Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Hm.
The bus was from Bakersfield, which itself is little less than 80 miles from the coast, and no more than 90 miles from the edge of US territorial waters, or what Sec. 287. [8 U.S.C. 1357] defines as an "reasonable distance" from an "external boundary" or "territorial waters". That means that under federal law and US code, the bus and anyone on it were subject to ID verification. I don't think it matters how far the bus was from the border at the time of this incident, but I think the agents were in the right here. They were going based off of point of origination, not destination. That gave them the right to be there, and they were wrongfully denied the ability to enforce the law.
1) They were not forcefully searching anyone, they were searching a vehicle whose point of origination was well within the reasonable distance defined under Sec 287 (a)(3) of the INA.
2) Asking for verification of citizenship is not in and of itself unlawful search or seizure.
Yeah, unpopular opinion, but can people at least look at the law before screaming about constitutional rights?
You should remove that 'classical liberal' tag from under your av and replace it with 'rabid statist.' Respectfully. It would be more in-line with what you just wrote here.
If we want to be good conservatives, we have a very good guide. The Constitution.
The federal government is not that guide. Government, by its very existence, is force. It need only to exist to be feared.
If we want to be good conservatives, we have to ask what the role of government should be. The Framers asked that question, they had a Revolution, and they wrote a Constitution. They decided the proper role of government was to protect liberty. That government should be limided for liberty.
Again - Limited for Liberty.
Learn it. Love it. Live it.
If we want to be good conservatives, we have to ask what the role of government should be.
One of the primary roles is to secure the damn border.
Build the wall!!!