Business SUES Oregon church over refusal to allow homosexual event

Ambridge Event Center should not have signed the contract if they didn’t like the morality clause, but they did and they will likely lose in court.
Meh fucking Oregon hates Christians and loves faggot scum.
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.
Baker in CA won...no cake necessary

Which baker is that?
Kern judge issues final judgment in Tastries case

Lampe wrote, "The right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment outweighs the State's interest in ensuring a freely accessible marketplace. The right of freedom of thought guaranteed by the First Amendment includes the right to speak, and the right to refrain from speaking. Sometimes the most profound protest is silence."

How does this enter into religion?
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

Because Jesus would also judge certain people not worthy of standing in a church, after all all of mankind are not 'god's children' only those approved by Pastor Billy Bob.

Jesus H people stop pretending you are Christians, you aren't. You act in all ways against what Christ said and taught. Just man up and admit it you don't really give a shit about other human beings and you aren't Christians. You'll feel better.
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.

Here is a case where the separation of church and state takes precedence. You lose.

No it doesn't.






Yeah, it does. The First Amendment expressly forbids the government from passing any law that abridges the free exercise of religion. Don't like it, move to one of your socialist shitholes you love so much.
 
Ambridge Event Center should not have signed the contract if they didn’t like the morality clause, but they did and they will likely lose in court.
Meh fucking Oregon hates Christians and loves faggot scum.

It isn’t fags suing. It’s the business owners. I have little sympathy for people that willingly sign a contract and then whine about it later.
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.

Here is a case where the separation of church and state takes precedence. You lose.

No it doesn't.

Yeah, it does. The First Amendment expressly forbids the government from passing any law that abridges the free exercise of religion. Don't like it, move to one of your socialist shitholes you love so much.

You are ignorant. Renting a building DOES NOT effect/affect free exercise of religion.
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.

Here is a case where the separation of church and state takes precedence. You lose.

No it doesn't.

Yeah, it does. The First Amendment expressly forbids the government from passing any law that abridges the free exercise of religion. Don't like it, move to one of your socialist shitholes you love so much.

You are ignorant. Renting a building DOES NOT effect/affect free exercise of religion.






Yes it does. Demanding that a religious group provide a service for ANYONE that they disapprove of, is a direct assault on their freedom to express themselves. As usual, you are flat wrong.
 
I think everyone should be able to be sued.

Bigots must pay the piper also.
So we should be able to sue everyone who tries to prevent our free practice of religion? I can't wait. Religion organization have hundreds of millions of people to sue the tiny 2% that are LGBT. And hundreds of millions of dollar to back it.

By all means. If you want a legal free for all, we can do that, and you will lose. Freedom of religion is in the constitution. LGBT is not. Be careful what you wish for honey. You may not like the results of what you ask.

How is renting a building contrary to freedom of practicing religion?
 
I think everyone should be able to be sued.

Bigots must pay the piper also.

The church has every right to decide whom they want to use their venues or not. This case will likely get laughed out of court.

By using homophobic religious bigotry?

I don’t care what their reasoning is. If they don’t want to rent out their venues to people that wear shorts then that is their right.
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.

Liberals say it’s ok to ban conservatives on social media because it’s a private company, but now bakeries and churches can’t do it. How does that work?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because conservatives are piranha's.
 
The
If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.
Church owns it. Church is NOT a business which is why it isn't taxed and the same rules don't apply. Just like with religious schools.

A tax exempt business is NOT a business.....How so?

"Freedom of Religion" covers it. Now go away.

Renting a building prevents the owner from practicing religion? PLEASE STOP BEING SO IGNORANT!!!!!
building is private property. The building is part of a religious organization, under religious guidance. You can not force us to violate our principles. Sorry.

Building maintenance is religious guidance?
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.
Church owns it. Church is NOT a business which is why it isn't taxed and the same rules don't apply. Just like with religious schools.

That's odd. They advertise it as an event center. Looks like it's a business owned by a church, but it's still a business. They have to follow the rules.
Weddings at Ambridge Event Center in Portland, OR - Wedding Spot
 
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church

We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.

If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.





Here is a case where the separation of church and state takes precedence. You lose.

You could be right, as long as it is specifically part of the church and not a seperate business owned by the chourch. If my church owned a McDonalds franchize, would it be obligated to follow the laws concerning other McDonalds franchizes?
 
If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.

Here is a case where the separation of church and state takes precedence. You lose.

No it doesn't.

Yeah, it does. The First Amendment expressly forbids the government from passing any law that abridges the free exercise of religion. Don't like it, move to one of your socialist shitholes you love so much.

You are ignorant. Renting a building DOES NOT effect/affect free exercise of religion.

Yes it does. Demanding that a religious group provide a service for ANYONE that they disapprove of, is a direct assault on their freedom to express themselves. As usual, you are flat wrong.

How is renting a building providing a religious service?
 
I think everyone should be able to be sued.

Bigots must pay the piper also.

The church has every right to decide whom they want to use their venues or not. This case will likely get laughed out of court.

By using homophobic religious bigotry?

I don’t care what their reasoning is. If they don’t want to rent out their venues to people that wear shorts then that is their right.

Even if their reasoning is homophobic religious bigotry? A dress code is perfectly legal.
 
Even if their reasoning is homophobic religious bigotry? A dress code is perfectly legal.

Yes. It’s their property. Don’t like it? Don’t become a member of their church or rent any of their venues. Problem solved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top