Breaking: ABC news insider leaks hot mic video to project veritaas major Jeffery E. investigation...

[Billiejeens]

This is why media must be shut down as a national security act
They do not report occurrent fact events
They do speculate about what might have happened or they think should have happened and present that as fact when it is not
In this case they actually suppressed and thwarted the release of fact information that did not fit their liberal palate.
They are a danger to America and no longer a resource of America

Once AGAIN --- I think this is the fourth time now --- commercial media is not there to "report occurent fact events", whatever that means. They're there to make money. Period. That's what capitalist enterprises DO. Their MO is to keep you staring blankly at the screen long enough to sell you shit you don't need, and to do that they'll run or not run whatever keeps you staring there.

What don't you idiots GET about that?

That it's not true?

You're actually shitting sitting on this board claiming that commercials don't exist?

You're even stupider than I thought. What in the wide world of fuck do you think Arbitron and Nielsen ratings books are for? Making origami?

I'm not claiming that.

 

[Billiejeens]

How come its always the "liberal" journalists breaking these stories about Epstein and others?? Why didn't Breitbart or Infowars break this story?? Instead of making up shit about a Pizza parlor

The Propagandists didn't break it, they spiked it.
Pay attention.

You do understand that "JOURNALISTS" took their reporting to their editors and their editors spiked it because their editors are CORPORATE OWNED right??

But that doesn't change the fact that this journalist is the MAIN REASON Epstein went to prison....and this journalist is not a conservative....
View attachment 288487

And the only reason Judy Brown's face isn't a household name among conservatives is because they don't give a fuck about the victims of Epstein, they just care about if they can use him to attack Democrats....which makes you full of shit....

Not because they are corporate owned
Because they are proven progressive activists.

 

[Pogo]

How come its always the "liberal" journalists breaking these stories about Epstein and others?? Why didn't Breitbart or Infowars break this story?? Instead of making up shit about a Pizza parlor

The Propagandists didn't break it, they spiked it.
Pay attention.

You do understand that "JOURNALISTS" took their reporting to their editors and their editors spiked it because their editors are CORPORATE OWNED right??

But that doesn't change the fact that this journalist is the MAIN REASON Epstein went to prison....and this journalist is not a conservative....
View attachment 288487

And the only reason Judy Brown's face isn't a household name among conservatives is because they don't give a fuck about the victims of Epstein, they just care about if they can use him to attack Democrats....which makes you full of shit....

Not because they are corporate owned
Because they are proven progressive activists.

So yes you are claiming that, in your ignorance, because I can tell you right here and now, NOBODY makes a damn dime from "activism", whether "Progressive" or anything else. They make their money from selling you shit you don't need like dick drugs, stupid phones and pickemup trucks big enough to tow a meteorite. And to sell you that shit they will present whatever pap keeps you planted there until the sponsor gets the floor.

THAT is how it works, and that's what ratings are for.

And that leads us directly back to the network pushback of "nobody knows who he (Epstein) is". That means the network has to first EXPLAIN who he is, and that costs viewership, and ratings go down, and they can't charge as much for commercials, as they can when the feature the latest missing white girl or naked people stranded on an island forced to eat bugs.

Your ridiculous paranoia fantasies of "they're all out to get me" are ironically true --- they ARE out to get your money. They don't give a flying shit about what's left of your mind.

This is why we call them commercial broadcasters. The whole idea of doing it -- at all -- is to milk money from the audience.

 

[Billiejeens]

How come its always the "liberal" journalists breaking these stories about Epstein and others?? Why didn't Breitbart or Infowars break this story?? Instead of making up shit about a Pizza parlor

The Propagandists didn't break it, they spiked it.
Pay attention.

You do understand that "JOURNALISTS" took their reporting to their editors and their editors spiked it because their editors are CORPORATE OWNED right??

But that doesn't change the fact that this journalist is the MAIN REASON Epstein went to prison....and this journalist is not a conservative....
View attachment 288487

And the only reason Judy Brown's face isn't a household name among conservatives is because they don't give a fuck about the victims of Epstein, they just care about if they can use him to attack Democrats....which makes you full of shit....

Not because they are corporate owned
Because they are proven progressive activists.

So yes you are claiming that, in your ignorance, because I can tell you right here and now, NOBODY makes a damn dime from "activism", whether "Progressive" or anything else. They make their money from selling you shit you don't need like dick drugs, stupid phones and pickemup trucks big enough to tow a meteorite. And to sell you that shit they will present whatever pap keeps you planted there until the sponsor gets the floor.

THAT is how it works, and that's what ratings are for.

And that leads us directly back to the network pushback of "nobody knows who he (Epstein) is". That means the network has to first EXPLAIN who he is, and that costs viewership, and ratings go down, and they can't charge as much for commercials, as they can when the feature the latest missing white girl or naked people stranded on an island forced to eat bugs.

Your ridiculous paranoia fantasies of "they're all out to get me" are ironically true --- they ARE out to get your money. They don't give a flying shit about what's left of your mind.

TSDR

If ratings were the goal -
News networks would all adopt the FoxNews Playbook.
They would rather be activists than have ratings.
All you need to do is look.
Other than airports - no one is watching CNN
No one is watching MSNBC

 

[Pogo]

How come its always the "liberal" journalists breaking these stories about Epstein and others?? Why didn't Breitbart or Infowars break this story?? Instead of making up shit about a Pizza parlor

The Propagandists didn't break it, they spiked it.
Pay attention.

You do understand that "JOURNALISTS" took their reporting to their editors and their editors spiked it because their editors are CORPORATE OWNED right??

But that doesn't change the fact that this journalist is the MAIN REASON Epstein went to prison....and this journalist is not a conservative....
View attachment 288487

And the only reason Judy Brown's face isn't a household name among conservatives is because they don't give a fuck about the victims of Epstein, they just care about if they can use him to attack Democrats....which makes you full of shit....

Not because they are corporate owned
Because they are proven progressive activists.

So yes you are claiming that, in your ignorance, because I can tell you right here and now, NOBODY makes a damn dime from "activism", whether "Progressive" or anything else. They make their money from selling you shit you don't need like dick drugs, stupid phones and pickemup trucks big enough to tow a meteorite. And to sell you that shit they will present whatever pap keeps you planted there until the sponsor gets the floor.

THAT is how it works, and that's what ratings are for.

And that leads us directly back to the network pushback of "nobody knows who he (Epstein) is". That means the network has to first EXPLAIN who he is, and that costs viewership, and ratings go down, and they can't charge as much for commercials, as they can when the feature the latest missing white girl or naked people stranded on an island forced to eat bugs.

Your ridiculous paranoia fantasies of "they're all out to get me" are ironically true --- they ARE out to get your money. They don't give a flying shit about what's left of your mind.

TSDR

If ratings were the goal -
News networks would all adopt the FoxNews Playbook.
They would rather be activists than have ratings.
All you need to do is look.
Other than airports - no one is watching CNN
No one is watching MSNBC

No idea what "TSDR" is supposed to mean but yes, so-called "news" networks HAVE adopted the Fox Noise model. That's a perfect illustration. Before Roger What-Ailes-Ya bubbled up Fox Noise, CNN was holding the position of news source with its idea of 24 hour coverage so we didn't have to wait for the 6pm network news.

But doing news -- REAL news -- is expensive. You need to hire reporters, fly them around with production crews, trucks, satellite phones, you need to open and maintain foreign bureaus, all that shit. That's why the old traditional Huntley-Brinkley-Cronkite network news shows were all subsidized by the mindless Gilligan's Islands and Beverly Hillbillies, because that's where the money was. The newscasts were loss leaders. Just there for PR so that a given station, come license renewal time, could tell the FCC, "See? We're serving the public interest as the license requires, look at all these news shows".

And of course being on cable, the Foxes and CNNs don't need broadcast licenses anyway so they're relieved of the mandate to operate "in the public interest, convenience and necessity" as licensees are.

Rupert Murdoch, who made his fortune selling sleazy tabloid rags, bubbled up the idea of, instead of spending all that money on actual news, plopping some talking heads down in a studio to talk ABOUT the news, rather than actually report it. MUCH cheaper. He came up with a gossip channel which, instead of gossiping about celebrities, gossips about politicians. It's always about people, not policy. That's a direct Appeal to Emotion.

Roger Ailes candidly put it this way: "If two guys are on a stage and one guy says 'I know how to bring peace to the Middle East' and the other guy falls into the orchestra pit, which one do you think is going to be on the evening news?"

That's why all those garish Romper Room colors festoon the set. That's why the women are all facing the camera in short skirts. That's why all those suggestive chyrons are dancing across the screen. That's why the talking heads are pounding their fists on the desk and speaking in three octaves. All that shit SELLS. Emotion sells. Sex sells. Suggestive shit plants seeds and the colors keep you awake. And then ---- BAM, buy this dick drug. That's the game, Gumball. It's all manipulative psychology. Commentary --- which is where Fox Noise makes all its money --- is cheap, because as the old maxim says, TALK IS CHEAP.

And that's why ratings exist.

CNN, to its discredit, saw what Fox Noise was doing and adopted some of the same shit. MSNBC came along and switched from its far-right position that Fox already had, to the other side to milk a different audience. ALL of them are in it for the goal of maximizing viewership, simply because the more hypnotized drones you have, the more you can charge the advertiser for time. Ratings measure attention. If my network can deliver more eyeballs than yours, then I can charge more for a commercial. Simple as that. How I get those eyeballs could be bimbos in short skirts in a garishly colored studio with suggestive chyrons running amok, it could be naked people on an island forced to eat bugs, it could be here's the results of the paternity tests, it could be dancing with the who-cares. Doesn't matter, they're all there for the same goal.

THAT, Virginia, is how they work and what they work for. Not fucking "activisim", which makes ZERO money.

 

[MindWars]

In case you missed it, a video came out this week that makes it look like ABC News affirmatively protected billionaire alleged pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. This came on top of allegations from journalist Ronan Farrow that NBC News killed his reporting on alleged rapist Harvey Weinstein to protect their own in-house sexual abuser, morning anchor Matt Lauer. In case anyone’s still wondering why people don’t trust the press, this is a pretty good place to start.
Tucker Carlson And Neil Patel: Child Rape Stories Are Too ‘Stupid’ For ABC News To Cover



Oh imagine that and just thinnk this site does the same thing and oh imagine the proof when you can go right over there annd see how NNOT ME BUT THEM placed it right in conspiracy go find them probably 15 pages back or more but oh those " CHILD SEX SLAVES" . are such a conspiracy nobody wannts to face the truth it's too hard and scary esp. when you let PLANNED PARENTHOOD SEXUALIZE THE SHIT OUT OF YOUR KIDS YOU STUPID MOTHER FKRS!!

 

[william the wie]

yeah, the coastal elites are into pedophilia

 

[MindWars]

Editors Note: Project Veritas is publishing the writing below at the request of the ABC news insider who gave us the Amy Robach tape.


This was submitted to us in light of the actions taken against those wrongfully identified as involved in the leaking of the tape and the reactions of ABC news to their spiking of the story on Jeffrey Epstein.

ABC Insider: Why I, alone, released the Amy Robach Epstein tape.
-------------------------------

Oh imagine that .....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That's a Whistle blower!

 

[Blackrook]

NBC, ABC And CBS Appear To Have Run Cover For World’s Most Powerful Rape Rings

It's time for the rich and powerful to have a final reckoning.

Epstein did not kill himself.

He was murdered by a cabal of rich and powerful men who engaged in pedophilia and rape of young girls.

The Democrats and liberals on this forum need to stop covering for these people.

 

[candycorn]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

 

[Blackrook]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

No one believes Epstein killed himself including you.

So you are deliberately covering up for pedophiles.

What does that say about you, candycorn?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

No one believes Epstein killed himself including you.

So you are deliberately covering up for pedophiles.

What does that say about you, candycorn?

It’s a pedophile. Candycornhole.

 

[Theowl32]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

C word

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

yep that's why the clintons had people pay him a visit on the last night he was breathing on earth.

 

[candycorn]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

yep that's why the clintons had people pay him a visit on the last night he was breathing on earth.

zero.

describes both your evidence and IQ

 

[candycorn]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

C word

you got a problem Short Stack?

 

[liarintheWH]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

C word

Call her an ‘ankle’.

That’s three foot lower.

 

[Oddball]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

Didn't get the memo about the brown acid, didja?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Trump’s pedo buddy committed suicide

No one believes Epstein killed himself including you.

So you are deliberately covering up for pedophiles.

What does that say about you, candycorn?

And covering for Bill Clinton, which is really what this is all about