Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 35,301
- 23,304
- 1,845
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You demand everything and provide nothing.Nothing is what I expect from you, and you never disappoint, Chester.
I just have no reason to ever provide an answer to anything you ask.You don't know -
I knew that, that's why I asked.
They are reportedly .gov addresses on the official government server. As such, they are not private and are subject to FOIA requests.Other than a warrant. This isn't how our criminal justice system works. You don't get to go fishing in Joe Bidens private emails just because you hope to find something.
That's not the way it works, Curried! It doesn't matter if the money went to directly to Joe Biden or it went to his family. It's still influence peddling. If Joe knew about it...and it's obvious that he did!...then sending the money to his family doesn't make it legit!Who says he didn't know? There is no crime in Joe Biden's family members being successful businessmen and no crime in Joe knowing that they are.
I provided a link backing up my claim, ironically, you provided a link backing up my claim too.You demand everything and provide nothing.
You are a parasite.
Yes you do, it’s because you are a liar, Moroner.I just have no reason to ever provide an answer to anything you ask.
I just have no reason to ever provide an answer to anything you ask.
Well, the OP is not known for thinking things thru before he/she rushes to post his/her crap from RW sources.Apparently mob boss Joe Biden went through all the trouble of creating aliases and fake email accounts to do his dirty underhanded dealings and then forgot to not turn them all over to the National Archives.
I don't. There's no point.Yes you do
False. My link demonstrated that executive privilege covers more than conversations among the executive branch officials and can cover any advisor to the president as well as conversations with foreign leaders and other officials., you provided a link backing up my claim too.
All your examples include the President. Ya know, The Chief EXECUTIVEFalse. My link demonstrated that executive privilege covers more than conversations among the executive branch officials and can cover any advisor to the president as well as conversations with foreign leaders and other officials.
So the National Archives has Joe Biden’s pseudonym emails and is protecting the Usurper from scrutiny. How much bribery money has the National Archives received and what entity may be funding them?
National Archives acknowledges 5,400 Biden pseudonym emails, faces lawsuit for their release
The new lawsuit turns up the pressure on the archives to release the documents.justthenews.com
All my examples prove I'm right. Imaging being so stupid that you think that Wikipedia is the definitive and all inclusive source that nothing could ever add toAll your examples include the President. Ya know, The Chief EXECUTIVE
.What a goober.
If that's the case have fun fishing. Let us know when you catch something.They are reportedly .gov addresses on the official government server. As such, they are not private and are subject to FOIA requests.
You're apparently too stupid to know what influence peddling is. If a foreign company hires Hunter Biden and pays him millions of dollars to sit on their board that's perfectly legal. They can pay whoever they want to do whatever they want, that's their business. That in and of it self does not prove Joe Biden used his government position to help his son financially.That's not the way it works, Curried! It doesn't matter if the money went to directly to Joe Biden or it went to his family. It's still influence peddling. If Joe knew about it...and it's obvious that he did!...then sending the money to his family doesn't make it legit!
First, I never made that claim about Wiki.All my examples prove I'm right. Imaging being so stupid that you think that Wikipedia is the definitive and all inclusive source that nothing could ever add to
Did you buy your tissues yet?
You still think executive privilege only involves communications inside the executive branch?Your link, and your examples, prove i am right.
Then why wasn’t Trump’s Ukraine call covered by EP, Simp?False. My link demonstrated that executive privilege covers more than conversations among the executive branch officials and can cover any advisor to the president as well as conversations with foreign leaders and other officials.