Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Trump says he will appoint Ted Cruz to the SCOTUS maybe he will get Cruz supporters on board. This election isn't about the Presidency, it is about who chooses the next four SCOTUS judges who will defend our Bill of Rights and support the Constitution. Hillary will appoint Trannies, gays, BLM types, Occupy,and othe far left radicals because she will owe it to them for her election.
He says a lot of things, then he turns around and says 'psych!'.
Even if he dangled Cruz for SC, he'd just as quick turn on a dime. Maybe he's bipolar? smh
No, what Trump did to Cruz is called 'rebranding' him, and now he makes amends after winning so that there's no hard feelings. ...and maybe a SCOTUS pick.
Before the Cruz campaign dirties began with Carson, I personally dreamed of Cruz as Attorney General and always wanted Carly to be the WH Press Secretary.And there is nothing liberal about your love of big government.
Just because I am not an anarchist like doesnt make me a lover of big government, dude.
Liberals are what founded the country.
lol, not by todays definitions
Ironically today liberals are called libertarians and the people who call themselves liberal are authoritarian leftists.
Um, no, Libertarians are anarchists and Fellow Travelers.
You also call yourselves "JimBowie1958"
I dont call myself Jim Bowie; I simply named my account after Jim Bowie because I admire the mans love for freedom.
Dont even pretend you understand Bowie.
Donald Trump wouldn't know free markets if they bit him in the ass. He repeated that again saying on Hannity that his plan isn't to fix why companies want to leave, he wants to punish them for trying to do what's in their interest.
Defeat Donald Trump, he sucks
So Kaz, you voting for Hellary now?
"Free Market" is a nice way of describing "America Takes It In The Ass".If Trump says he will appoint Ted Cruz to the SCOTUS maybe he will get Cruz supporters on board. This election isn't about the Presidency, it is about who chooses the next four SCOTUS judges who will defend our Bill of Rights and support the Constitution. Hillary will appoint Trannies, gays, BLM types, Occupy,and othe far left radicals because she will owe it to them for her election.
He says a lot of things, then he turns around and says 'psych!'.
Even if he dangled Cruz for SC, he'd just as quick turn on a dime. Maybe he's bipolar? smh
No, what Trump did to Cruz is called 'rebranding' him, and now he makes amends after winning so that there's no hard feelings. ...and maybe a SCOTUS pick.
Before the Cruz campaign dirties began with Carson, I personally dreamed of Cruz as Attorney General and always wanted Carly to be the WH Press Secretary.And there is nothing liberal about your love of big government.
Just because I am not an anarchist like doesnt make me a lover of big government, dude.
Liberals are what founded the country.
lol, not by todays definitions
Ironically today liberals are called libertarians and the people who call themselves liberal are authoritarian leftists.
Um, no, Libertarians are anarchists and Fellow Travelers.
You also call yourselves "JimBowie1958"
I dont call myself Jim Bowie; I simply named my account after Jim Bowie because I admire the mans love for freedom.
Dont even pretend you understand Bowie.
Donald Trump wouldn't know free markets if they bit him in the ass. He repeated that again saying on Hannity that his plan isn't to fix why companies want to leave, he wants to punish them for trying to do what's in their interest.
Defeat Donald Trump, he sucks
So Kaz, you voting for Hellary now?
Maybe. Depends who the Libertarian Party picks.
But Trump's anti-free market rhetoric is scary. That's what he was pounding on Hannity yesterday, we have to control markets and companies and punish the ones who want to leave, not figure out why they want to leave and fix it. Hillary is going to be four years of scandal, she won't get shit done
"Free Market" is a nice way of describing "America Takes It In The Ass".He says a lot of things, then he turns around and says 'psych!'.
Even if he dangled Cruz for SC, he'd just as quick turn on a dime. Maybe he's bipolar? smh
No, what Trump did to Cruz is called 'rebranding' him, and now he makes amends after winning so that there's no hard feelings. ...and maybe a SCOTUS pick.
Before the Cruz campaign dirties began with Carson, I personally dreamed of Cruz as Attorney General and always wanted Carly to be the WH Press Secretary.And there is nothing liberal about your love of big government.
Just because I am not an anarchist like doesnt make me a lover of big government, dude.
Liberals are what founded the country.
lol, not by todays definitions
Ironically today liberals are called libertarians and the people who call themselves liberal are authoritarian leftists.
Um, no, Libertarians are anarchists and Fellow Travelers.
You also call yourselves "JimBowie1958"
I dont call myself Jim Bowie; I simply named my account after Jim Bowie because I admire the mans love for freedom.
Dont even pretend you understand Bowie.
Donald Trump wouldn't know free markets if they bit him in the ass. He repeated that again saying on Hannity that his plan isn't to fix why companies want to leave, he wants to punish them for trying to do what's in their interest.
Defeat Donald Trump, he sucks
So Kaz, you voting for Hellary now?
Maybe. Depends who the Libertarian Party picks.
But Trump's anti-free market rhetoric is scary. That's what he was pounding on Hannity yesterday, we have to control markets and companies and punish the ones who want to leave, not figure out why they want to leave and fix it. Hillary is going to be four years of scandal, she won't get shit done
It like calling yourself pro-choice when it's really pro-abortion.
I don't know what you're babbling about, but can you point out what part of this free market system has caused anything to decrease costs to the consumer? Sure, you can site examples of where it may possibly have decreased the increase in costs, but free markets do only one thing other than relieve us of our wealth, and that's move jobs over seas."Free Market" is a nice way of describing "America Takes It In The Ass".No, what Trump did to Cruz is called 'rebranding' him, and now he makes amends after winning so that there's no hard feelings. ...and maybe a SCOTUS pick.
Before the Cruz campaign dirties began with Carson, I personally dreamed of Cruz as Attorney General and always wanted Carly to be the WH Press Secretary.Just because I am not an anarchist like doesnt make me a lover of big government, dude.
lol, not by todays definitions
Um, no, Libertarians are anarchists and Fellow Travelers.
I dont call myself Jim Bowie; I simply named my account after Jim Bowie because I admire the mans love for freedom.
Dont even pretend you understand Bowie.
Donald Trump wouldn't know free markets if they bit him in the ass. He repeated that again saying on Hannity that his plan isn't to fix why companies want to leave, he wants to punish them for trying to do what's in their interest.
Defeat Donald Trump, he sucks
So Kaz, you voting for Hellary now?
Maybe. Depends who the Libertarian Party picks.
But Trump's anti-free market rhetoric is scary. That's what he was pounding on Hannity yesterday, we have to control markets and companies and punish the ones who want to leave, not figure out why they want to leave and fix it. Hillary is going to be four years of scandal, she won't get shit done
It like calling yourself pro-choice when it's really pro-abortion.
Yeah, fucking consumers with lower prices, it needs to be stopped.
LOL, and yeah, thinking something should be not banned by government (in this case abortion) means that you want it to happen. Everything you don't want people to do needs to be illegal. Choice, not. Well, your choice for everyone. You are an authoritarian, at least you admit that. No wonder you don't support economic freedom either
Voting for Trump is helping Clinton.
Still sticking with your Kasich fantasy? Or are you finally coming around to my way of thinking?
Your way of thinking is liberal bullshit, mixed with a juvenile obsession with the s-e-x.
You may have me confused with someone else. I'm the one that has been telling you that the GOP is fucked. That with or without Trump they were going to lose. And that your Kasich fantasy was meaningless nonsense.
And here we are. With Trump the presumptive nominee, Kasich's odds roughly that number that comes just after zero, and even you admitting that the GOP's odds of winning with Trump were slim to none.
I knew you'd come around.
Still a damned idiot, I see.
I have always said that Trump has zero chance of winning in November. Kasich is the only candidate who can win in November. You have been desperately wanting Trump to be the nominee because you want to secure a Clinton victory. You've been trash talking Kasich because you know he's the only one who can defeat Clinton.
You are so close....but still don't quite get it. Yes, I wanted Trump as the GOP nominee. He's the dream nominee from a DNC perspective. But that's not why I predicted Kasich would fail. It was the evidence. Which you described as.'liberal bullshit'.
Evidence has no political affiliation. Reality isn't liberal or conservative. I simply had a better command of the facts, a clearer perception of reality than you did.
Which is why I was right. What I told you was going to happen is happening. Ignore as you will. It won't matter anymore than it did with your Kasich nonsense.
cannot wait till levin, beck, medved talk about this tom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (today)
Levin talked about it today, he's already pivoting to support Trump and nudge his Cruz callers in that direction.
Another vote for Hillary.My significant other, who has always voted republican, will not vote for president this year.
Still sticking with your Kasich fantasy? Or are you finally coming around to my way of thinking?
Your way of thinking is liberal bullshit, mixed with a juvenile obsession with the s-e-x.
You may have me confused with someone else. I'm the one that has been telling you that the GOP is fucked. That with or without Trump they were going to lose. And that your Kasich fantasy was meaningless nonsense.
And here we are. With Trump the presumptive nominee, Kasich's odds roughly that number that comes just after zero, and even you admitting that the GOP's odds of winning with Trump were slim to none.
I knew you'd come around.
Still a damned idiot, I see.
I have always said that Trump has zero chance of winning in November. Kasich is the only candidate who can win in November. You have been desperately wanting Trump to be the nominee because you want to secure a Clinton victory. You've been trash talking Kasich because you know he's the only one who can defeat Clinton.
You are so close....but still don't quite get it. Yes, I wanted Trump as the GOP nominee. He's the dream nominee from a DNC perspective. But that's not why I predicted Kasich would fail. It was the evidence. Which you described as.'liberal bullshit'.
Evidence has no political affiliation. Reality isn't liberal or conservative. I simply had a better command of the facts, a clearer perception of reality than you did.
Which is why I was right. What I told you was going to happen is happening. Ignore as you will. It won't matter anymore than it did with your Kasich nonsense.
Your way of thinking is liberal bullshit, mixed with a juvenile obsession with the s-e-x.
You may have me confused with someone else. I'm the one that has been telling you that the GOP is fucked. That with or without Trump they were going to lose. And that your Kasich fantasy was meaningless nonsense.
And here we are. With Trump the presumptive nominee, Kasich's odds roughly that number that comes just after zero, and even you admitting that the GOP's odds of winning with Trump were slim to none.
I knew you'd come around.
Still a damned idiot, I see.
I have always said that Trump has zero chance of winning in November. Kasich is the only candidate who can win in November. You have been desperately wanting Trump to be the nominee because you want to secure a Clinton victory. You've been trash talking Kasich because you know he's the only one who can defeat Clinton.
You are so close....but still don't quite get it. Yes, I wanted Trump as the GOP nominee. He's the dream nominee from a DNC perspective. But that's not why I predicted Kasich would fail. It was the evidence. Which you described as.'liberal bullshit'.
Evidence has no political affiliation. Reality isn't liberal or conservative. I simply had a better command of the facts, a clearer perception of reality than you did.
Which is why I was right. What I told you was going to happen is happening. Ignore as you will. It won't matter anymore than it did with your Kasich nonsense.
And yet....you've adopted my every argument. You can only deny reality for so long.
Remember that next time we disagree; Evidence trumps wishes.
I have been more aligned with candidates like Trump since I first registered to vote in 2007. I suspect there are about as many Republican Trump supporters like myself as the number of true socialists supporting Bernie.You are an idiot social justice kook. We don't want you voting for our candidates.
Prior to 2012, I voted for Republican candidates every year.
And when you guys get so nutty that Ted fucking Cruz is a "RINO", but Donald Trump, who has supported abortion, eminent domain, cheated on two wives, is a "real conservative", I think your philosophical compass might be a bit skewed.
It is truly sad when you guys admit that Republicans are the ones who will decide this election....Not teu
Thankfully your vote doesn't mean shit in the General. Texans won't let sHillary become president.Yup. The path is wide open for Hillary now. As it is now, I won't vote von Trump. I'll be writing a candidate in. Just about everyone else here in our lunch room pretty much feels the same. I thought I could do the anyone but Hillary thing, but just like the last two presidential elections I can't bring my self to vote for a fake. Couldn't do it with McCain, would not do it with the Mormon freak show Mittens and I can't do it now with the Donald. I'll vote to keep Cruz in the Senate where he has done exactly what he said he would do. Was a good race. Good on our guy. Hope I'm wrong about the Donald.
Yeah, right. Like I told your boyfriend, trump will go down because Texans will stay home. He will lose the northeast, and all before that Hillary will drag him through the mud and stomp him. As I also told your boyfriend, you trumptards melt down will be awesome. No back to Hannity. Enjoy your night. Come November you will be crying.
I don't know what you're babbling about, but can you point out what part of this free market system has caused anything to decrease costs to the consumer? Sure, you can site examples of where it may possibly have decreased the increase in costs, but free markets do only one thing other than relieve us of our wealth, and that's move jobs over seas."Free Market" is a nice way of describing "America Takes It In The Ass".Before the Cruz campaign dirties began with Carson, I personally dreamed of Cruz as Attorney General and always wanted Carly to be the WH Press Secretary.Donald Trump wouldn't know free markets if they bit him in the ass. He repeated that again saying on Hannity that his plan isn't to fix why companies want to leave, he wants to punish them for trying to do what's in their interest.
Defeat Donald Trump, he sucks
So Kaz, you voting for Hellary now?
Maybe. Depends who the Libertarian Party picks.
But Trump's anti-free market rhetoric is scary. That's what he was pounding on Hannity yesterday, we have to control markets and companies and punish the ones who want to leave, not figure out why they want to leave and fix it. Hillary is going to be four years of scandal, she won't get shit done
It like calling yourself pro-choice when it's really pro-abortion.
Yeah, fucking consumers with lower prices, it needs to be stopped.
LOL, and yeah, thinking something should be not banned by government (in this case abortion) means that you want it to happen. Everything you don't want people to do needs to be illegal. Choice, not. Well, your choice for everyone. You are an authoritarian, at least you admit that. No wonder you don't support economic freedom either
cannot wait till levin, beck, medved talk about this tom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (today)
Levin talked about it today, he's already pivoting to support Trump and nudge his Cruz callers in that direction.
Well he must have had an epiphany because he's been rabidly Never Trump. Either that or his ratings have gone lower than ever because he's turned off so many former listeners.
I understand what free markets are. Problem is, most other countries don't have the system we have. Their economic system revolves around their government rather than free enterprise. Because of that they tend to cheat.....tend to manipulate currencies amongst other things.I don't know what you're babbling about, but can you point out what part of this free market system has caused anything to decrease costs to the consumer? Sure, you can site examples of where it may possibly have decreased the increase in costs, but free markets do only one thing other than relieve us of our wealth, and that's move jobs over seas."Free Market" is a nice way of describing "America Takes It In The Ass".So Kaz, you voting for Hellary now?
Maybe. Depends who the Libertarian Party picks.
But Trump's anti-free market rhetoric is scary. That's what he was pounding on Hannity yesterday, we have to control markets and companies and punish the ones who want to leave, not figure out why they want to leave and fix it. Hillary is going to be four years of scandal, she won't get shit done
It like calling yourself pro-choice when it's really pro-abortion.
Yeah, fucking consumers with lower prices, it needs to be stopped.
LOL, and yeah, thinking something should be not banned by government (in this case abortion) means that you want it to happen. Everything you don't want people to do needs to be illegal. Choice, not. Well, your choice for everyone. You are an authoritarian, at least you admit that. No wonder you don't support economic freedom either
Not interested in teaching the field of economics to someone on the internet who doesn't even want to learn
You may have me confused with someone else. I'm the one that has been telling you that the GOP is fucked. That with or without Trump they were going to lose. And that your Kasich fantasy was meaningless nonsense.
And here we are. With Trump the presumptive nominee, Kasich's odds roughly that number that comes just after zero, and even you admitting that the GOP's odds of winning with Trump were slim to none.
I knew you'd come around.
Still a damned idiot, I see.
I have always said that Trump has zero chance of winning in November. Kasich is the only candidate who can win in November. You have been desperately wanting Trump to be the nominee because you want to secure a Clinton victory. You've been trash talking Kasich because you know he's the only one who can defeat Clinton.
You are so close....but still don't quite get it. Yes, I wanted Trump as the GOP nominee. He's the dream nominee from a DNC perspective. But that's not why I predicted Kasich would fail. It was the evidence. Which you described as.'liberal bullshit'.
Evidence has no political affiliation. Reality isn't liberal or conservative. I simply had a better command of the facts, a clearer perception of reality than you did.
Which is why I was right. What I told you was going to happen is happening. Ignore as you will. It won't matter anymore than it did with your Kasich nonsense.
And yet....you've adopted my every argument. You can only deny reality for so long.
Remember that next time we disagree; Evidence trumps wishes.
John Kasich suspends presidential campaign: reports
John Kasich suspends presidential campaign: reports
My significant other, who has always voted republican, will not vote for president this year.
I have been more aligned with candidates like Trump since I first registered to vote in 2007. I suspect there are about as many Republican Trump supporters like myself as the number of true socialists supporting Bernie.You are an idiot social justice kook. We don't want you voting for our candidates.
Prior to 2012, I voted for Republican candidates every year.
And when you guys get so nutty that Ted fucking Cruz is a "RINO", but Donald Trump, who has supported abortion, eminent domain, cheated on two wives, is a "real conservative", I think your philosophical compass might be a bit skewed.
The Republican Party hasn't been truly socially conservative since Goldwater. The Democrat party has dictated what is and isn't socially conservative for an entire generation.
My significant other, who has always voted republican, will not vote for president this year.
Me either.
