LMAO!!!Tell that to the Argies, and the Iraqui's, and the Afghans they aired out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LMAO!!!Tell that to the Argies, and the Iraqui's, and the Afghans they aired out.
Maybe he has your camera turned on?Why? Why would that matter here?
That's all the cornholio has, to be honest. Lies and fear mongering.Yeah...cuz that's what happened when 29 states went back to constitutional carry.
View attachment 962611
Your state is one of them.
So get the fuck outta here with you're fear-mongering bullshit.
That's the German police way. Of course they carry submachine guns, but the philosophy is the same.I think all cops should have a long rifle slung, and their pistol only as a secondary.
If every cop were to be loaded for bear like this, then you wouldn't have a bunch of stank-ass N words talking back to them when they pull them over.
I also can't understand why cop cars aren't up-armored.
But I understand why Democrats think that being stylish and less intimidating will keep the Karens from screaming from the sight of big scary pew-pews.
Anyone who's been to Frankfurt or Berlin knows the Polizei don't screw around, because they sling Uzis. It's meant to be intimidating.
There's no point to issuing someone a weapon they haven't trained properly on.That's the German police way. Of course they carry submachine guns, but the philosophy is the same.
I would just make damned sure that every cop goes through a legit CQB school, like Gunsight, or Thunder Ranch, or the equivalent.
How efficiently you can kill each other isn't my concern.A bump stock is a POS, but anything that can get more lead downrange when the Democrat's transplanted thugs start killing people, the better.
Apparently it is.How efficiently you can kill each other isn't my concern.
Horseshit. Your god took your guns.No, it was just the ATF. They are only beholden to themselves, and the political class.
It isn’t the scotus with the comprehension issue, it’s dullards such as yourself.For the technically minded: The Scotus may not have understood the question relating to these BP's. It isn't about needing to pull the trigger, it's about creating a device that allows the mechanism to operate in the same manner as full automatic.
Or, the Scotus could have pretended to not understand.
In either case, the Scotus has set up the ground work needed to outlaw full automatic weapons. That then makes it more likely that the Scotus didn't understand completely!
(except for the exceptions in place)
It isn't about needing to pull the trigger, it's about creating a device that allows the mechanism to operate in the same manner as full automatic.
The truly pathetic thing here is that you're actually stupid enough to actually believe that.The result will be more dead people.
That is all.
For the technically minded: The Scotus may not have understood the question relating to these BP's. It isn't about needing to pull the trigger, it's about creating a device that allows the mechanism to operate in the same manner as full automatic.
In either case, the Scotus has set up the ground work needed to outlaw full automatic weapons.