Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Speaking of wild shit, sounds like you got a red herring up your butt.Trump throw's out the wildest shit without proof then demands that everyone muses on what if it did happen and what it would mean.
Instead of searching for his red herrings and asking what they mean if it's real how about the news refuses to cover any of it until Trump acts to prove the allegations?
To an Irrational Mind such as yours, all Rational Thought appears to be Irrational.
Let's be honest here..............
The Left has had a break with reality ever since The Election.
You are not only in denial still about the election, but you are in denial about the Criminal Nature of The Clintons, Obama, and the Chicago Political Machine.
You are still in denial about The Fact, The DNC played you for Chumps and pulled your strings like a Marionette.
Dance little monkey, dance!
The denial is yours, friend.
It's Trump that's on the hot seat.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try, but you wouldn't succeed.
Soooo...was it the Russians who were 'hacking' the election?
Well....zero evidence for that, but now we find that it was Susan Rice and the Obamunists who we learn have violated the civil rights of Americans, in ways that never happened before Obama.
Yet, no Democrat or Democrat supporter seems upset about it. In fact, just a week ago, Susan Rice went on tv and lied about any knowledge about it. This, alone, reveals that the Obama team knew how corrupt they were and tried to hide it.
Actually, she and the rest of them organized the surveillance for over a year, before Trump even had the nomination.
AND....none of the surveillance was related in any way into the investigation into Russia, the only excuse offered for the surveillance: once more we find that, to know what the Left is doing, watch what they blame the other side for.
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying.You couldn't be more wrong.
I could.
I could simply take up your position.
Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Sorry, but your cheeto-in-chief has STILL not been vindicated for his nonsensical tweet about "wiretapping", and virtually every Republican agrees with this.
Christie: No evidence Trump was spied on
Indeed. After all of that spying and conversation tracking, the only thing these Corrupt Dems came up with is that Trump said "Pussy".
Uh, there was no spying, and STILL it's clear Trump and all of his underlings had improper contacts with Russia, Trump has not divested himself of financial dealings, and he's violated the constitution by accepting foreign emoluments.
So.....the opposite of what you said.
Uh. There was spying. Susan Rice ordered that private U.S. citizens be unmasked and their conversation logged. You can play all the semantic games you like, but the SPYING-SURVEILLANCE is WORSE THAN WATERGATE.
LMAO, ACCORDING TO THE WHITE HOUSE, dipshit.
The Intelligence Devin Nunes Brought to the White House Came From the White House
A call is not documentation. Try keeping up.
No, how about you keep up? There was no spying on the Trump team. Period.
The denial is yours, friend.
It's Trump that's on the hot seat.
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try, but you wouldn't succeed.
Soooo...was it the Russians who were 'hacking' the election?
Well....zero evidence for that, but now we find that it was Susan Rice and the Obamunists who we learn have violated the civil rights of Americans, in ways that never happened before Obama.
Yet, no Democrat or Democrat supporter seems upset about it. In fact, just a week ago, Susan Rice went on tv and lied about any knowledge about it. This, alone, reveals that the Obama team knew how corrupt they were and tried to hide it.
Actually, she and the rest of them organized the surveillance for over a year, before Trump even had the nomination.
AND....none of the surveillance was related in any way into the investigation into Russia, the only excuse offered for the surveillance: once more we find that, to know what the Left is doing, watch what they blame the other side for.
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying.You couldn't be more wrong.
I could.
I could simply take up your position.
Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Sorry, but your cheeto-in-chief has STILL not been vindicated for his nonsensical tweet about "wiretapping", and virtually every Republican agrees with this.
Christie: No evidence Trump was spied on
'
It's good of you to have crawled over for a bout of education....and I'm here to provide it!
Not as simple as you are, but simple enough to provide the proof:
1. "The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
2. sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
3. . Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
4. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
Game, Set, Match.
Tic toc, tic toc, time is running out for the previous administration. There are going to be liberals who will go to jail and I hope it goes to the top. CrosedCraption is a water carrier for the lickspittle lapdog liberals, just cant get more despicable than that. Shame on you CC..Trump throw's out the wildest shit without proof then demands that everyone muses on what if it did happen and what it would mean.
Instead of searching for his red herrings and asking what they mean if it's real how about the news refuses to cover any of it until Trump acts to prove the allegations?
It is wrong. It was incidental collection, since the target was from a FISA warrant. And the Trump associates were cauight talking to people under FISA surveilance. And the NatSecAdv needed to know who the bad guys were talking to, which is why their names were unmasked.Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Uh, there was no spying, and STILL it's clear Trump and all of his underlings had improper contacts with Russia, Trump has not divested himself of financial dealings, and he's violated the constitution by accepting foreign emoluments.
So.....the opposite of what you said.
Uh. There was spying. Susan Rice ordered that private U.S. citizens be unmasked and their conversation logged. You can play all the semantic games you like, but the SPYING-SURVEILLANCE is WORSE THAN WATERGATE.
LMAO, ACCORDING TO THE WHITE HOUSE, dipshit.
The Intelligence Devin Nunes Brought to the White House Came From the White House
A call is not documentation. Try keeping up.
No, how about you keep up? There was no spying on the Trump team. Period.
^^^ Denial, it's not just for breakfast ^^^
Uh. There was spying. Susan Rice ordered that private U.S. citizens be unmasked and their conversation logged. You can play all the semantic games you like, but the SPYING-SURVEILLANCE is WORSE THAN WATERGATE.
LMAO, ACCORDING TO THE WHITE HOUSE, dipshit.
The Intelligence Devin Nunes Brought to the White House Came From the White House
A call is not documentation. Try keeping up.
No, how about you keep up? There was no spying on the Trump team. Period.
^^^ Denial, it's not just for breakfast ^^^
Read my links, dipshit.
"It's not just for breakfast"? Jesus you people are astronomically dumb. Where do you come from? And who keeps giving you wifi?
It is wrong. It was incidental collection, since the target was from a FISA warrant. And the Trump associates were cauight talking to people under FISA surveilance. And the NatSecAdv needed to know who the bad guys were talking to, which is why their names were unmasked.Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Take notes, MutatedGene:
There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:
1. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.
2. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.
It is illegal for the intell, maked or other wise, to be passes to journalists or made known.
As the spying by the Obamunists had nothing to do with the Russian investigation, there is no reason for either the spying or the unmasking....outside of this:
"Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
.... we need to start putting Obama officials by the hundreds in jail until we get to the bottom of this fascist weaponization of intelligence organizations that we depend upon not to take us down the road to Stalinism."
Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon
Soooo....during a presidential campaign, the Obama administration was spying on the people around Donald Trump.
Isn't what the Obamunists did exactly what the Democrats were so incensed about in Watergate????
You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try, but you wouldn't succeed.
Soooo...was it the Russians who were 'hacking' the election?
Well....zero evidence for that, but now we find that it was Susan Rice and the Obamunists who we learn have violated the civil rights of Americans, in ways that never happened before Obama.
Yet, no Democrat or Democrat supporter seems upset about it. In fact, just a week ago, Susan Rice went on tv and lied about any knowledge about it. This, alone, reveals that the Obama team knew how corrupt they were and tried to hide it.
Actually, she and the rest of them organized the surveillance for over a year, before Trump even had the nomination.
AND....none of the surveillance was related in any way into the investigation into Russia, the only excuse offered for the surveillance: once more we find that, to know what the Left is doing, watch what they blame the other side for.
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying.You couldn't be more wrong.
I could.
I could simply take up your position.
Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Sorry, but your cheeto-in-chief has STILL not been vindicated for his nonsensical tweet about "wiretapping", and virtually every Republican agrees with this.
Christie: No evidence Trump was spied on
'
It's good of you to have crawled over for a bout of education....and I'm here to provide it!
Not as simple as you are, but simple enough to provide the proof:
1. "The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
2. sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
3. . Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
4. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
Game, Set, Match.
No, the Obama team was not "spying" on Trump targets. They were (legally) spying on targets that were talking with the Trump team.
Which should actually be the REAL story: People who were legitimate targets of a warrant (meaning there was suspected wrongdoing by these targets) were thick as thieves with the Trump transition.
But keep focusing on the weeds to deflect from your criminal president.
LMAO, ACCORDING TO THE WHITE HOUSE, dipshit.
The Intelligence Devin Nunes Brought to the White House Came From the White House
A call is not documentation. Try keeping up.
No, how about you keep up? There was no spying on the Trump team. Period.
^^^ Denial, it's not just for breakfast ^^^
Read my links, dipshit.
"It's not just for breakfast"? Jesus you people are astronomically dumb. Where do you come from? And who keeps giving you wifi?
*sigh* It must be sad for you to go through life with such a limited and unamusing perspective.
It is wrong. It was incidental collection, since the target was from a FISA warrant. And the Trump associates were cauight talking to people under FISA surveilance. And the NatSecAdv needed to know who the bad guys were talking to, which is why their names were unmasked.Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Take notes, MutatedGene:
There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:
1. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.
2. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.
It is illegal for the intell, maked or other wise, to be passes to journalists or made known.
As the spying by the Obamunists had nothing to do with the Russian investigation, there is no reason for either the spying or the unmasking....outside of this:
"Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
.... we need to start putting Obama officials by the hundreds in jail until we get to the bottom of this fascist weaponization of intelligence organizations that we depend upon not to take us down the road to Stalinism."
Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon
Soooo....during a presidential campaign, the Obama administration was spying on the people around Donald Trump.
Isn't what the Obamunists did exactly what the Democrats were so incensed about in Watergate????
What a superbly objective and professionally written piece of journalism titled "Fascist felonious Obama administration".
What, nothing from the National Enquirer?
I could.
I could simply take up your position.
Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Sorry, but your cheeto-in-chief has STILL not been vindicated for his nonsensical tweet about "wiretapping", and virtually every Republican agrees with this.
Christie: No evidence Trump was spied on
'
It's good of you to have crawled over for a bout of education....and I'm here to provide it!
Not as simple as you are, but simple enough to provide the proof:
1. "The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
2. sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
3. . Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
4. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
Game, Set, Match.
No, the Obama team was not "spying" on Trump targets. They were (legally) spying on targets that were talking with the Trump team.
Which should actually be the REAL story: People who were legitimate targets of a warrant (meaning there was suspected wrongdoing by these targets) were thick as thieves with the Trump transition.
But keep focusing on the weeds to deflect from your criminal president.
Was the so-called 'incidental espionage' of Trump officials related to the Russian investigation?
Susan Rice: what did she do, and when did she do it???
"Intelligence sources said the logs discovered by National Security Council staff suggested Rice’s interest in the NSA materials, some of which included unmasked Americans' identities, appeared to begin last July around the time Trump secured the GOP nomination and accelerated after Trump’s election in November launched a transition that continued through January.
The intelligence reports included some intercepts of Americans talking to foreigners and many more involving foreign leaders talking about the future president, his campaign associates or his transition, the sources said. Most if not all had nothing to do with the Russian election interference scandal, the sources said, speaking only on condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the materials.
.... names were sometimes unmasked at the request of Rice...."
White House logs indicate Susan Rice consumed unmasked intel on Trump associates
Trump throw's out the wildest shit without proof then demands that everyone muses on what if it did happen and what it would mean.
Instead of searching for his red herrings and asking what they mean if it's real how about the news refuses to cover any of it until Trump acts to prove the allegations?
It is wrong. It was incidental collection, since the target was from a FISA warrant. And the Trump associates were cauight talking to people under FISA surveilance. And the NatSecAdv needed to know who the bad guys were talking to, which is why their names were unmasked.Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Take notes, MutatedGene:
There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:
1. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.
2. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.
It is illegal for the intell, maked or other wise, to be passes to journalists or made known.
As the spying by the Obamunists had nothing to do with the Russian investigation, there is no reason for either the spying or the unmasking....outside of this:
"Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
.... we need to start putting Obama officials by the hundreds in jail until we get to the bottom of this fascist weaponization of intelligence organizations that we depend upon not to take us down the road to Stalinism."
Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon
Soooo....during a presidential campaign, the Obama administration was spying on the people around Donald Trump.
Isn't what the Obamunists did exactly what the Democrats were so incensed about in Watergate????
What a superbly objective and professionally written piece of journalism titled "Fascist felonious Obama administration".
What, nothing from the National Enquirer?
When you can't dispute the facts, try to dispute the source of the message.
You learned that in indoctrination school...er, government school?
Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Sorry, but your cheeto-in-chief has STILL not been vindicated for his nonsensical tweet about "wiretapping", and virtually every Republican agrees with this.
Christie: No evidence Trump was spied on
'
It's good of you to have crawled over for a bout of education....and I'm here to provide it!
Not as simple as you are, but simple enough to provide the proof:
1. "The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
2. sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
3. . Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
4. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
Game, Set, Match.
No, the Obama team was not "spying" on Trump targets. They were (legally) spying on targets that were talking with the Trump team.
Which should actually be the REAL story: People who were legitimate targets of a warrant (meaning there was suspected wrongdoing by these targets) were thick as thieves with the Trump transition.
But keep focusing on the weeds to deflect from your criminal president.
Was the so-called 'incidental espionage' of Trump officials related to the Russian investigation?
Susan Rice: what did she do, and when did she do it???
"Intelligence sources said the logs discovered by National Security Council staff suggested Rice’s interest in the NSA materials, some of which included unmasked Americans' identities, appeared to begin last July around the time Trump secured the GOP nomination and accelerated after Trump’s election in November launched a transition that continued through January.
The intelligence reports included some intercepts of Americans talking to foreigners and many more involving foreign leaders talking about the future president, his campaign associates or his transition, the sources said. Most if not all had nothing to do with the Russian election interference scandal, the sources said, speaking only on condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the materials.
.... names were sometimes unmasked at the request of Rice...."
White House logs indicate Susan Rice consumed unmasked intel on Trump associates
"Unmasking" was her prerogative, and has been done by countless prior administrations.
It's not like revealing a CIA agent or something. Only republicans pull bullshit like that.
