Burger King Moves North to Canada for Tax Reasons.

Burger King Dares Obama To Stop It From Fleeing To Canada


Burger King’s plan to scurry across the Canadian border to avoid U.S. taxes could be seen as the corporate equivalent of flipping President Barack Obama the bird.

The White House vowed earlier this month to use an executive order to curb tax inversions -- deals in which U.S. companies buy smaller foreign firms in countries with lower taxes, then renounce their U.S. corporate citizenship and re-incorporate in that country.

Still, Burger King said late Sunday night that it was in talks to merge with Tim Hortons, Canada’s popular bakery and coffee chain. The new, combined company would be headquartered in Canada.

In a research note, Potomac Research Group political strategist Greg Valliere said Burger King’s move challenges regulators at the White House and Treasury to back up threats to crack down on inversions.

“So much for the theory that Treasury could chill future inversion deals by hinting of possible action,” Valliere wrote in the note. “We still don’t expect regulations to be finalized until early next year, after a deliberative comment period, but we think there’s a good chance that Treasury will get a phone call today from the White House, urging quicker action.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Treasury spokesperson and Radina Russell, a Burger King spokeswoman, both declined to comment.

Though the timing of the deal suggests a disregard for the Obama administration’s ability limit tax inversions, some say the company could be heading north before political pressure to close the tax loophole gives way to tangible legal changes.

“My sense is this is Burger King trying to dodge paying its taxes. I don’t know that I’d attribute it to their making a move like this to directly challenge Obama,” Frank Clemente, executive director of the nonprofit Americans for Tax Fairness, told The Huffington Post. “I can’t say what’s on the company’s mind here, whether they’re trying to beat the clock on this and do something before Congress passes legislation or do something before Obama signs an executive order.”

The past few years have seen American companies practically stampede to the border in an effort take advantage of lower rates elsewhere. The top U.S. corporate rate is 35 percent. In Ireland, for example, it is just 12.5 percent.

At least 21 U.S. companies have announced plans to invert since the start of 2012, according to a tally kept Bloomberg News. Among the brands planning to pull up stakes are Chiquita, the banana giant, and Mylan, which makes generic drugs.

One company, the drugstore giant Walgreen, considered and then abandoned a planned inversion earlier this month as part of its takeover of the Swiss company Alliance Boots, after it faced significant public backlash.

The chief executive of Mylan recently told a New York Times columnist that she had no choice but to invert as part of a buyout of a company in the Netherlands. But this argument isn't especially convincing. That's because the U.S. tax code is so riddled with loopholes that very few companies pay anything near 35 percent. Companies like General Electric, Google and Apple have whiz-bang tax departments that have mastered the art of tax avoidance, often by routing income through low- or no-tax jurisdictions, like Bermuda.

In 2010, profitable U.S. corporations paid an effective rate of less than 13 percent, according to the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan arm of Congress.

But in the world of tax avoidance, as in life, there are haves and have-nots. Tech and drug companies have all sorts of ways to shift earnings abroad and make tax bills lower. Companies that sell a lot of physical things in the U.S. -- such as hamburgers -- typically pay a much higher rate, because it is harder to disguise those sales as foreign income. Inversions won't solve this tax problem altogether, but they do give businesses a basket of new tax avoidance options.

The Walgreen inversion, for example, could have allowed the company to slash its tax rate by as much as 15 percent, equating to savings of billions of dollars. Burger King's projected tax savings, according to initial news reports, would be smaller, though it is too early to say for sure how much.

In 2013 the company deposited $88 million in government coffers, at an effective tax rate of about 27 percent, according to filings. (That's lower than the top rate because the company doesn't pay domestic taxes on burgers sold abroad. Burger King is huge in Germany, as it turns out).

But even if Burger King's tax savings add up to no more than a few million dollars a year, by corporate standards, it is easy money. Completing an inversion is primarily a function of filing the right paperwork. Company executives can stay put at headquarters in Miami. They can become Canadian without even buying a winter coat.


Burger King Dares Obama To Stop It From Fleeing To Canada
 
With corporate tax rates the way they are, it's hard to blame businesses from wanting to cut their rate.

Of course Obama will now call Burger King unpatriotic.

He should do the same with any American company/foreign company operating in America that is not employing Americans but instead employing foreigners in foreign countries.

Then he should hit them with a special tax.
A tax so punitive that they will employ Americans in America.

Companies in America being allowed to send American jobs to India, the Philippines etc because of 'slave' labour and massive tax breaks....baaah!
There oughta be a law!

Obama should start a govt-owned burger chain..."American Burgers.."
with only American produce used and only American staff employed.
Yeah, because that is what our government should be. Punishers for not following an authoritarian ideology like progressive-ism.
 
There's no other reason for this transaction. It makes no commercial sense otherwise.

Tim Horton's is a robust, growing franchise. Burger King is in decline. They have nothing in common in terms of menu. From a business standpoint, it is a dumb transaction.
 
There's no other reason for this transaction. It makes no commercial sense otherwise.

Tim Horton's is a robust, growing franchise. Burger King is in decline. They have nothing in common in terms of menu. From a business standpoint, it is a dumb transaction.

Buying a robust growing business is a bad business decision?
 
Wendy's has great burgers and good fries, by the way:

A representative for Burger King, Miguel Piedra, said while the headquarters of the new company would be in Canada, Burger King would still continue to be run out of Miami. Piedra also said the comments on Burger King's Facebook page represent a small fraction of the company's more than 7 million followers on the social media site.

Burger King isn't the first company to face fallout over a tax inversion, which is when a company acquires a business in another country, then relocates its headquarters there. Big U.S. companies, including pharmaceutical AbbiVie and Valeant Pharmaceuticals, recently have pursued tax inversions to cut their costs. Earlier this month, Walgreen abandoned plans to pursue a tax inversion after negative publicity about the planned move.

Hard to swallow Burger King may move to Canada - Yahoo Finance
 
There's no other reason for this transaction. It makes no commercial sense otherwise.

Tim Horton's is a robust, growing franchise. Burger King is in decline. They have nothing in common in terms of menu. From a business standpoint, it is a dumb transaction.

Buying a robust growing business is a bad business decision?

My mistake for being unclear. I meant from Timmy's perspective. There's no reason for Tim Horton's to do this other than price.

In the Canadian press, they're saying that it will open markets for Timmy's since BK is in 98 countries. But that rarely works. The only company that I'm aware of that has successfully rolled out multiple brands across the globe is Yum, and that's because KFC is wildly successful whereas Pizza Hut does OK. Taco Bell isn't much anywhere else.
 
With corporate tax rates the way they are, it's hard to blame businesses from wanting to cut their rate.

Of course Obama will now call Burger King unpatriotic.

He should do the same with any American company/foreign company operating in America that is not employing Americans but instead employing foreigners in foreign countries.

Then he should hit them with a special tax.
A tax so punitive that they will employ Americans in America.

Companies in America being allowed to send American jobs to India, the Philippines etc because of 'slave' labour and massive tax breaks....baaah!
There oughta be a law!

Obama should start a govt-owned burger chain..."American Burgers.."
with only American produce used and only American staff employed.

You seem to be upset with American businesses who employ non-Americans.
I hope this means then that you are staunchly against illegal immigration, and you're ready to protest here in just a couple weeks when Obama goes rogue, and makes an executive decision by granting some sort of amnesty ?
 
This is funny and hugely ironic, given that Canada is far more "liberal" and socialist than the U.S. They have real national health care and APPARENTLY lower tax rates. LOL

Only a lower tax rate for their corporate tax, as the article states "The tax regime isn’t greener on the northern side of the border for individuals, however: The average Canadian pays 42% of their income in taxes, according to the Fraser Institute."
So the individual has to pay for all those "liberal" and socialist" programs in Canada.
 
Actually, the effective rate for a corporation the size of Burger King is around 12.5%; add in increased labor & import costs, this is great way too LOSE money.

But the fact that there’s no provision for Burger King BKW -0.31% to walk away from the deal, in the event of the passing of some unfavorable tax-inversion legislation, suggests “that this is a strategic event,” Anderson said. “It’s more than just a tax deal.”

Besides the tax break, Anderson believes the deal would benefit both companies, as Burger King would get a company with historically strong operations and a growing brand in the U.S., and gain access to a competitive coffee product. And Tim HortonsTHI +0.56% CA:THI +19.26% would gain access to a broader array of potential franchise partners in the U.S., he said.

Tim Hortons reported fiscal second-quarter same-store sales growth of 5.9% in the U.S. and 2.4% in Canada, while Burger King reported U.S. and Canada same-store sales growth of 0.4%. The company’s have similar structures, as nearly 100% of their restaurants are owned by franchisees.

Burger King likes more than Tim Hortons tax rate - MarketWatch

Burger King is unlikely to pay the base rate however.

Have taxes your way Why Burger King wants to become a Canadian citizen - The Washington Post

While it's possible that the plan to reincorporate might be part of need to appease Canadian authorities, which, according to the Investment Canada Act, could block the merger if they believe it is not in the best interests of the country, it would still carry a significant shift in tax payments to the U.S. government.

A Burger King reincorporation, however, would be different from most of those that would have preceded it. The Miami-based burger slinger would be one of the most visible to move overseas, at least in the eyes of the American consumers. The vast majority of corporate headquarter hauls have been executed by pharmaceutical companies, whose brand equity is far less important to sales. Burger King's business, by comparison, stands to be more significantly impacted if there is any public backlash.

Their website still has Burger King USA, and how about making all BKs foreign entities? No more BK for me if they move, I'll buy AMERICAN.
 
Last edited:
This is funny and hugely ironic, given that Canada is far more "liberal" and socialist than the U.S. They have real national health care and APPARENTLY lower tax rates. LOL

Only a lower tax rate for their corporate tax, as the article states "The tax regime isn’t greener on the northern side of the border for individuals, however: The average Canadian pays 42% of their income in taxes, according to the Fraser Institute."
So the individual has to pay for all those "liberal" and socialist" programs in Canada.

The Heritage Foundation does a global ranking on Economic Freedom. Here's the comparison:

EconomicFreedom_zps5968c49d.jpg


Look at the disparity in the Fiscal Freedom and especially in the Freedom from Corruption categories. The US though wins the day in terms of Labor Freedom.
 
Actually, the effective rate for a corporation the size of Burger King is around 12.5%; add in increased labor & import costs, this is great way too LOSE money.

You should short the stock then. Maybe send Burger King an email that they're going to lose money.
 
Actually, the effective rate for a corporation the size of Burger King is around 12.5%; add in increased labor & import costs, this is great way too LOSE money.

You should short the stock then. Maybe send Burger King an email that they're going to lose money.

I doubt BK INTERnational will care, but if enough in the USA buy elsewhere, well.....
 
Actually, the effective rate for a corporation the size of Burger King is around 12.5%; add in increased labor & import costs, this is great way too LOSE money.

You should short the stock then. Maybe send Burger King an email that they're going to lose money.

I doubt BK INTERnational will care, but if enough in the USA buy elsewhere, well.....

They're not being Anti-American, they're simply anti-liberal. The US is going hog-wild in terms of socialism and it's too damn expensive to do business here. This is a signal that the US needs to get it's spending under control.

Look at Canada - their fiscal house is in order, they've actually had balanced budgets for a string of years. Meanwhile, the US has the most progressive taxation scheme in the world, one of the highest corporate tax rates, and still manages to have massive annual deficits. We've got boatloads of tax revenue coming in but we have no spending discipline. It's utter insanity for the government to be encouraging illegal infiltrators to sign up for food stamps and other programs. Insanity.

No wonder we have such a socialist welfare system and the spending that is bankrupting us, we encourage poor peasants to come here and suck at the teat.
 
Actually, the effective rate for a corporation the size of Burger King is around 12.5%; add in increased labor & import costs, this is great way too LOSE money.

You should short the stock then. Maybe send Burger King an email that they're going to lose money.

I doubt BK INTERnational will care, but if enough in the USA buy elsewhere, well.....

They're not being Anti-American, they're simply anti-liberal. The US is going hog-wild in terms of socialism and it's too damn expensive to do business here. This is a signal that the US needs to get it's spending under control.

Look at Canada - their fiscal house is in order, they've actually had balanced budgets for a string of years. Meanwhile, the US has the most progressive taxation scheme in the world, one of the highest corporate tax rates, and still manages to have massive annual deficits. We've got boatloads of tax revenue coming in but we have no spending discipline. It's utter insanity for the government to be encouraging illegal infiltrators to sign up for food stamps and other programs. Insanity.

No wonder we have such a socialist welfare system and the spending that is bankrupting us, we encourage poor peasants to come here and suck at the teat.

Actually, INDIVIDUAL income taxes are much higher in Canada, as is the cost of living. Businesses cannot make as much per capita, as many Canadians buy in the US. Much of the populations lives close to the border.
 
What company would want to stay in America and pay taxes to support liberal welfare policies? What company wants to operate under all the liberal anti-business restrictions?
 
Did Obama just chases the King across the border.?
US Corporate Tax Rate 35% the highest in the industrialized world
Canada's Corporate Tax Rate 15%

Burger King looking at crossing the border: The iconic American fast-food brand is in talks to buy coffee-and-donuts chain Tim Hortons and move its headquarters to Canada.

A Tax Inversion Deal Is On The Menu For Burger King - Forbes


who could blame them

who ever thought it would come to this

I did. I knew it was coming. It's not rocket science. When you import people from socialist countries and they're mostly from the peasant class, then they're going to vote the same way here that they voted in the nation of their birth.

When you change the people of a country, then you change the culture and values too. Does Mexico strike people as a free market paradise?
 
Actually, the effective rate for a corporation the size of Burger King is around 12.5%; add in increased labor & import costs, this is great way too LOSE money.

You should short the stock then. Maybe send Burger King an email that they're going to lose money.

I doubt BK INTERnational will care, but if enough in the USA buy elsewhere, well.....

They're not being Anti-American, they're simply anti-liberal. The US is going hog-wild in terms of socialism and it's too damn expensive to do business here. This is a signal that the US needs to get it's spending under control.

Look at Canada - their fiscal house is in order, they've actually had balanced budgets for a string of years. Meanwhile, the US has the most progressive taxation scheme in the world, one of the highest corporate tax rates, and still manages to have massive annual deficits. We've got boatloads of tax revenue coming in but we have no spending discipline. It's utter insanity for the government to be encouraging illegal infiltrators to sign up for food stamps and other programs. Insanity.

No wonder we have such a socialist welfare system and the spending that is bankrupting us, we encourage poor peasants to come here and suck at the teat.

I know quite a few Canadians that came south for "vakays" and never returned; better paying jobs, high costs of climate difference & other US advantages made that decision for them. I'll take US made and owned myself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top