Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think everyone should be able to be sued.
Bigots must pay the piper also.
The church has every right to decide whom they want to use their venues or not. This case will likely get laughed out of court.
By using homophobic religious bigotry?
I don’t care what their reasoning is. If they don’t want to rent out their venues to people that wear shorts then that is their right.
Even if their reasoning is homophobic religious bigotry? A dress code is perfectly legal.
No it doesn't.
Yeah, it does. The First Amendment expressly forbids the government from passing any law that abridges the free exercise of religion. Don't like it, move to one of your socialist shitholes you love so much.
You are ignorant. Renting a building DOES NOT effect/affect free exercise of religion.
Yes it does. Demanding that a religious group provide a service for ANYONE that they disapprove of, is a direct assault on their freedom to express themselves. As usual, you are flat wrong.
How is renting a building providing a religious service?
Because it is up to them how their property is used, that's why. Your anti religious, secular attacks not withstanding. Private Property means PRIVATE PROPERTY!
But in a recent lawsuit, the Portland, Ore., business says it it was only following orders from the church that owned the event space, which had inserted a "morals clause'" in their contract that forbade the center from hosting "offensive" events.
Read more here: 'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church
So we should be able to sue everyone who tries to prevent our free practice of religion? I can't wait. Religion organization have hundreds of millions of people to sue the tiny 2% that are LGBT. And hundreds of millions of dollar to back it.I think everyone should be able to be sued.
Bigots must pay the piper also.
By all means. If you want a legal free for all, we can do that, and you will lose. Freedom of religion is in the constitution. LGBT is not. Be careful what you wish for honey. You may not like the results of what you ask.
How is renting a building contrary to freedom of practicing religion?
You have to ask that?
The building as a sanctuary, is for the purpose of being used for actions that fit the religious conduct of the organization that owns it.
Thus they can rent it out in accordance with their beliefs. Using a church building, for evil actions, would be in violation of those religious standards.
It's that simple.
I think everyone should be able to be sued.
Bigots must pay the piper also.
The church has every right to decide whom they want to use their venues or not. This case will likely get laughed out of court.
By using homophobic religious bigotry?
I don’t care what their reasoning is. If they don’t want to rent out their venues to people that wear shorts then that is their right.
Even if their reasoning is homophobic religious bigotry? A dress code is perfectly legal.
Absolutely. Even if their reasoning is homophobic religious bigotry. You are free to rent out a building not owned by that church.
You don't get to deny rights to a religious organization, just because you believe in fascism.
But in a recent lawsuit, the Portland, Ore., business says it it was only following orders from the church that owned the event space, which had inserted a "morals clause'" in their contract that forbade the center from hosting "offensive" events.
Read more here: 'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church
If the Church of LGBT wins this case, it means the Christian church would have to also allow the Church of Satan to hold events there too.
There's nothing in the Constitution about sexual orientation. There is about recognized religion. When your local PA laws are tested, they will fail.Under your business license, you can't discriminate because of somebody's sexual orientation.
It's that simple.
LolI think everyone should be able to be sued.
Bigots must pay the piper also.
The Catholic Church represents the Catholic Church, and only the Catholic Church... It does not represent Christians…
But in a recent lawsuit, the Portland, Ore., business says it it was only following orders from the church that owned the event space, which had inserted a "morals clause'" in their contract that forbade the center from hosting "offensive" events.
Read more here: 'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church
If the Church of LGBT wins this case, it means the Christian church would have to also allow the Church of Satan to hold events there too.
So a gay-cult facility who rents out their Hall for events cannot say no to a group of Christians holding an event that proclaims in a huge banner across the oversized front doors "Homosexuality is a sin unto God!"?Not true. The church would have to not rent their facilities.
A very important distinction is to be made here. Pope Francis DID NOT say that these sexual deviants' behaviors should be embraced. All sinners are welcomed to come reform themselves under the Eye of God. They should walk through the doors, receive sacrament and then the priest should turn to Jude 1 and Romans 1 & begin the sermon.
'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church
We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.
If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.
If they want to discriminate, then they should give up their tax-exemption. If all the taxpayers are going to pay their property tax all taxpayers should have access to the property.Church owns it. Church is NOT a business which is why it isn't taxed and the same rules don't apply. Just like with religious schools.'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church
We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.
If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.
If they want to discriminate, then they should give up their tax-exemption. If all the taxpayers are going to pay their property tax all taxpayers should have access to the property.Church owns it. Church is NOT a business which is why it isn't taxed and the same rules don't apply. Just like with religious schools.'Morals clause' prevented them from hosting LGBT event. They're suing the church
We all knew it was coming folks! Give these cultural marxists an inch they will take the ENTIRE THING! Just like with gun control give an inch they will not stop until they have taken EVERY gun...they won't stop here until EVERYONE business,church,person abides by their definition of what's right and allowed.
If you're in business to serve the public, you have to follow the laws regulating that. Rent the place to the people, and while they are at it, they need to get in the kitchen and bake a damn cake too.
he is the Anti-ChristTeaching false doctrine. The Church should excommunicate his socialist ass.
If they want to discriminate, then they should give up their tax-exemption. If all the taxpayers are going to pay their property tax all taxpayers should have access to the property.Church owns it. Church is NOT a business which is why it isn't taxed and the same rules don't apply. Just like with religious schools.
