TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #741
Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
Obama's selections where purely political...........Not by their abilities. If they were chosen without taking in their views on politics you would not see the splits in decisions time and time again.That's why we have courtsNot when they openly violate our laws..............Amnesty for illegals is certainly against the law..........as are other EPA laws just overturned by SCOTUSEOs have always been constitutional. At least they are when a Republican is presidentThe Dems will suddenly be for the Constitutionalist for this selection even though they have gone against it time and time again with their pen and phone. Amnesty for illegals and Sanctuaries.............
Just another election with their standard tactics.
They will be thwarted on getting the nomination. The only question is on what they gain from tactics they will use over it. If the tables were turned they would do the same and have in the past done the exact same thing. Showing that history of their tactics could level the playing field.
Just because something is not conservative, does not make it unconstitutional
His 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
I didn't watch the debate.........you have your own problems.........a candidate under FBI investigation and another that proposes 19 Trillion in new taxes over 10 years.Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
BenghaziI didn't watch the debate.........you have your own problems.........a candidate under FBI investigation and another that proposes 19 Trillion in new taxes over 10 years.Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
Get realObama's selections where purely political...........Not by their abilities. If they were chosen without taking in their views on politics you would not see the splits in decisions time and time again.That's why we have courtsNot when they openly violate our laws..............Amnesty for illegals is certainly against the law..........as are other EPA laws just overturned by SCOTUSEOs have always been constitutional. At least they are when a Republican is presidentThe Dems will suddenly be for the Constitutionalist for this selection even though they have gone against it time and time again with their pen and phone. Amnesty for illegals and Sanctuaries.............
Just another election with their standard tactics.
They will be thwarted on getting the nomination. The only question is on what they gain from tactics they will use over it. If the tables were turned they would do the same and have in the past done the exact same thing. Showing that history of their tactics could level the playing field.
Just because something is not conservative, does not make it unconstitutional
His 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
That is a fact so get ready for the Boo s...they hate facts cause they interfere with their dogmasAll selections are political..
Classified and above Top Secret e mails.BenghaziI didn't watch the debate.........you have your own problems.........a candidate under FBI investigation and another that proposes 19 Trillion in new taxes over 10 years.Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
Benghazi rules down with facts ...facts are a liberal schemeClassified and above Top Secret e mails.BenghaziI didn't watch the debate.........you have your own problems.........a candidate under FBI investigation and another that proposes 19 Trillion in new taxes over 10 years.Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
A 97 to 0 vote is no longer possible............different times..........the Great Divide has widened........This is the Fact that was Booed by Republicans LOL...they desperately want to deny the Negro President what is routine for white Presidents
![]()
And that was what the Founders Envisioned.............and exactly why the President needs confirmation by the Senate....................Checks and Balances............No free ride................and they will use this check to block any nomination before next year.Get realObama's selections where purely political...........Not by their abilities. If they were chosen without taking in their views on politics you would not see the splits in decisions time and time again.That's why we have courtsNot when they openly violate our laws..............Amnesty for illegals is certainly against the law..........as are other EPA laws just overturned by SCOTUSEOs have always been constitutional. At least they are when a Republican is presidentThe Dems will suddenly be for the Constitutionalist for this selection even though they have gone against it time and time again with their pen and phone. Amnesty for illegals and Sanctuaries.............
Just another election with their standard tactics.
They will be thwarted on getting the nomination. The only question is on what they gain from tactics they will use over it. If the tables were turned they would do the same and have in the past done the exact same thing. Showing that history of their tactics could level the playing field.
Just because something is not conservative, does not make it unconstitutional
His 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
All selections are political......Thomas's wife gets paid to fight Obamacare
Five Solicitors General have later served on the Supreme Court: William Howard Taft (who served as the 27th President of the United States before becoming Chief Justice of the United States), Stanley Forman Reed, Robert H. Jackson, Thurgood Marshall, and Elena Kagan.
Benghazi rules down with facts ...facts are a liberal schemeClassified and above Top Secret e mails.BenghaziI didn't watch the debate.........you have your own problems.........a candidate under FBI investigation and another that proposes 19 Trillion in new taxes over 10 years.Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lolHis 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
Sure, and George Zimmerman is doing time in the big house. The next president is going to nominate and get the next SCJ confirmed. Obama doesn't have a chance of getting a liberal in there. Time is against him and the last mid-term has consequences. Read 'em and whine.
Ironically, that is not "the original intent" of Advise and Consent in the Constitution. Justice Scalia would not be pleased...And that was what the Founders Envisioned.............and exactly why the President needs confirmation by the Senate....................Checks and Balances............No free ride................and they will use this check to block any nomination before next year.
Obama's selections where purely political...........Not by their abilities. If they were chosen without taking in their views on politics you would not see the splits in decisions time and time again.
His 2 new appointees should have not ruled in Obamacare when they had ties to the process.
Fictional movies are one thing but FactsBenghazi rules down with facts ...facts are a liberal schemeClassified and above Top Secret e mails.BenghaziI didn't watch the debate.........you have your own problems.........a candidate under FBI investigation and another that proposes 19 Trillion in new taxes over 10 years.Do you boo facts when you hear them like the Republicans at the debate ? lol
Endorsed by those who actually fought there...........Not by the cover up machine............arms for ISIS........arms for ISIS...............how about gun running to Syria ending up in the hands of the enemy........................hmmm
What are the facts.................................Boo Boo stop using facts ...facts are irrelevant....Republicans