BREAKING: Fani Willis is Done! Nathan Wade Testifies He Paid For Vacations with His Business Card and Fani Willis Reimbursed Him in CASH For Expenses

[Markle]

Still doesn't make trump less guilty.

Yeah, about that.

Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort. Like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution. In some jurisdictions, the term "malicious prosecution" denotes the wrongful initiation of criminal proceedings, while the term "malicious use of process" denotes the wrongful initiation of civil proceedings.

 

[Slade3200]

So she picked her underqualified boyfriend next. Unacceptable.

The ex governor who just testified said that her BF was well organized and he was not surprise to see him selected as prosecutor. So that slaps down your underqualified argument

 

[Slade3200]

Used cash,

Yes… and?

 

[Hum Dinger]

It's incredible that the judge would allow the defense to investigate the prosecution's personal life as a tactic to stop a criminal prosecution.

That's a hell of a precedent to set. Every time anyone gets criminally charged, it will become standard procedure for the defense to investigate the prosecutor's personal lives and make accusations to have the prosecutor removed based on any imaginary (or real) accusations.

It's total BULLSHIT!

If some investigation, outside of the criminal case, were to find some issues worth the prosecutor's personal life, then fine, but having the defense attorney's in an unrelated criminal case attempt to prosecute the prosecutor is nonsense.

 

[0311]

P01135809 has been to libel for rape of E. Jean Carroll. Two women in that trial were clear, P01135809 did sexually assault.

Over20+Women have accused P01135809 have aacused P01135809 of Sexual Abuse/Sexual Assault/Sexual Harassment/Rape and he is front runner for the ReNaziKlan Nomination.

But a consentual sexual relationship between Ms. Willis and another man and the sky is falling. IF Ms. Willis was white this would never have happened.

This is nothing more cheap political theater. A blatant attemp to disqualify Ms. Willis (won't happen) from the Georgia RICO case against P01135809. There one reason and one reason only for this shit and that is P01135809 has no fucking defense and P01135809's bus bench ad shysters are dragging this process out for as long as possible.

 

[Seymour Flops]

It's incredible that the judge would allow the defense to investigate the prosecution's personal life as a tactic to stop a criminal prosecution.

That's a hell of a precedent to set. Every time anyone gets criminally charged, it will become standard procedure for the defense to investigate the prosecutor's personal lives and make accusations to have the prosecutor removed based on any imaginary (or real) accusations.

It's total BULLSHIT!

If some investigation, outside of the criminal case, were to find some issues worth the prosecutor's personal life, then fine, but having the defense attorney's in an unrelated criminal case attempt to prosecute the prosecutor is nonsense.

I would agree with you for a normal criminal case. And accuse bank robber, for example, should not be able to look into the prosecutors marital life or even extra marital affairs, and Home wrecking. He either robbed the bank, or he didn’t.

However, this case relies Almost entirely on the prosecutors credibility. At least the case so far. Miss Willis got her indictment based on presenting herself as a credible professional on biased person to a grand jury.

Nobody can deny this is an extremely politicized case. Once you decide to criminalize political opposition, you can’t expect that it will all be one-sided. at least not until succeeds in overthrowing the Democratic process. Once that happens, do processes out the window, and the accusation is as good as the conviction.

So far the Democrats have not done that. But you have to admire their tenacity and trying.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yeah, about that.

Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort. Like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution. In some jurisdictions, the term "malicious prosecution" denotes the wrongful initiation of criminal proceedings, while the term "malicious use of process" denotes the wrongful initiation of civil proceedings.

Trump the criminal may argue that, which he will lose bigly. And they may very well add malicious avoidance and allied charges, such as perjury under sworn oath.

 

[Flash]

The ex governor who just testified said that her BF was well organized and he was not surprise to see him selected as prosecutor. So that slaps down your underqualified argument

Barnes is a Democrat piece of shit. He can't be trusted to tell the truth.

 

[Lisa558]

If Fani Willis is removed, that will not stop the case against the insurrectionist, trump.

Nobody was ever even charged with insurrection.

But now that Fani admitted this was political, it has to be r examined as to whether there’s a case there, and then a new case assigned. That will take time, and opening a lawsuit a few months before Election Day will look like even more of what it is: election interference.

 

[hadit]

So here we see Lisa once again entering a thread with her anti-black hatred. This questioning is stupid and shows the desperation of the trump legal team. If Trump was innocent, all he has to do is let the case happen and allow the evidence to prove his Innocence. But he's not innocent so he's trying to do whatever he can to stop the trial or hopefully delay it until after the election in the hopes he can win and then stop the case.

Would you give that same advice to a black man on trial for assaulting a cop? Let the case happen and allow the evidence to prove his innocence? You and I both know that when a prosecutor has it in for a defendant that rules get broken and people get wrongly convicted. It is sound legal defense, therefore, for the defendant to throw as many roadblocks in the prosecution's way as possible, to raise the cost of obtaining a conviction.

 

[JimH52]

Nobody was ever even charged with insurrection.

But now that Fani admitted this was political, it has to be r examined as to whether there’s a case there, and then a new case assigned. That will take time, and opening a lawsuit a few months before Election Day will look like even more of what it is: election interference.

Well, since trump has placed his daughter in charge of the money in the RNC, no other candidates will get any mo
ney. It will all go to your orange leader. I bet down ballot candidates will appreciate that.

Jack Smith has brought several charges against trump related to obstruction of the transfer of power. Read and be educated.

What to know about Trump's 4 indictments and the criminal charges

Former President Donald Trump has now been indicted in four separate cases. Here's where things stand.

www.cbsnews.com

Indicted: Special counsel's Jan. 6 investigation​

Smith's office has also been investigating alleged efforts to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power after Trump lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden, including the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The grand jury hearing evidence in this case indicted Trump on Aug. 1.

Trump faces four charges in this indictment: conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.

The indictment lists six unnamed co-conspirators. Prosecutors allege they were "enlisted" to assist Trump in "his criminal efforts to overturn" the election "and retain power."

"The attack on our nation's Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy," Smith said in a brief remarks after the release of the 45-page indictment outlining the charges. "As described in the indictment, it was fueled by lies. Lies by the defendant targeted at obstructing a bedrock function of the U.S. government: the nation's process of collecting, counting and certifying the results of the presidential election."

Trump has vehemently denied allegations of wrongdoing related to his efforts to overturn the election results, and accused the special counsel of political bias.

"Why didn't they bring this ridiculous case 2.5 years ago? They wanted it right in the middle of my campaign, that's why!" Trump said in a post on his social media site, Truth Social.

 

[Lisa558]

Well, since trump has placed his daughter in charge of the money in the RNC, no other candidates will get any mo
ney. It will all go to your orange leader. I bet down ballot candidates will appreciate that.

Jack Smith has brought several charges against trump related to obstruction of the transfer of power. Read and be educated.

What to know about Trump's 4 indictments and the criminal charges

Former President Donald Trump has now been indicted in four separate cases. Here's where things stand.

www.cbsnews.com

Indicted: Special counsel's Jan. 6 investigation​

Smith's office has also been investigating alleged efforts to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power after Trump lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden, including the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The grand jury hearing evidence in this case indicted Trump on Aug. 1.

Trump faces four charges in this indictment: conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.

The indictment lists six unnamed co-conspirators. Prosecutors allege they were "enlisted" to assist Trump in "his criminal efforts to overturn" the election "and retain power."

"The attack on our nation's Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy," Smith said in a brief remarks after the release of the 45-page indictment outlining the charges. "As described in the indictment, it was fueled by lies. Lies by the defendant targeted at obstructing a bedrock function of the U.S. government: the nation's process of collecting, counting and certifying the results of the presidential election."

Trump has vehemently denied allegations of wrongdoing related to his efforts to overturn the election results, and accused the special counsel of political bias.

"Why didn't they bring this ridiculous case 2.5 years ago? They wanted it right in the middle of my campaign, that's why!" Trump said in a post on his social media site, Truth Social.

Overreach on it all, due to Miss Willis’ political motivations. She will definitely be dismissed from this case, and the entire case may be dismissed due to prosecutorial misconduct.

Wny are you so afraid of letting Americans decide whether they want Biden or Trump?

 

[0311]

Fulton County Prosecutors Decline To Call Fani Willis For Questioning.

Fulton County prosecutors decline to call Fani Willis to return for questioning

Fulton County prosecutors declined to call D.A. Fani Willis to testify for a second day in the hearing held to disqualify her from prosecuting the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump.

www.cbsnews.com

Fulton County prosecutors will not call District Attorney Fani Willis to the witness stand for additional questioning Friday, after she forcefully defended herself and accused defense attorneys of lying as part of a bid to disqualify her and her office from prosecuting the Georgia election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

Willis testified for roughly two hours Thursday in the evidentiary hearing held before Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee, during which she fiercely pushed back on claims from lawyers representing Trump and several of his co-defendants that she engaged in an improper relationship with Wade, whom she hired to work on the case, and financially benefited from it.

A lawyer for Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign official, first raised the allegations about Willis and Wade last month and is seeking to have prosecutors involved in the case disqualified and the indictment dismissed. Trump and his allies are accused of orchestrating a scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. They have pleaded not guilty to all charges.

 

[Lesh]

Improperly hiring somebody underqualified doesn’t dismiss the case it just replaces the team. Your excuses don’t make logical sense, mine do…. Delay and distract

Wait

The defense is claiming that the prosecutor isn’t qualified enough?

Most defense teams would love that

What’s being claimed is that Willis got Wade hired to either benefit him or benefit her.

First of all he was hired previous to their relationship beginning and second he made LESS money by taking that job.

As far as Willis the claim is that she hired her boyfriend so he could take her on trips paid for by the state of Georgia

They have to prove that the relationship began before he was hired

Willis did not reimburse for trips they took together

He found a way to make the state of Georgia pay for those trips

They can’t seem to prove any of that

 

[0311]

Barnes is a Democrat piece of shit. He can't be trusted to tell the truth.

P01135809 is Lying piece of shit. He cheated on each of his wives. A man who has cheated on each of his wives cannot be truted and the lies of P01135809 well documented.

You bitch about one man not being trust for his lies, while at the same time believing every lie ever told to you by a man who fucks around on each of his wives.

 

[Rogue AI]

Yes it is, but none of it puts into question case against Trump.

NO it does not relate to everything, just as Willis sometimes jaywalking would not relate to everything.

Actually it does effect the most important criminal case in Fulton County history. If Willis is corrupt, the whole case will be scrutinized. Even if the judge leaves her, her own testimony, under oath, opened doors to all sorts of new issues.

 

[Hum Dinger]

I would agree with you for a normal criminal case. And accuse bank robber, for example, should not be able to look into the prosecutors marital life or even extra marital affairs, and Home wrecking. He either robbed the bank, or he didn’t.

However, this case relies Almost entirely on the prosecutors credibility. At least the case so far. Miss Willis got her indictment based on presenting herself as a credible professional on biased person to a grand jury.

Nobody can deny this is an extremely politicized case. Once you decide to criminalize political opposition, you can’t expect that it will all be one-sided. at least not until succeeds in overthrowing the Democratic process. Once that happens, do processes out the window, and the accusation is as good as the conviction.

So far the Democrats have not done that. But you have to admire their tenacity and trying.

A criminal case is a criminal case. This case is not politicized except for the attempt by the defense to politicize it.

This case is not dependent on Fanni Willis credibility any more than any other criminal case Her case is based on evidence, not on her personal credibility.

These people committed a crime. Fanni Willis has to prove it using evidence, not just because she says so.

If anything, the only question of credibility is on the credibility of the defendants, and now the defense attorneys.

You're assertion that:

"Once you decide to criminalize political opposition, you can’t expect that it will all be one-sided.", is nonsense.

That would mean that anyone involved in any political activity was entitled to commit crimes and to turn their trials into a political circus when prosecuted.

Political people have no greater rights than everyone else.

 

[Lesh]

I would agree with you for a normal criminal case. And accuse bank robber, for example, should not be able to look into the prosecutors marital life or even extra marital affairs, and Home wrecking. He either robbed the bank, or he didn’t.

However, this case relies Almost entirely on the prosecutors credibility. At least the case so far. Miss Willis got her indictment based on presenting herself as a credible professional on biased person to a grand jury.

Nobody can deny this is an extremely politicized case. Once you decide to criminalize political opposition, you can’t expect that it will all be one-sided. at least not until succeeds in overthrowing the Democratic process. Once that happens, do processes out the window, and the accusation is as good as the conviction.

So far the Democrats have not done that. But you have to admire their tenacity and trying.

Relies almost entirely on the prosecutor’s credibility?

No it relies exclusively on the evidence presented to the court

 

[JimH52]

Overreach on it all, due to Miss Willis’ political motivations. She will definitely be dismissed from this case, and the entire case may be dismissed due to prosecutorial misconduct.

Wny are you so afraid of letting Americans decide whether they want Biden or Trump?

Not afraid at all. trump is a serial liar. You know he is a serial liar. I just wish the SS had allowed trump to travel to the insurrection at the Capitol, like he wanted to do. Then there would be no question of his involvement. He incited, he encourage it, and he endorsed it.

 

[Orangecat]

I contend that Fani will escape justice because she is related to Hillary Clinton.
My proof: