred national security authority from the executive branch to the judicial branch.
Tyranny
Make your case.
. The left is willing for Americans safety to be threatened, compromised, and even them being killed to get at Trump.Mohammed Reza Taheri-aza intentionally rammed into people on the UNC Chapel Hill campus. Nine people were injured, none seriously. Taheri-aza was reportedly an Iranian-born U.S. citizen.List them
There is one I will find more but one is too many. My question to you is why would you want to increase the odds? Why are you against a pause to examine the immigration process? What is wrong with you?
Muslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.
It's worse than that. Democrats in office and within the rank and file have figured out that the offspring of immigrants often vote democrat. It's for future votes. They are willing to win elections with the dregs of society over the safety of American citizens.The left is willing for Americans safety to be threatened, compromised, and even them being killed to get at Trump.
Its the muzzies who are the true victims here....lolMuslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.
SHUT THE FUCK UP
THE GODDAMNED WARMONGERS HAVE BOMBED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE COUNTRIES
WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS
LET JUSTICE BE DONE.
.
Muslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.
SHUT THE FUCK UP
THE GODDAMNED WARMONGERS HAVE BOMBED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE COUNTRIES
WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS
LET JUSTICE BE DONE.
.
.
Muslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.
SHUT THE FUCK UP
THE GODDAMNED WARMONGERS HAVE BOMBED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE COUNTRIES
WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS
LET JUSTICE BE DONE.
.
.
With Ginsberg and Sotomayor? Nah.We need to get Gorsuch in the SCOTUS right away!
I believe we'll win 8-0 with the Supreme Court as it sits now and the 9th Circuit is due to get broken apart.
Where did you earn your JD?9th Circuit? It will go against Trump
What a shocker. They ruled against Trump.
Another court ruling on the politics and not the letter of the law.