Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 73,284
- 66,045
False. A total lie.There was no quid quo pro offered, so you got nothing.I DID read the entire conversation, twice. The fact that the President put his request politely doesn't mean it isn't a request. And let's not forget that the military aid that had been promised to Ukraine had been stopped by Trump a few days before. Hence all the sucking up in that phone call; it, too, was part of the "tenor" of that discussion.whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great... so if you can look into it ...He asked a simple question. No quid pro quo. No bribery. No high crimes, which per our constitution are necessary to impeach.
That isn't a question. It is a request. Apparently, the fact that Trump is sending over Giuliani to help him with the "looking into it" and that it will certainly be beneficial to Trump's campaign if the Ukraine can find Biden's son and Biden guilty of something nefarious, is why the ICIG was concerned. Or maybe there is more we don't know about yet since the whistleblower himself has said NOTHING.
He prefaced it with the fact that the Mueller investigation found nothing and it began in the Ukraine. You need to read the entire conversation and gauge the tenor not just bits and pieces. To me it flowed well and he cannot command the President of Ukraine to do anything. "It would be great" means he is asking not telling. He literally said "Whatever you can do with the Attorney General"
There's nothing sinister about asking a foreign government to investigate some possible corruption involving American public officials. It certainly isn't illegal.
What's sinister is blackmailing a foreign government into not investigating corruption. That's what Biden did.