BREAKING in Baltimore: Prosecutor Mosby...ASKED cops to target neighborhood where Grey was arrested!

[007]

So I suppose there'd be no dissent if it were a light-skinned person in authority who ordered an increased police presence in that location?

No, there'd be MORE dissent.

 

[bucs90]

... and then she throws them under the bus and has them arrested after they follow her orders.

Hmmm... I see trouble for that little bubble headed retard.

So, she ordered them to arrest him without probable cause, to put him in the back of a paddy wagon without restraining him but with his hands cuffed behind his back so he could not protect himself and to drive around the neighborhood, making sharp turns and sudden stops to bounce him off the walls? She did not "order" them anywhere. She does not have that authority over the police. She, along with the police command, decided to send more cops to where there was more crime. Imagine that? Doing that has absolutely nothing to do what the police did to Gray when they got there. Talk about bubble headed retards. Look in the mirror.

He's a known drug dealer and he ran.
Sounds to me like the cops were just following orders.

Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Theres no evidence they intentionally harmed him. Which is why she wanted a gag order...which was denied today.

Defense is gonna slowly leak all this....like a suffocating swarm of sand for the prosecution.


First bit.....Mosby orderee the heavy drug enforcement of an all black street corner haha!!! What a racist!!! Now...they're gonna subpoena her as a star witness....thus forcing her to remove herself from the prosecution hahaha!!!!!

Shes in so far over her head.

 

[paddymurphy]

The Baltimore Sun


HOLY SHIT!!!! 3 weeks before Freddie Grey was arrested...Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby REQUESTED for Baltimore police to TARGET the neighborhood Freddie Grey lived in!! Why??? Well....atrocious crime for one...AND...her husband is a councilman who represented that area!

WOW! Major ethical problems:


1- Racial profiling. She direcred BPD to focus on a black area. Shes RACIST right?
2- Using her power as a prosecutor to sway enforcement towards something that would benefit her husband


ALSO....today a judge struck down the gag order she demanded. Her evidence...or lack of...will soon shine.

What a racist bitch!!! TARGETING a black neighborhood! !!?

Is this true?

If the answer is 'yes', then...

Kiss that prosecution-case goodbye...

Honest-to-God, you can't make this shit up...

These people would phukk-up a two-car gang toidy...

How is it an ethical problem for a prosecutor to have a task force targeting a high crime area and for her to prosecute the police who, while doing that, allegedly broke the law and killed a prisoner? That fact is not at all relevant to the case she may or may not have.

I see we have another 'tard on the board.

Brilliant response. Is that your "go to comment" when you are too stupid to respond substantively?

 

[Wake]

Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

"How," not "who." I mean, come on.

Theres gonna be dead n!ggers littering the streets this summer.

*Sigh*

 

[bucs90]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Whoever Baltimore police union hired...this dude is good. Hes eating her case for breakfast.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

... and then she throws them under the bus and has them arrested after they follow her orders.

Hmmm... I see trouble for that little bubble headed retard.

So, she ordered them to arrest him without probable cause, to put him in the back of a paddy wagon without restraining him but with his hands cuffed behind his back so he could not protect himself and to drive around the neighborhood, making sharp turns and sudden stops to bounce him off the walls? She did not "order" them anywhere. She does not have that authority over the police. She, along with the police command, decided to send more cops to where there was more crime. Imagine that? Doing that has absolutely nothing to do what the police did to Gray when they got there. Talk about bubble headed retards. Look in the mirror.

He's a known drug dealer and he ran.
Sounds to me like the cops were just following orders.

Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Do you have any idea why they didnt put on his seat belt?
It's out there but as an ill informed dimwit I doubt you'll know why.

 

[Theowl32]

Do you know that there are left wing morons who still think Mike Brown held his hands up and was shot in the back? A lot of them post here.

 

[paddymurphy]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

... and then she throws them under the bus and has them arrested after they follow her orders.

Hmmm... I see trouble for that little bubble headed retard.

So, she ordered them to arrest him without probable cause, to put him in the back of a paddy wagon without restraining him but with his hands cuffed behind his back so he could not protect himself and to drive around the neighborhood, making sharp turns and sudden stops to bounce him off the walls? She did not "order" them anywhere. She does not have that authority over the police. She, along with the police command, decided to send more cops to where there was more crime. Imagine that? Doing that has absolutely nothing to do what the police did to Gray when they got there. Talk about bubble headed retards. Look in the mirror.

He's a known drug dealer and he ran.
Sounds to me like the cops were just following orders.

Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Theres no evidence they intentionally harmed him. Which is why she wanted a gag order...which was denied today.

Defense is gonna slowly leak all this....like a suffocating swarm of sand for the prosecution.


First bit.....Mosby orderee the heavy drug enforcement of an all black street corner haha!!! What a racist!!! Now...they're gonna subpoena her as a star witness....thus forcing her to remove herself from the prosecution hahaha!!!!!

Shes in so far over her head.

Thats what happens when you try and rule from a biased position.
It always comes back and bites you in the ass.

 

[Kondor3]

Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

"How," not "who." I mean, come on.

Theres gonna be dead n!ggers littering the streets this summer.

*Sigh*

Forgive he-she-it... it's still trying to iron the wrinkles out of its latest sock...

 

[bucs90]

Before Gray arrest prosecutors called for more officers Local News - Home

Its hitting all the Maryland news outlets now. Defense has filed for Mosby to immediately recuse herself.

One of her emails...was sent to Lt. Rice...one of the defendants. Wow. NO CHANCE she remains.

No wonder she wanted that gag order so badly.

OOOPS!!!

 

[paddymurphy]

... and then she throws them under the bus and has them arrested after they follow her orders.

Hmmm... I see trouble for that little bubble headed retard.

So, she ordered them to arrest him without probable cause, to put him in the back of a paddy wagon without restraining him but with his hands cuffed behind his back so he could not protect himself and to drive around the neighborhood, making sharp turns and sudden stops to bounce him off the walls? She did not "order" them anywhere. She does not have that authority over the police. She, along with the police command, decided to send more cops to where there was more crime. Imagine that? Doing that has absolutely nothing to do what the police did to Gray when they got there. Talk about bubble headed retards. Look in the mirror.

He's a known drug dealer and he ran.
Sounds to me like the cops were just following orders.

Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Theres no evidence they intentionally harmed him. Which is why she wanted a gag order...which was denied today.

Defense is gonna slowly leak all this....like a suffocating swarm of sand for the prosecution.


First bit.....Mosby orderee the heavy drug enforcement of an all black street corner haha!!! What a racist!!! Now...they're gonna subpoena her as a star witness....thus forcing her to remove herself from the prosecution hahaha!!!!!

Shes in so far over her head.[/QUOTE

Jesus but you are not bright. It is not racist to send more police to where there is more crime. And, since no one is charged with intentionally killing him, the absence of evidence of that means nothing. The gag order was denied because the case was moved from the district Court to the Circuit Court and the Circuit Court Judge could not act on a motion for a gag order filed in the District Court. I understand that little things like facts and truth and the law mean nothing to you, but are you really comfortable putting out there how clueless you are?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

At the behest of her husband who is on the city council of the area.
So much conflict of interest here it's ridiculous.

 

[paddymurphy]

Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

"How," not "who." I mean, come on.

Theres gonna be dead n!ggers littering the streets this summer.

*Sigh*

Forgive he-she-it... it's still trying to iron the wrinkles out of its latest sock...

Sorry, but there is so much utter stupidity coming from you and your buddies that I had a typo. None of you clowns know a damn thing about the law and post as if you were F. Lee Bailey.

 

[paddymurphy]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

At the behest of her husband who is on the city council of the area.
So much conflict of interest here it's ridiculous.

So, because a prosecutor's husband told her that there was a lot of crime in a particular area and she relayed that information to the police who thought it just might be a good idea to send some extra cops there, that is a conflict? I have seen more utter stupidity from you clowns in the last ten minutes that on any discussion board ever.

 

[Kondor3]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

True.

I have not tried a case.

Don't really need to.

When the motives and actions of the chief prosecutor are in question and when that same chief prosecutor can be seen trying to suppress the public release of relevant information and when the court system overrides her protestations, this sets the stage for petitioning to have the case dismissed with reasonably high prospects for success.

It now seems entirely possible that the case will never even go to trial, even without plea bargaining.

Don't blame me, if the DA has dirty hands on this one.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

Next you're going to tell us you're a lawyer...

 

[paddymurphy]

http://readingeagle.com/ap/article/...-freddie-gray-was-arrested&template=mobileart

Wow. She specifically asked for DRUG enforcement (Freddy known for that) of the specific intersection he was arrested at!!!

Defense is invoking that directive as motive for the chase....AND...is going to call her as a witness hahaha!!!! Which makes her a witness AND the prosecutor. ...which she cant be! She'll have to recuse herself from the trial!!!

HOLY FUCK this police union lawyer is taking her ass back to law school.

These cops are going free.

He will not be permitted to call her as a witness because nothing about why the police were there is in any way relevant to the trial.

 

[paddymurphy]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

True.

I have not tried a case.

Don't really need to.

When the motives and actions of the chief prosecutor are in question and when that same chief prosecutor can be seen trying to suppress the public release of relevant information and when the court system overrides her protestations, this sets the stage for petitioning to have the case dismissed with reasonably high prospects for success.

It now seems entirely possible that the case will never even go to trial, even without plea bargaining.

Don't blame me, if the DA has dirty hands on this one.

They are not in question; gag orders are requested in most high profile cases and granted; it is unethical for a prosecutor to release evidence such as an autopsy report prior to trial; and there is not probability at all that the case could be dismissed on any of these. Some of the charges will be dismissed and some of the defendants dismissed from the case. But it will go to trial for the officer who put him in the back unrestrained and for the officer who drove the vehicle.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

...Following orders by patrolling in that area. Did she order them to put him in a paddy wagon, cuffed and unrestrained and then to drive around Baltimore bouncing him around the back of the wagon? Do you people think before you post? Do you have any idea who moronic your comments are?

Goes to the trustworthiness, objectivity and vested interests of the DA's office, and, if they have dirty hands as well, then, the Defense can shred the Prosecution's case.

Any port in a storm, and the dumbass may have just served-up Christmas-in-Summertime for the Defense... an extraordinary gift, to be exploited to the hilt.

Perhaps the Voters of Baltimore will remember this, the next time she runs for office - although, after this, the next time she runs, it may be for Dogcatcher - with very uncertain prospects.

Clearly, you have never tried a case from either side. The fact that the police were in a high crime area, even if it were at her request (imagine that, a prosecutor working with police to determine where the crime is occurring so they can put their resources there) is completely irrelevant to any issue at the trial. No Judge would allow a defense attorney to try to make that an issue and no defense attorney would be stupid enough to think it would make a difference. What is relevant at trial is how Freddy Gray died; not how the police happened to be in that neighborhood.

At the behest of her husband who is on the city council of the area.
So much conflict of interest here it's ridiculous.

So, because a prosecutor's husband told her that there was a lot of crime in a particular area and she relayed that information to the police who thought it just might be a good idea to send some extra cops there, that is a conflict? I have seen more utter stupidity from you clowns in the last ten minutes that on any discussion board ever.

Care to make a bet whether or not she'll have to recuse herself from the case?