Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it doesn’t matter what you or I think. The point is what wasn’t moral 500 years ago to those people, is moral today to us. Even if you agree with the people 500 years ago.Like, flying a plane? Eating hot dogs? Birth control?unnatural behavior will never be accepted as moral
Eh, you could care less what I think about it and that's just fine with me...
.
You missed the point. Man’s perception of morality changes.Not the point. Did you get the point? Seems morality evolvesNot me. I'm old fashioned that way.Is it ok for you to go have another woman give you a full body massage? Is it ok that your wife have a man give her a full body massage? Then your morals have loosened in 100 years. No man 100 years ago would think it’s ok for another man to give his wife a full body massage even if he was a professional.No. Humans are subjective. Morals are standards. Standards exist for reasons. When you deviate from the standard the reasons make themselves known through predictable surprises.Morality seems to be subjective among Christians. Look at how New England Christians are treating kraft after it was found out he participates in human trafficking. Compare that to the outrage of Michael Vick for dog fighting or ray rice for punching that woman in the elevator. Is forcing a woman to suck dicks for money better than one punch to the face?So you are saying we are following the wrong religion.
You seem to be contradicting yourself here.
Should kraft be forced to sell the team?
A Muslim man today would think it completely immoral.
You’re a more liberal moral person.
Maybe one day you will be able to process normalization of deviance and predictable surprises but it doesn’t seem like today will be the day.Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
Only time and outcomes will tell.Point is we are right now but wrong just a couple generations ago regarding two men loving each other.There's never been a socialist movement without a free love movement so I wouldn't be surprised by anything man does.In just a couple generations we now realize two men or two women loving each Is completely moral.I'm shocked. Shocked.Morality seems to be subjective among Christians.
Turns out it is very moral.
Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
I consider that a win
Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
I consider that a win
.Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
You missed the point. Man’s perception of morality changes.
Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.
What you are describing is man’s perception of morality. Not morality itself.Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
Ding still doesn’t understand..Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
You missed the point. Man’s perception of morality changes.
Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.
morality is a construct - - from the underpinnings of evil vs good where over time one is allowed and the other isn't. per the original conclusions of the earliest religions.
christianity that aqueouses to evil rather than its elimination will be to their "predictable surprise" - over time their eventual extinction.
Do you eat cows? It can be said eating cows is immoral. Are you an immoral person?What you are describing is man’s perception of morality. Not morality itself.Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.Not me. I'm old fashioned that way.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
But I do. You are confusing man's changing perception of morality with morality changing. Morality just is.Ding still doesn’t understand..Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
You missed the point. Man’s perception of morality changes.
Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.
morality is a construct - - from the underpinnings of evil vs good where over time one is allowed and the other isn't. per the original conclusions of the earliest religions.
christianity that aqueouses to evil rather than its elimination will be to their "predictable surprise" - over time their eventual extinction.
Yes, it can be said that. In fact, if we want to find the highest possible standard then not taking any life at all for any reason would be it.Do you eat cows? It can be said eating cows is immoral. Are you an immoral person?What you are describing is man’s perception of morality. Not morality itself.Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
Do you eat vegetables? Vegetables are living organisms too, right?Do you eat cows? It can be said eating cows is immoral. Are you an immoral person?What you are describing is man’s perception of morality. Not morality itself.Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
Do you eat cows? It can be said eating cows is immoral. Are you an immoral person?What you are describing is man’s perception of morality. Not morality itself.Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
.Ding still doesn’t understand..Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.Morality isn’t subjective. Man’s perception of morality is. Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves.This seems like one of those times where I have demonstrated that morality is subjective and all ding could come back with was that?Haha, yeah, like a faith healer, or an alchemist.
I consider that a win
Watch the Orville. Great show. It’s like Star Trek where they visit other planets. On one planet it was immoral to be straight. Everyone was gay. They killed straights.
If we didn’t start covering our women’s bodies with clothes 50,000 years ago nudity wouldn’t be immoral.
You missed the point. Man’s perception of morality changes.
Nonsense. And I’ve given you plenty examples how it’s all in your head.
morality is a construct - - from the underpinnings of evil vs good where over time one is allowed and the other isn't. per the original conclusions of the earliest religions.
christianity that aqueouses to evil rather than its elimination will be to their "predictable surprise" - over time their eventual extinction.
Ding still doesn’t understand.
I never claimed to be a saint.Are you an immoral person?
I’m a sinner.
By drowning?christianity that aqueouses to evil rather than its elimination will be to their "predictable surprise" - over time their eventual extinction.
