Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With the exception of the assassination attempt. Flip it. If conservatives were protesting a Democrat or liberal justice and there were an assassination attempt, you people would be blaming the rhetoric of the protestors and the media would be doing 24x7 coverage lobbying for the removal of the protestors out of concern for the safety of the justice; regardless of law.The protesters have obeyed Maryland law from my understanding.
Schumer is already saying he has protesters outside his home
It is Snow flakes in the court who demand protection from the first amendment
www.nbcnewyork.com
Since you're stupid I'll post it again, jknowgoodSchumer also can't tell the truth. If he had protesters it would be on the news.
www.nbcnewyork.com
We know you want to forget January 6th.No the only violent protesters are usually democrat
Sure, as soon as you show us in the Constitution where women have the right to vote, ammunition is a protected right, and the Air Force is legal.How about showing us IN THE CONSTITUTION where the federal government has that right.
The Washington Post approved it. You lying cocksucker.RUTH MARCUS, not the Editorial Board, you fucking idiot.
Then what's all the screaming and complaining about elitists?Who gives a fuck what they charge? if you think it is too much, don't go. Who even gives a fuck if they cater to the "elite "?
There are places in my town that my wife and I eat at that people think cater to the "well off"...and guess what....THEY DO. And their food is fucking amazing and that is why we go
OK, you're just too fucking stupid to waste my time on any longer. You don't even know that WaPo has conservative opinion columnists and liberal opinion columnists, and then they have Editorial Board opinions. ALL ARE OPINIONS, you stupid cocksucker. They're not factual news stories like the rest of the paper.The Washington Post approved it. You lying cocksucker.
There's no federal law prohibiting that, but there is one prohibiting intimidating judges.Protesters rally outside Chuck Schumer's home
February 1, 2017 | 10:03 AM EDT
Demonstrators gathered outside Sen. Charles Schumer's (D-N.Y.) apartment Jan. 31, to protest Schumer’s support of some of President Trump’s Cabinet nominees.
Almost a month agosomeone was just arrested for planning the assassination of Kavanaugh .
They started their intimidation tactics weeks before the decision was finalized and announced. They tried to influence the decision by intimidation and threatsFAIL.
“with the intent of influencing any judge”. He already decided the case. There is no attempt to influence him. They are protesting his decision.
AND to peacefully assemble. Two distinct rights.There it is in black and white, the people have the right to petition the GOVERNMENT for redress
Which bit?They violated a federal law.
Was that a protest?With the exception of the assassination attempt.
You can't even point out what isn't factual about it, you pusillanimous prairie punk.OK, you're just too fucking stupid to waste my time on any longer. You don't even know that WaPo has conservative opinion columnists and liberal opinion columnists, and then they have Editorial Board opinions. ALL ARE OPINIONS, you stupid cocksucker. They're not factual news stories like the rest of the paper.
Harassing a citizen at a restaurant isn't petitioning the government.AND to peacefully assemble. Two distinct rights.
I’m a Marylander. It’s against Maryland Law.Was that a protest?
