BREAKING! Robert Mueller Requests Postponement of Gen. Michael Flynn’s Sentencing

[Faun]

crickets

Approaching a thousand posts in this thread and not one of these rightards have been able to answer...

what in Nunes' memo helps Flynn...?

 

[Care4all]

Did you forget what claim you were trying to back up?

I don't see anything about "FALSIFIED and FABRICATED" evidence in there. Maybe you posted the wrong link?

DERP

{Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.

In a court filing, Mr. Steele also says his accusations against the president and his aides about a supposed Russian hacking conspiracy were never supposed to be made public, much less posted in full on a website for the world to see on Jan. 10.}

Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

You mindless hacks are FUNNY when you're in full meltdown panic mode....

SO what? The dossier was not the primary information provided to the judge for the extension approval of the surveillance.... there was 120 plus pages of information provided by the justice dept to the FISA judge showing that the surveillance the previous 90 days provided important information for the counter intelligence investigation and for the request to have it continue was critical....the FISA judge and his staff then had to spend the time to read and analyze the 120 pages of info to decide if t was legal to go forward with the extension of the surveillance....

The Dossier was just a preliminary field investigative report, and did need to be verified.....and yes Steele knew that.... he never said it was 100% accurate, he thought it COULD BE close to that, but inevitably, some info turns out to be wrong in field reports, it ALL needed to be verified by the FBI....

and since the FBI has had the dossier/field report, they HAVE verified several parts of the dossier.....

whatever bit of the dossier submitted in the FISA extension request, would NOT have been the primary information used by the FISA judge, it could simply be supplemental information.....

A 4 page cherry picked, partisan instead of bipartisan memo isn't gonna tell an accurate story of a 120 page story....

Really?

Well let's see your evidence?



Your coup has failed and you are all melting down.

This is far worse than Watergate, I have a feeling you Stalinist scum will finally be held to answer for your crimes.

BY ALL MEANS

you can stick with that "story'', even after the egg gets thrown in your face.... no problem with me....

So, no evidence huh?

{
The committee’s chairman, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), expressed alarm at the ever-expanding investigation, saying, “We are now beginning to understand the magnitude of this insider bias on Mueller’s team.” As previously reported, there were nine Democrat donors on the team of 15, and one member had even worked for Hillary Clinton.

According to Goodlatte, this bias was on display in investigator Andrew Weissmann’s stated “awe” of fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates for disobeying President Trump, and investigator Jeannie Rhee’s representation of the irretrievably corrupt Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

“Aren’t DoJ attorneys advised to avoid even the ‘appearance of impropriety’?” Goodlatte asked, saying the “potential bias” of certain career Justice Department officials and lawyers on Mueller’s team was “deeply troubling.” “DoJ investigations must not be tainted by individuals imposing their own political prejudices.”

Committee members learned that Peter Strzok, the principal investigator in the Hillary Clinton email scandal, was exchanging pro-Clinton and anti-Trump messages throughout his extramarital affair with lawyer Lisa Page, who was working at the time for FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe. McCabe served as acting director of the FBI from May 9 when President Trump fired then-director James Comey until Aug. 2 when new director Christopher Wray took over. While serving as acting FBI director, McCabe was involved in the email investigation.

McCabe’s wife, Jill McCabe, was a Democratic candidate in 2015 for District 13 of the Virginia State Senate. Her campaign received nearly $675,000 in donations from the Virginia Democratic Party and Common Good VA, a political action committee of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D), a slippery longtime Clinton flunky. Mr. McCabe failed to recuse himself from the Clinton email probe until Nov. 1, 2016, which was four days after Comey, then the FBI director, announced the agency had reopened the investigation into the emails after finding new data on computer hard drives belonging to former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), the now-imprisoned sex-offender husband of Hillary’s top lieutenant, Huma Abedin. It was also eight days after the ties between Mrs. McCabe and McAuliffe became public knowledge.

Disturbingly, Strzok, who was later removed from the investigation by Mueller and demoted by the FBI for his texting misconduct, apparently relied on the discredited “piss-gate” dossier from opposition research firm Fusion GPS which was working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Among the dossier’s ridiculous claims was that President Trump hired prostitutes in Moscow to urinate on a hotel bed. The fanciful file was assembled by former British spy Christopher Steele based on information provided by Russian government operatives. The FBI reportedly paid for the dossier and may even have used it to obtain warrants to snoop on Trump associates from the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Fusion GPS has acknowledged in court documents that it paid a senior Justice Department official’s wife to dig up dirt on Donald Trump, the Daily Caller reports. The company stated it hired Nellie H. Ohr as a subcontractor to assist with “research and analysis of Mr. Trump.” Ohr is married to Bruce G. Ohr, who was associate deputy attorney general until his recent mysterious demotion at the Justice Department.

Wherever there is trouble, look for Strzok’s fingerprints. Strzok talked then-FBI Director James Comey into calling Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information “extremely careless” instead of “grossly negligent.” He also interviewed then-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn before the Trump administration canned him.

At an oversight hearing last week, Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) said the watering down of the language about Clinton was done “so she could escape prosecution and thus stay in the race against Donald Trump.”

Text messages between Strzok and his mistress that were released by the congressional committee show the two Hillary supporters tag-teaming then-candidate Trump as early as 2015.}

FBI Plot Against Trump

You traitors are fucked, and you know it.

you can wish in one hand and crap in the other, and see which one gets filled first....

it's a second rate effort by the President and Nunes to try to muddy the waters in the Russian investigation and Trump's obstruction of justice allegation, but it won't work....except with you trumpateers, who've been programmed to receive and believe all bull crud ala Trump...

your guy Stzrok, called for and wrote the memo to reopen the Hillary email investigation..... the one single thing, if yu could choose only one, that made her lose the election, all polls were soaring until that point.... now why would this FBI guy do that? Why would he favor Trump like that and put an end to her winning if he was soooooo biased? Makes you wonder, doesn't it?

If there are problems with them getting FISA warrants, as there have been several times before....then congress needs to FIX the problem..... it's what they are suppose to do....

What they are doing now, in this very unethical, (outside of their protocols of the intelligence committee to investigate in a bipartisan manner with hearings in the committee,) and dog and pony show manner.....is nothing but a propaganda campaign for the feeble minded.... too bad you can't see that....

 

[Care4all]

WHAT in heaven's name is the president working soooooooooo hard to hide?

what in the world has crooked donald done.....?

 

[mikegriffith1]

I bet liberals don't even know why Flynn was charged or what Flynn lied about. His lies had nothing to do with "collusion" with the Russians to influence/steal the election. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz:

The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth, they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.

Consider his request to Sergey Kislyak, then Russian ambassador to the U.S., to delay or oppose a United Nations Security Council vote on an anti-Israel resolution that the outgoing Obama administration refused to veto. Not only was that request not criminal, it was the right thing to do. President Obama’s unilateral decision to change decades-long American policy by not vetoing a perniciously one-sided anti-Israel resolution was opposed by Congress and by most Americans. It was not good for America, for Israel or for peace. It was done out of Obama’s personal pique against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than on principle. . . .

As the president-elect, Donald Trump was constitutionally and politically entitled to try to protect his ability to broker a fair peace between the Israelis and Palestinians by urging all members of the Security Council to vote against or delay the enactment of the resolution. The fact that such efforts to do the right thing did not succeed does not diminish the correctness of the effort. I wish it had succeeded. We would be in a better place today. . . .

So there was nothing criminal about Flynn’s request of Kislyak, even if he were instructed to do so by higher-ups in the Trump transition team. The same is true of his discussions regarding sanctions. The president-elect is entitled to have different policies about sanctions and to have his transition team discuss them with Russian officials. (Alan Dershowitz: Why did Michael Flynn lie, and why did Robert Mueller charge him with lying?)​

So there you have it. Flynn lied about talking with the Russians about two foreign policy issues about which the President-elect had every right to try to keep his options open to pursue a different path--not one word about "collusion" to try to rig the election.

 

[Faun]

I bet liberals don't even know why Flynn was charged or what Flynn lied about. His lies had nothing to do with "collusion" with the Russians to influence/steal the election. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz:

The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth, they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.

Consider his request to Sergey Kislyak, then Russian ambassador to the U.S., to delay or oppose a United Nations Security Council vote on an anti-Israel resolution that the outgoing Obama administration refused to veto. Not only was that request not criminal, it was the right thing to do. President Obama’s unilateral decision to change decades-long American policy by not vetoing a perniciously one-sided anti-Israel resolution was opposed by Congress and by most Americans. It was not good for America, for Israel or for peace. It was done out of Obama’s personal pique against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than on principle. . . .

As the president-elect, Donald Trump was constitutionally and politically entitled to try to protect his ability to broker a fair peace between the Israelis and Palestinians by urging all members of the Security Council to vote against or delay the enactment of the resolution. The fact that such efforts to do the right thing did not succeed does not diminish the correctness of the effort. I wish it had succeeded. We would be in a better place today. . . .

So there was nothing criminal about Flynn’s request of Kislyak, even if he were instructed to do so by higher-ups in the Trump transition team. The same is true of his discussions regarding sanctions. The president-elect is entitled to have different policies about sanctions and to have his transition team discuss them with Russian officials. (Alan Dershowitz: Why did Michael Flynn lie, and why did Robert Mueller charge him with lying?)​

So there you have it. Flynn lied about talking with the Russians about two foreign policy issues about which the President-elect had every right to try to keep his options open to pursue a different path--not one word about "collusion" to try to rig the election.

Great, you admit Flynn lied to the FBI. Now lock him up.

 

[mikegriffith1]

I bet liberals don't even know why Flynn was charged or what Flynn lied about. His lies had nothing to do with "collusion" with the Russians to influence/steal the election. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz:

The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth, they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.

Consider his request to Sergey Kislyak, then Russian ambassador to the U.S., to delay or oppose a United Nations Security Council vote on an anti-Israel resolution that the outgoing Obama administration refused to veto. Not only was that request not criminal, it was the right thing to do. President Obama’s unilateral decision to change decades-long American policy by not vetoing a perniciously one-sided anti-Israel resolution was opposed by Congress and by most Americans. It was not good for America, for Israel or for peace. It was done out of Obama’s personal pique against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than on principle. . . .

As the president-elect, Donald Trump was constitutionally and politically entitled to try to protect his ability to broker a fair peace between the Israelis and Palestinians by urging all members of the Security Council to vote against or delay the enactment of the resolution. The fact that such efforts to do the right thing did not succeed does not diminish the correctness of the effort. I wish it had succeeded. We would be in a better place today. . . .

So there was nothing criminal about Flynn’s request of Kislyak, even if he were instructed to do so by higher-ups in the Trump transition team. The same is true of his discussions regarding sanctions. The president-elect is entitled to have different policies about sanctions and to have his transition team discuss them with Russian officials. (Alan Dershowitz: Why did Michael Flynn lie, and why did Robert Mueller charge him with lying?)​

So there you have it. Flynn lied about talking with the Russians about two foreign policy issues about which the President-elect had every right to try to keep his options open to pursue a different path--not one word about "collusion" to try to rig the election.

Great, you admit Flynn lied to the FBI. Now lock him up.

Wow, that's your take from those facts? That's pathetic. He committed no crime in talking with the Russians about those issues. But you want him locked up because he lied to the FBI about discussing those issues with the Russians. You would have made a great Nazi.

 

[Faun]

I bet liberals don't even know why Flynn was charged or what Flynn lied about. His lies had nothing to do with "collusion" with the Russians to influence/steal the election. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz:

The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth, they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.

Consider his request to Sergey Kislyak, then Russian ambassador to the U.S., to delay or oppose a United Nations Security Council vote on an anti-Israel resolution that the outgoing Obama administration refused to veto. Not only was that request not criminal, it was the right thing to do. President Obama’s unilateral decision to change decades-long American policy by not vetoing a perniciously one-sided anti-Israel resolution was opposed by Congress and by most Americans. It was not good for America, for Israel or for peace. It was done out of Obama’s personal pique against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than on principle. . . .

As the president-elect, Donald Trump was constitutionally and politically entitled to try to protect his ability to broker a fair peace between the Israelis and Palestinians by urging all members of the Security Council to vote against or delay the enactment of the resolution. The fact that such efforts to do the right thing did not succeed does not diminish the correctness of the effort. I wish it had succeeded. We would be in a better place today. . . .

So there was nothing criminal about Flynn’s request of Kislyak, even if he were instructed to do so by higher-ups in the Trump transition team. The same is true of his discussions regarding sanctions. The president-elect is entitled to have different policies about sanctions and to have his transition team discuss them with Russian officials. (Alan Dershowitz: Why did Michael Flynn lie, and why did Robert Mueller charge him with lying?)​

So there you have it. Flynn lied about talking with the Russians about two foreign policy issues about which the President-elect had every right to try to keep his options open to pursue a different path--not one word about "collusion" to try to rig the election.

Great, you admit Flynn lied to the FBI. Now lock him up.

Wow, that's your take from those facts? That's pathetic. He committed no crime in talking with the Russians about those issues. But you want him locked up because he lied to the FBI about discussing those issues with the Russians. You would have made a great Nazi.

Wow, took only one post to get you to play your nazi card.

Now what more “facts” do ya need? He lied to the FBI... lying to the FBI is a crime... Lock him up.

 

[jillian]

crickets

Approaching a thousand posts in this thread and not one of these rightards have been able to answer...

what in Nunes' memo helps Flynn...?

because they're lying loons.

and nunes knows that trumptards are imbeciles and he can tell them any idiocy he wants.

but... from a real federal prosecutor this morning.....

almost exactly what we''ve been saying.. which is that they aren't going to let Flynn be sentenced until he fulfills his part of the bargain and testifies at every trial he agreed to testify at.

damn, they're imbeciles.

 

[dannyboys]

What indictment? Flynn plead guilty. He's convicted and awaiting sentencing.

Really? where is he waiting? A plea of guilt in a grand jury means zip zero nada until he stands before a judge...Grand jury's do not have a sitting judge...a courtroom is where he will face punishment if convicted...
The plea could have been coerced and a court room is where that will be weeded out...coercion comes in all forms like if he felt his son for example was next in line to be brought up to a GJ he may have felt coerced...
If the judge agrees he can withdraw his plea...then it's up to Mueller if he wants to proceed or not...Grand juries can not send you to prison take your property or anything else like that...

Flynn will walk....my prediction...

If Struck even breathed on any paperwork which had Flynn's name on it the caes won't even see a judge.
Mueller KNEW all about Struck's Trump-hate syndrome before he hired him.
No one in Mueller's position wouldn't know.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

“Due to the status of the Special Counsel’s investigation, the parties do not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time,” the document, signed by Mueller and Flynn attorneys Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony, said. "

'The STATUS of the investigation'?

Sounds like the collapsing investigation, the inability to even prove a crime was committed warranting the investigation, having to fire exposed criminal biased members of his team, the compete questioning of his team's credibility, and mow the up-coming release of the Summary of Evidence...may have a good bit to do with Mueller's call for a delay...

Sounds like Flynn still has work to do.

 

[rightwinger]

Flynn is not done singing yet

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What indictment? Flynn plead guilty. He's convicted and awaiting sentencing.

Really? where is he waiting? A plea of guilt in a grand jury means zip zero nada until he stands before a judge...Grand jury's do not have a sitting judge...a courtroom is where he will face punishment if convicted...
The plea could have been coerced and a court room is where that will be weeded out...coercion comes in all forms like if he felt his son for example was next in line to be brought up to a GJ he may have felt coerced...
If the judge agrees he can withdraw his plea...then it's up to Mueller if he wants to proceed or not...Grand juries can not send you to prison take your property or anything else like that...

Flynn will walk....my prediction...

If Struck even breathed on any paperwork which had Flynn's name on it the caes won't even see a judge.
Mueller KNEW all about Struck's Trump-hate syndrome before he hired him.
No one in Mueller's position wouldn't know.

So he made Flynn lie?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

at which time Flynn will be allocuted by the judge and the judge will sentence him

Not if he changes his plea...then there will be a trial date set...it happens all the time with grand jury's...

I thought he already stood in front of a judge in a courtroom and pled guilty, no? If so, he won't be asked if he wants to change his plea. It will be a sentencing.

He did. Judge Rudolph Contreras, in fact. Rambunctious is just among the most ignorant of all the posters on this forum who thinks Flynn hasn't had his day in court yet.

Hmm....judge sounds Mexican. He's most likely not able to be fair.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

at which time Flynn will be allocuted by the judge and the judge will sentence him

Not if he changes his plea...then there will be a trial date set...it happens all the time with grand jury's...

I thought he already stood in front of a judge in a courtroom and pled guilty, no? If so, he won't be asked if he wants to change his plea. It will be a sentencing.

He did. Judge Rudolph Contreras, in fact. Rambunctious is just among the most ignorant of all the posters on this forum who thinks Flynn hasn't had his day in court yet.

He’s not the only one. It’s beyond belief.

You should take an introduction to law class, fakelawyer.

A coerced confession based on fabricated evidence?

Look, you Stalinists have a long history of beating "confessions" out of your victims, but the normals are woke and we are restoring law to this land, driving you thugs out.

A coerced confession based on fabricated evidence

Fabricated evidence?

He has plead guilty, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I bet liberals don't even know why Flynn was charged or what Flynn lied about. His lies had nothing to do with "collusion" with the Russians to influence/steal the election. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz:

The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth, they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.

Consider his request to Sergey Kislyak, then Russian ambassador to the U.S., to delay or oppose a United Nations Security Council vote on an anti-Israel resolution that the outgoing Obama administration refused to veto. Not only was that request not criminal, it was the right thing to do. President Obama’s unilateral decision to change decades-long American policy by not vetoing a perniciously one-sided anti-Israel resolution was opposed by Congress and by most Americans. It was not good for America, for Israel or for peace. It was done out of Obama’s personal pique against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rather than on principle. . . .

As the president-elect, Donald Trump was constitutionally and politically entitled to try to protect his ability to broker a fair peace between the Israelis and Palestinians by urging all members of the Security Council to vote against or delay the enactment of the resolution. The fact that such efforts to do the right thing did not succeed does not diminish the correctness of the effort. I wish it had succeeded. We would be in a better place today. . . .

So there was nothing criminal about Flynn’s request of Kislyak, even if he were instructed to do so by higher-ups in the Trump transition team. The same is true of his discussions regarding sanctions. The president-elect is entitled to have different policies about sanctions and to have his transition team discuss them with Russian officials. (Alan Dershowitz: Why did Michael Flynn lie, and why did Robert Mueller charge him with lying?)​

So there you have it. Flynn lied about talking with the Russians about two foreign policy issues about which the President-elect had every right to try to keep his options open to pursue a different path--not one word about "collusion" to try to rig the election.

Great. He's been convicted and the memo has absolutely nothing to do with that.

 

[easyt65]

Strzok interviews Abedin & Mills. He is proven to have protected them from...surprise, surprise...'LYING TO THE FBI' ... after having proven to have protected Hillary from her crimes.

Strzok interviews Flynn. Flynn lies about his conversation with a Russian Rep, WHICH WAS NOT EVEN A CRIME, and he is indicted for 'Lying to the FBI'.

Strzok is fired from Mueller's Team by Mueller who is forced to do so in a pre-emptive move designed to save the credibility of his team / investigation.

Strzok is exposed as an anti-Trump Pro-Hillary extremist, not the only one on Mueller's team (surprise, surprise). His affair with another anti-Trump Pro-Hillary extremist co-Conspirator is revealed.

The FBI's 'Insurance Policy' conspiracy is revealed, FBI Deputy Director McCabe - now under investigation by the DOJ - is exposed as the FBI Leader who makes the comment, is exposed as having set up a meeting with the WH then leaked classified from the meeting.

The Obama administration's 'Secret Society' is exposed....

And now the Summary of Evidence is about to be released, exposing Rosenstein's / Mueller's / Comey's / McCabe's Abuse power / violations of both FBI protocol and law...

Now Mueller suddenly calls for a delay in Flynn's sentencing....


Perhaps after the Summary is released he will offer to drop charges against Flynn (or offer a deal to go light on Flynn's sentencing) if no charges are filed against him.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Strzok interviews Abedin & Mills. He is proven to have protected them from...surprise, surprise...'LYING TO THE FBI' ... after having proven to have protected Hillary from her crimes.

Strzok interviews Flynn. Flynn lies about his conversation with a Russian Rep, WHICH WAS NOT EVEN A CRIME, and he is indicted for 'Lying to the FBI'.

Strzok is fired from Mueller's Team by Mueller who is forced to do so in a pre-emptive move designed to save the credibility of his team / investigation.

Strzok is exposed as an anti-Trump Pro-Hillary extremist, not the only one on Mueller's team (surprise, surprise). His affair with another anti-Trump Pro-Hillary extremist co-Conspirator is revealed.

The FBI's 'Insurance Policy' conspiracy is revealed, FBI Deputy Director McCabe - now under investigation by the DOJ - is exposed as the FBI Leader who makes the comment, is exposed as having set up a meeting with the WH then leaked classified from the meeting.

The Obama administration's 'Secret Society' is exposed....

And now the Summary of Evidence is about to be released, exposing Rosenstein's / Mueller's / Comey's / McCabe's Abuse power / violations of both FBI protocol and law...

Now Mueller suddenly calls for a delay in Flynn's sentencing....


Perhaps after the Summary is released he will offer to drop charges against Flynn (or offer a deal to go light on Flynn's sentencing) if no charges are filed against him.

Flynn called the ambassador on his line.
Flynn is intercepted while speaking with the ambassador. The call is recorded.


Flynn is later called in to be interviewed by the FBI. He is asked if he has had any contacts with Russians and if so what was the nature of those conversations. The interview is recorded.

Flynn was not truthful in the interview. He was charged and plead guilty.



What in that memo could possibly affect that outcome?

 

[Care4all]

Strzok interviews Abedin & Mills. He is proven to have protected them from...surprise, surprise...'LYING TO THE FBI' ... after having proven to have protected Hillary from her crimes

That has not been proven at all....the Inspector General is investigating whether their personal feelings and comments were shown to have affected their work....And the investigation is not over.

PLEASE stop lying....

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Just a smile, Easy.

Loser.

 

[easyt65]

Strzok interviews Abedin & Mills. He is proven to have protected them from...surprise, surprise...'LYING TO THE FBI' ... after having proven to have protected Hillary from her crimes

That has not been proven at all....the Inspector General is investigating whether their personal feelings and comments were shown to have affected their work....And the investigation is not over.

PLEASE stop lying....

Yes. Yes it has.

"The FBI agent who was fired from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation team for sending anti-Donald Trump text messages conducted the interviews with two Hillary Clinton aides accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former secretary of state’s private email server.

Neither of the Clinton associates, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, faced legal consequences for their misleading statements, which they made in interviews last year with former FBI section chief Peter Strzok."

-- Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements To FBI



It seems like lying hutch has a 'disciple' following in his footsteps.....