Breaking: 9th Circuit Issues Ruling Not To Protect America's Sovereignty

[beagle9]

Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.

Where in the Constitution does it give the president authority to ban anyone from entering the country? Not Article 2 where the president's powers are listed. Also, who's Marshall, and what on Earth is "unexceptable?"

The Constitution DOES NOT - STATES RETAINED THE RIGHT TO CONTROL IMMIGRATION


the 1798 federal immigration law was challenged by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson - the law was allowed to expire in 1800.

We had NO IMMIGRATION Law for 89 years - until congress decided that the Chinese insistence to work in the California Gold Mines constituted an EMERGENCY. A racist SCOTUS agreed.


..

OK but isn't this a unique situation where federal over rides the states due to national security issues ? I mean we are constantly under threat now, and when our very lives are at risk who is to make the judgement calls other than the President for whom the people had invested their power unto him in order to keep this nation as a whole safe ?

Constant threat? The court certainly didn't agree and the SCOTUS probably will not either. They were swayed by the simple fact that travelers from the seven countries included already face heavy scrutiny. There have been no fatal attacks on U.S. soil by people from the seven countries since 9/11. Had Trump selected countries like Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Lebanon, or Pakistan, he would have had a better chance.

. He probably watered down the list in order to appease the left, but that was a mistake it seems.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Update:

www.breitbart.com/video/2017/02/09/dershowitz-9th-circuit-ruling-not-a-solid-decision-looks-like-its-based-more-on-policy-than-on-constitutionality/

 

[BoSoxGal]

They expose themselves as mere Progressives, not judges. The president's constitutional authority in this matter could not be more clear.

Where did you earn your JD? Please share your legal analysis.

 

[kaz]

While 9th Circuit plays activist, a 13-year-old American girl was raped by a Muslim refugee from...Sudan

Wouldn't it be nice if Muslim extremists raped the 9th?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Anybody know how that 9th circuit court ruled on obama's drone killings of Americans and and others without judge, jury, or trial? It would have been a stretch for obama to say he was doing it to protect Americans, but I believe Trump's action would. Look at the record muslims have of doing terror in countries they've emigrated to. Common sense folks.

So it is a Muslim ban then?

 

[beagle9]

His EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.

The point is,Trump lost

Till the next terrorist attack. Then Trump gets off Scott free. And the blame, and responsibility falls right into the liberals, and democrats laps; sealing thier fate.

Uuuuuunfortunately the terrorists who did 9/11 were all from countries not on the list, and killed 2800 Americans. Pakistan, which harbored its mastermind, is also not on the list.

Meanwhile (again) the total death by terrorism from the countries that ARE on the list continues to be Zero.

Tell us all about "Scott free" [sic]. Who enslaved Scott?

. Matters not if the terrorist weren't from the places on the list, but that the locations on the list could prove to be dangerous for us at the time these list are created. I'm sure that the list will change as circumstances change in the world. Right now these are the locations of concern.

Why are Iranian citizens a concern. They are amongst the most pro USA people on earth

. Not Iranian citizens, but possibly Iranian operatives right ? In any country there are people who love us and hate us, but we must always be aware of those who want to hurt us, and lately it has been these Muslims or Islamist or Arabs or whatever they relate to or call themselves.

 

[beagle9]

Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.

Where in the Constitution does it give the president authority to ban anyone from entering the country? Not Article 2 where the president's powers are listed. Also, who's Marshall, and what on Earth is "unexceptable?"

. Just following along, so maybe I am confused as to where they said Trump gets the power to do what he has done or wants to do. Wasn't it the Constitution?? Am I spelling Marshal law wrong ? Isn't that what is implemented when the countries security is threatened from within ??

The president wrote an executive order, but that doesn't mean he had the authority from the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant the president the power to ban anyone from entering the country. You're thinking martial law.

. Wow, listening to the arguments he has the authority, but this political leftist court says no ?? Looking at their rulings over the years, it is amazing that anyone takes this court seriously.

At what point did you become a constitutional expert?

. Just learning from y'all... How am I doing ? Becareful how you answer... LOL

 

[Contumacious]

Muslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

THE GODDAMNED WARMONGERS HAVE BOMBED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE COUNTRIES

WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

LET JUSTICE BE DONE.


.


.

i'll let the Syrian president speak then...

Syrian President Says Some Syrian Refugees Are “Definitely” Terrorists!

Assad includes as terrorists : ISIS, and AQ,

But those entities are allies of these United States of America

.

 

[BoSoxGal]

20 pages of mostly folks who don't understand basic civics and are whiny snowflakes.

 

[Contumacious]

Muslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

THE GODDAMNED WARMONGERS HAVE BOMBED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE COUNTRIES

WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

LET JUSTICE BE DONE.



.

Its the muzzies who are the true victims here....lol

Yes, they are

1.5 Million thrown under the bus by Harry S Truman in 1949.


.

 

[Dragonlady]

Americans are being driven insane by Trump's fear mongering. He is making the United States are larger target by confirming every Jihadists wet dreams. Americans hate Muslims and are at war with Islam. Trump's travel ban is proof positive. Al Qaeda is now opening taunting Trump. None of this will end well.

At home, he's stoking the alt-right to start attacking immigrants and refugees. And undermining the media and the Courts with his attacks.

Donald J. Trump is the world's most dangerous man. Just not in the way his ardent supporters think.

 

[Avatar4321]

Still haven't seen a real argument why the ban should be stayed. Or how the president doesn't clearly have the authority to Implement it.

 

[Boss]

So it is a Muslim ban then?

Nope. It's not Muslim. It's not a ban.

 

[Contumacious]

Muslims have one HUGE thing in their favor with the Left. The Left HATES Christianity -- & Islam is anti-Christian.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

THE GODDAMNED WARMONGERS HAVE BOMBED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE COUNTRIES

WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

LET JUSTICE BE DONE.


.


.

I'm not an immigrant.

I understand that you were hatched

.

 

[Flopper]

how, can you list them?

Sure...his intention was to pause to make sure we know who is coming in not a ban, so now he will just slow immigration down to a snails pace until he gets the ruling he wants at the SCOTUS.

That may have been his intent but the reality was many people who worked in the US for years, had families, and businesses were stranded in these countries. The EO was a knee jerk reaction that left immigration people in airports uninformed and untrained. There were young people on student visas that were being denied entry. Just as bad, were millions of people all of over the world wondering if there US visa was worth the paper it was printed on. People with work permits in the US were afraid to leave the country and still are.

Trust in the US is destroyed by this and other such actions. When a person spends hundreds of dollars, make plans, and waits months to get a US Visa, accepts a job, or enrolls in school they expect the United States to honor that Visa. Just like breaking trade agreements it brings into question can the US be trusted.

 

[Dim Bulb]

Still haven't seen a real argument why the ban should be stayed. Or how the president doesn't clearly have the authority to Implement it.

The POTUS does indeed have authority to issue an executive order that is neither constitutionally vague nor in effect discriminates against one religion. They could've easily done that. They could STILL easily issue an order that is sound constitutionally. As you suggest, it would be easy. But their incompetent drafting and incompetent defense screwed us all. And we are spending our time arguing about judges. You give judges a pile of monkey dirt to evaluate, then don't be surprised when the judges say, "Hey. That's monkey dirt!" It ain't their fault.

 

[Coyote]

Update! One of the judges is a Jewess.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/judges-blocked-trump-appointed-barack-obama-jimmy-carter/

So? Does that scare you?

 

[jasonnfree]

Anybody know how that 9th circuit court ruled on obama's drone killings of Americans and and others without judge, jury, or trial? It would have been a stretch for obama to say he was doing it to protect Americans, but I believe Trump's action would. Look at the record muslims have of doing terror in countries they've emigrated to. Common sense folks.

So it is a Muslim ban then?

You're too tied up in what's in a name. I'm talking about security of American citizens and don't really care if it's tacky and politically incorrect to stop possible terrorists coming here.

 

[Flopper]

Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.

Where in the Constitution does it give the president authority to ban anyone from entering the country? Not Article 2 where the president's powers are listed. Also, who's Marshall, and what on Earth is "unexceptable?"

The Constitution DOES NOT - STATES RETAINED THE RIGHT TO CONTROL IMMIGRATION


the 1798 federal immigration law was challenged by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson - the law was allowed to expire in 1800.

We had NO IMMIGRATION Law for 89 years - until congress decided that the Chinese insistence to work in the California Gold Mines constituted an EMERGENCY. A racist SCOTUS agreed.


..

OK but isn't this a unique situation where federal over rides the states due to national security issues ? I mean we are constantly under threat now, and when our very lives are at risk who is to make the judgement calls other than the President for whom the people had invested their power unto him in order to keep this nation as a whole safe ?

Constant threat? The court certainly didn't agree and the SCOTUS probably will not either. They were swayed by the simple fact that travelers from the seven countries included already face heavy scrutiny. There have been no fatal attacks on U.S. soil by people from the seven countries since 9/11. Had Trump selected countries like Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Lebanon, or Pakistan, he would have had a better chance.

. He probably watered down the list in order to appease the left, but that was a mistake it seems.

Or to avoid countries where he had business interest.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Update! One of the judges is a Jewess.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/judges-blocked-trump-appointed-barack-obama-jimmy-carter/

So? Does that scare you?

Jews are a danger to society in general.