Brett Kavanaugh was forced out of a DC restaurant by protesters amid anger at SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade

[candycorn]

Huh?

What part has you puzzled, skippy?

 

[tahuyaman]

Judges have increasingly jumped into the political realm and made policy.

Stop lying about that.

Mostly liberal judges.

 

[tahuyaman]

What part has you puzzled, skippy?

Huh? Ok. I’ll chalk you up as another troll.

 

[tahuyaman]

,

Why are they even protesting the Justices to start with?

Supreme Court Justices are not there to represent the will of the people, don't write laws, and they have already decided the Dobbs case..
If they have an issue or a problem, they need to take it up with their elected Representatives.


.​

Supreme Court justices are there to ensure laws passed by the legislature are compatible with the US Constitution. That all. .

 

[Synthaholic]

QUEEN!

 

[otto105]

Why is it wrong to send this issue to each state where it actually belongs?

The right of privacy isn't a state issue.

 

[otto105]

Supreme Court justices are there to ensure laws passed by the legislature are compatible with the US Constitution. That all. .

Where in the constitution does it mention interracial marriage?

Or is that now a state issue?

 

[otto105]

Mostly liberal judges.

And you so want to be taken seriously. Have you looked at texas judges lately with conservative judge shopping them.

 

[tahuyaman]

And you so want to be taken seriously. Have you looked at texas judges lately with conservative judge shopping them.

State judges doing what they are supposed to do.

What is it about federalism and states rights liberals don’t understand?

 

[tahuyaman]

Where in the constitution does it mention interracial marriage?

Or is that now a state issue?

Yes, it’s not addressed in the US constitution. Neither is marriage in general. What’s your point?

 

[tahuyaman]

liberals are generally ignorant on the subject of civics.

 

[otto105]

Yes, it’s not addressed in the US constitution. Neither is marriage in general. What’s your point?

Then it's unconstitutional and not a right.

Right originalist.

 

[tahuyaman]

Then it's unconstitutional and not a right.

Right originalist.

What’s your point). Oh…. Sorry, You don’t have one.

 

[tahuyaman]

Then it's unconstitutional and not a right.

Right originalist.

That’s it. I’m done with you Until you can provide a less than idiotic commebtvv

 

[otto105]

What’s your point). Oh…. Sorry, You don’t have one.

The right to marry whom you choice is an unenumerated right granted by the constitution.

You position is that it has to be stated in document to be a constitutional right.

That would make laws regarding marriage not a right, but subject to state legislation.

 

[otto105]

That’s it. I’m done with you Until you can provide a less than idiotic commebtvv

You were done long before your latest failure.

 

[candycorn]

Huh? Ok. I’ll chalk you up as another troll.

cool. Good to know there are still some folks out there who know when they've been defeated.

 

[cnm]

Harassing a citizen at a restaurant isn't petitioning the government.

Peaceful assembly is distinct from petitioning the government. Do you not read?

 

[BS Filter]

Peaceful assembly is distinct from petitioning the government. Do you not read?

Peaceful? You're full of shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Liar.

You love what they did. You love that they intentionally deceived congress and the public.


Yet you embarrass yourself and lie to defend them against an accusation of doing something you love them for.

So bizarre. Trump has turned you guys' brains to tapioca.

You are insane.

You lie because you demand that all bow to your Reich. Despite repeatedly reminding you of the facts, you lie - because your Reich demands your mind and you have surrendered it.

You are quite simply - insane.