BREITBART: 'Hillary Clinton Named ‘Worst Ethics Violator of 2015′

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,186
2,645
'Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton has a new honorific title: “Worst Ethics Violator of 2015.”

The Foundation for Accountability and Government Trust (FACT), a Washington-based think tank, released a year-end list of Worst Ethics Violators for this ill-begotten calendar year. Clinton ran away with the contest.'

Atta girl, Hillary!

:banana: :clap: :happy-1: :rock: :thewave:
 
The thing is that just about half the voters are going to vote for her and no matter what stuff like this isn't going to change their mind. All the stuff dug up on either side really means nothing as 99.9 percent of minds are made up.
 
'Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton has a new honorific title: “Worst Ethics Violator of 2015.”

The Foundation for Accountability and Government Trust (FACT), a Washington-based think tank, released a year-end list of Worst Ethics Violators for this ill-begotten calendar year. Clinton ran away with the contest.'

Atta girl, Hillary!

:banana: :clap: :happy-1: :rock: :thewave:


I agree, but lets make them credible. Show others they called out on both sides of the political spectrum at some time.

Understand, I am not saying you/they are wrong, I am just suggesting that if all they call out is lefties, their call out is to biased to be worth anything much. But oh, if they have called out both parties for their excesses, then sir, you HAVE A WINNER!
 
The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (you think Breitbart would have figured that out from the acronym - it's not FAGT) is a right-wing "watchdog" group founded this year by a failed Republican politician from Iowa as an anti-Hillary group 501c3.
 
Libs are going insane on this 'no-brainer', and the best thay can come up with is 'Lib 101: Claim the Source is not credible'.

They aren't even smart enough to 'attack' the one who 'awarded' her, instead attacking the media that reported the story....

:lmao:
 
Libs are going insane on this 'no-brainer', and the best thay can come up with is 'Lib 101: Claim the Source is not credible'.

They aren't even smart enough to 'attack' the one who 'awarded' her, instead attacking the media that reported the story....

:lmao:

Anyone paying attention didn't need to read it, they know she's unethical
 
Libs are going insane on this 'no-brainer', and the best thay can come up with is 'Lib 101: Claim the Source is not credible'.

They aren't even smart enough to 'attack' the one who 'awarded' her, instead attacking the media that reported the story....

:lmao:


:lol:

Breitbart couldn't even get the name of their right-wing "watchdog" organization right.

It's an organization with nothing more on its resume than it's a loyal member of the rightwing propaganda machine.
 
Libs are going insane on this 'no-brainer', and the best thay can come up with is 'Lib 101: Claim the Source is not credible'.

They aren't even smart enough to 'attack' the one who 'awarded' her, instead attacking the media that reported the story....

:lmao:

Why bother, it's from Breitphart.
 
You mean Brietbart schlonged her also?

Breitbart being a stiff has nothing to do with his comically small penis.
Wow, attacking and mocking dead Americans.....

HILLARY, is that YOU?! :p

Your God disposed of Breitbart, not me.
Nah, you're just into mocking dead Americans, like Obama and Hillary...

Shameless....

Breitbart was an evil man. Sometimes mother nature unintentionally gets it right.
 
Yeah, mocking dead Americans....

NY is Hillary.... :p
 
Breitbart was evil?! No he just shined the light on the evil cockroaches. They thought with his death the kitchen light would no longer be coming on at 1am.... :p

Yes he was evil, as are all conservatives. That's why the gods make sure that conservatism, in the long run,

always loses.


Look at BB doubling-down on 'Lib 101'.
You go, boy!

:lmao:

They have the same credibility level as Alex Jones.

Or Salon LMAO The Liberal Bible
 

Forum List

Back
Top