Breaking: FBI BACKS CIA View that Russia Intervened to Help Trump Win Election

[jc456]

They haven't shown Congress anything.

How do you know? Are you a congressman that has sat in on the briefings?

So, all the Congressmen are lying?

Who said they were lying? Maybe they were told not to share the information until the CIA and other intelligence groups said they could? Do you have any understanding of how information within the intelligence agencies work?

do you know how congress works and their authority?

If the information isn't authorized to be released to the public yet by the intelligence community, then the Congressmen must follow those rules. You obviously don't understand how information in the government works...

sure I do, congress has all of the power in our government. They can call a president in and impeach him. They have the ultimate power.

 

[BlindBoo]

Let's be honest, the liberals are seriously butt-hurt by the election results. Liberals as a whole practice projection, blame and hypocrisy. As a result of this election and their poor dispositions, they'd blame the position of the moon if it meant denying what they've become, and their utter failure.

He won by a few votes, take that and shove it.

Trump won by a landslide.

Well he must have been using his tiny but well formed hands to measure it with. So by that measure it was YUGE! How much was his margin of victory over President Obama's victories?

 

[jc456]

So, all the Congressmen are lying?

Who said they were lying? Maybe they were told not to share the information until the CIA and other intelligence groups said they could? Do you have any understanding of how information within the intelligence agencies work?

do you know how congress works and their authority?

If the information isn't authorized to be released to the public yet by the intelligence community, then the Congressmen must follow those rules. You obviously don't understand how information in the government works...

So then what, we take their (the governments) word for it ?

You do until the information is authorized to be released.

no we don't. see how easy that was?

 

[Dale Smith]

The CIA aka "Crooks In Action"? The same group that has been training ISIS/ al qaeda? The same group that was behind the murder of JFK? The same group that was the OSS that brought in thousands of Nazis under "Operation PaperClip after WWII??? Thye same ones that use MK-Ultra trauma based mind control???? The ones that put in "Cointel-Pro" to infiltrate groups that were not "globalist friendly"???? The same ones that infiltrated the media under "Operation Mockingbird"???? The same group that has been flying opium into this country since the Korean War to fund their black ops? The same group that has orchestrated the overthrow of dozens of duly elected leaders that didn't play ball with their globalists because their country had resources that they coveted??? THAT group!!?!?!?!?!?!? Good call!!!!!

The CIA, FBI, National Intelligence Agency, and 17 other intelligence agencies in other countries... That's quite the conspiracy isn't it?

Every alphabet agency is incorporated and owned by the IMF.....don't you read my posts? Learn, grow....evolve and for God's sake stop eating the paste, ya dumb fuck.......

Every agency? Including those in other countries? You are so fucking out there. Why are you on a computer? You know they are tracking you right? They also have a camera in your television to watch you in your house... And they have that black box on your vehicle to track you there. And your cell phone? The microphone is always on to track what you say... and they put stuff in your food to make you more compliant.

I know more than you....infinitely more and I don'r sweat these corporate POS that believe that they "own" us......I give them the middle finger salute every chance I get. I pledge no loyalty to them any more than a slave would be towards his owner.....thems be the facts.

No, you THINK you know more than me. The only thing you do know more than me is a bunch of conspiracy dribble. Are you married? Do you have kids? If you act like this in real life I feel immensely sorry for them.

Nope, I can do circles around yo when it comes to what is really going on as it applies to the geo-political scene. My biological kids are grown but I have a lady love with an 11 year old....we all get along great. Have you any other questions that I can kick your ass on? (snicker)

 

[Lewdog]

Hmmm this is odd. Just not but a couple days ago Comey told Trump over the phone that there was no evidence of a Russian hack. I wonder what new information or what happened in the last couple of days.

Just shows how much of an agenda he has. Time for Comey to resign.

Hmm...so yesterday Comey was a lying hack who lied and manipulated data to damage Hillary. Today he is a trusted source....you guys are amazing.

And when Comey said he wouldn't indict Hillary he was a hack to Republicans... until he sent the letter a week before the election. Then he was awesome. Then a couple days latter he was a hack again. Then when Trump supporters thought he disagreed with the CIA he was great again... and now when he does agree with the CIA he is a bum.

 

[Crixus]

Gee, it's about time.

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.

Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
​

Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election

You're going to have to do a hell of a lot better than WaPo and "strong consensus".

Regardless, that does nothing to alleviate DNC sleaze, Hillary's defeat or your butthurt.

I don't have to "do anything" to placate a clown like you, this will be making the rounds on every major media news outlet.

Almost an hour later, only Fox News and WaPo are saying anything about it. Not even on the front page of Fox's site. Not trending on Twitter.

If the CIA wanted anyone to believe them, they wouldn't have canceled a briefing with the House Intelligence Committee. The FBI already has a tarnished reputation no thanks to their shenanigans with Hillary's e-mails.

Those two organizations are not very reliable right now. The WaPo recycling their story isn't helpful either.

It's being reported by the AP.

Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive

The poll in your link pretty much says how much traction the allegation is with the public at large.

 

[jc456]

Let's be honest, the liberals are seriously butt-hurt by the election results. Liberals as a whole practice projection, blame and hypocrisy. As a result of this election and their poor dispositions, they'd blame the position of the moon if it meant denying what they've become, and their utter failure.

He won by a few votes, take that and shove it.

Trump won by a landslide.

Well he must have been using his tiny but well formed hands to measure it with. So by that measure it was YUGE! How much was his margin of victory over President Obama's victories?

it was monstrous,

 

[Iceweasel]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

"“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

It's like global warming, a consensus isn't science. Or evidence.

The CIA, FBI, National Intelligence agency, and 17 other intelligence agencies in other countries... that a whole bunch of people to get together for a single conspiracy don't you think?

What conspiracy? There is NO evidence or it would be posted by now. A consensus of political opinion isn't evidence of anything but a bunch of opinions.

 

[Lewdog]

Who said they were lying? Maybe they were told not to share the information until the CIA and other intelligence groups said they could? Do you have any understanding of how information within the intelligence agencies work?

do you know how congress works and their authority?

If the information isn't authorized to be released to the public yet by the intelligence community, then the Congressmen must follow those rules. You obviously don't understand how information in the government works...

So then what, we take their (the governments) word for it ?

You do until the information is authorized to be released.

no we don't. see how easy that was?

Man you are all over the place. Did you take your meds today?

 

[jc456]

Gee, it's about time.

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.

Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
​

Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election

You're going to have to do a hell of a lot better than WaPo and "strong consensus".

Regardless, that does nothing to alleviate DNC sleaze, Hillary's defeat or your butthurt.

I don't have to "do anything" to placate a clown like you, this will be making the rounds on every major media news outlet.

Almost an hour later, only Fox News and WaPo are saying anything about it. Not even on the front page of Fox's site. Not trending on Twitter.

If the CIA wanted anyone to believe them, they wouldn't have canceled a briefing with the House Intelligence Committee. The FBI already has a tarnished reputation no thanks to their shenanigans with Hillary's e-mails.

Those two organizations are not very reliable right now. The WaPo recycling their story isn't helpful either.

It's being reported by the AP.

Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive

that means what? I want to see it say the Congress Special Committee backs the conclusion. Why do I care about the AP? who exactly are they in our government?

 

[Iceweasel]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

No they haven't. If you've got proof, post it up.

Read the article...it says they have. Lindsey Graham said he's been getting information for months about his hack... fucking keep up and read the information provided to you. I'm not going to repost something just because you are too lazy to read the links.

I've got the asshole blocked so didn't see any link. I'm not going to think for you. What they have is politically motivated speculation, here's some research you should have done.


Intel analysis shows Putin approved election hacking
"We don't have Putin's fingerprints on anything or a piece of paper that shows he signed the order, but the nature of the operation was such that this had to be approved by top levels of the Russian government," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence on the hacking told CNN.

So you commented in a thread about information you didn't have. Congrats, that's the definition of ignorance.

The OP didn't back up the assertion and you too fucking stupid to understand it. Congratulations.

 

[Lewdog]

Gee, it's about time.

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.

Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
​

Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election

You're going to have to do a hell of a lot better than WaPo and "strong consensus".

Regardless, that does nothing to alleviate DNC sleaze, Hillary's defeat or your butthurt.

I don't have to "do anything" to placate a clown like you, this will be making the rounds on every major media news outlet.

Almost an hour later, only Fox News and WaPo are saying anything about it. Not even on the front page of Fox's site. Not trending on Twitter.

If the CIA wanted anyone to believe them, they wouldn't have canceled a briefing with the House Intelligence Committee. The FBI already has a tarnished reputation no thanks to their shenanigans with Hillary's e-mails.

Those two organizations are not very reliable right now. The WaPo recycling their story isn't helpful either.

It's being reported by the AP.

Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive

The poll in your link pretty much says how much traction the allegation is with the public at large.

They added that poll after I linked it. That poll is also from 5 days ago back before it came out that the FBI agrees with the CIA. Wait and see how people feel when the real information comes out.

 

[Lewdog]

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

"“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

It's like global warming, a consensus isn't science. Or evidence.

The CIA, FBI, National Intelligence agency, and 17 other intelligence agencies in other countries... that a whole bunch of people to get together for a single conspiracy don't you think?

What conspiracy? There is NO evidence or it would be posted by now. A consensus of political opinion isn't evidence of anything but a bunch of opinions.

What conspiracy? Twenty various intelligence agencies from the U.S. to other countries around the world say Russia hacked the U.S. election...and you still think it isn't true. That's fucking crazy.

 

[jc456]

You're going to have to do a hell of a lot better than WaPo and "strong consensus".

Regardless, that does nothing to alleviate DNC sleaze, Hillary's defeat or your butthurt.

I don't have to "do anything" to placate a clown like you, this will be making the rounds on every major media news outlet.

Almost an hour later, only Fox News and WaPo are saying anything about it. Not even on the front page of Fox's site. Not trending on Twitter.

If the CIA wanted anyone to believe them, they wouldn't have canceled a briefing with the House Intelligence Committee. The FBI already has a tarnished reputation no thanks to their shenanigans with Hillary's e-mails.

Those two organizations are not very reliable right now. The WaPo recycling their story isn't helpful either.

It's being reported by the AP.

Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive

The poll in your link pretty much says how much traction the allegation is with the public at large.

They added that poll after I linked it. That poll is also from 5 days ago back before it came out that the FBI agrees with the CIA. Wait and see how people feel when the real information comes out.

well all the supposed emails are from months before the election? your point is what exactly?

 

[BlindBoo]

Show the proof....we're waiting

As if they're going to reveal to the public every little detail of exactly how Russian operatives successfully hacked the DNC. Unless you're a member of congress, you won't be "shown" a goddamn thing. The world doesn't revolve around your childish whining to see the "proof" with your own eyes. Grow up.

so show the US Congress. why won't they? you have that answer?

Fuck Congress, show us. Btw Congress has been getting briefed.

But if it contains information like names and stuff I hope they redact that shit before they show it to the Groper Elect.

fk congress? so you are all in on doing unconstitutional politicking eh? Damn right show us.

Yes fuck um. They've been getting the secret briefings all along. What have they been seeing that McConnell doesn't want us to see?

 

[Lewdog]

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

No they haven't. If you've got proof, post it up.

Read the article...it says they have. Lindsey Graham said he's been getting information for months about his hack... fucking keep up and read the information provided to you. I'm not going to repost something just because you are too lazy to read the links.

I've got the asshole blocked so didn't see any link. I'm not going to think for you. What they have is politically motivated speculation, here's some research you should have done.


Intel analysis shows Putin approved election hacking
"We don't have Putin's fingerprints on anything or a piece of paper that shows he signed the order, but the nature of the operation was such that this had to be approved by top levels of the Russian government," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence on the hacking told CNN.

So you commented in a thread about information you didn't have. Congrats, that's the definition of ignorance.

The OP didn't back up the assertion and you too fucking stupid to understand it. Congratulations.

How would you know? You fucking said you had him on ignore. Or are you lying?

 

[jc456]

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

"“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

It's like global warming, a consensus isn't science. Or evidence.

The CIA, FBI, National Intelligence agency, and 17 other intelligence agencies in other countries... that a whole bunch of people to get together for a single conspiracy don't you think?

What conspiracy? There is NO evidence or it would be posted by now. A consensus of political opinion isn't evidence of anything but a bunch of opinions.

What conspiracy? Twenty various intelligence agencies from the U.S. to other countries around the world say Russia hacked the U.S. election...and you still think it isn't true. That's fucking crazy.

damn straight bubba. See, it's still easy.

 

[Lewdog]

I don't have to "do anything" to placate a clown like you, this will be making the rounds on every major media news outlet.

Almost an hour later, only Fox News and WaPo are saying anything about it. Not even on the front page of Fox's site. Not trending on Twitter.

If the CIA wanted anyone to believe them, they wouldn't have canceled a briefing with the House Intelligence Committee. The FBI already has a tarnished reputation no thanks to their shenanigans with Hillary's e-mails.

Those two organizations are not very reliable right now. The WaPo recycling their story isn't helpful either.

It's being reported by the AP.

Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive

The poll in your link pretty much says how much traction the allegation is with the public at large.

They added that poll after I linked it. That poll is also from 5 days ago back before it came out that the FBI agrees with the CIA. Wait and see how people feel when the real information comes out.

well all the supposed emails are from months before the election? your point is what exactly?

What does that matter with the proof the Russians are the one that did the hacking?

 

[jc456]

Show the proof....we're waiting

As if they're going to reveal to the public every little detail of exactly how Russian operatives successfully hacked the DNC. Unless you're a member of congress, you won't be "shown" a goddamn thing. The world doesn't revolve around your childish whining to see the "proof" with your own eyes. Grow up.

so show the US Congress. why won't they? you have that answer?

Fuck Congress, show us. Btw Congress has been getting briefed.

But if it contains information like names and stuff I hope they redact that shit before they show it to the Groper Elect.

fk congress? so you are all in on doing unconstitutional politicking eh? Damn right show us.

Yes fuck um. They've been getting the secret briefings all along. What have they been seeing that McConnell doesn't want us to see?

why then did all of these senators and the president say it needed to be investigated. The special committee is ready, now submit what the subpoena asked for.

 

[Crixus]

So, all the Congressmen are lying?

Who said they were lying? Maybe they were told not to share the information until the CIA and other intelligence groups said they could? Do you have any understanding of how information within the intelligence agencies work?

do you know how congress works and their authority?

If the information isn't authorized to be released to the public yet by the intelligence community, then the Congressmen must follow those rules. You obviously don't understand how information in the government works...

So then what, we take their (the governments) word for it ?

You do until the information is authorized to be released.

As Americans we are obliged not to. No names have been released except for those whom Clinton her self has cast doubt on. If Russia was able to ,manipulate our elections then then is huge. If they can do this, what cant they do? Why are we not acting? This reaks of politics. But while we are at it, how about we look a bit deeper into the American politicians who are making the accusations?