- Oct 6, 2008
- 125,095
- 60,651
It is wrong. It was incidental collection, since the target was from a FISA warrant. And the Trump associates were cauight talking to people under FISA surveilance. And the NatSecAdv needed to know who the bad guys were talking to, which is why their names were unmasked.Is this wrong or right?
...it was not 'incidental collection of intelligence'....it was purely political spying by Obamunists.
Take notes, MutatedGene:
There are only two reasons for unmasking of a US citizen's name:
1. Is there a need to know the name of the citizen to understand the contest of the monitored intell.
2. If the citizen is involved in illegal activity.
It is illegal for the intell, maked or other wise, to be passes to journalists or made known.
As the spying by the Obamunists had nothing to do with the Russian investigation, there is no reason for either the spying or the unmasking....outside of this:
"Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
.... we need to start putting Obama officials by the hundreds in jail until we get to the bottom of this fascist weaponization of intelligence organizations that we depend upon not to take us down the road to Stalinism."
Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon
Soooo....during a presidential campaign, the Obama administration was spying on the people around Donald Trump.
Isn't what the Obamunists did exactly what the Democrats were so incensed about in Watergate????
What a superbly objective and professionally written piece of journalism titled "Fascist felonious Obama administration".
What, nothing from the National Enquirer?
![]()
When you can't dispute the facts, try to dispute the source of the message.
You learned that in indoctrination school...er, government school?
Yeah, and I guarantee you didn't read the Atlantic article I posted which clearly stated Rice did nothing wrong.
Then why are you Obamunists sweating?