- Apr 17, 2009
- 112,950
- 38,428
You're backpedaling furiously now.... what about any claim of illegal unmasking, which has never been proven, causes a warrant to be illegally obtained (which is where you started).Why would a FISA warrant against the Russian ambassador be illegal?
Not talking about that one. I am talking about the one that was being used against trump. The unmasking that was going on by the obama admin tells me they had a tap going on trump tower. Good luck justifying that one.
"The unmasking that was going on by the Obama admin tells me they had a tap going on Trump tower"
That sentence doesn't make sense. It looks like a pile of buzzwords without substance.
How would the "unmasking" tell you that Trump tower was tapped?
As for the surveillance that trapped Flynn in his lie - he was on the phone with the Russian Ambassador. It's a pretty safe bet that the target of the surveillance was the Russian, and not Flynn.
Then you didn't read and understand what I said. While obama was still in office there was a flurry of unmasking going on. All of it designed to harm the trump campaign. How did the obama admin get the information that allowed them to do the unmasking? As far as flynns case go's. How do you know? None of that has been released. You and I simply have no way of knowing how any of muellers case was built.
My speculation is based on several decades of work in the Court system. But that is all it is, speculation.
Have you not been paying attention? The big question is, was the dossier used to get the FISA warrant? It’s looking like it was. It can be argued that the whole bases of any case brought against Trump that grew from the dossier should be tossed when the dossier is declared a fake. Get used to the resting bitch face you saw on the democrat party last night. That’s how they will look for quite awhile I bet as they will be hearin “NO” allot. And Trump will be saying it.
Based on what?
And some elements of the dossier have been verified as fact. Other parts remain unverified. None of it was presented as factual.