Got it. That’s why I thought you were being sarcastic. All is forgiven!Oops, sorry.
Stupid internet.
-Homer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got it. That’s why I thought you were being sarcastic. All is forgiven!Oops, sorry.
Stupid internet.
-Homer
i don't give a shit what he said....do you think this guy was qualifird to prosecute a former prezThe guy that called Fani low IQ negro?
No, def not qualified.
i don't give a shit what he said....do you think this guy was qualifird to prosecute a former prez
i hate when i do that too...................lolGot it. That’s why I thought you were being sarcastic. All is forgiven!
you got nuttin rogerSo what did your “Racist…lol” comment meant?
First of all, please say sex. Try to show some class.Again, you are implying that a kiss and or a hug implies people are fucking. It does not.
Then, given her disgruntled former employee status, do you even belive her?
I sure don't.
My guess, she got cash to say what she said.
It meant nothing, gotcha.you got nuttin roger
First of all, please say sex. Try to show some class.
Second, who said they had to be engaging in sex at that point? They were in a romantic relationship, and Fani hired her boyfriend, who by the way was faaaar from the best qualified.
Third, you’re squirming around to save Fani. Her Fani is cooked!
So do you want us to start describing whites as white privilege hires? Because that's what many of them are. OBTW Willis won an election.DEI Fani ramble on about meaningless nonsense. It reminded me of Hairy Legs *Joe and his Cornpop story.
NO, the white privilege hires are coming home to roost. That is what the world sees.Man are these DEI chickens coming home to roost or what? It’s all there for the world to see.
The judge thinks so. He already squashed that line of inquiry. He said anyone with a bar card and a heart beat is qualified.i don't give a shit what he said....do you think this guy was qualifird to prosecute a former prez
REALLY, Jackass? And you think you can hold a trial deciding a person's life while the DA is running around having illicit affairs in secret with the chief prosecutor in the case behind everyone's back???That hearing is about alleged misconduct that has nothing to do with Trump getting due justice process.
That is EXACTLY the reason, because SHE is the one who BROUGHT the case, dipshit. She RAN on "getting Trump" and now we find this out? What else don't we know? She will be lucky not to lose her license to practice law much less not face criminal charges herself over this. The law takes a very dim view of stuff like this because not only does it destroy any pretense of impartial justice upon which our law is based and to which every officer of the court swears to uphold, but if she thought she could get away with this, then what else is she pulling or might pull in the future?If Willis will be taken off the case in no way does that mean the case against Trump and his co-conspirators would be somehow dismissed.
It's over for Fani! She's being exposed and the witnesses are ratting her out. This is not going to end well for her.
REALLY, Jackass? And you think you can hold a trial deciding a person's life while the DA is running around having illicit affairs in secret with the chief prosecutor in the case behind everyone's back???
It is called a CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Bunghole.
That is EXACTLY the reason, because SHE is the one who BROUGHT the case, dipshit. She RAN on "getting Trump" and now we find this out? What else don't we know? She will be lucky not to lose her license to practice law much less not face criminal charges herself over this. The law takes a very dim view of stuff like this because not only does it destroy any pretense of impartial justice upon which our law id based and to which every officer of the court swears to uphold, but if she thought she could get away with this, then what else is she pulling or might pull in the future?
It is a matter of INTEGRITY of the court.
This was HER case, and if the very integrity of the DA is now in question, so too must be whatever "evidence" she has. Trump is entitled to a FAIR and IMPARTIAL trial BY LAW.
It will be shocking if they don't entirely throw out the case. This is about erring on the side of the benefit of the doubt because people are presumed INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY, not something to be handed off like a baton to the "next guy" to GET TRUMP.
The evidence against trump and the 19 others does not go away if Willis is removed. Trump is caught on tape violating Georgia law.REALLY, Jackass? And you think you can hold a trial deciding a person's life while the DA is running around having illicit affairs in secret with the chief prosecutor in the case behind everyone's back???
It is called a CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Bunghole.
That is EXACTLY the reason, because SHE is the one who BROUGHT the case, dipshit. She RAN on "getting Trump" and now we find this out? What else don't we know? She will be lucky not to lose her license to practice law much less not face criminal charges herself over this. The law takes a very dim view of stuff like this because not only does it destroy any pretense of impartial justice upon which our law is based and to which every officer of the court swears to uphold, but if she thought she could get away with this, then what else is she pulling or might pull in the future?
It is a matter of INTEGRITY of the court.
This was HER case, and if the very integrity of the DA is now in question, so too must be whatever "evidence" she has. Trump is entitled to a FAIR and IMPARTIAL trial BY LAW.
It will be shocking if they don't entirely throw out the case. This is about erring on the side of the benefit of the doubt because people are presumed INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY, not something to be handed off like a baton to the "next guy" to GET TRUMP.
Since when do prosecutors owe criminal defendants an update on their relationship status?REALLY, Jackass? And you think you can hold a trial deciding a person's life while the DA is running around having illicit affairs in secret with the chief prosecutor in the case behind everyone's back???
It is called a CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Bunghole.
Two grand juries decided to bring this case to trial.That is EXACTLY the reason, because SHE is the one who BROUGHT the case, dipshit. She RAN on "getting Trump" and now we find this out? What else don't we know? She will be lucky not to lose her license to practice law much less not face criminal charges herself over this. The law takes a very dim view of stuff like this because not only does it destroy any pretense of impartial justice upon which our law id based and to which every officer of the court swears to uphold, but if she thought she could get away with this, then what else is she pulling or might pull in the future?
Criminal defendants questioning the integrity of their prosecutors doesn't mean much.It is a matter of INTEGRITY of the court.
This was HER case, and if the very integrity of the DA is now in question, so too must be whatever "evidence" she has. Trump is entitled to a FAIR and IMPARTIAL trial BY LAW.
It will be shocking if they don't entirely throw out the case. This is about erring on the side of the benefit of the doubt because people are presumed INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY, not something to be handed off like a baton to the "next guy" to GET TRUMP.
Illicit affair? What illicit affair? Their affair was perfectly legal.