Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,391
- 9,170
They have nice shirts.Banana Republic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They have nice shirts.Banana Republic.
Which of course makes your side perpetual cucks.Dem leaders in congress incite MOBS to riot, loot and burn across American and NONE of them are being held accountable. Why the double standard with Trump?
I think we all know, Dems are assholes!
That’s always been America.Fair and impartial judge huh?
She told Trump in court that if he pleads not guilty he;ll get a much harsher sentence.
Yup...that's America under democrats!
He's free because of who he is & he has money. The idiots who rampaged on J6 who have neither of the above to protect them are rotting in fucking prison while that albino ape pile of shit is living large on a golf course.I actually agree.
If you are charging him with INSURRECTION, why is he free,
Isnt he a threat to overthrow the government?
It makes no sense. The indictment is PURE BULLSHIT.
Let’s see if a jury buys that.The election was rigged.
This has just been revealed. This is bonafide grounds for recusal. Her anti-Trump bias is being exposed in one of her January 6er cases where she expressed deep hatred towards our beloved magnificent patriotic President Trump. Here's the latest.
![]()
But yet she made no attempt to hold him in custody, which she could have done.
We hate your side's guts, make a note.Which of course makes your side perpetual cucks.
That’s why something like 98% of defendants plead out.
She is no longer a neutral magistrateTo those that defend the statement, how is this not problematic? It clearly communicates the fact that she thinks he should be behind bars for his role in Jan 6th.
There is no other way to read that statement. If you cannot pull that from her statement I do not see how you can pull anything from Trump's statements. I do not see why it really is all that complicated, the judge can be switched out and her statements do not change any of the material facts of the case. I do not see why it simply cannot proceed with another judge that has not made any statements about Trump's culpability.
Um, you have Tater.Essentially republicans support Trump because they have no other good candidates.
So much for the deep bench republicans always claimed they had.
That their best hope is to replay the battle they lost.
Cucks usually do.We hate your side's guts, make a note.
Exactly. Showing that sort of audacity in the face of overwhelming evidence doesn’t look good for the defendant. Especially in these cases where there are so many witnesses against the defendant.Because if they have the audacity to even TRY to defend themselves then we're REALLY gonna stick it to them!
Yup...sounds like a leftist to me!
This has just been revealed. This is bonafide grounds for recusal. Her anti-Trump bias is being exposed in one of her January 6er cases where she expressed deep hatred towards our beloved magnificent patriotic President Trump. Here's the latest.
![]()
Don’t give the DeepSwamp any ideas!He is a flight risk (He has airplanes and helicopters)
He might overthrow the government.
He should probably just be executed immediately. It the only fair solution.
Unfortunately, it is another lie... If it wasn't a lie, then the trumper mouths wouldn't be open and moving! That's what it's come down to, sadly!"BREAKING! Judge Chutkan Expressed Anger that Trump was still "Free" and Not Behind Bars in a January 6er Case"
Please provide "credible" proof that Judge Chutkan "EXPRESSED ANGER". Sounds like another NaziCon lie to me.