California Bans SINGING During ON-LINE Church Services

[Andylusion]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

wait.... during ONLINE services? How do you spread corona by singing.... ONLINE?

You don't. This is where the headline immediately becomes suspect. First thing I checked was to see if this was satire from Babylon Bee or sump'm. Second thing was to check the source URL. And there is was, wasn't it.

So I looked up the issue... and it does appear that....

What they said was true. So many churches have been doing online church services. These include a half dozen people, on stage singing, usually spread extremely far apart on stage, and playing instruments.

The ban specifically says, no singing or playing of instruments.

Page 8, sub section C:

No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19​

This is too far. Sorry, but this is too far.
Now even when the entire church is completely empty, and you have a whooping 6 people on stage, and likely six people in the church that have been together the entire time regardless.... and you tell them they can't even sing into a camera?

Then we need to ban the White House press corp too. We need to ban all the people at the restaurants too. Heck, we need to ban anyone from being within visual distance of each other.

No, this is ridiculous now. Sorry, but this really is too far. This is over reach. If feel sorry for anyone left in California. What a hell hole that place has become.

Whatever happened to playing the organ in church?

Organ is a bit out of fashion. I haven't been to a church that had an organ since I was a teenager.

That said, they were concerned about instruments that involve blowing into with your mouth.
Still an over reach.

 

[Andylusion]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

wait.... during ONLINE services? How do you spread corona by singing.... ONLINE?

You don't. This is where the headline immediately becomes suspect. First thing I checked was to see if this was satire from Babylon Bee or sump'm. Second thing was to check the source URL. And there is was, wasn't it.

So I looked up the issue... and it does appear that....

What they said was true. So many churches have been doing online church services. These include a half dozen people, on stage singing, usually spread extremely far apart on stage, and playing instruments.

The ban specifically says, no singing or playing of instruments.

Page 8, sub section C:

No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19​

This is too far. Sorry, but this is too far.
Now even when the entire church is completely empty, and you have a whooping 6 people on stage, and likely six people in the church that have been together the entire time regardless.... and you tell them they can't even sing into a camera?

Then we need to ban the White House press corp too. We need to ban all the people at the restaurants too. Heck, we need to ban anyone from being within visual distance of each other.

No, this is ridiculous now. Sorry, but this really is too far. This is over reach. If feel sorry for anyone left in California. What a hell hole that place has become.

Yes, singing. To keep the building itself sanitary. Here's why.

Correct me if I'm wrong... but the WHO did not even declare a pandemic until March 11th, and the choir practice in question, was on March 10th.

So there were no stay at home orders, or any lock down orders, or anything.

So it appears.... that you are singling out this church for not social distancing, during a time when no one was social distancing yet... am I wrong?

 

[Pogo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

wait.... during ONLINE services? How do you spread corona by singing.... ONLINE?

You don't. This is where the headline immediately becomes suspect. First thing I checked was to see if this was satire from Babylon Bee or sump'm. Second thing was to check the source URL. And there is was, wasn't it.

So I looked up the issue... and it does appear that....

What they said was true. So many churches have been doing online church services. These include a half dozen people, on stage singing, usually spread extremely far apart on stage, and playing instruments.

The ban specifically says, no singing or playing of instruments.

Page 8, sub section C:

No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19​

This is too far. Sorry, but this is too far.
Now even when the entire church is completely empty, and you have a whooping 6 people on stage, and likely six people in the church that have been together the entire time regardless.... and you tell them they can't even sing into a camera?

Then we need to ban the White House press corp too. We need to ban all the people at the restaurants too. Heck, we need to ban anyone from being within visual distance of each other.

No, this is ridiculous now. Sorry, but this really is too far. This is over reach. If feel sorry for anyone left in California. What a hell hole that place has become.

Yes, singing. To keep the building itself sanitary. Here's why.

Correct me if I'm wrong... but the WHO did not even declare a pandemic until March 11th, and the choir practice in question, was on March 10th.

So there were no stay at home orders, or any lock down orders, or anything.

So it appears.... that you are singling out this church for not social distancing, during a time when no one was social distancing yet... am I wrong?

Yes, you are. WHO or what proclaimed a pandemic is irrelevant --- the point here is the danger was already known, the choir practice itself was promoted as "optional" for that reason, AND the singers took the precautions of hand sanitizing AND social distancing, whether required by local ordinance or not, and they still infected each other THROUGH THE ACT OF SIGNING. That's the point here.

Singing of course involves the expiration of breath, quite a lot of it, into the air where infected water droplets can carry and/or land on a nearby surface such as a chair or a music stand, which is then touched absentmindedly by the next singer, and so on. So if you're carrying the virus, which you may well be doing with no knowledge of it, the act of singing or blowing into a wind instrument is like being given a radio transmitter to broadcast it.

 

[Dick Foster]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Unconstitutional, frivolous, unenforceable, contemptible and illegal.

 

[SmokeALib]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

wait.... during ONLINE services? How do you spread corona by singing.... ONLINE?

You don't. This is where the headline immediately becomes suspect. First thing I checked was to see if this was satire from Babylon Bee or sump'm. Second thing was to check the source URL. And there is was, wasn't it.

So I looked up the issue... and it does appear that....

What they said was true. So many churches have been doing online church services. These include a half dozen people, on stage singing, usually spread extremely far apart on stage, and playing instruments.

The ban specifically says, no singing or playing of instruments.

Page 8, sub section C:

No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19​

This is too far. Sorry, but this is too far.
Now even when the entire church is completely empty, and you have a whooping 6 people on stage, and likely six people in the church that have been together the entire time regardless.... and you tell them they can't even sing into a camera?

Then we need to ban the White House press corp too. We need to ban all the people at the restaurants too. Heck, we need to ban anyone from being within visual distance of each other.

No, this is ridiculous now. Sorry, but this really is too far. This is over reach. If feel sorry for anyone left in California. What a hell hole that place has become.

Yes, singing. To keep the building itself sanitary. Here's why.

Correct me if I'm wrong... but the WHO did not even declare a pandemic until March 11th, and the choir practice in question, was on March 10th.

So there were no stay at home orders, or any lock down orders, or anything.

So it appears.... that you are singling out this church for not social distancing, during a time when no one was social distancing yet... am I wrong?

Yes, you are. WHO or what proclaimed a pandemic is irrelevant --- the point here is the danger was already known, the choir practice itself was promoted as "optional" for that reason, AND the singers took the precautions of hand sanitizing AND social distancing, whether required by local ordinance or not, and they still infected each other THROUGH THE ACT OF SIGNING. That's the point here.

Singing of course involves the expiration of breath, quite a lot of it, into the air where infected water droplets can carry and/or land on a nearby surface such as a chair or a music stand, which is then touched absentmindedly by the next singer, and so on. So if you're carrying the virus, which you may well be doing with no knowledge of it, the act of singing or blowing into a wind instrument is like being given a radio transmitter to broadcast it.

Leftards don't go to church. So why all the crying?

 

[Norman]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

 

[Pogo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

wait.... during ONLINE services? How do you spread corona by singing.... ONLINE?

You don't. This is where the headline immediately becomes suspect. First thing I checked was to see if this was satire from Babylon Bee or sump'm. Second thing was to check the source URL. And there is was, wasn't it.

So I looked up the issue... and it does appear that....

What they said was true. So many churches have been doing online church services. These include a half dozen people, on stage singing, usually spread extremely far apart on stage, and playing instruments.

The ban specifically says, no singing or playing of instruments.

Page 8, sub section C:

No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19​

This is too far. Sorry, but this is too far.
Now even when the entire church is completely empty, and you have a whooping 6 people on stage, and likely six people in the church that have been together the entire time regardless.... and you tell them they can't even sing into a camera?

Then we need to ban the White House press corp too. We need to ban all the people at the restaurants too. Heck, we need to ban anyone from being within visual distance of each other.

No, this is ridiculous now. Sorry, but this really is too far. This is over reach. If feel sorry for anyone left in California. What a hell hole that place has become.

Yes, singing. To keep the building itself sanitary. Here's why.

Correct me if I'm wrong... but the WHO did not even declare a pandemic until March 11th, and the choir practice in question, was on March 10th.

So there were no stay at home orders, or any lock down orders, or anything.

So it appears.... that you are singling out this church for not social distancing, during a time when no one was social distancing yet... am I wrong?

Yes, you are. WHO or what proclaimed a pandemic is irrelevant --- the point here is the danger was already known, the choir practice itself was promoted as "optional" for that reason, AND the singers took the precautions of hand sanitizing AND social distancing, whether required by local ordinance or not, and they still infected each other THROUGH THE ACT OF SIGNING. That's the point here.

Singing of course involves the expiration of breath, quite a lot of it, into the air where infected water droplets can carry and/or land on a nearby surface such as a chair or a music stand, which is then touched absentmindedly by the next singer, and so on. So if you're carrying the virus, which you may well be doing with no knowledge of it, the act of singing or blowing into a wind instrument is like being given a radio transmitter to broadcast it.

Leftards don't go to church. So why all the crying?

SINGING, not crying.

The OP is bullshit anyway, it's not about "going to church".

 

[colfax_m]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Singing aerosolizes droplets.

Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness - Scientific Reports

Mechanistic hypotheses about airborne infectious disease transmission have traditionally emphasized the role of coughing and sneezing, which are dramatic expiratory events that yield both easily visible droplets and large quantities of particles too small to see by eye. Nonetheless, it has long...

www.nature.com

 

[initforme]

I don't live in Cali....so it's not an issue. What they do there doesn't affect me.

 

[Pogo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Distinction without much difference as far as a virus cares.

 

[Norman]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Singing aerosolizes droplets.

Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness - Scientific Reports

Mechanistic hypotheses about airborne infectious disease transmission have traditionally emphasized the role of coughing and sneezing, which are dramatic expiratory events that yield both easily visible droplets and large quantities of particles too small to see by eye. Nonetheless, it has long...

www.nature.com

Study talks about spoken language.

In singing you keep the air in, not blow it out.

Democrats fail science again.

 

[Norman]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Distinction without much difference as far as a virus cares.

He would be out of breath in less than a second, and could not add any pressure to vocal cords to boot.

This is not singing.

Democrats failed their science.

 

[Pogo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Distinction without much difference as far as a virus cares.

He would be out of breath in less than a second, and could not add any pressure to vocal cords to boot.

This is not singing.

Democrats failed their science.

It's more likely a sneeze but I couldn't find a similar pic of singing. Same idea though.

Not sure what the fuck any of that has to do with "Democrats". I think of it more as "epidemiology".

 

[Pogo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Singing aerosolizes droplets.

Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness - Scientific Reports

Mechanistic hypotheses about airborne infectious disease transmission have traditionally emphasized the role of coughing and sneezing, which are dramatic expiratory events that yield both easily visible droplets and large quantities of particles too small to see by eye. Nonetheless, it has long...

www.nature.com

Study talks about spoken language.

In singing you keep the air in, not blow it out.

Democrats fail science again.

Go ahead and try to sing without expelling air.

And once AGAIN nothing here is about "Democrats". That's a political party.
Political party / singing. Know the difference.

 

[Pogo]

I don't live in Cali....so it's not an issue. What they do there doesn't affect me.

BEST post of the thread, right there.

 

[Norman]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Distinction without much difference as far as a virus cares.

He would be out of breath in less than a second, and could not add any pressure to vocal cords to boot.

This is not singing.

Democrats failed their science.

It's more likely a sneeze but I couldn't find a similar pic of singing. Same idea though.

Not sure what the fuck any of that has to do with "Democrats". I think of it more as "epidemiology".

Just a hunch, but banning singing sounds like a democrat idea.

 

[Norman]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Singing aerosolizes droplets.

Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness - Scientific Reports

Mechanistic hypotheses about airborne infectious disease transmission have traditionally emphasized the role of coughing and sneezing, which are dramatic expiratory events that yield both easily visible droplets and large quantities of particles too small to see by eye. Nonetheless, it has long...

www.nature.com

Study talks about spoken language.

In singing you keep the air in, not blow it out.

Democrats fail science again.

Go ahead and try to sing without expelling air.

And once AGAIN nothing here is about "Democrats". That's a political party.
Political party / singing. Know the difference.

So was expelling air also banned?

More great democratic ideas...

 

[colfax_m]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Singing aerosolizes droplets.

Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness - Scientific Reports

Mechanistic hypotheses about airborne infectious disease transmission have traditionally emphasized the role of coughing and sneezing, which are dramatic expiratory events that yield both easily visible droplets and large quantities of particles too small to see by eye. Nonetheless, it has long...

www.nature.com

Study talks about spoken language.

In singing you keep the air in, not blow it out.

Democrats fail science again.

Try reading more than the first line kiddo.

 

[Norman]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Do democrats know how singing works?

It is SINGING, not SPITTING. I guess they think it is the same after years of spitting on Americans.

Singing aerosolizes droplets.

Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness - Scientific Reports

Mechanistic hypotheses about airborne infectious disease transmission have traditionally emphasized the role of coughing and sneezing, which are dramatic expiratory events that yield both easily visible droplets and large quantities of particles too small to see by eye. Nonetheless, it has long...

www.nature.com

Study talks about spoken language.

In singing you keep the air in, not blow it out.

Democrats fail science again.

Try reading more than the first line kiddo.

The conclusion is that you and democrats need to shut up, by law.

This way we defeat the corona, and our ears are speared a lot of screech. Great plan.

 

[Nostra]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

wait.... during ONLINE services? How do you spread corona by singing.... ONLINE?

You don't. This is where the headline immediately becomes suspect. First thing I checked was to see if this was satire from Babylon Bee or sump'm. Second thing was to check the source URL. And there is was, wasn't it.

So I looked up the issue... and it does appear that....

What they said was true. So many churches have been doing online church services. These include a half dozen people, on stage singing, usually spread extremely far apart on stage, and playing instruments.

The ban specifically says, no singing or playing of instruments.

Page 8, sub section C:

No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19​

This is too far. Sorry, but this is too far.
Now even when the entire church is completely empty, and you have a whooping 6 people on stage, and likely six people in the church that have been together the entire time regardless.... and you tell them they can't even sing into a camera?

Then we need to ban the White House press corp too. We need to ban all the people at the restaurants too. Heck, we need to ban anyone from being within visual distance of each other.

No, this is ridiculous now. Sorry, but this really is too far. This is over reach. If feel sorry for anyone left in California. What a hell hole that place has become.

Yes, singing. To keep the building itself sanitary. Here's why.

Correct me if I'm wrong... but the WHO did not even declare a pandemic until March 11th, and the choir practice in question, was on March 10th.

So there were no stay at home orders, or any lock down orders, or anything.

So it appears.... that you are singling out this church for not social distancing, during a time when no one was social distancing yet... am I wrong?

Yes, you are. WHO or what proclaimed a pandemic is irrelevant --- the point here is the danger was already known, the choir practice itself was promoted as "optional" for that reason, AND the singers took the precautions of hand sanitizing AND social distancing, whether required by local ordinance or not, and they still infected each other THROUGH THE ACT OF SIGNING. That's the point here.

Singing of course involves the expiration of breath, quite a lot of it, into the air where infected water droplets can carry and/or land on a nearby surface such as a chair or a music stand, which is then touched absentmindedly by the next singer, and so on. So if you're carrying the virus, which you may well be doing with no knowledge of it, the act of singing or blowing into a wind instrument is like being given a radio transmitter to broadcast it.

Breathing is now illegal in KKKalifornia.