Ca Gay Marriage Ban Unconstitutional

[mal]

You people really are racist morons. How else did you think the court would rule? Did you really expect the court to uphold a discriminatory practice? The fags win, and the religious right-wing, zealots LOSE ! BRAVO

Hey Shitpack!... It's a San Fran Judge... It's going the 9th next... The MOST Overturned Court in the Land.

Everything to this point has been as Predictable the Sun Rising in the East.



peace...

Hate to tell ya Moe but this judge is a conservative.
Read the opinion. The folks that opposed gay marriage admitted to Ted Olson that their opposition WAS discrimination.
Is Ted Olson a liberal? LOL
U need to do your homework.
A true conservative supports the rights of gays to marry.
Read the closing argument of Ted Olson,CONSERVATIVE lawyer supporting gay marriage.
You should know that this decision is a great day for freedom and justice.
Rejoice man. Start loving your freedom more than wanting to take it away from others.

You don't Define what "Conservative" is or what "Rights" are...

And those who Choose to Defy thier Natural Design and Equipment do NOT have a Right to Force Society to Embrace it as Equal to something it Naturally is NOT.

Have a Civil Union and take your Sexual Exhibitionism off the streets and put it back in the Fucking Bedroom.

Enough already.



peace...

 

[manifold]

I sure hope this thing gets to the USSC as soon as possible so they can finally legalize gay-marriage countrywide. Maybe then we can put this shit behind us and move the fuck on already.

Seriously.

 

[Gadawg73]

Hey Shitpack!... It's a San Fran Judge... It's going the 9th next... The MOST Overturned Court in the Land.

Everything to this point has been as Predictable the Sun Rising in the East.



peace...

Hate to tell ya Moe but this judge is a conservative.
Read the opinion. The folks that opposed gay marriage admitted to Ted Olson that their opposition WAS discrimination.
Is Ted Olson a liberal? LOL
U need to do your homework.
A true conservative supports the rights of gays to marry.
Read the closing argument of Ted Olson,CONSERVATIVE lawyer supporting gay marriage.
You should know that this decision is a great day for freedom and justice.
Rejoice man. Start loving your freedom more than wanting to take it away from others.

You don't Define what "Conservative" is or what "Rights" are...

And those who Choose to Defy thier Natural Design and Equipment do NOT have a Right to Force Society to Embrace it as Equal to something it Naturally is NOT.

Have a Civil Union and take your Sexual Exhibitionism off the streets and put it back in the Fucking Bedroom.

Enough already.



peace...

You are right. I do not define what conservative is or what rights are.
But you do all the time here and just proved without any doubt out of your own mouth that you are a hypocrit for doing so.

 

[mal]

Hate to tell ya Moe but this judge is a conservative.
Read the opinion. The folks that opposed gay marriage admitted to Ted Olson that their opposition WAS discrimination.
Is Ted Olson a liberal? LOL
U need to do your homework.
A true conservative supports the rights of gays to marry.
Read the closing argument of Ted Olson,CONSERVATIVE lawyer supporting gay marriage.
You should know that this decision is a great day for freedom and justice.
Rejoice man. Start loving your freedom more than wanting to take it away from others.

You don't Define what "Conservative" is or what "Rights" are...

And those who Choose to Defy thier Natural Design and Equipment do NOT have a Right to Force Society to Embrace it as Equal to something it Naturally is NOT.

Have a Civil Union and take your Sexual Exhibitionism off the streets and put it back in the Fucking Bedroom.

Enough already.



peace...

You are right. I do not define what conservative is or what rights are.
But you do all the time here and just proved without any doubt out of your own mouth that you are a hypocrit for doing so.

Simply Asserting it ain't the same as Proving it or Illustrating it...

Try again.



peace...

 

[bodecea]

I sure hope this thing gets to the USSC as soon as possible so they can finally legalize gay-marriage countrywide. Maybe then we can put this shit behind us and move the fuck on already.

Seriously.

Thanks to the Prop H8 proponents, this may very well get to SCOTUS within the next few years.

 

[mal]

I sure hope this thing gets to the USSC as soon as possible so they can finally legalize gay-marriage countrywide. Maybe then we can put this shit behind us and move the fuck on already.

Seriously.

Thanks to the Prop H8 proponents, this may very well get to SCOTUS within the next few years.

Better Hope that 1 of the 5 in the 5-4's is out before it does...



peace...

 

[manifold]

Only a truly disingenuous fucktard, or a clinically retarded shit-for-brains would actually believe that...

Gays marrying = Forcing society to embrace homosexuality.


true story

 

[bodecea]

Only a truly disingenuous fucktard, or a clinically retarded shit-for-brains would actually believe that...

Gays marrying = Forcing society to embrace homosexuality.


true story

Since yesterday the pearls-clutching has been INTENSE!

 

[manifold]

Only a truly disingenuous fucktard, or a clinically retarded shit-for-brains would actually believe that...

Gays marrying = Forcing society to embrace homosexuality.


true story

Since yesterday the pearls-clutching has been INTENSE!

FYI, throwing in jokes about benoit balls ain't helping your case.

 

[bodecea]

Only a truly disingenuous fucktard, or a clinically retarded shit-for-brains would actually believe that...

Gays marrying = Forcing society to embrace homosexuality.


true story

Since yesterday the pearls-clutching has been INTENSE!

FYI, throwing in jokes about benoit balls ain't helping your case.

OK, that's funny right there!

 

[CurveLight]

The public voted overwhelmingly for no gay marriage. A judge overturned this for activists who aren't content with just working out contractual agreements on the side like rational people. Therefore you have taken away the will of the people and supplanted it with activist special interest. People don't LIKE that when their vote is nullified by an asshole judge looking play social engineer because they feel entitled to.

It will be interesting IF it turns out SCOTUS bans gay marriage nation wide though. Willing to accept THAT decision too? The majority of Americans, particularly minorities would rejoice their will would matter.

You're a fucking idiot. We don't live in a country where majority rules. Avoiding that kind of tyranny is why the Constitution was written.

 

[ConHog]

The public voted overwhelmingly for no gay marriage. A judge overturned this for activists who aren't content with just working out contractual agreements on the side like rational people. Therefore you have taken away the will of the people and supplanted it with activist special interest. People don't LIKE that when their vote is nullified by an asshole judge looking play social engineer because they feel entitled to.

It will be interesting IF it turns out SCOTUS bans gay marriage nation wide though. Willing to accept THAT decision too? The majority of Americans, particularly minorities would rejoice their will would matter.

You're a fucking idiot. We don't live in a country where majority rules. Avoiding that kind of tyranny is why the Constitution was written.

Actually, we DO in fact live in a country where the majority rule, as long as they don't infringe on the COTUS.

 

[mal]

Only a truly disingenuous fucktard, or a clinically retarded shit-for-brains would actually believe that...

Gays marrying = Forcing society to embrace homosexuality.


true story

Making it Law that EVERYONE Recognize a Chosen Deviation from our Natural Design and Equipment IS Forcing everyone to Embrace Homosexuality as Equal to something it is NOT.

The Laws are OUR Laws... We have to Abide by them.

I don't Care if People Deviate, I simply want them to Stop Insisting that the other 95% of us Acknowledge it and even worse, allow it to be Taught to Children in School.

Stay away from Children with the Agenda... Stay away from Marriage... Have a Civil Union and get the fuck out of the Streets with the Exhibitionism of what you SHOULD be doing in the Bedroom.



peace...

 

[mal]

The public voted overwhelmingly for no gay marriage. A judge overturned this for activists who aren't content with just working out contractual agreements on the side like rational people. Therefore you have taken away the will of the people and supplanted it with activist special interest. People don't LIKE that when their vote is nullified by an asshole judge looking play social engineer because they feel entitled to.

It will be interesting IF it turns out SCOTUS bans gay marriage nation wide though. Willing to accept THAT decision too? The majority of Americans, particularly minorities would rejoice their will would matter.

You're a fucking idiot. We don't live in a country where majority rules. Avoiding that kind of tyranny is why the Constitution was written.

Actually, the Declaration was Inspired by a Lack of Religious Freedom and the Tyranny of the FEW on the Masses...

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights was a Product of that Declaration.

Ironic that you don't get that Considering our Discussions in this and other Threads.

Do some Reading... You are Ignorant of our History, and it shows.



peace...

 

[Gadawg73]

According to mal a man that marries a woman and then beats that woman is forcing all of us to accept beating women is the norm.

 

[ConHog]

According to mal a man that marries a woman and then beats that woman is forcing all of us to accept beating women is the norm.

Accusing Mal of advocating wife beating seems unacceptable to me.

 

[Gadawg73]

According to mal a man that marries a woman and then beats that woman is forcing all of us to accept beating women is the norm.

Accusing Mal of advocating wife beating seems unacceptable to me.

For your post to make any sense and be valid you first would have to show that I accused Mal of advicating wife beating.
Where did I do that?
Some proof would be a start.

 

[Tech_Esq]

According to mal a man that marries a woman and then beats that woman is forcing all of us to accept beating women is the norm.

That's convoluted at best. You should pick another analogy.

 

[bodecea]

According to mal a man that marries a woman and then beats that woman is forcing all of us to accept beating women is the norm.

That's convoluted at best. You should pick another analogy.

I believe that is the point he is making.

 

[Tech_Esq]

According to mal a man that marries a woman and then beats that woman is forcing all of us to accept beating women is the norm.

That's convoluted at best. You should pick another analogy.

I believe that is the point he is making.

I meant the analogy not the point. The point is completely lost on me. I'd love to know what it was though.