Brian Kemp is mighty PO’d

[colfax_m]

I know trump voters did not lose

No one who voted lost. Each of us had our vote counted, much to the dismay of Trump and many of his supporters who have been fighting non-stop to take away the votes of others.

 

[Mac-7]

How do you know they were cheating if you couldn’t see anything?

I assume they are cheating just as a bank assumes you are a phony till you prove otherwise

 

[Mac-7]

No one who voted lost.

Wrong

every stolen vote was a loss for America

 

[colfax_m]

I assume they are cheating just as a bank assumes you are a phony till you prove otherwise

Assumptions don’t fly well in a court of law.

No wonder you guys can’t win a case.

 

[colfax_m]

No one who voted lost.

Wrong

every stolen vote was a loss for America

Good thing there’s no real evidence of any of these supposed stolen votes. Just a lot of nonsense accusations.

 

[Mac-7]

Assumptions don’t fly well in a court of law.

There is the court of twisted judges and the court of public opinion

and ultimately the latter is the higher authority

 

[colfax_m]

Assumptions don’t fly well in a court of law.

There is the court of twisted judges and the court of public opinion

and ultimately the latter is the higher authority

Last time I checked, we are a country of laws, not of men.

 

[Mac-7]

Last time I checked, we are a country of laws, not of men.

Yes, but when the law as imposed by partisan judges is an ass men lose respect for it

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, but when the law as imposed by partisan judges is an ass men lose respect for it

There were dozens of judges involved and the results were basically unanimous. Many of whom were appointed by Republicans, some of which were Trump appointees.

At some point in time, the weary “partisan judges” narrative runs face first into reality. This is just a weak excuse for a failed narrative.

Since we are a nation of laws, not of men, the opinion of whatever faction you claim to belong to is irrelevant. You don’t get to decide.

 

[Agit8r]

On the one hand, The behavior of election denialists is deplorable to an unforgivable degree.

On the other hand, for Kemp it is karma for being a far-right corporatist stooge.

 

[Mac-7]

There were dozens of judges involved and the results were basically unanimous.

and yet the election was a farce

if the judical system cant protect us from that it is worthless

 

[Mac-7]

On the other hand, for Kemp it is karma for being a far-right corporatist stooge.

Too many republicans seek elected office just to enrich themselves

kemp never thought the voters would actually expect him to do anything right

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Q: Does Donald know that this BS is not only dangerous, but hurting the R candidates in the runoff?
A: Nope, he doesn’t give a rat’s ass.

Redirect Notice

Fuck ChiCom Kemp!

 

[colfax_m]

and yet the election was a farce

The election was fine. The only reason you think I it was a farce is because Trump lost and you can’t come to terms with it.

 

[OKTexas]

Link. And they stopped observers from doing either, hence the request for the signature audit. Explain how they challenge a signature they can't get close enough to see.

Observers don’t match signature, poll workers do.

Each state is different but I’m pretty sure in Georgia that’s done before Election Day.

Observers can watch all phases of the election and make challenges when something untoward is observed. But they were kept too far away to see anything.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Show me the law that authorizes the SOS to change election requirements. The US Constitution says only the State legislature has that authority.

The legislature says that the electors are decided by popular vote. The SOS is tasked with enforcing that directive which is what they were doing.

Nothing the SOS did was illegal, it was all done with approval and guidance by the court system. If it were illegal, the courts would have said so, but the lawsuits attempting to dispute this have failed.

That is still be litigated, but a judge can't override the US Constitution.

.

If that is your claim, you would be overturning elections in pretty much every state.

If that's what the law requires, so be it. Unlike you, I care if the laws are followed. There's a reason 26 European countries have outlawed voting by mail and you commies want it expanded, it's easier to cheat.

.

So now you want to follow what Europeans are doing.

I do, stop mass mail voting, require proof of citizenship to register and require ID for any form of voting. Would those be bad things?

.

 

[Indeependent]

Q: Does Donald know that this BS is not only dangerous, but hurting the R candidates in the runoff?
A: Nope, he doesn’t give a rat’s ass.

Redirect Notice

Every Globalist politician should be harassed.

 

[Moonglow]

Now. . . is this the guy that laundered money through China?

Don't you send you laundry to the Chinese?

 

[OKTexas]

I know trump voters did not lose

No one who voted lost. Each of us had our vote counted, much to the dismay of Trump and many of his supporters who have been fighting non-stop to take away the votes of others.

So you want the votes of the dead, non-citizens and the ineligible to be counted, got it.

.

 

[Moonglow]

Show me the law that authorizes the SOS to change election requirements. The US Constitution says only the State legislature has that authority.

The legislature says that the electors are decided by popular vote. The SOS is tasked with enforcing that directive which is what they were doing.

Nothing the SOS did was illegal, it was all done with approval and guidance by the court system. If it were illegal, the courts would have said so, but the lawsuits attempting to dispute this have failed.

That is still be litigated, but a judge can't override the US Constitution.

.

If that is your claim, you would be overturning elections in pretty much every state.

If that's what the law requires, so be it. Unlike you, I care if the laws are followed. There's a reason 26 European countries have outlawed voting by mail and you commies want it expanded, it's easier to cheat.

.

So now you want to follow what Europeans are doing.

I do, stop mass mail voting, require proof of citizenship to register and require ID for any form of voting. Would those be bad things?

.

In an Arizona voting case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that states are obligated to permit registration for federal elections using the federal form, which does not require documentary proof of citizenship. States may have their own form, but they must be willing to accept the federal form. Trump’s spokesperson didn’t respond to our request for evidence, but he specified "federal elections" in his statement.

Fact-check: Do states verify U.S. citizenship as a condition for voting?

When people register to vote, they sign a form attesting under penalty of perjury that they are a citizen and eligible to vote.

www.statesman.com