Can Gun Nuts Please Stop Saying You Need Guns to Protect Yourself From A Potential Tyrannical Government!!!

Not if the deaths are caused by war. Capitalist death tolls are much higher.



Not even close. The Soviet Union lost 26 million in WWII. The Nazis lost 4.8 million. The Japanese lost 4.7 million.

The British lost 450,000, the French 250,000, and the Americans 350,000.

That's because socialist countries don't value people. Capitalist countries do.

The level of your ignorance is astonishing.
 
Whenever socialism is tried it performs better than capitalism, across the board. Even in the case of the Soviet Union, where despite of the Wests invasion of Russia after WW1, sanctions, and four million Germans invading it, it became the second-largest economy in the world. The Soviets industrialized a poor, under-industrialized agrarian society in less than twenty years into an industrial juggernaut. It accomplished what took the US and Western Europe more than 140 years of industrialization, in just two decades. That's the power of socialism.

Are you fucking nuts?

Ever seen a Soviet radio? Jay-sus.

Fucking commies screw up everything they touch.

After the war they inherited/stole the best microphone plant in the world from the Germans, and promptly fucked it up so bad they had to sell it BACK to the Germans.

There is no path a socialist government puts you on by force as far as work or career, you're quite confused. You should read Marx and educate yourself. As far as the "gulag", the longest sentence was ten years and it was more of a work camp than anything else. There are prisons here in the US now that are worse than gulags and in this country you can get sentenced to as much as 1000 years.

Oh come on. The old joke in the Soviet union was, "we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us".


Your death toll figures are groundless and amount to nothing more than capitalist cold-war propaganda.
BULLSHIT.

You sir, are a stone cold liar.

Add in the 60 million in China, and that's well over 100 million

I'll tell you exactly why it happens too, it's not rocket science.
 
For those who want to examine the evidence for communism, here are a few books written by an American scholar who is fluent in Russian and has access to the Soviet archives:


716IcVN03qL.jpg


71sPv8cP89L.jpg



61AzckYfWEL.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Another view of Stalin - Martens, Ludo.pdf
    2.9 MB · Views: 11
  • Socialism Betrayed_ Behind the - Thomas Kenny.pdf
    1.4 MB · Views: 11
  • pdfcookie.com_perestroika-the-complete-collapse-of-revisionism-by-harpal-brar-1992.pdf
    16.8 MB · Views: 10
  • Imperialism in the 21st Century - Party for Socialism.pdf
    2.2 MB · Views: 12
  • Why Marx Was Right - Eagleton, Terry.pdf
    850.4 KB · Views: 12
Not even close. The Soviet Union lost 26 million in WWII. The Nazis lost 4.8 million. The Japanese lost 4.7 million.

The British lost 450,000, the French 250,000, and the Americans 350,000.

That's because socialist countries don't value people. Capitalist countries do.

The level of your ignorance is astonishing.
It's because Germany was the most advanced and powerful military at the time. The Soviets lost nine million soldiers and about 18 million civilians from many different causes. You're quite ignorant.
 
Evidence. Anyways even if that were the case, and it's not, it doesn't render socialism or communism an ineffective economic system.
See? ^^^

Told ya the nutballs would be coming out of the woodwork.

There has only been ONE working communist system ever in history, it was in India and it only worked because there was a common economy.

Everywhere else it's been a complete disaster.
 
See? ^^^

Told ya the nutballs would be coming out of the woodwork.

There has only been ONE working communist system ever in history, it was in India and it only worked because there was a common economy.

Everywhere else it's been a complete disaster.

A complete success for tens of thousands of years, both when we were living in hunter-gatherer tribes and when tried in the 20th century. The USSR didn't collapse due to socialism but despite it. More, communism is the natural, inevitable end of human production, not capitalism. Capitalism will be forced to socialize its production in the next few decades and eventually we will all be communists, including you and your grandchildren.
 
Are you fucking nuts?

Ever seen a Soviet radio? Jay-sus.

Fucking commies screw up everything they touch.

After the war they inherited/stole the best microphone plant in the world from the Germans, and promptly fucked it up so bad they had to sell it BACK to the Germans.



Oh come on. The old joke in the Soviet union was, "we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us".



BULLSHIT.

You sir, are a stone cold liar.

Add in the 60 million in China, and that's well over 100 million

I'll tell you exactly why it happens too, it's not rocket science.

Cheap rhetoric. Communism proved to be the quickest method to industrialize a nation. It turned Russia, a poor, agrarian society, into an industrial giant and rival of the United States in a few decades, despite all of the wars and sanctions..etc.
 
A complete success for tens of thousands of years, both when we were living in hunter-gatherer tribes and when tried in the 20th century. The USSR didn't collapse due to socialism but despite it. More, communism is the natural, inevitable end of human production, not capitalism. Capitalism will be forced to socialize its production in the next few decades and eventually we will all be communists, including you and your gra-

Believe whatever nonsense toots your horn, Bubba.
Those were facts little one not nonsense.

The nonsense is the proven falsehoods spewed by Marx
 
Cheap rhetoric. Communism proved to be the quickest method to industrialize a nation. It turned Russia, a poor, agrarian society, into an industrial giant and rival of the United States in a few decades, despite all of the wars and sanctions..etc.
It turned Russia into a slave state and vast wasteland of destitution and poverty
 
When was the last time an employer forced you to apply for a job?

People need to sell their labor power to a capitalist to eat and have a roof over their heads, so that's a silly question. You supposed champions of democracy and freedom, only want it in government and politics but not where most people spend most of their waking hours. In the workplace. Democracy shouldn't just be in politics, but also in the workplace.
 
People need to sell their labor power to a capitalist to eat and have a roof over their heads, so that's a silly question. You supposed champions of democracy and freedom, only want it in government and politics but not where most people spend most of their waking hours. In the workplace. Democracy shouldn't just be in politics, but also in the workplace.
People need to labor in order to survivie regardless of the system.

It is a legitimate question and you run from it like a coward. Democracy should not be in politics or the workplace.
 

Forum List

Back
Top