Breaking: Biden Fails To Comply With House Oversight Committee Investigation Into Top-Secret Docs After Promising "Highest Standards In Transparency"

[struth]

Still waiting on that proof. You said you could, but haven’t provided any.

ignoring reality doesn’t change it

 

[Marener]

ignoring reality doesn’t change it

Reality is that you haven’t provided any proof.

 

[Independent thinker]

And the National Archive's are not complying either with the investigation. What does this tell you?

Biden Fails to Comply with Classified Doc Probe After Vowing 'Transparency'

The Biden administration has failed to comply with the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Joe Biden's mishandling of documents.

www.breitbart.com

Apparently the left are OK with Biden being above the law.

 

[struth]

Reality is that you haven’t provided any proof.

the proof has repeatedly been provided. you ignore it, in a desperate attempt to defend traitor joe

 

[Marener]

the proof has repeatedly been provided

You haven’t provided anything.

You said you could. You didn’t.

 

[candycorn]

What part about you can't indict a sitting president do you not understand?

Yep, sitting presidents are untouchable according to the Trump DOJ.

Yet another way the right wingers who supported the Blob are now regretting it.

 

[struth]

You haven’t provided anything.

You said you could. You didn’t.

ignoring facts won’t change them. Hur doesn’t ignore facts…and you dembots are in a world of Hur right now

 

[Marener]

ignoring facts won’t change them

It is not a fact if you can’t prove it.

So prove it.

 

[struth]

It is not a fact if you can’t prove it.

So prove it.

i have already…ignoring it won’t change that

 

[Marener]

i have already

That’s not proof. That’s just another claim.

Let’s see the proof.

 

[ABikerSailor]

i have already…ignoring it won’t change that

If you had already "proved" it in this thread, then you should have no problem telling us all what post number your "proof" is in. I know that when I've linked to something I've shown as proof, I absolutely have zero problem listing the link number (and sometimes reposting the link).

 

[struth]

That’s not proof. That’s just another claim.

Let’s see the proof.

you are merely a troll that ignores reality

Hur won’t ignore reality…you are entering a world of Hur

 

[jknowgood]

Actually, absolutely nothing was OK'd by anyone but the orange clown and your lying pundits of fox and your Internet conspiracy nuts, everything you know is garbage propaganda and incorrect or spun out of all resemblance to reality. You are a brainwashed functional moron. Try some news channels or BBC or France 24 or any respected journalists around the world who will tell you you're nuts. lol

You really think if Trump did illegally take classified documents, he wouldn't be in jail? The thing is, is somehow the twist it and Trump goes. Then Biden will have to go? You ready to sacrifice Biden?

 

[struth]

If you had already "proved" it in this thread, then you should have no problem telling us all what post number your "proof" is in. I know that when I've linked to something I've shown as proof, I absolutely have zero problem listing the link number (and sometimes reposting the link).

another dembot cultist that ignores reality

 

[ABikerSailor]

another dembot cultist that ignores reality

You claimed you proved it, now give us the post number where you did so. I'm willing to scroll back to the post number where your "proof" is, but I'm not willing to re read the entire thread for something that probably isn't there.

 

[Marener]

you are merely a troll that ignores reality

You said you had proof but refuse to provide it.

That makes you the troll.

It’s not a fact until you prove it. It’s not reality until you prove it.

So prove it.

 

[struth]

You said you had proof but refuse to provide it.

That makes you the troll.

It’s not a fact until you prove it. It’s not reality until you prove it.

So prove it.

the proof has been repeatedly produced

 

[struth]

You claimed you proved it, now give us the post number where you did so. I'm willing to scroll back to the post number where your "proof" is, but I'm not willing to re read the entire thread for something that probably isn't there.

don’t worry Hur will be coming down

 

[Marener]

the proof has been repeatedly produced

So you claim. Now prove it’d already been produced.

 

[struth]

So you claim. Now prove it’d already been produced.

geez you are jus gonna troll